Keith Hackett has laid into VAR for the "farcical" decision to intervene in the late penalty shout during Saturday's draw between Everton and Manchester United.
The former PGMOL chief is the latest figure to give his verdict after Andy Madley reversed his decision to award Everton a stoppage-time spot-kick.
He said: “So Andy Madley, correctly in my opinion, awards a penalty kick for holding. So why has VAR got to intervene and then convince Madley to overturn his decision?”
“Come on, guys – you’re making decisions that are farcical, a correct decision overturned incorrectly, because of VAR intervention. Andy, you’re better than this, tell the VAR to go and do one because you were correct in the first instance and you’ve now overturned a good decision and disallowed a penalty kick. You’re wrong.”
» Read the full article at The Mirror
Reader Comments (16)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
2 Posted 23/02/2025 at 09:14:50
The referee has the final say — Yes/No????
3 Posted 23/02/2025 at 09:30:29
I suspect the top clubs now have yet another team on their side.
4 Posted 23/02/2025 at 17:17:10
I would also like to see referees attend after-match press conferences; unfortunately VAR would be too far away although they do have a link to the ground by which they communicate with match officials which should be made audible to the fans.
And it's about time Everton grew a pair and stood up to voice concerns over such events.
5 Posted 23/02/2025 at 18:05:47
It wouldn't make a blind bit of difference if Everton "grew a pair".
Moyes had his say in his post-match presser and put some idiot reporter in his place as regards the penalty.
These shower already hate us so can you imagine it if the coaches and players suddenly spouted off how hard done by we were? (We were, by the way.)
We'd never get another decision. That yesterday was as stonewall as it gets. I'd left by then but having watched it over and over, I'm convinced these bastards hate us.
Anywhere else on the field, it's a foul, so I can't understand for the life of me how he reversed it.
Corrupt.
6 Posted 23/02/2025 at 22:10:34
NFL officials often go to a pitchside monitor to review plays if they have been challenged. The understanding is that the official asks for the footage he wants to see and those back at NFL in NY show the footage demanded.
It seems that on Saturday the PL equivalent of the NY officials decided what to show the official on the pitch and at no point was the match referee able to demand to see video he wanted to see, only what those at Stockley Park wanted him to see.
Perhaps our US friends can confirm this difference in protocol.
7 Posted 24/02/2025 at 04:49:54
We should be asking how VAR viewed the film, release of all audio and why the Ref was shown only the one view of the incident and of course how these officials are appointed to which games.
If there's anything inefficiency and corruption hates it is being highlighted as that is usually just the beginning.
8 Posted 24/02/2025 at 06:42:41
It's a terrible decision by VAR, but it's not surprising at all. VAR isn't there to reach the right decision. Show me anywhere in their rules that say that's what they're trying to do. They don't care about the outcome, they care about following their rules. Even if it produces an absurdity.
Does anyone remember the Liverpool Spurs VAR cock up? The words "Well done boys, good process" were uttered. That just sums it up to me - they delivered the polar opposite outcome to the one they were supposed to. Then when they realised what they'd done, the VAR said "I can't do anything". The rules didn't allow them to. So they hid it.
I remember people on here laughing at that lot while I was trying to make the point that the referees had shown what they were about. I even got accused of defending Liverpool!
Wrong outcome, but the process ruled. Every football fan should have been absolutely outraged at what happened. But they weren't, until something went against their team...
We've now been screwed over by a VAR technicality. Maguire didn't do enough to concede a penalty. One was never awarded for the foul by De Ligt. Young's fall didn't match the impact from Maguire. It's pretty obviously a penalty but the process has been followed and the penalty denied. "Well done boys, good process".
9 Posted 24/02/2025 at 06:56:24
later they will be back to speak to fans and Players so I will tune back in.
Oh the name of our (non) communications director is Peter Kenyon
10 Posted 24/02/2025 at 07:35:16
Also note he spent 4 minutes trying to find fault with Beto's goal.
11 Posted 24/02/2025 at 17:34:34
Of course, not everyone necessarily uses / follows the process correctly, which is why the conversations need to be broadcast.
Rugby refs and their various assistants have proper discussions and come up with a consensus decision. Football, for some reason, still prefers to operate with a veil of secrecy.
Inadequate/ poorly utilised procedures need improving / bolstering with targeted training but to solve a problem youve first got to admit you have a problem.
12 Posted 27/02/2025 at 23:09:29
13 Posted 28/02/2025 at 01:10:09
VAR could have cleared that up. But instead they went with "sorry, we have to take your first answer" and then not only reviewed it that way, but deliberately hid any angle that might have swayed the referee into thinking that he actually made the right decision in awarding a penalty.
We should be outraged at that. All football fans should be.
But no-one except Evertonians care. Just as no-one but Liverpool fans cared when the VAR team and then PGMOL cocked up and then tried to hide what had happened.
14 Posted 28/02/2025 at 13:32:52
15 Posted 01/03/2025 at 07:32:44
Money, Sky, Money, Premier League, Money, VAR, money, PGMOL, money, Refs, money… and last but not least EFC.
16 Posted 03/03/2025 at 05:39:25
All four commentators said "Oh, that's a penalty. De Ligt pulled him back!"
There was a bit of discussion, did he pull it for long enough? Did he make a meal of it? Consensus of the four: Narh, that's a penalty.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW


1 Posted 23/02/2025 at 08:01:22
Well said and perfectly put.