Stick or twist

by   |   15/06/2016  46 Comments  [Jump to last]

It is being reported that EFC plan to offer Lukaku double his wages to stay at Everton.

I have pretty fixed views on this.

He has 3 years remaining on his existing contract.

He has disrespected the club by mouthing off in public about him needing a CL club.

Although he has a pretty good goalscoring rate his general ability and hold up play leaves a lot to be desired.

Under normal circumstances I would send him packing up the road to whatever club wants to pay an outrageous fee for a contracted player and although the media keep talking up the so called big clubs I cannot see anyone stumping up around 60m for him.

On the other hand who would we replace him with. There is talk about Pelle but although he outshone Lukaku in the game the other day his goalscoring rate in the Prem does not appear that good.

Kane and Aguerro would appear to be unattainable and Vardy has already turned Arsenal down.We would need to find a Martial or Rashford and even they may be one season wonders. Jansenn or Milik look good options but have never played in the Premier League.

So, fellow ToffeeWebbers, do we stick or twist? And if we twist who would you go for and how much do you think we could get for Rom?

back Return to Talking Points index  :  Add your Comments »


Reader Comments (46)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Nigel Gregson
1 Posted 16/06/2016 at 07:21:29
Jay - we will need to let him go. I doubt that Koeman's hard taskmaster approach will work for Lukaku.
Ian Jones
2 Posted 16/06/2016 at 07:59:40
Although I am not a great fan of his for most if not all of the reasons many of us have stated including his off-field comments, it would be interesting to keep him at least for another season. See how he performs with a different manager and hopefully a change of style.

In a perfect world it would be great if we had a youngster ready to step up. Bringing in another good forward from outside would also provide competition for places. Lukaku hasn't had any competition as such at Everton.

Having said that he has competition for his international place and that doesn't seem to get him fired up....

If Koeman follows the old Dutch Total Football model, I am not sure whether Lukaku would fit in with his plans.

Interesting times

Jay Woods
3 Posted 16/06/2016 at 08:11:23
I never want to see him in an Everton shirt again.

He has shown himself to be devoid of honour and respect, not just for the club whose wages keep him alive, but also for the heritage of the club which stands as one of England's finest, way ahead of Manchester City (for example) or his beloved Chelsea. Everton FC is footballing aristocracy, a "Traditionsverein" as the German media often refer to the club reverentially.

This guy is like an elevated servant who burps at a royal banquet and then bemoans the quality of the fare on offer. He simply must go.

Keith Harrison
4 Posted 16/06/2016 at 08:18:36
Hopefully this is a bit of mind games to force hurried bids for the sack of sand before the Euros totally show him up.

With 3 years left, why offer him a new deal - and piss off every other member of the squad?

I could more believe RK is about to double his training.

Alex Jones
5 Posted 16/06/2016 at 08:19:38
Keep him for a year on his present wages regardless of whether he wants to go or not and then if he impress make him an offer next year and if not we'll still be able to get the same money.
Ian Jones
6 Posted 16/06/2016 at 08:26:40
Jay Woods - When you put it like that. Twist.
Jay Harris- I don't know enough about Southampton players to be too specific but you mention Pelle and his goalscoring ability. He may not have scored as many as Lukaku but what's his all-round ability like in terms of his team mates, making runs to provide the space for others to benefit from.

Going away from your original point of the thread, I think the modern day focus on goals and assists doesn't always provide the full picture.

Koeman had a pretty good goals record at Intl level. Most of them penalties!

Gareth Clark
7 Posted 16/06/2016 at 09:11:11
Sell him & get Janssen and Milik
Dave Abrahams
8 Posted 16/06/2016 at 09:26:16
Ian (6) you are correct in saying there is more to football to be considered than goals and assists, much more.
Clive Rogers
9 Posted 16/06/2016 at 09:44:12
Twist. His head is no longer right. Every time something doesn't go to plan it will be because he's at the wrong club.
Mike Allison
10 Posted 16/06/2016 at 09:44:56
The knickers in a twist brigade out in force again.

"How dare he mouth off?!" they all mouth off.

Winston Williamson
11 Posted 16/06/2016 at 10:01:18
Twist, unfortunately.

In an ideal world he is a must keep and we buy players to compete with him.

He appears to have burnt his bridges with the fans though. There is a manner in which you can display ambition without inferring your present club is beneath you.

His utterings to the media make him look and sound like an ungrateful Wanker. We don't like wankers at EFC so it's a twist unfortunately.

Sam Hoare
12 Posted 16/06/2016 at 10:01:56
I don't really like Lukaku. He's clearly very full of himself and has been disrespectful to the club on numerous occasions. He's also not as good as he thinks he is.

But he is no doubt one of our best players. He's scored more than 60 goals for us in 3 seasons at around 1 ever 2 games. Thats alot of goals. He also assisted 7 in the league last season which is more than Kane and Aguero combined.

He may be a twat but he is a highly effective twat and will be difficult to replace. The Premier league has seen many expensive strikers come in and fail to score goals but we have one who does.

For that reason I am just about prepared to put up with his nonsense, so long as he keeps finding the back of the net.

Brent Stephens
13 Posted 16/06/2016 at 10:08:03
Give me a Greavsie every time. Goals, assists. Let the rest of the team provide the (other) entertainment (like Stones playing around with the ball in defence?).
Mike Allison
14 Posted 16/06/2016 at 10:13:01
How about we stop being so insecure and sensitive and match him.

He wants to play Champions League football? Hang on a minute, that's what we want.

He wants to win trophies? Hang on a minute, that's what we want.

He's ambitious to get to the very top? Hang on a minute... and so on.

He's a high quality, proven goalscorer (despite what some of you are trying to tell yourselves) and is exactly the kind of player we should be buying, the bonus is, he's already here.

Some of you want rid of a huge asset because you don't like his interviews and he has bad games. Grow up and get over it. In the same week we're all excited about Koeman sacking off Southampton to jump ship to us for the sake of ambition we're supposed to get rid of the one player in our squad who is outwardly showing the kind of ambition we're now supposed to have?

We finished 11th, on 47pts, two seasons running. I want us to sell all the players who don't think they're better than that.

Jim Lloyd
15 Posted 16/06/2016 at 10:17:09
Well put Sam!
In the end, I think Ronald will have a discussion with Rom and take it from there. If the lad wants to move, then the manager will have to weigh up whether his heart is in it or not, and take it from there.

There's a lot of cash at stake so it's unlikely that we would just sell him off to the first bidder. If he stays into next season, presuming no-one offers mega bucks for him, then It's in his interest and ours for him to fire on all cylinders.

Derek Thomas
16 Posted 16/06/2016 at 10:20:30
I'm with Alex @5; a bit of both, let him stew a bit (can't have the staff farting in the Palaces of the mighty) and see what happens at/by The Jan window.

A number of things could happen:

1) Nothing; nobody comes in at the right price ( if it doesn't start with a 6 then fuck off) or even any price.

1a) We keep a decent asset for the Club.

2) Lukaku changes his attitude - see 1a above

3) Koeman changes it for him - see 1a above

4) Somebody DOES come in with an offer we cant refuse - well we can't cut our noses off to spite our faces can we.

Lukaku's options;

1)Fanny around like he does/has been/is doing for Belgium, keep listening to his Dad and agent, while making silly statements to the press.

2) Pull finger; earn a new contract extension, because we're going places and taking him, hopefully with us / or a move.

Paul Kennedy
17 Posted 16/06/2016 at 10:21:29
Get rid and buy a new pin ball machine. I have never seen a player with such bad first touch, poor control; every time the ball comes to him it shoots off giving defenders time to tackle. Reminds me of Jimmy Pearson from the '70s.
Dick Fearon
18 Posted 16/06/2016 at 10:24:08
To be honest, for his age Lukaku is setting scoring records and this under a manager who's focus was on style rather than results. Our much needed No 10 could already be on the books ready to burst onto the scene. If that is not the case our new found wealth and results driven new manager would solve that problem.
Our final home game of 15/16 season provided a glimpse of what was possible and there is a good chance we could improve over that.
I suggest we double Roms wage and add a buy out clause of 60 million.
That should keep him motivated .


Eric Myles
19 Posted 16/06/2016 at 11:18:42
Doubling wages doesn't motivate Dick, it just creates an increased sense of entitlement.

But performance based incentives do motivate, like when Catterick paid Alan Ball a fiver for every goal he scored with his head.

We could give Lukaku 10 grand for every first ball he controls, and deduct 10 grand for every one he fails to control. Then he'll be playing for free every week.

Martin Nicholls
20 Posted 16/06/2016 at 11:44:34
Mike#14 - great post! Particularly agree your last paragraph - as you say, it is those who are content with mid- table mediocrity who, like Martinez, we should get rid of.
Paul Mackie
21 Posted 16/06/2016 at 11:47:03
Stick.

The reason you see silly figures quoted for Lukaku is because proven PL goal scorers are expensive. Give him a season under Koeman and then if he's still not what we need them get rid. With 3 years on his contract, he's going nowhere unless the club says so.

Les Green
22 Posted 16/06/2016 at 12:57:11
Assuming this isn't speculation, then I think it's a good strategy from the club - depending on the accuracy of the reported wages.
It's a public method to see how serious he is about wanting to leave. If he jumps at the new contract then he's game for staying, and anyone that wants him after that will have to buy him out of a bigger contract. On the other hand, turning down the offer of re-negotiating a new contract makes a public statement about his short term intentions - assuming nobody that wants to buy him has seen him play at the Euros
Dan Davies
23 Posted 16/06/2016 at 12:59:53
Stick.

We are in control here, he has three years on his contract! Any verbal agreement between him and our former manager about leaving if we didn't match his expectations is dead in the water.

Everton should now show Lukaku and hid dad that the club is in charge here not them. Tell Lukaku he's going nowhere, go and buy Milik and Bony and give this boy some competition.

Ray Said
24 Posted 16/06/2016 at 13:20:38
Stick. The new manager should start by telling every single player that they have a fresh start with him-if they want to stay and fight for their places. Lukaku , like a few players, went backwards last season under RM's 'management'. Give them all a fresh start, a full, fitness based preseason, a new style of play designed to get the best out of them and see how it goes.

Those who don't want that fresh start should be shown the door.

Jay Harris
25 Posted 16/06/2016 at 19:41:24
Apart from Gareth noone has mentioned an alternative and I get the feeling that most of us would forgive him his indiscretions if he got his head down, shut up and worked for the cause.

I would go along with that only on the grounds we cant get any sensible money for him.

Chelsea now appear disinterested and Juventus wont go more than 30m.

If we could get anything over 50m I would cash in mainly because I believe his situation is toxic for team spirit.

Tony Draper
26 Posted 16/06/2016 at 20:03:32
Stick !

Let Ronald have a word with him.
No point hiring a top drawer, top paid manager then pouting, sulking and weeping and tossing away a prime young asset. This time last year we wanted to sign him, but thought that £20M would probably do.

Today ?
£65M is being bandied about.
This time 12 months ?
£120M ?

Stick !

Dennis Ng
27 Posted 16/06/2016 at 20:21:56
If Koeman can't convince him to shut up and play, sell him. He's good but we should not let anyone set a precedent that a player can be bigger than the club.

Tony, I agree with letting RK talk to him and try to change his mind but not more than that. Lukaku won't be worth much more than $65m. I could be wrong but not many clubs pay over $50m for a player and those that do are already stocked at the striker position. Bale and CR7 showed tremendous talent before they were sold for their insane prices and has great marketing value. Lukaku hasn't show either, so...

Jay, the names you mentioned, Aguero, Kane, Vardy, they aren't comparable to Lukaku. They have achieved much more and are team players, and certainly not attainable without losing an arm AND a leg.

I think we can easily replace Lukaku with up and coming strikers across Europe, like Milik, Batshuayi etc. Even the Swiss kid we haven't even played yet! I don't have many names but looking at the Euros and knowing how many quality young players are not in it makes me feel comfortable about replacing Lukaku.

We will adjust according to what RK wants anyway. We can even go for a direct swap for Morata if Juve is that interested in Lukaku LOL

Tony Draper
28 Posted 16/06/2016 at 22:32:10
Dennis @27.
I think that maybe we are looking at the same page, but from different angles in slightly different lighting, lol !

I reckon keep Lulu, BUT also grab our "replacement", now.

Then we can afford to play serious hard balls over his price in 12 months time IF we still look like a club below his aspirations. IF !

We have no further need to create thin gruel from "Old Mother Hubards Cupboard" any longer. So we now MUST consider each any every player only as "the current holder of that shirt". WE employ them, NOT vice versa !

Dennis Ng
29 Posted 16/06/2016 at 22:47:17
Tony, yes, we're saying the same thing. I was just shocked when you said we could get $120m LOL

And I'm more "cut our losses early" kind of guy

I would also hope we get more than 1 replacement. Create competition, groom for the future. I'll let RK decide if Lulu is worth keeping. Paying him is one thing but having him always turn his head when things don't go his way, not my type of player.

Jason Pullen
30 Posted 16/06/2016 at 22:49:51
Mike Allison, we are not in the Champions League NOW. And that is clearly what Lukaku says he wants NOW. Not in a few seasons. So he wants to leave. So the question becomes do you keep a player who wants to move and has publicly said so. I think you sell. But only for the right price.
Dan Davies
31 Posted 16/06/2016 at 22:56:50
Tony @28, spot on mate, the club have the power here! Why let Lukaku go now and then either struggle to get a replacement in or pay over the odds?

If and when he leaves it should suit us not him! Let's hold him to his contract, at the same time get a quality striker in or two and if he wants to leave he's gonna have to play the best football of his career to date, for US.

Fran Mitchell
32 Posted 16/06/2016 at 23:22:07
Jesus Christ, some of us blues get offended rather easily. IF we get 65 millio for Rom I won't be in mourning, BUT that does not get away from the fact (yes boys and girls), that he is the best goalscorer we have had since the 80s.

That is a long time to go without a consistent goalscorer, and some of you wanna throw him out because he said something you didn't like. Jesus, and what, some lads from holland are gonna come and replace him....could work, may not.

The lad is what, 23, he's scored a bucketload of goals and his team was shit. And he comes out and says he wants to play champions league.

Apparently this is 'disrespecting the club' - hummmm, don't remember him posting a photo of his dog taking a dump on our shirt or anything else. ( funnily enough, when a player leaves a smaller club to come to Everton we say, good move lad, here you'll have a better chance...never do I here go, what a disrespectful dick, he shouçld've stayed at Rotherham...who does he think he is, ZIco?)

On a side note, Milick missed a sitter today, guess that means he's shit and off the list of potential signings accorfing to TW standards.


My opinion, if we can, Stick. His value ain't going down, and I doubt we'll find a 20 plus goal striker to replace him. If we are to make an assault on the top-4, a 20-plus goal striker is essential.

Laurie Hartley
33 Posted 16/06/2016 at 23:48:57
Jay # 25 - In my view you have identified the real issue in the Lukaku situation:

"I believe his situation is toxic for team spirit."

We don't know if that is the case but if it is, it has to be twist

James Stewart
34 Posted 17/06/2016 at 11:12:41
Twist. Lukaku is effective but his technique is still seriously lacking and that will not improve. Anyone who offers the sum mentioned we should snap their hand off. Plenty of better players out there who would be an upgrade on Lukaku.
James Stewart
35 Posted 17/06/2016 at 11:21:30
Plus I would agree with @25. He simply never shuts up about other clubs, PSG the latest one he is talking up, this on the back of his woeful showing against Italy. It is simply embarrassing. Bad for morale and Moshiri won't stand for it with all his focus on growing the Everton brand.
Baz Daly
37 Posted 17/06/2016 at 11:38:28
Stick...he's one of the best strikers in the world right now...keep the lad for as long as is possible...he can only get better anyway...

The fact that he isn't the world's most perfect footballer...with stellar hold-up play...and who always says the right thing....might just be why he's still here...

Laurie Hartley
38 Posted 17/06/2016 at 12:13:52
Just read about his latest advert on GQ magazine.

http://www.gqmagazine.fr/euro-2016/actu/articles/romelu-lukaku-interview-le-psg-est-un-grand-club-avec-un-projet-magnifique/43163

My French isn't very good but going on my limited linguistic skills plus the translation in the Mail, it seems he has made his mind up anyway.

I have had enough of him - not that that counts for much. Definitely twist.

Gordon Crawford
39 Posted 17/06/2016 at 12:26:44
I dont care if he scores 50 goals a year. I just dont want him at Everton anymore. He is undermining eveything Moshiri is trying to accomplish. Twist, twist, twist.
Scott Hamilton
40 Posted 17/06/2016 at 12:39:16
Gordon (39) - If he scores 50 goals a season for us then I will personally carry him to every game!
Steavey Buckley
41 Posted 17/06/2016 at 12:48:04
To gain an extra 40 points per season, a team needs a top manager (Everton have one,) plenty of cash to spend (Everton have) and a top goal scorer and top goal keeper. Those 2 situations are not clear at the moment, so Everton only have an extra 20 points.
Gordon Crawford
42 Posted 17/06/2016 at 12:53:35
Scott you will have sore arms. Lol
Dave Pritchard
43 Posted 17/06/2016 at 13:07:18
Steavey, if only it was that simple to get 20 extra points.
Craig Walker
44 Posted 17/06/2016 at 13:18:08
Someone on ToffeeWeb during a game (and I can't for the life of me remember who) described Lukaku as something like "he can be a goal getter and good finisher when he wants to be or he can be a bollard. Unfortunately for us, he's in bollard mode today". If royalties had to be paid for every time you reused somebody else's words then I'd have to make a big contribution to whoever first wrote those words. It sums him up completely. The reality was that he had that great game against Chelsea, made the comments about CL football and then turned into bollard mode for the rest of the season. In doing so, he spurned our best chance in years of getting to a final and winning something. In a Belgian shirt he got goals in the warm-up games then turned into bollard mode when it mattered.

Get shut and cash in whilst he'd still command a hefty fee.

Similarly with Stones and anyone else who thinks they are better and bigger than EFC.

Steavey Buckley
45 Posted 17/06/2016 at 13:19:39
It is about simple maths. A goal keeper saves them at one end and a goal scorer scores them at the other. Most teams who get relegated don't score enough goals but concede a plenty; just to prove my point.
Andrew Clare
46 Posted 17/06/2016 at 13:34:01
There must be better player out there for 40 million. In my world he is not a world class player. There are only about ten to 15 truly world class players and Lukaku certainly isn't one of them.So get rid of him. I would like to see more goal scoring midfielders in the team and defenders getting goals more often. A team with 4 or 5 goal scoring players getting into double figures is much more dangerous than relying on one player to score when he is in the mood.
We would only be angry if he stayed here. Watching him stroll around blaming everyone else except himself for his lack of goals.
I don't want anyone at Everton who isn't 100% for the club and that includes Stones.
Dave Pritchard
47 Posted 17/06/2016 at 13:51:25
Steavey, I wasn't questioning your general view that a winning team needs a good manager, keeper and striker. I just don't think it can be broken down as simply as you have been doing. Many factors (to keep the maths theme going) are involved, for example teamwork, squad strength, other teams abilities, luck with injuries to name a few.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


About these ads



© ToffeeWeb