How the Blues made good

, 3 May, 98comments  |  Jump to most recent
The FT provide some fascinating insight into the methods employed by David Moyes to sustain Everton's perennial challenge for Europe despite significantly inferior financial resources compared to the Club's rivals.

From a near-obsessive attention to player statistics and preparation to meticulous analysis of opposition players and diligent scouting, Simon Kuper describes the lengths to which the Everton boss goes to consistently beat the odds stacked against the Blues on the increasingly un-level playing field of the Premier League.

Moyes has no particular ideology of how to play football. Arsène Wenger of Arsenal, say, has always striven for a fast-passing attacking game. Moyes, by contrast, tailors Everton's style to each new opponent. He works out what the opposition does — and then tries to stop it. Before facing Manchester City, for instance, he found the positions where City's playmaker David Silva usually receives the ball, and put men there.

Team meetings at other clubs rarely last more than 15 minutes. Everton's meetings are longer and more frequent. A player might receive briefings on the opposition and his own tasks throughout the week. Consequently, Everton play a very planned game. More than at rival clubs, their players take to the field with quite complex guidelines for what to do.

Read the full article at FT.com

With thanks to Chris Wolfe and Peter Kendall for bringing this article to our attention

Quotes or other material sourced from Financial Times



Reader Comments (98)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


James Davies
1 Posted 03/05/2013 at 18:39:42
That's probably why when the opposition don't play into our hands we look lost.

Moyes: "Initiative? I didn't tell you to use your initiative"

Anthony Flack
2 Posted 03/05/2013 at 18:41:12
Plan A track back cover
Plan B see plan A
Doesn't work oh shit bring off best player and replace with Naismith
Ian Bennett
3 Posted 03/05/2013 at 18:49:20
Possibly explains why we can't play 2 games a week.
Brent Stephens
4 Posted 03/05/2013 at 18:50:33
The full article is well worth a read.One quote from a member of the coaching staff staff “What the public sees isn’t necessarily what’s happening.”
Peter Thistle
5 Posted 03/05/2013 at 18:59:51
I'd be more impressed with all that data analysis if he could use it to get an away win for a change.
Nick Entwistle
6 Posted 03/05/2013 at 18:58:48
"I sat down a few tables away with four members of Moyes’s support staff. One of them, David Weir, a quiet Scotsman in a cardigan"

Great article. If you've seen moneyball, using the data mentioned in the article, you'll know that all these old talent scouts were saying play this player, play that player, but the stats showed a different angle that lead to improved play.

I don't know what they were saying about Neville, but we've now found the reason, surely!

Peter Bell
7 Posted 03/05/2013 at 19:16:00
Now we have our answer to why ever striker brought to this club goes down hill. No interest in putting the ball in the opposition net, just stop the other team.
Patrick Murphy
8 Posted 03/05/2013 at 19:12:20
Interesting stuff, but I wish they would spend more time getting the players to do the basics like pass and control and shoot etc. We have become the re-born school of science, all science and very little football.

I wasn't too fond of the author of the piece either who states that (Everton) " were – and are – the second club of England’s poorest city."

Dave Lynch
9 Posted 03/05/2013 at 19:25:07
Worries more about how the opposition can hurt us than how we can hurt the opposition.
Andy Morden
10 Posted 03/05/2013 at 19:24:38
This isn't all that surprising is it? We all knew Moyes often sets out to stop opposition first and foremost. The insight is the obsessive attention to detail involved and the methodology. So thanks to the FT Moyes' methods are now public and any advantage we had are now gone!

The article focuses on how Moyes gets analysis of opposition tactics to stop them, what it doesn't reveal is if or how he uses them to dictate offensive tatcics. Extending the same logic, then surely you can tell a lot about how teams shape up and how gaps / spaces appear for us Everton to exploit?

My other concern is about flexibility. If you base your gameplan on predictibility and you come across an opposition manager who is unpredictable and willing to try new things in a match it could throw a spanner in the works! Perhaps explains why historically Moyes has utterly failed to make crucical changes in games when we need them?

Nick Entwistle
11 Posted 03/05/2013 at 19:33:36
The angle on defense is something the journalist - who I think wrote the exceptionally good Football Against the Enemy with a great chapter on Lobonovski's use of computer data to assess the form of a player on any given day - went for, but he did give mention to Baines and his creating chances stat.

Something which Pat Nevin talks about here... http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/21838331

I can't believe anyone thinks the stats aren't used for attacking play also. Revie used to care only for the opposition, and Clough only cared for what his team did.
We know which football was the better, but in terms of cup finals and titles (including the being robbed blind on a few occasions) Revie has it.

Kevin Tully
12 Posted 03/05/2013 at 19:39:24
The article reinforces every preconception I had concerning the way we approach a game.

I wonder if our strikers are given a defensive tracking role when we don't have the ball? Something to look out for at Anfield I suppose.

Richard Dodd
13 Posted 03/05/2013 at 19:45:04
I`m sure that Moyes is just as attentive to our attacking options as he is to the defensive strategy.It`s just that attackers playing crap just lose you the chance to win whilst defenders doing likewise usually ensure you lose!
This very capable manager`s approach has led to us being permanently seventhish when finances available would only merit tenthish.
NO club does better with less resources.
Kevin Day
14 Posted 03/05/2013 at 20:01:56
Would love to see how Moyes gets on with money to spend, bet a pound to a penny we would titles.
Richard Dodd
15 Posted 03/05/2013 at 20:27:30
Kevin, no reason to think otherwise, is there?
Mark Frere
16 Posted 03/05/2013 at 20:26:20
The article shows Moyes isn't actually tactically inept like lots of people like to suggest here on ToffeeWeb. He plans his tactics with meticulous care, if we cast our minds back to the first quarter of this season, we played some of the best football in the PL, with some of the best attacking stats in Europe. This showed that Moyes's teams can play good attacking football when all his players are fit and in form.

The problem Moyes has always had is that he's never had a sufficient amount of money to fill his squads with quality players to maintain a good attacking style of football. Unfortunately players get injured and players lose form, and Moyes has never had enough quality in reserve.

James Flynn
17 Posted 03/05/2013 at 21:01:30
Well, on the other hand, Martinez in. God help us.

Come on Kenwright et al, shake some loose. You can't take it with you.

Andy Crooks
18 Posted 03/05/2013 at 21:06:09
Nick, two European cups with NOTTINGHAM FOREST, suggests to me that Revie doesn't have it over Clough in a million years.
Trevor Lynes
19 Posted 03/05/2013 at 21:03:55
Mr Frere, thank God that someone agrees with me.
Pound for pound we are the premier champs, we consistently finish much higher than the majority of our rivals and we cost far less than nearly all of them.
Moyes is the mother Hubbard of the league and confounds the efforts of sides with much more finances than we allow him.

He has to stop other teams playing by well laid tactical plans because he knows the limitations of his own players. At last this season he had assembled the best footballing side he has ever had but was let down badly in January when the only activity this club had was in loaning OUT four players.
He must have felt he had been kicked in the teeth.

The only investors this club has is its fans who pay to watch and buy merchandise.
The board hang onto their shares, watch for free and take merchandise when they want it.
The signing of two decent squad m,embers would have given the fans a fillip and freshened the team up for the chase for europe.
This board room has let us all down badly.

James Flynn
20 Posted 03/05/2013 at 21:05:43
By the way, anyone notice the emphasis on stopping opponents Ferguson and Mourhino, um, emphasize?

Moyes OU . . .hold on. Let me think. No, Moyes OUT. It is fucking Moyes. All his years in the Prem he hasn't figured out to simply sign world-class strikers.

So obvious.

David Haimes
21 Posted 03/05/2013 at 19:28:16
Regarding strikers, you can make the case that after strikers leave Evertone they really go downhill. Jeffers, Johnson, Beattie, Vaughn, the list goes on. If Moyes' tactic was really somehow breaking strikers, then we would see them become prolific when they went elsewhere which is really not happening.

Yes, I didn't mention Rooney but I think he is an exception in many ways.

Mark Frere
22 Posted 03/05/2013 at 21:15:44
Nick, don't forget Clough won a domestic league title with Derby and Forest as well. Revie only won 2 league titles with Leeds, should of been more with the quality that team had.
Robin Cannon
23 Posted 03/05/2013 at 21:29:06
This is a brilliant article to reinforce the existing feelings of both the pro-Moyes and anti-Moyes camps!
Wayne Smyth
24 Posted 03/05/2013 at 21:26:46
"Everton play a very planned game. More than at rival clubs, their players take to the field with quite complex guidelines for what to do."

This is not necessarily an advantage....it also explains why the guy has to stand on the sidelines and shout every pass, tackle and fart to the players, some of whom are probably confused as hell.

Brian Garside
25 Posted 03/05/2013 at 21:49:11
The word 'confused' comes to mind. Could it be our players?
Barry Rathbone
26 Posted 03/05/2013 at 21:15:43
Dreadful piece reinforcing all the fears about Moyes lack of intuition and obsessions that produce so little.

A depressing gloss about Moyes while ignoring the elephant in the room with blithe comments about cheap furniture.

The question why THIS club out of the original Prem cartel has fayred so badly and by such a distance eludes todays journos, it's just a waste of ink.

The new EFC emblem should be without a laurel - how hypocritical the trappings of a champion be applied at a ghost club run and managed by buffoons.

Ross Edwards
27 Posted 03/05/2013 at 21:54:24
Basically, Moyes's meetings for the derby on Sunday went like this:

"Right lads, I've looked at Liverpool on the video against Newcastle and I must say, we look like complete underdogs. But, don't let that worry you. We will hold them then score to make it 1-0. We hold on until the 75th minute then I bring on you, Nais, and take you off, Kev. Don't worry, Ossie; if you play poorly, you still complete the 90 minutes.

"Plan A has been explained, but then when Liverpool score, Plan B is called Operation White Flag in which we simply retreat and play hopeless hoofball up to you Vic to make it look like we are still in it.

"The best we can expect here lads, is a result, not a win, let's not get carried away. Remember, I am famous all over the world for consistency and outperforming on a small budget so a point will reconfirm that. So, Plan A, keep it tight, then score in the 35th minute, then I hold on for 40 minutes until I bring you on Nais, then we panic a bit and retreat in Operation White Flag, which as I explained already, is Plan B.

"Remember, result, consistency, underdogs – NOT ambition, win and achievement. Got that? Right, see you later, I've got a flight to catch..."

Nick Entwistle
28 Posted 03/05/2013 at 21:34:18
But Revie did win the Uefa cup twice, runner up once, lost to a bunged ref in the CWC final and won an FA Cup which Clough never did.

And his team went on to the 75 European Cup final and lost to a complaining Beckenbauer who Gerrard obviously took notes from...and not to mention about 6 runners up spots in the league, including the Astle 'off side'... which wasn't offside but I'm throwing that in.

Ross Edwards
29 Posted 03/05/2013 at 22:10:41
Revie's Leeds must have been the unluckiest in footy history.
Colin Glassar
30 Posted 03/05/2013 at 22:10:02
What a load of tosh. Poorest city in the country? Liverpool is going through a revival and will soon have a waterfront to equal Manhattan. We have also won more league titles than Man City, Spurs and Chelsea combined so the FT can stuff their article where the sun don't shine.

We are badly run, I admit, but we are a massive fucking club. COYB!!!!

Mark Frere
31 Posted 03/05/2013 at 22:03:42
Ross Edwards,

FFS! We are 5 points in front of the RS with 3 games to play, at least Moyes has given us hope, that's something we never had much of before he came here. If you're this negative now, what was you like when Mike Walker, Howard Kendall 3 and Walter Smith were in charge?

Ross Edwards
32 Posted 03/05/2013 at 22:16:00
Oh come on, Mark, it's called sarcasm mate. I'm absolutely over the moon that we are above the RS. The power is shifting and that has really peed them off. What I wrote in my post was pure sarcasm.

I think we'll win 3-0, Jela hat-trick.

COYB!

Colin Wainwright
33 Posted 03/05/2013 at 22:13:09
Clough and Taylor just nick it for me, simply because they created two great teams in footballs backwaters. Didn't realise Revie's Leeds side were so close to winning so much more though, tbh.
Mark Frere
34 Posted 03/05/2013 at 22:21:08
Ross, I take it everything you've said anti-Moyes on ToffeeWeb recently is just sarcasm then? and you think he's a really good manager?
Ross Edwards
35 Posted 03/05/2013 at 22:32:13
No Mark, just that last post you complained about. The post in which I was skitting DM's meeting was pure sarcasm. Rest of it isn't.
Carl Sanderson
36 Posted 03/05/2013 at 22:22:48
One of the best articles I've read, that. It gives the lie to the suggestion that David Moyes is "tactically inept" and negative in his outlook. It also shows that we will be the poorer when Moyes leaves. And that the Board will be exposed to scrutiny as never before.
Kevin Day
37 Posted 03/05/2013 at 22:43:18
Richard Dodd,

Unfortunately my friend there isn't. One day, hopefully with us, he will get the opportunity to play with some cash without having to sell, and if its not with us, it will be very sad.

Mark Frere
38 Posted 03/05/2013 at 22:46:34
Carl Sanderson
Well said, the only reason Everton fans have tolerated this board to an extent, is because Moyes has exceeded expectations season after season and our situation doesn't look as bleak as it should do.

Carl Sanderson
39 Posted 03/05/2013 at 23:03:54
Mark:

Exactly; very well put. If only we had a chairman with the foresight and acumen of, say, Daniel Levy, what could Moyes achieve? It doesn't bear thinking about.

Kevin Day
40 Posted 03/05/2013 at 23:20:41
I don't know if it's only me who had observed this, but the closer the season end approaches, the more pro Moyes posts are returning to TW.

I think people, or at least I hope, we are all realising what we have to lose if the man moves on.

Kenwright, sort it out.

Carl Bloxam
41 Posted 03/05/2013 at 23:09:47
Mark Frere and Trevor Lynes, thanks for talking sense. If he had three times the budget, teams would have to adapt to us more than they do now. We don't so we have to adapt to them.

It remains frustrating though that we can do so well against the big clubs and drop so many points against the lower sides. We dropped 2 against QPR, Wigan and 3 at Reading. That's the three current relegation spots. Take those 7 points and we are third.

Carl Sanderson
42 Posted 03/05/2013 at 23:25:56
Kevin:

I had not observed that, actually. (That may change when he does leave, though!)

Paul Smith
43 Posted 03/05/2013 at 23:44:18
I can't believe some people would think DM is tactically inept – err, Hello! – he manages a Premier League football club, is paid £3 million spondoolies perennially and has been in the top flight for 11 years.

Would stand to reason he knows his trade. It's akin to saying red Adair is shit at putting out fires. But we pay him millions to do it anyway.

Don't make sense to say he's tactically inept – doesn't always get it right – yes.

Frank Wade
44 Posted 03/05/2013 at 23:41:09
An article written by a respected journalist praising our manager. Should be a cause for celebration and is seen as such. by most sensible Everton fans and a cause for admiration and a little jealousy by fans of other teams.

But hey, here on ToffeeWeb, we have:

Anthony Flack who seems to be suggesting a tactic of 'not' tracking back

Kevin Tully who seems to think that strikers should not have a role to play defensively. Watch Messi Kevin as he presses the opposition defenders in their half. Why did Vic get a standing ovation when he chased and harried Man City defenders before eventually winning back the ball from Kompany. Should he not do this Kevin?

James Flynn wants David Moyes out because he hasn't signed a world class striker. How many clubs of Everton's means have signed world class strikers recently?

Ross Edwards is over the moon, for once, that we are 5 points ahead of a team called RS, but still devotes his time to arguing for a change in manager on a daily basis.

Barry Rathbone refers to the article as a 'dreadful piece' and a 'depressing gloss about Moyes', hardly the same Barry Rathbone who wrote a dreadful piece recently suggesting a midfield role next season for Big Vic. Tactical masterclass that was.

Thankfully, there is an element of sanity returning to ToffeeWeb as we enter the final 3 games of the season within 3 points of our record Premier League haul. Some of the football played early in the season with our strongest squad was fantastic.

As other have said on here. Watching opposition games in detail and planning a team's strategy when our opponents have the ball is a must for every manager and it doesn't end there. The same tapes are used to identify and exploit weaknesses in opponents defences when we have the ball.

Unless one is sat behind the dug out, it is hard to hear what instructions David Moyes is giving to the team. Watching The Oldham away game on TV, he can be clearly heard saying 'get the ball down and pass it, pass it'. Several times, he can be seen trying to push our defensive line forward, rather than fall back to protect a lead.

Credit where it's due to David Moyes who deserves more backing from the board, who deserves more commercial awareness to generate funds, who is using the non-signing of a new contract as a bargaining tool to try to extract funds to team strengthening. Well done Simon Kuper for highlighting the depth of effort made by David Moyes to prepare his teams properly.

The quote from performance analyst James Smith at the end of Kuper's article says it all about our great club and is the reason I think David Moyes will find it hard to walk away.

Ernie Baywood
45 Posted 04/05/2013 at 01:14:49
Interesting article that reinforces my view of Moyes. That he is meticulous in his preparation, that he has a formula for over-achievement, but that he manages by numbers.

The very best don't manage by numbers. If you play the percentages against top sides, you usually get beaten.

Ernie Baywood
46 Posted 04/05/2013 at 02:26:56
Interesting little caption in that article...

The Moyes years – a story of success


Aug 2004: Wayne Rooney sold to Manchester United for £25.6m
Jan 2005: Mikel Arteta arrives on loan from Real Sociedad. Signs for £2m in July 2005. Sold to Arsenal for £10m in 2011
Sept 2008: Marouane Fellaini bought from Standard Liege for more than £15m, breaking the club’s transfer record
Nov 2012: Leon Osman, who has played more than 300 games for Everton, makes England debut, aged 31


Maybe they have a slightly different definition of success.

Tim Jones
47 Posted 04/05/2013 at 06:09:58
Colin Glassar (#990):

Colin I think you will find that Liverpool's gory as built on the Triangular Trade i.e. Manufactured goods from UK to Africa, Slaves from Africa to the USA, and raw materials from both Africa and the USA back to UK. Unfortunately none of those commodities or trade routes shipping methods or markets exist anymore and when the Militant Socialist Dockers refused to handle Containers 'cos, it would impact on their robbin', Europort which COULD have been in Liverpool or partially in Liverpool went instead to Rotterdam and Liverpool went in to a steady decline from which it has never recovered.

I can vividly remember coming home periodically in the 60s and 70s and you could SEE the decline in visits only a few months apart. My family and friends who stayed in Liverpool of course could not see it nor accept what I was telling them. But Liverpool literally fell apart almost before your very eyes.

Dennis Stevens
48 Posted 04/05/2013 at 06:26:40
Frank Wade #035 - So Toffewebbers that think like you are 'sensible', a return to 'sanity'. What next? People who think differently to you must be in UKIP?

What evidence is there for your assertion that Moyes ' ... is using the non-signing of a new contract as a bargaining tool to try to extract funds to team strengthening.'? I note this alleged strategy didn't inspire the Board to support Moyes' chase for 4th place back in January. For all we know Moyes is merely keeping his options open, which could leave the club scrambling for a replacement if he subsequently decides to leave.

The article is quite interesting & echoes some of the tactical points made on Executioners Bong regarding Moyes' thoroughness in analysing & planning to thwart the opposition. However, it is interesting that there is little to indicate the use if this particular approach offensively, which one would assume is the flip side, as it were.

Mike Green
49 Posted 04/05/2013 at 06:54:37
Well said Patrick 941 - I wonder how the data analysts, the bedrock of this miraculous success after all, feel about being continually being referred to as 'grunts' too? Patronising twat!

I'm with many of the posters above (James Davies, Kevin Tully, Ernie Baywood etc).

I just read this and my heart sinks. What a horrible article. It's also bollocks. If Moyes tailors his approach to each team individually, why do we always come out 4-5-1? And had it not occurred to to him that if someone's sitting in the oppositions dugout doing exactly the same thing we are ultimately going to end up with one result more than any — draw.

The great managers only worry about what their own team can do, not the opposition. This article says it all for me. No imagination, no creativity, just mind numbing paralysis by analysis.

Moyes Out.

Barry Rathbone
50 Posted 04/05/2013 at 07:47:35
Frank Wade, reading your pompous quote/riposte announcements I wasn't sure what you were doing.

Then you got to the "Moyes has 'em over a barrel" fabrication and I realised you are a comedian - well done.

Ged Simpson
51 Posted 04/05/2013 at 07:53:33
"The great managers only worry about what their own team can do, not the opposition."

What crap.

Mike Green
52 Posted 04/05/2013 at 07:58:28
Also, the author's on rocky ground saying Liverpool's history dwarfs ours, making out he's writing a thorough bit of journalism but really he's just trotting out the same perceived wisdoms and perceptions of an arrogant, lazy, biased media. Again, it says it all.

All this article is doing is popping down the shops to buy the Emperor some new clothes.

And while we're at it – was Steve Round on holiday? What does he do?!?!

Mike Green
53 Posted 04/05/2013 at 08:04:22
You need to read some biographies Ged.
Mike Green
55 Posted 04/05/2013 at 08:16:05
Actually Ged, I apologise and take that back.

You're right, it was crap in that I exaggerated but great managers don't take the approach Moyes does of concentrating on what the other team are going to do, the primarily focus on what they are going to do to the opposition.

Again, apologies.

Carl Sanderson
56 Posted 04/05/2013 at 08:41:48
Frank Wade 035:

Sustained applause for the post of the month. I note that you provided a critique of the more asinine posts by the anti-Moyes cabal, in a polite, well-phrased contribution.

I trust that you won't come in for any ad hominem abuse, which is their usual response when they have no argument. Oh wait...

Kevin Hudson
57 Posted 04/05/2013 at 08:46:26
This article, although essentially a puff-piece, confirms what I'd always suspected about Moyes.

Namely, that he's a stickler for detail, and very precise in his prep & planning. Moyes has to squeeze every ounce out of his limited group – and he does it brilliantly.

By his own admission, Mancini never prepared his team properly when they visited Goodison last year and, with the luxury squad he has at his disposal, I doubt he spends even half the time Moyes does on detail.

Predictably, there are those who simply cannot stop themselves from parsing elements of the article, in order to spin an all too-familiar & negative take; just as predictably, I'm acknowledging a manager who uses every available resource to educate his team & maximise performance.

Carl Sanderson
58 Posted 04/05/2013 at 09:30:43
Kevin:

I agree with that and the corollary is that if (and when) he gets the chance to work with a more talented, better-funded squad he may well achieve the trophy success he deserves.

I fervently hope that will happen at Everton.

Trevor Lynes
59 Posted 04/05/2013 at 09:27:21
Could not put it better Kevin # 085

Not one of the Moyes critics looks at the real stats...we have used less players than any other premier league side. Our activity in the last transfer window was no-one IN and four loaned OUT!!

The Fer episode was a huge slap in the face for every EFC fan including DM. As was the Ofoe debacle !!

The only investors in our once great club are the fans. We pay to watch, we buy the merchandise. The board meanwhile sit on their shares and invest nothing!! Dave Whelan at Wigan is worth more than every board member we have put together.

Paul Andrews
60 Posted 04/05/2013 at 09:45:15
Tom Jones (056):

What part of the Tory voting world do you live in now?

Kev Johnson
61 Posted 04/05/2013 at 10:09:03
Paul - what part of Tim's post do you consider untrue? I'm on the Left, but I think it's broadly accurate. Admittedly, this is not really football related, but the FT article we're discussing does say Liverpool is England's poorest city and Colin didn't agree with that. I'm afraid it is, as a matter of fact.
Steve Brown
62 Posted 04/05/2013 at 10:15:45
I am sure the article is entirely accurate about the approach Moyes and his team of analysts take. Kuper wrote a really interesting book called Soccernomics which demonstrates that paying players more leads to better performances... But, I think there is a place for Cloughie instinct, courage and football savvy when games are there to be won or lost.

That for me is what David Moyes lacks a bit of, hence why he has over-performed in relation to the wealth of the club but still come up short in the decisive moments.

Chris James
63 Posted 04/05/2013 at 09:55:33
It's threads like this that make me realise why we're called the Bitters: Incredibly respected national newspaper comes out with article praising Moyes's in-depth approach to matches and ability to compete despite lack of resources.

On the 'fan' site, the vast majority of posters selectively pick out points to underline their preconceived ideas about why he's a crap manager that will never win anything. Suffice to say this is almost the complete antithesis of what the article and in truth virtually all independent/neutral commentators say.

Should we be disappointed about not being top 4 and looking forward to a cup final? Damned right. Four questions though for the MOYB.

Q1: Is it Moyes's fault that we haven't achieved this?

Or is it down to a combination of terrible refereeing decisions that have cost us 8-10 points, a lack of investment at key times when the squad needed a boost, star striker losing his bottle, and the team just not turning up for a couple of key matches (victories vs Wigan and Sunderland would have us looking at a totally different situation today – assured of European football, likely looking forward to a cup final and 2 pts off 4th)

Q2: Which 'dour, defensive' team created most chances in the Premier League in the first half of the season (and is still among top 5 or 6)?

I'll give you a clue, they play in Royal Blue.

Q3: But who's played a massive role in helping to raise those ambitions?

Since the Premier League started (and even since our mid-80s spell of dominance) Everton had spent far more time in the bottom half and skirting relegation than considering European football – just one top 10 finish in the 90s. In the 11 seasons (including this) since Moyes began his tenure, we'll only have finished outside of the top 10 twice (and one of those was 11th) and have been a fixture in the teams challenging for European football every year, qualifying 4 times before this season (which looks like it will sadly come up short).

Q4: What manager in the league do you genuinely believe would have done a better job with the resources available (ie, very limited)?

I know that this argument won't be welcome by most, relying as it does on actual facts and independent viewpoints rather than entrenched perception, but then perhaps I'm just not bitter enough to be one of the 'real' Evertonians?

Barry Rathbone
64 Posted 04/05/2013 at 10:19:04
Carl Sanderson 081, surely a "post of the month" should at least get the facts right — I'm not sure there's ever an award anywhere for "propaganda of the month"!
Carl Sanderson
65 Posted 04/05/2013 at 10:30:20
Chris 101:

Bloody hell! I thought it would be impossible to top Frank's post but that one is a gem.

Gary Mortimer
66 Posted 04/05/2013 at 10:27:33
Chris?

Only the deludes call us "the Bitters".

Who's to say that a different manager may have got more out of a team that contained Arteta, Pienaar, Cahill, Saha, Fellaini, Jags, Baines etc???

I think a different manager would have given Ross a lot more game time than Naismith this season.

I think a different manager may have dropped Osman when he was clearly unfit and off-form.

In answer to Q1 - we didn't win v Wigan or Sunderland and it was the nature of the defeats that rankle more than anything. Moyes dropped Gibson in the Cup match and got it wrong.

Eugene Ruane
70 Posted 04/05/2013 at 10:32:07
Chris (101) - "Incredibly respected national newspaper"

INCREDIBLY respected?

Really?

By who?

Is this "relying on actual facts" or is it an "entrenched perception"?

Kevin Tully
72 Posted 04/05/2013 at 10:34:23
Well guys, if Moyes is as good as you all say, there will be a queue of suitors waiting to sign him at the end of the season... or will you all find another excuse why he hasn't been offered a 'big' job?

Let's see if this modern great can find a way to beat a team below us tomorrow eh?

Chris James
73 Posted 04/05/2013 at 10:37:31
Gary, I've responded to your points.

'Only the deludes call us "the bitters".'

Not actually true: I know Spurs, Chelsea and Man Utd fans that also referee to Evertonians in the same way. I also have fellow Blues who jokingly use the term also.

"Who's to say that a different manager may have got more out of a team that contained Arteta, Pienaar, Cahill, Saha, Fellaini, Jags, Baines etc???"
Um, and who's to say they would? Pure conjecture and a totally moot point, although it may be worth noting who bought all those players in at prices way below their market value...

"I think a different manager would have given Ross a lot more game time than Naismith this season."

That is likely true... although, bar the Spurs game and one or two moments early on, I remain to be convinced Barkley is yet a Premier League standard player. I will agree that Naismith's game time later in the season is slightly bewildering (although to be fair he looked like one of our better players in a limp pre-season) and I will agree his main skillset appears to be 'running about'. I'd also point out Berkley was started in two of our biggest games vs Spurs (in which he did well) and Arsenal (in which he was largely anonymous).

"I think a different manager may have dropped Osman when he was clearly unfit and off form."
Possibly so, again it's conjecture as to whether they would and whether a replacement would improve the squad. Osman was unarguably one of our best creative players early doors capable of creating opportunities that changed matches (hence the deserved England call up). I agree he's looked inconsistent recently, but the same argument that says Barkley and Co need to be played into form surely applies to Osman as well.

"In answer to Q1 - we didn't win v Wigan or Sunderland and it was the nature of the defeats that rankle more than anything. Moyes dropped Gibson in the Cup match and got it wrong."
It's possible Moyes made a mistake here definitely (as do all managers), but we obviously don't know all the factors, it's not like Gibson is immune from injury for instance so maybe he was carrying a knock. I'd also have argued that we should have been able to roll over Wigan without our strongest team. The fact we lost so badly can't be ascribed to just one player change, the team as a whole didn't perform on the day. It happens to all teams at one time or another (even the mighty Spaniards have been taught lessons this season).

Kevin Tully
74 Posted 04/05/2013 at 10:51:40
Frank # 035,

Comparing anyone to Messi is a little silly, especially our strikers! It was clear the Yak wasn't able to play this type of game, that may be the reason he was shipped out to Blackburn for £1m.

He then went on to score 17 Premier League goals for a relegated side. That season we couldn't buy a goal when Saha was played up front on his own if you remember.

Blackburn's much maligned manager was quoted as saying "I only tell Yakubu to play the width of the box."

Maybe we could have got those 17 goals out of him?

Sam Hoare
75 Posted 04/05/2013 at 11:03:07
Kevin, those 17 goals didn't stop them getting relegated though did it? Could it be that making sure your striker stays in the box means that you keep possesion less, conceed more and therefore lose/draw more matches? Don't see a queue forming for Steve Kean either...
Paul Andrews
76 Posted 04/05/2013 at 11:21:02
Kevin 097,

"The dockers refused to handle containers because it would impact on their robbing."

Dan Brierley
77 Posted 04/05/2013 at 10:52:35
It was quite obvious how this thread was going to turn out! I think ultimately it's a question of 'taste' regarding football style as opposed to anything else. I am firmly in the camp of 'I don't care how it looks, points mean prizes'.

I think the following list of transfer spending over the last decade (taken from the BBC website) demonstrates clearly how effective Moyes is:

Expenditure (in millions)
1. Chelsea 673
2. Man City 572
3. Liverpool 414
4. Man Utd 352
5. Tottenham 350
6. Arsenal 214
7. Aston Villa 201
8. Sunderland 187
9. Newcastle 174
10. Everton 129
11. West Ham 123
12. Wigan 110
13. Fulham 107

There are only three teams that are actually higher placed in the PL compared to their position in the above list, Man Utd, Arsenal & Everton. I prefer to take this as a measure of success, over the utterly useless 'hasn't won at a sky 4 side' stat. Amazingly it is not the media that came up with that stat, but our own fans.

But even if Everton win tomorrow, it will not change people's opinions. Just like how we (quite rightly) saw Moyes get slated previously for the terrible starts to a season. This season, we started well and have rarely been outside the top 6. But any credit given? Don't be stupid!

It also begs the question if Moyes HAD won a cup during his tenure, would it really have made a difference to people's perceptions? I seriously doubt it.

Ben Jones
78 Posted 04/05/2013 at 11:19:46
To be fair Barry, Frank was spot on about your contradictory nature of saying the article was bad and then you wrote the Anichebe one.

Conveniently haven't mentioned yet.

I thought the article was good, the only thing that worries me is the whole "we must focus on the opposition" argument, which is where I think the article is misleading.

You would think with our resources, it is not surprising, but we do actually have good players. We have the best fullback in the league, England's best centre back (in my opinion), two class wingers and a £25 million affro-haired midfield enforcer. Our first team I would say is the 6th best team in the league, so we are over-achieving massively with the squad. But I don't buy the whole "focusing on the opposition" thing, because we have good players to damage other teams.

That's where the article is misleading.

Nick Entwistle
79 Posted 04/05/2013 at 11:31:02
Dan, everyone will have their taste. Impressive as it is I don't like tica taca and prefer a stronger running game. But above all I prefer my team to be competitive with style coming later.

I also think that this dour hoof ball style of Moyes is a fallacy.

We play better football than two thirds of the Prem and funnily enough when the football looks bad it coincides with poor form – and when we're on form the football is great. Funny how that happens.

Brent Stephens
80 Posted 04/05/2013 at 11:39:32
TimPeter "Liverpool's glory was built on the Triangular Trade i.e. Manufactured goods from UK to Africa, Slaves from Africa to the USA, and raw materials from both Africa and the USA back to UK. Unfortunately none of those commodities or trade routes shipping methods or markets exist anymore." I guess you didn't really mean that the end of the slave trade is unfortunate.
Chris James
81 Posted 04/05/2013 at 11:45:11
Eugene, so the FT isn't a respected national newspaper?
I'm presuming you're not a currant bun man, Daily Mail perhaps?
Dan Brierley
82 Posted 04/05/2013 at 11:43:44
I would agree that hoofball as a tactic is certainly a fallacy Nick, although Jags clearly hasn't got the message! But to be fair if Jags has not got an outlet, I prefer to see him leather it upfield towards Felli than try running at players...
Gary Mortimer
83 Posted 04/05/2013 at 11:38:29
Chris @113.

Well reasoned, but a few "possibles" and the like. Fans who want Moyes to stay will give him the benefit of the doubt. Fans who want a change will highlight any mistakes.

I think his inability to get a single away win at Liverpool, Man Utd, Chelsea and Arsenal has been down to his (in my opinion) over-cautious, defence-first tactics against the 'big boys'. The fact we seem to have the hoodoo sign over City should be taken as a sign that we should be capable of beating anyone in their own backyard, but against the old traditional Sky 4 we all too often revert to KIPATAN1.

Eugene Ruane
84 Posted 04/05/2013 at 12:57:01
Chris (126) - "Eugene, so the FT isn't a respected national newspaper?
I'm presuming you're not a currant bun man, Daily Mail perhaps?"

Firstly Chris, not biting on your attempts to deflect (re what I do/don't read etc).

Secondly, I notice your 'INCREDIBLY respected national newspaper" (101) has now become merely a 'respected national newspaper'

(if we wait for a few more posts will it become a hopeless financial rag?).

Want a fact?

It's level of respect is subjective.

In other words, whether it is 'respected' or not is (coincidentally like 99% of all debate on Moyes) a matter of opinion, consequently stating it's 'incredibly respected' DOESN'T strengthen your opinion, it weakens it as you appear to be clutching at straws to get your opinion across

Seriously, am I (is anyone) supposed to think "Hey maybe I'll change my opinion on Moyes, which is based on 11 years of ME watching his Everton sides, because Chris James reckons an article in a primarily financial newspaper says he's doing the (no pun etc) business"?

Do I respect the FT?

No (clue's in the title).

Do most people in Britain respect it?

I don't think so, I'm 54 and nobody has ever told me they do.

Are there people with shares in ACME who respect the paper?

I'm sure there are.

And?

Does the FT follow and obsess over Everton/Moyes EVERY day and watch just about every game?

No?

Do they have space to fill?

Yes.

Do they...well you know what, you can ask and answer all these questions yourself, should you have a desire to and you don't let any agenda get in the way.

Look I'll spell it out - Margaret Thatcher was recently described as having been 'incredibly respected' but for many (like me) she was a vindictive putrid venal old gash.

See what I mean?

Chris James
85 Posted 04/05/2013 at 12:56:23
Hey Gary, as we're talking about facts then you're right: it's impossible to ignore the poor results against Liverpool, Man Utd, Chelsea and Arsenal.

I'm more inclined to believe that it's down to psychology than tactics and teams/players that have actually won something or win regularly able to turn up a gear and having that extra edge. You can of course argue that it's down to Moyes to instil this belief and to an extent that's fair, but there is no substitute for experience.

I think the performances are moving in the right way and this year from 6 games we've got 6 points via 1 win, 3 draws and 2 defeats (the Chelsea one pretty narrow) with 2 games still to come. I'd hope that we can make it at least increase that to 9, but still I agree it's not great.

However, if you include the entire top 5 above us + Liverpool (Sky 6?), our points average looks decidedly better. Taking 4 points each from City and Spurs, leaves us with 3 wins, 5 draws and 2 defeats from 10 matches and a total of 14 points from a possible 30 (and arguably we could/should have had 4 more due to last minute Spurs equaliser and dodgy Man City penalty).

If we could finish on a high by taking 4 points from the Chelsea/Liverpool matches coming (a tall order I appreciate), then we'd end up on 18 out of 36 points which I think you'd have to agree is a pretty respectable haul against the biggest and best (and much better funded) teams in the country, effectively sharing the points (although it's actually better than that, as the other teams would have only garnered 12 points from matches against us).

Chris James
86 Posted 04/05/2013 at 13:11:15
Good pedantry Eugene with a fair helping of subjective opinion thrown in (you aren't a local politician by any chance? Daily Mail AND UKIP?).

I personally consider the FT to be an incredibly respected paper (sorry if didn't check my original post word for word in a light discussion on a fan forum, your honour) and also more objective and neutral on football issues than most papers partly because it's at a remove and doesn't follow every game in intricate detail. On which point, I'm assuming that as you do follow each game in Opta-esque detail, you're building in every single aspect of every performance into your argument rather than just picking points that suit your argument and ignoring the rest?

I'd also like to point out that the article in question was based upon hard data not the usual opinion and stereotypes from jovial ex-players and world-weary journos trying to fill space.

My key objection to your ripose however, which ties neatly into your talk of deflection, is that the 'respectability' or otherwise is blatantly not really the core tenant of my argument. The point being that it was the latest in a fair line of independent articles/views/reports giving Moyes credit and respect for what he's achieved that was immediately hacked down and twisted by those who appear desperate to condemn Moyes a hopeless failure regardless of the facts.


I'm going to assume you belong to that not so happy band of followers, whereas I'm clearly a rose-tinted Moyes apologist (you should check out my Naismith rants in live forums to underpin this 'fact') but whilst the football world may continue to disappoint (for at least 3 more games of Davey in charge) you can at least find solace in the local election results.

Kev Johnson
87 Posted 04/05/2013 at 13:15:04
Paul (120) – er, right. I must have missed that bit. I also missed Tim's unfortunate use of the word "unfortunate" as pointed out by Brent (125). Let's face it, I didn't read it properly, did I? You're right, it is a politically biased portrait of Liverpool's history.

Here's a thought, amongst all this talk of whether or not Simon Kuper or the FT are "respected", can I put forward the idea that ToffeeWeb is, in itself, a "respected" football fan site? It is, you know! That makes the opinion of its contributors – us lot – worthy of "respect". So, essentially, it's a battle of two highly/incredibly respected teams, with the outcome very much in the balance.

Alright, who's going to go in goal?

Phil Hamer
88 Posted 04/05/2013 at 12:28:14
Frank Wade your post was a huge breath of fresh air against the usual backdrop of jaw droppingly short sighted anti Moyes nonsense. Interesting that the more articulate and intelligently written posts tend to be from readers on one side of the 'divide', whereas posts from readers on the other side tend to be repetetive, poorly written and often very abusive. This may sound snobbish but it's simply true. I hate the constant use of the phrases 'RS, Chelski, Manure, Spuds, Apologists, MOB, Doddists etc. Just write properly!!.(One name in particular screams out at me here but I will avoid mentioning it.)

Incidentally, this 'divide' that I talk about seems to exist solely on the pages of this website. I cannot think of another website, fanzine, pub, a section of the ground where this debate even exists. This is primarily because ranting about how Moyes should be sacked would probably be greeted with derision in any other place/platform.

Unfortunately I've noticed that the word 'ToffeeWebbers' has in some places become a byword for short sighted, abusive or unknowledgeable internet trolls who think Everton should sack one of the highest rated managers in the UK. ('Highest Rated' by people who actuall play/analyse/coach the game on a professional level, as opposed to people who watch the game as a hobby). This is quite sad because ToffeeWeb provides a fantastic link to all the best Everton related articles on the web, such as the superb piece by Simon Kuper that started this thread. It just seems that opening up the website to more user-generated content has turned it into one enormous platform for a debate that just doesn't exist elsewhere. The threads of almost every article posted by Lyndon or Michael (the article could be about how expensive the pies are at Goodison, or how horrible the lager is..) invariably descend into the same tired, exhausting, infuriating 'Moyes Debates' between the same two groups of people.

I spend more time shaking my head in disbelief at this website than actually enjoying the articles provided. The problem is it's strangely addictive in a negative & unpleasant way..

..and maybe I've just hit the nail on the head...

Steve Brown
89 Posted 04/05/2013 at 14:02:16
By the way, who will give a stuff if we win tomorrow? You won't be arguing you'll be kissing the wife, hugging the dog and necking 20 pints.

The bitters and deluders might even give each other some manly hugs too.

Paul Dark
90 Posted 04/05/2013 at 17:15:28
Analysis is one thing, intelligence quite another (and winning trophies yet another) – pace David Moyes.
Patrick Murphy
91 Posted 04/05/2013 at 17:21:40
Spurs Baled out again. I wonder how you manage to create that kind of dependability with stats and computers?
Brent Stephens
92 Posted 04/05/2013 at 17:47:54
Steve #151 "By the way, who will give a stuff if we win tomorrow? You won't be arguing you'll be kissing the wife, hugging the dog and necking 20 pints".

If we win tomorrow, I'll hug my wife, kiss my pint and neck the dog.

Paul Ferry
93 Posted 04/05/2013 at 18:18:06
Squire Tim Jones - 56 - lucky escape eh, phew, good for you.

Would you like me to recommend some articles on Liverpool's 18th century growth? Liverpool and its port profited more from being the prime exporter of the Industrial Revolution than from the Slave triangle.

Why on earth do you seek to tarnish the city you left behind like this? Quite frankly, seems to me that you are trying to justify your own lived life. Slavery, yes, and let's have a pop at Bristol too while we are at it. But that's not the complete story by a golden mile. Liverpool also had the first permanent Chinese and Black communities in any English city.

Now put your little anti-Liverpool arrows back in your home counties pouch, there's a good chap. I promise to always hum 'The Great Escape' whenever I happen to come across another post from your gilt-edged pen.

Phil Bellis
94 Posted 04/05/2013 at 18:36:51
Kev

"... can I put forward the idea that ToffeeWeb is, in itself, a "respected" football fan site? It is, you know!..."

You certainly can; but... don't go near the People's Forum

Mark Frere
95 Posted 04/05/2013 at 19:45:31
Dan Brierley 121

I think your list of club spending is very misleading. You've got to take into account the net spend of clubs. Spurs and Arsenal's net spend is pretty much zero, the same as ours give or take a few million. Then the second major factor you decided not to mention, is the wage bills. The wage bill is a major factor in dictating the quality and size of a squad a manager is capable of putting together. We are pretty much even with Arsenal and Spurs in terms of net spend, but we spend nowhere near as much on wages

Phil Roberts
96 Posted 04/05/2013 at 19:48:59
Personally, one of the best bits was "Smith starts musing on what he likes about the club. Everton, he says, doesn’t generate weekly soap opera of players’ misbehaviour. This is a club to be proud of,” says Smith, “from the point of view of overachieving, from the way it conducts itself, from the way the manager and players are perceived. It’s respected by other clubs and other managers and other staff.” He doesn’t mind that Everton are unfashionable. “I actually think that the old stadium, with its history, that’s part of what Everton is.”

And that sums up why I am proud to call myself an Evertonian.

Paul Ferry
97 Posted 05/05/2013 at 03:12:44
Phil - 149 - I'm sorry, who on earth do you think you are: 'as opposed to people who watch the game as a hobby'.

Yeah and you avoid the pitfalls of your little list of no-nos? Good writing? As a humanities professor in a Carnegie-Mellon research university would you like me to critique your writing?

'People who watch the game as a hobby'. How dare you write that drivel. Your constructed world of binary polarities is in your head friend. So, people who are on your 'other side' watch EFC for a 'hobby'?

Your post is shameful, reprehensible, and as deeply divisive as anything that you castigate.

Oh, by the way, 'this may sound snobbish but it's simply true', you don't write that well either. And, 'this may sound snobbish but it's simply true', your interpretation that 'posts from readers on the other [anti-Moyes] side tend to be repetetive [please learn how to spell repetitive] , poorly written and often very abusive', is little short of hilarious and utterly upside down.

Thanks for the salutary tutorial. I have no idea what world you move in but it's not one that the majority of blues move in, where debate about Moyes goes on day-after-day. And, your intervention while smug and smarmy is nowhere near as smart and cultured as you think it is.

Never heard of you on these boards before; hoping against hope that your smug little patois disappears like a slug under a boot in a flash.

Phil Hamer
98 Posted 05/05/2013 at 10:32:41
Haha, Paul, you've just made my day! Watch you don't choke on that thesaurus. Good writing does not mean 'insert as many complex words as you can into a sentence'. And I don't suggest I'm a particularly good writer, merely that I hate this 'RS, Chelski, Manure, Gobshite' style of writing used by many posters on here.

'People who watch football as a hobby.' I obviously include myself in that. My point is that when you have respected pundits, managers and coaches talking highly about Moyes, I tend to trust their opinion more than a fan who comes on here and says 'Dour Davey Negative Hoofball always bottles vs the RS and it's time he fucks off..'

Apologies that my post caused you so much anger, but if you think my words were 'shameful, reprehensible, and as deeply divisive as anything that you castigate', then dude you need to get a more balanced view of life.

I'm extremely impressed that you are a humanities professor in a Carnegie-Mellon research university. As I'm sure everyone else is. I also bow to your superior vocabulary. ('Your constructed world of binary polarities is in your head friend'). Yep, you've got me there.

As for your last line. Wow. Loving that slug reference. I wonder if you'd use that line if we were talking face to face in the boozer.

Something tells me your persona would be very different in that situation.

You're an overblown idiot.

Kevin Tully
99 Posted 05/05/2013 at 11:56:07
"I think we'll go in with a slightly different frame of mind than previous years, when basically it's been 'Stop them and try and nick one.' We won't be trying to nick a goal but create one.

Phil Jagielka, The Sunday Times - 05/05 /13.

See you lads tomorrow!

Paul Ferry
100 Posted 05/05/2013 at 16:41:57
Paul - 304 - your true colours come out in your final sentences. Let me guess, shell-suit, 5 foot-5, mam on knuckles, staff bull, death-metal? Your last sentences put your op in context, you exactly are the sort of jumped-up little thug slug you berate and slate.
Phil Hamer
101 Posted 05/05/2013 at 16:53:20
Paul, If you must speculate on my personal circumstances, I'm a self-employed personal trainer and nutrition advisor based in Cardiff. I work with people from all cross sections of society trying to help them alter their lifestyles and increase their quality of life. Quite what my personal situation has to do with this is anybody's guess.

I am in no way a 'thug slug', I do not own a staff bull and am not into death metal.

If anybody said to you what you just said to me in your last comment, you would spontaneously combust. And if you said those things to someone while not behind the safety screen of internet obscurity you would find yourself in a great deal of trouble.

You must be a very, very unhappy man Paul. Just stop digging now and leave it.

Ian Hollingworth
102 Posted 06/05/2013 at 16:11:49
Correct me if I am wrong but football is about opinions and we use TW to share these opinions. It would be pretty boring if we all agreed.

Not sure why some of these posts end up in slanging matches or am I just being boring?

Patrick Hart
103 Posted 07/05/2013 at 17:13:02
The author Simon Kuper writes about the club we know and love as if they were (with all due respect) a Tranmere Rovers battling against the big boys in the Premier League. As such, the article betrays a glaring lack of knowledge about Everton's tradition, history and fanbase (only last month, the Independent ranked EFC fourth in its list of English football's biggest clubs).

Such ignorance is no surprise from a johnny-foreigner-come-lately to the English game – the unholy journalistic trinity of Marcotti, Balague and Honigstein are other examples of this beast. However, what it also does is to indict the Bill Kenwright regime for making the Blues the worst-funded big club in the history of the Premier League.

Their legacy – constituted by failed ground moves, failed sponsorship deals, non-existent transfer funds and a divided fanbase – is the cliche that Everton are punching above their weight or overachieving even by finishing among the Premier League's top six, seven or eight. Never mind the club's overall status as one of the top flight's four best-performing teams of all time.

Because of the straitened, mortgaged-to-the-hilt circumstances that the Kenwright regime have imposed on Everton for 13-odd years now (remember how they failed to make a first-team cash signing for 2½ years, between Heitinga and Gibson), the club's name is becoming dangerously synonymous with impoverished, if gallant, underdogs.

This "can't do" board have consistently let us down (apart from Finch Farm, when have they actually delivered something?); they get one last chance to surprise us this summer when David Moyes will ask for the funds required to sustain Everton's place towards the top of the table. Yet is anybody really expecting "can't" to suddenly become "can" on this one occasion?

Beyond the managerial question, though, the Evertonian brand will continue to suffer the longer the club are associated with a board of directors who are both unwilling and, all the evidence suggests, utterly incapable of moving EFC forward. If Evertonians are happy to be outperformed commercially by the likes of Norwich and Fulham, or to be outspent by Stoke, QPR et al, then perhaps this talk of doing away with the Nil Satis motto is justified after all.


Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads

© ToffeeWeb