10/08/2026 72comments  |  Jump to last

It’s not often you see an out-and-out, straight swap deal go ahead, especially between two Premier League clubs.

Sure, there have been those deals put in place to circumnavigate the league’s financial rules, but they were always very much established as separate transactions, even if everybody knew they were essentially a swap.

However, in the case of Brennan Johnson potentially heading to Everton and Dwight McNeil hoping to head the opposite way to Crystal Palace, it seems like a straight swap could be coming to pass.

There will likely have to be some compromise to finalise it, but should it go ahead, Everton are getting a player who needs a change off their books, and are actually bringing in the profile of wide player they need — pace, a runner in behind and with an eye for goal.

It sets Everton up nicely in the wide positions, and there is still a strong likelihood Jack Grealish joins before the transfer window is up. Iliman Ndiaye, of course, may ultimately make way too, but with Johnson in the ranks, there is a proven record of output, from a player who is only 25.

Everton came close to signing Johnson before. He was a key target for Kevin Thelwell and Frank Lampard back in 2022, but that deal was scuppered once Nottingham Forest gained promotion to the Premier League.

A year later, Tottenham were paying just short of £50M to sign the Wales international.

And while the last year or so has been tough for Johnson, Everton are getting an upgrade.

He has that versatility of being able to play anywhere across the front line, including up top, but his best position is on the right. Really, this is the kind of player Everton should have been going for last year, but instead they elected to spend big on Tyler Dibling.

It’s not that Dibling is not a promising talent, but last summer, Everton needed to sign a right winger who would come in and make an impact, who would get minutes. David Moyes would always be more likely to give Johnson minutes than a 19-year-old.

This is shrewd business, though, from Everton. A stumbling block could be Johnson’s wages, which are reported to be north of £100k per week. However, perhaps Everton will be hoping to negotiate that salary down.

Johnson is not the most creative player, but he is someone who is adept at getting on the end of moves, either to finish or provide that final pass. He may not be playing crisp throughballs in behind, but his movement — when on form — is excellent, and he attacks the posts well. 

Since the start of 2022-23, Johnson has scored 37 goals and provided 19 assists in 181 games. His best goal tally came in 2024-25, when he netted 18 times for Spurs, including grabbing the winner in the Europa League Final.

Last season was his poorest when it came to goal involvements, as he registered just 6 across his time with both Spurs and Palace, but he is coming into a team that has struggled for goals — the bar is low.

It is a move that comes with question marks, though. 

Dibling had probably his most promising display in an Everton shirt against Stuttgart on Saturday, playing off the right flank, a position Johnson is likely to occupy. However, there is nothing wrong with healthy competition, as long as Moyes is willing to rotate.

This writer still feels it is likely Grealish ends up at Everton come the end of the window, and so the sale of Ndiaye probably becomes more likely now in turn. It’s not that Johnson is Ndiaye’s replacement as such, it’s just hard to see Everton carrying five wingers into the campaign, albeit they must still hold out for a very high fee on Ndiaye.

Moyes must also be willing to play to Johnson’s strengths. There’s little point in having him hug the touchline — he needs to have the freedom to cut inside and make those darting runs to latch onto crosses from the left, which is why going to re-sign Grealish make sense. Or, Everton need to upgrade on Vitaliy Mykolenko, which they seem incapable of doing.

McNeil will go with my best wishes, albeit apart from when Palace rock up to Hill Dickinson Stadium on 22 August. He was brought in at a difficult time for the club and, once Sean Dyche took over, he had an excellent spell in 2023 and 2024.

His form has badly dipped since then, though, and that he got so much game time last season was frankly baffling, even if he did do a decent job in a few matches in the late winter/early spring.

If this goes to plan, then Everton should have got the better of this deal. They have a player who is younger, with more potential, and crucially, more of the attributes that the team requires right now.

 

Reader Comments (72)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()


Karl Jones
1 Posted 10/08/2026 at 13:06:39
Swop of the flops.
Paul Hewitt
2 Posted 10/08/2026 at 13:11:09
It's not worked out for Johnson at Palace. But at all his other clubs he's got decent statistics.

He's by no means a flop.
Gavin Johnson
3 Posted 10/08/2026 at 13:53:54
I wouldn't say McNeil can be described as a flop for us either. We bought him when we were in deep financial trouble. He was under £20M and was on about £30k a week.

He was also probably our most important player -- along with Doucoure -- under Dyche.
Kevin Molloy
4 Posted 10/08/2026 at 14:06:52
The footballing world gazes upon our swaps. In Awe.
Ashley Krotosky
5 Posted 10/08/2026 at 14:10:55
Potentially a good omen, (-though I'd certainly prefer to be relying on high quality players and management).

From memory - certainly my life time - most of our trophies have been won with some Welsh playing contribution 69-70 a noted exception).
Si Cooper
6 Posted 10/08/2026 at 14:18:41
As someone who has always been acutely aware of Dwight's limitations I have to say that if Brennan Johnson at least matches his heart and his commitment then we will do pretty well out of this deal.

It should not be forgotten by any Evertonian that Dwight and his partner have gone through a horrible ordeal (which is hopefully all behind them now), which obviously impacted his performances for a while, and yet he has never shirked.

The way he elevated his game after the disappointment they experienced in January is also praiseworthy.

I think Brennan Johnson has the higher potential but his confidence must be battered. Hopefully our club will suit him and allow him to flourish again.

This deal is strange enough to make me wonder if there is a scenario where Crystal Palace can somehow benefit from a domino effect if Iliman Ndiaye were already set to move on in the next few weeks.
Ian Wilkins
7 Posted 10/08/2026 at 14:19:29
Think we'll keep 4 wide men, without Grealish?

Dibling out on loan? Ndiaye departure?
Eric Myles
8 Posted 10/08/2026 at 14:31:36
Gerry Humphreys @ Ashley #5.
Tommy Carter
9 Posted 10/08/2026 at 14:34:33
To have Dibling, George, Johnson, and Ndiaye as our wide options is not a bad prospect for a manager willing to give all of them a fair share of opportunity. Of that list, if we keep all, then Dibling and George I can foresee getting little playing time. Especially Dibling.

George and Johnson give some much needed pace to this side. Johnson also stretches the play, he is a player that stretches the game and hits the penalty area with runs as often as he can. This is a quality that can benefit our team massively.

I think this is a fair deal. McNeil has some great qualities but he needs to play central with runners around him. Despite his height and effort, he's physically not brilliant at this level but he is technically decent.

I would imagine he'll be more of a playmaker in the Palace team rather than on a wide midfield shift like he was under Moyes. I would expect them to sharpen up his set-piece deliveries also and use these as an asset -- particularly at home.
Kevin Molloy
10 Posted 10/08/2026 at 14:40:36
I don't think Johnson is going to need much nurturing, I don't see it in any way like the Dele situation. This time last year, he was finishing off a season where he'd got the winner in a European final, one of 17 goals he'd got that season for a crap Spurs side, from the wing.

We're used to our wingers pulling in four a year. We just need to get this deal over the line before Parish wakes up on the floor from whatever casino we took him to last night!
Billy Bradshaw
11 Posted 10/08/2026 at 14:44:38
Just hope Johnson doesn't go round in circles trying to keep the ball on his left foot that McNeil used to do.

That frustrated the hell out of me... and probably the rest of his teammates.
Sean Kearns
12 Posted 10/08/2026 at 14:57:55
Can't wait for him to do all the hard work then look up and try a 1-2 with either Tweedle Dee or Tweedle Dumb! 🤣

Baby steps though, I suppose
Stu Darlington
13 Posted 10/08/2026 at 15:06:11
How come Palace were happy to let him go so quickly after signing him?

Do I smell something fishy here or am I being just my normal paranoid self?

After all, people say, if a deal looks too good to be true... it usually is.
Rob Dolby
14 Posted 10/08/2026 at 15:15:03
Swop of the flops is a classic.

It's worrying Palace want to offload someone who they spent £30M on 12 months ago for a player in the last 12 months of his contract.

I just hope this isn't a sign that Ndiaye is on his way.
Rocco Bugaj
15 Posted 10/08/2026 at 15:34:37
Lucas Digne is moving to PSG for £7M or £8M.

I would rather see him than Mykolenko.
Christy Ring
16 Posted 10/08/2026 at 15:36:44
Hopefully it will resurrect Johnson's career, he was totally absent at Palace.

I wish Dwight all the best, has a cultured left foot, and the few seasons. We were in a relegation scrap, he was one of our unsung heroes.
Tommy Carter
17 Posted 10/08/2026 at 15:44:20
@13 Stu. That is the obvious concern. Unless they just want his wages off their books and think they can get McNeil in for around half the wages and then sign another player for the other half of Johnson's wages.

Whilst we are negotiating with them, we should offer money for Mateta as part of any deal. If we gave them McNeil plus £15M for Mateta and Johnson, that would be good business. Then offload Beto for £10M and the deal has cost us £5M for two good players -- one of whom is really good.
Ian Wilkins
18 Posted 10/08/2026 at 15:56:55
Any swap of players in the Premier League has to be signed off as a fair market value trade by the Premier League.

We will probably get fined or have points deducted for contemplating it.
Brendan McLaughlin
19 Posted 10/08/2026 at 16:01:29
Ian #18

That certainly was the case under PSR. Not sure it still applies under SCR.
Paul Kossoff
20 Posted 10/08/2026 at 16:26:15
The BBC are already questioning this transfer. Not in a good way but seeing it as Why? I myself thought Why would Palace agree with swapping Johnson for McNeil???

Here is what the BBC are saying.

While such player trades between clubs are an unusual transfer window event, they are permitted -- but they do have to meet certain rules.

The swap of McNeil and Johnson will technically be treated as two separate transfers, and will be part of the assessment of the Premier League squad cost ratio (SCR) regulations.

For example, Johnson cost Palace £35M, and his valuation as part of the McNeil deal would affect the Eagles' SCR calculations. He would need to be valued at about £30M for it to be recorded as a neutral transaction on the accounts.

But what if he is valued at less than that?

When McNeil's proposed move to Selhurst Park fell through in February, he was valued at £20M. If this is a true swap deal, and the two players are valued at £20M, that would be a £10m loss for Palace.

All swap deals also still have to pass the Premier League's fair market value (FMV) checks.

Regulations around associated party transactions (APTs) and FMV were first introduced in 2021 in order to "provide a robust mechanism to safeguard the financial stability, integrity and competitive balance" in the Premier League.

External valuation companies will be consulted on factors such as a player's age and performance level, as well as assessing deals with other comparable players, to determine if a deal tallies with market value.

The Premier League will make the final judgement on whether the deal passes FMV checks.
Paul Hewitt
21 Posted 10/08/2026 at 16:30:01
If the Premier League have anything to do with it, they will block it.
Paul Kossoff
22 Posted 10/08/2026 at 16:31:46
Paul @21,

The Premier League will block it on one factor: this is Everton.
Lee Jackson
23 Posted 10/08/2026 at 16:37:27
Johnson: 1 goal or assist every 3 games (Premier League only).
McNeil: 1 goal or assist every 4.5 games (Premier League only).

Seems we are getting the better deal, statistically (and transfer value) speaking. We should 'swap' more often...

We 'won' the Dobbin - Iroegbunam deal too. Dobbin now valued at £7M and Iroegbunam at £18M and Dobbin never played for Villa. For those not following (as I wasn't), Dobbin is now at Southampton.
Ian Wilkins
24 Posted 10/08/2026 at 16:37:30
I'd like to think that Everton and Palace have already tested this with the Premier League... surely?

We can't have Dwight unpacking the boxes for a second time…
Christy Ring
25 Posted 10/08/2026 at 16:44:39
There's no way they'll stop the deal, but it's Palace who'll be under more scrutiny, because they bought Johnson for £35M.

We valued McNeil at £20M in the last window when the deal fell through, so the problem is not at our end.
Ian Jones
26 Posted 10/08/2026 at 16:46:14
I thought Johnson's move to Palace from Spurs was a strange decision by him.

Let's hope, if this swap takes place, he finds his way again with us.
John Keating
27 Posted 10/08/2026 at 16:52:39
Yes, I agree, these half-wits at the Premier League will get involved... they'll decide the relative values of each player.

We will get charged with a playing advantage, get relegated to the Northern Premier League, and get fined £20B.

At least we can meet up with Jeff Stelling when we play Hartlepool.
Lee Jackson
28 Posted 10/08/2026 at 16:54:16
Johnson, with 1 goal/assist in 3 games, is better than any other Everton player including Illy (1 in 3.7 (and he takes the pens)) and KDH (1 in 4.7). So it seems a bit odd that several folk don't want him at all.

Yes, he had a very poor time at Palace but has been pretty consistent across his other seasons in the Premier League.

He's also pretty durable it seems, only missing 5 games through injury in 4 Premier League seasons, 2 hamstring, 3 calf.
Jack Convery
29 Posted 10/08/2026 at 16:57:13
Who do Forest have that we can swap for Beto???

Aina, a right-back... or Morata, left-footed and plays centre-back or left-back.
Brendan McLaughlin
30 Posted 10/08/2026 at 16:58:19
The FMV regulations are there largely to prevent clubs "swapping" players at inflated prices.

This appears to be a straightforward swap so I can't see how an issue could arise to prevent this deal going through.
Steve Shave
31 Posted 10/08/2026 at 17:01:35
I have retired from TW following its sad decline but couldn't resist a little glance to see what folk thought of this deal. If true, it's an absolutely blinding bit of business, especially with Dwight in the last year of his contract!

He didn't settle at Palace but, with a bit of love from our wonderful fans, maybe we can see some form return. I like him and think he will provide excellent competition along with our other wingers. I now think this means Jack won't be coming... love him, but it's for the best.

As for right back, I like the look of the Spanish kid we are allegedly after but I would prefer someone more experienced like Wan Bissaka. Could we get both with the Barca lad on a loan? I think we will only get a striker if someone is prepared to offer some cash for one of our current forwards, come on Leipzig you know you want to! Delap doesn't seem too popular on here but I think he'd be a terrific signing. COYB.
Jeff Armstrong
32 Posted 10/08/2026 at 17:21:15
Steve 31,

I also moved away from ToffeeWeb after the reshuffle, but I gradually began to return, starting with the live forum and eventually came full circle.

It's pretty much business as usual if you ignore all the betting ads and some of the obviously clickbait articles that offer no real insight or analysis. But when some of the posts get tasty, it's as entertaining as ever.
John Keating
33 Posted 10/08/2026 at 17:24:16
I really don't know if it's a good or bad deal for us.

I really question everything Moyes does for us since he fucked us over for the Man Utd job.
Christy Ring
34 Posted 10/08/2026 at 17:26:14
Steve #31,

Sad to hear you've retired from ToffeeWeb.

The way things are going, I'd be more than happy if we got one right-back!
Ian Bennett
35 Posted 10/08/2026 at 17:39:20
Try Munoz for Patterson.

When on a roll... don't stop.
Liam Mogan
36 Posted 10/08/2026 at 17:48:57
McNeil has no pace whatsoever and you get found out in the modern game without it.

No matter what position he plays, Palace will soon find his limitations unbearable.
Mike Gaynes
37 Posted 10/08/2026 at 18:07:41
Steve #31,

Congratulations on your TW retirement, because now you can become a highly-paid pundit!
Hector Blaukugel
38 Posted 10/08/2026 at 18:18:19
If it goes through, I think it's a very good deal for us. He looked decent for Forest and I hoped we would go in for him when he left Spurs.

He is young enough, hopefully will settle, and find his previous form. As much as I like the man, McNeil was done here a long time ago.
Darren Hind
39 Posted 10/08/2026 at 18:28:00
For me, this is not the deal it is being portrayed as.

Palace were saddled with a massive wage for a player who, to be blunt, failed. I bet they cannot believe their luck that somebody would come and take that wage off them -- £6M a year, I hear.

Two totally different players. McNeil is very skillful but simply doesn't have the pace or athleticism to get away from a defender he has just beaten. Johnson is almost the complete opposite. Searing pace, but not blessed with a great deal of skill. No tricks... or composure.

Which club will be the happier with the deal come the end of the season? Well, we had to let McNeil go; he was surplus... But my money is on Palace fans to be happier once this plays out.
David West
40 Posted 10/08/2026 at 18:36:55
Incoming Premier League valuation of Johnson at £75M. Everton deemed in violation of SCR!!

See them now rubbing their hands together...
Dale Self
41 Posted 10/08/2026 at 19:00:56
Steve Shave 31, I miss you maaaan. Drop by every once in a while. Take care of yerself.
Michael Kenrick
Editorial Team
42 Posted 10/08/2026 at 20:54:27
Yea, Steve, we miss you... well, probably not as much as Dale does.

I'm glad you got past the ToffeeWeb homepage, which is far from welcoming. I'm hoping there's a major revamp coming down the wires, possibly as early as the end of the week. But the betting stuff will still be present, I believe, as it helps to provide the funds to run the website.

At the moment, if you go straight to News, or the News Archive, you get all the current stories, and we are striving to provide valid updates about Everton every single day, so there should always be something new for you to scan.

The News pages are a lot cleaner than the home page, and hopefully easy to skim through, with usually a good bit of back and forth from our posters who can be counted on to provide a decent flow of comments.

Jeff @32, thanks for coming back and being one of those posters who help make the site what it is. I hope you don't think too many of the stories are clickbait. We want traffic, of course, but each story should have meaningful Everton content, and the story titles are meant to inform you of that content, which for me is the opposite of clickbait.

There's a major shift coming in how we run the site, and I should really have Harry tell us more, but he might be waiting for the rollout first.
Steve Shave
43 Posted 10/08/2026 at 20:56:59
Thanks for the love, Dale, I do miss TW sometimes. Its demise coincided with the break-up of my marriage so it was a tough year, I just lost interest in football generally, completely unhelped by my ongoing hatred of VAR!

I hope to get back some love for the game this season, that would be helped by getting Eddie Howe in and moving Davie boy upstairs.
Dave Abrahams
44 Posted 10/08/2026 at 21:25:32
Eric (8)

Out of curiosity, I had a look at your Gerry Humphreys choice and he just sneaked in with one league appearance and one cup game in 1969-70.
Christy Ring
45 Posted 10/08/2026 at 21:30:30
Ian #35 You're on the ball, it's been reported we've moved onto the 30 year old Munoz, as Johnson is too expensive? Haven't Roma spent €18m on Molina, and we can't go above £12m. It's beyond laughable the amount of fullbacks we've been linked with, and we're still miles away?
Jeff Armstrong
46 Posted 10/08/2026 at 21:37:15
Michael 42, You're right I probably was being a bit harsh on the stuff Patric and Harry are are putting out. I was referring more to some of the earlier articles which appeared to be AI generated, is Anajishu Roy still about, haven't seen much from him lately...

Christy 45, I think Munoz would be a better option than the Celtic lad, he's got bags of Premier League experience and is a great overlapping full back, good signing if the price is right my guess around £15M.
Ian Wilkins
47 Posted 10/08/2026 at 22:08:36
Munoz would be great, can’t see why Palace would sell unless in a financial mess.
We seem to be linked with a different right back everyday. Project panic…
Alan McGuffog
48 Posted 10/08/2026 at 23:33:47
Dave @44...

And the previous season (I think) scored one of the greatest goals ever seen at Goodison.
Mike Gaynes
49 Posted 11/08/2026 at 01:22:01
Darren #39, Johnson had the "composure" to ring up a goal involvement every 135 minutes -- exactly a game and a half -- over a two-year period at Spurs. Nobody does that in the Premier League, or bags 18 in a season himself, without having significant quality in his game.

We have no idea what has gone wrong for him over the last calendar year, but the searing pace you speak of is our most glaring deficiency and our most desperate need.

In the words of Stephano in Shakespeare's The Tempest (I'm playing the role this weekend), if we "can recover and tame him, he's a gift for any emperor who ever trod on neat's leather."
Mike Gaynes
50 Posted 11/08/2026 at 01:28:40
Christy #45, did you see Munoz in the World Cup for Colombia?

The guy has an atomic battery in his belly. Loves to attack. He'd add so much excitement to this dull club. Hope it's true.
Si Cooper
51 Posted 11/08/2026 at 01:40:25
So is the deal for Johnson real or not? When it's reported someone's having a medical, it's not often that things go completely silent.

Munoz would be a great signing despite his age, but I'd expect he would have plenty of options if Palace are letting him go. All action and an eye for goal as well.

Unless he's been playing on painkillers to mask injuries, I'd expect he could keep going at a decent level for at least another 4 years.
Eric Myles
52 Posted 11/08/2026 at 01:46:47
Dave #44, you probably remember his Dad playing for us as well? Or so they say Da in Wales?

Son of my Father
Steve Brown
53 Posted 11/08/2026 at 02:06:44
Brendan Johnson is a pretty functional player, but he does have pace and can provide goals and assists -- if we start next season without Ndiaye and Grealish this will be our biggest issue.

So he's probably worth a punt. Big 'however' though: when a player's form has been in serious decline for a year, it usually continues to decline.
Andy Meighan
54 Posted 11/08/2026 at 06:02:44
Paul 20.

Well the BBC would question it, wouldn't they? Their site is run by Southern so-called kopites, none of whom probably have ever been near the theme park in their lives.

Watching Toffee TV yesterday while on holiday and apparently the two cretins who front their Redmen TV show were absolutely fuming.

God knows why... they spend absolutely zillions on flops like Isak worse and the best of them all ping pong, absolutely shite and they have the temerity to question a straight swap and automatically think it stinks.

Horrible set of entitled twats if you ask me, and I hope Brennan goes on to tear their full-back to bits in the next derby.
Brendan McLaughlin
55 Posted 11/08/2026 at 07:10:40
I'm surprised the clubs didn't' agree to "buy" the players from each other. My understanding is that this approach would have improved each clubs SCR position albeit not significantly.

Hard to see the rationale behind a straight swap.
Darren Hind
56 Posted 11/08/2026 at 08:11:40
Mike

You must surely know you have brought your stats to the wrong door? I could of course dismantle them, but I am getting very bored trying to explain the difference between reality and stats.

Wage-wise we are already on the receiving end of this deal -- we have relieved Palace of a massive albatross. Let's hope we are not simply putting it around our own necks.

It's really unlike you to get a tad over-enthusiastic over our latest signings... and I kinda know that your enthusiasm is driven by stats rather than what you have seen. I sincerely hope you are right... this time.

If Johnson proves to be more successful for Everton than McNeil is for Palace, I think we would all be delighted.
Eric Myles
57 Posted 11/08/2026 at 08:20:19
Brendan, hopefully it's because our new transfer gurus have come up with a loophole that benefits us.

Amortisation maybe? Profit on future sale?

Johnson - McNeil deal: Have two clubs ever swapped players before?

URL gone wonky again Now fixed -- Ed
Brendan McLaughlin
58 Posted 11/08/2026 at 08:32:41
Eric #57,

"Brendan, hopefully it's because our new transfer gurus have come up with a loophole that benefits us."

Now you have got me worried!
Mick O\\\'Malley
59 Posted 11/08/2026 at 09:12:30
I'd take Johnson over McNiel all day long, the lad was one of Spurs' best players that season, which is why Palace paid £35M. He has a decent goal return plus the pace to go with it.

McNiel is a one-footed crab, he has a decent left foot and a cracking shot but his pace lets him down.

Sometimes players don't settle at certain clubs, so I'm not arsed about Johnson's time at Palace; I'm hoping we get the Spurs version!
Ian Wilkins
60 Posted 11/08/2026 at 09:19:38
Being suggested by some sources in media (reliable?) that our recruitment team are keen on Munoz, Moyes not so much.

Not his type of full-back, gets forward too often, too many goals and assists. Too often out of his own half.

Can't be true, can it….
Dave Lynch
61 Posted 11/08/2026 at 09:20:14
Being reported we are interested in signing Munoz, the Palace right-back.
Dave Abrahams
62 Posted 11/08/2026 at 09:24:08
Eric (52),

Yes, Jack Humphreys played quite a lot when TG Jones wasn't picked, when he and Theo Kelly were arguing over the refusal to let TG go to Italy on a transfer deal.

I saw him play many games for the Blues, not sure if an illness ended his career.

If I'm not mistaken, Jack was Gerry's stepdad and Gerry finished his career at Crewe Alexandra, playing under Jack's old teammate at Everton, Harry Catterick.
Stu Darlington
63 Posted 11/08/2026 at 09:34:46
I'm still concerned about this deal.

I just read this morning that there were problems with his attitude and consistency at Palace.

Like Darren says, we will be paying big wages, so I hope he doesn't turn out to be another lemon!
Ian Bennett
65 Posted 11/08/2026 at 09:59:20
My friend AI reckons Johnson has 49 goals and 23 assists in the last 4 seasons. McNeil: 14 goals and 16 assists.

What it appears is Moyes has traded the wages of Gana and McNeil for Norgaard and Johnson, for a total transfer value of £7M.

This looks like smart business by Everton, particularly when McNeil walks for free at the end of the season.

McNeil isn't getting ahead of Ndiaye, George, Grealish or Alcaraz on the left. Nor should he get in front of Dibling, Ndiaye, Johnson or Rohl on the right.

I like the Munoz rumour too.
Tommy Carter
66 Posted 11/08/2026 at 10:05:47
If a wide forward was what Everton were looking for -- to improve our team massively -- then they should have spent the money and bought Jarrod Bowen.
James Marshall
67 Posted 11/08/2026 at 10:06:24
Done deal!

We've signed Johnson -- it's official.
David West
68 Posted 11/08/2026 at 10:14:06
I find it crazy people are even having doubts about this deal.

McNeil's output has been abysmal since his good 18 months under Dyche, and that only seemed good because of the terrible team we had at the time.

Some people will never be happy, whoever you sign... I get that. There's no real downside, if Johnson is shite, then we have swapped a shite player for a shite player, but a younger one, with a decent chance of selling him on.

Some people would moan if we swapped McNeil for Yamal.
Martin Reppion
69 Posted 11/08/2026 at 10:39:15
Sorry Tommy #66.

You and others on here are deluded in thinking that Everton can snap their fingers, open a wallet and players will flock to the club.

Bowen did not want to leave West Ham and signed a new contract to prove it. For a deal to happen, it is not just the financials that matter. Unbelievable as it is, some people just don't want to live on Merseyside, or uproot their kids from schools they are happy in. Some players like living close to the bright lights of London.

For a deal to happen, we have to be the best option for that player -- not just in terms of money. It seems that slowly, our recruitment team is assembling a squad that looks to have more depth than last season, and a little more quality. Add to that the improvements seen pre-season in Dibling, Barry, Rohl and Armstrong, there is a little cause for optimism.

Yes, we need to keep looking for a couple of full-backs. But as with other positions, if we are competing with more attractive suitors, then it will be a struggle.
Kevin Molloy
70 Posted 11/08/2026 at 10:42:31
All the main-stream media are moaning that this is very strange, and that it may not pass the Fair Market Value test.

What possible motivation could Palace have for passing off one of their assets at an undervalue?
Tommy Carter
71 Posted 11/08/2026 at 11:07:22
Martin @69.

Everybody has a price. Particularly footballers. It's a commodity business and if TFG wanted to improve our starting XI and get a Champions League-class player, ready to go, proven and a brilliant player -- that we realistically could acquire -- then Bowen would be your man.

Offer West Ham £30M and Dwight McNeil and they would consider that offer seriously in my opinion. I'd even go up to £40M for Bowen -- he's that good. And 3 years of him for £40M and his wages would be a comparative bargain.

Once West Ham and Everton want to do the deal, what the player wants comes second.
Ian Wilkins
72 Posted 11/08/2026 at 12:50:01
It seems Munoz is available, Palace have bought another right-back. We should take this guy, proper attacking right-back. £15-20M?

Bet he moves to Forest with Glasner, despite them already having Aina. Bet we go back in for Alistair Johnston at Celtic, unexciting.
John Collins
73 Posted 11/08/2026 at 14:22:58
Ian 72.

"A proper attacking right-back"...

The reason Moyes won't sign him, mate.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


How to get rid of these ads and support TW

© ToffeeWeb