12/05/2025 59comments  |  Jump to last

Former Everton owner Farhad Moshiri has been talking to Sky Sports about Goodison Park and the investment he made in construction of the new Everton Stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock.

“We were all in love with Goodison. I was in love with Goodison. Nobody wanted to move. But the reason we had to leave was partly infrastructural, partly financial.

“I had to put in £400M. The rest had to come from other investors.

“The fact we have The Friedkin Group, really good custodians in a new stadium – I think this is our best chance to bridge the gap. Our fans have suffered far too long.

“My biggest sadness is not to have attended more games. I wish I’d been able to but I was constrained by my work. I have no regret.”

 

Reader Comments (59)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()


Christy Ring
1 Posted 12/05/2025 at 21:35:58
Anyone watch the Moshiri interview on Sky Sports?

He said he'd no regrets and they had to leave Goodison to compete.

He put in £400M himself into the new stadium?

Michael Kenrick
2 Posted 12/05/2025 at 22:43:57
That would leave a £350M 'black hole' in Everton's finances.

I'm not convinced there were 'other investors' — just those crazy loans.

Mark Taylor
3 Posted 12/05/2025 at 23:37:59
I suppose one shouldn't carp given the guy took a bath to the tune of about £300-400M, without which we wouldn't really be viable going forward (to the extent we are).

I hope those 'other business interests' were, for his sake, lucrative. And that he has paid off Usmanov any debt obligations.

Colin Glassar
4 Posted 12/05/2025 at 23:44:19
Him and his mate were one of the worst things to ever happen to our club.
Craig Scott
5 Posted 12/05/2025 at 23:50:41
I recognise that Moshiri made lots of mistakes and he has been roundly pilloried for those mistakes by all on sundry, particularly on this forum.

But he was first and foremost an investor, and I don't think he professed to be an expert on all things football. His objective was to obtain significant investment to advance the club (from his own and others' pockets) and he was reliant on football 'experts' to spend that money wisely.

He of course has to take responsibility for the fact that his selection of people to spend that money wisely largely failed. But as well as the $400M he managed to obtain for recruitment when he started off, he also managed to get the where-with-all to get the stadium constructed and finished.

We may not currently have the squad to be competing for Europe as a result of his and others' decisions, but he deserves the credit for putting his money where his mouth is and facilitating the funding of our fantastic stadium.

We'd still be seen as a nostalgic old-fashioned club with an outdated stadium if it wasn't for him.

Ernie Baywood
6 Posted 13/05/2025 at 03:02:45
Craig, he was our owner at a pivotal point in our history. The club needed to do something in regard to the stadium – I don't believe the alternative (ie, do nothing) really existed.

He did that, but it's hard to say that he didn't screw it up. Under his watch, we built a new stadium, got worse as a team, and went under significant financial strain. We broke rules with regard to financial sustainability and were penalised, putting the club's status at serious risk. And he and his board slandered our supporters.

From his personal perspective, he took a bath.

Success? Credit? Not for me.

Craig Scott
7 Posted 13/05/2025 at 03:52:07
Ernie, doing nothing to improve, upgrade, or replace the stadium certainly existed, and would have continued to exist, until Moshiri came along.

The woes the club faced during his tenure were ultimately his responsibility, but not all were entirely of his making. Others obviously had a hand in all of that who are conveniently forgotten about, not least the managers who splashed all the cash but did little to significantly elevate the club's status in the Premier League.

I'm also skeptical of the many fans and TW posters who I recall were only too happy to revel in all the money being made available at the time and exalt the likes of Moshiri, Marcel and Marco et al. I remember those posters well, but I assume you weren't one of them.

Those same posters now sit with hindsight and lambast and insult the guy who, despite his mistakes, at least had the balls (and commitment) to cobble together over £1B during his time to benefit our club.

I wonder how many of us who love this club would have done the same if we had access to that sort of dough?

Don Alexander
9 Posted 13/05/2025 at 03:53:58
Moshiri was a close employee of a shyster called Usmanov, one of the despicable robbing bastards from Russia, several of whom were openly welcomed into our country by those in absolute power, until their puppeteer Putin pissed on all their chips,

Thus Moshiri was also a shyster from the off, annually confirming it to the world-wide football business.

Kenwright and the board were con artists happy to screw the max for themselves as we plunged ever lower to where we still are now.

Moshiri and Kenwright severely damaged us as trophy winners… and for years yet to come.

Paul Hewitt
10 Posted 13/05/2025 at 06:22:19
Far from a perfect owner but he has built a fantastic new stadium that would never have happened without him. He also walked away losing 400 million. Just listened to the wrong people.

I hope he is in attendance for the first game at the new stadium. He deserves that at least.

Danny O'Neill
11 Posted 13/05/2025 at 06:28:55
Paul, you hit a nerve there. Far be it from me to question a successful businessman, but his naivety in running a football club was his downfall.

We do have the new Everton Stadium to thank him for and the millions he ploughed into the club.

Pitch side, he retained the old guard and gave his money to the wrong people.

I don't bear any grudges against him personally, just disappointed that he didn't take control other than his title.

John Keating
12 Posted 13/05/2025 at 07:03:53
Paul 10 and Danny 11

Together a great post.

They say time is a great healer, possibly more mellower in Moshiri's case

Love him, hate him – the fact is, whether by luck or judgement, without him, we would be getting some paint from B&Q to give Goodison a fresh lick next month and mop the piss up out the bogs.

At the end of the day by luck we have somehow come through the Moshiri - Kenwright period and escaped disaster.

I truly hope Moshiri attends both the Southampton game and first game at the new stadium.

Steve Shave
13 Posted 13/05/2025 at 07:14:08
Totally agree, Colin, the new stadium does not let him off the hook for me. Nor does how much money he lost on us. I am grateful for his vision and work on the new stadium but I do not believe it overshadows the rest of his legacy.

Foolish, reckless and naive decision-making characterised his tenure. He nearly finished us. I was happier to see the back of him than I was Kenwright.

We have to move on though, new era, new dawn, new team.

Robert Tressell
14 Posted 13/05/2025 at 07:25:53
Vain and incompetent man — but the stadium looks great.
Danny O'Neill
15 Posted 13/05/2025 at 07:36:17
It's a mindblower, Robert.

I keep saying it, but I was probably more impressed by the approach and walking through the old dock walls, that have been preserved, and seeing the outside as I was taken with the inside of the stadium itself.

There is a reason that we are becoming the location of choice for non-Everton events over the traditional Northwest venues. Rugby League and the Euros. Concerts and Boxing to follow.

For all his failings, Moshiri delivered where those before him failed.

Paul Ferry
16 Posted 13/05/2025 at 07:40:55
Craig Scott 5 – ‘But he was first and foremost an investor, and I don't think he professed to be an expert on all things football’.

So why on earth did he stick his ‘investor’ nose into club/team affairs then Craig? Like, for example, shithouse red Benitez, that showed that our absentee landlord had no respect for us and who we are. I do not for one second believe that ‘work’ is the reason for his long absences from The Old Lady. He went to more aways in his last two years. I wonder why?

Craig Scott 7 – ‘I'm also skeptical of the many fans and TW posters who I recall were only too happy to revel in all the money being made available at the time and exalt the likes of Moshiri, Marcel and Marco et al. I remember those posters well, but I assume you weren't one of them’.

Top snide smarmy post Craig, Of course we were fucking ‘happy to revel in all the money being made available at the time’ because for the first time in 50 years we had money. What sort of mind – yours Craig – would then use that ‘happy to revel’ after so long to criticise right-minded people who then as time unfolded and reality dawned dared, deigned, and despicably criticised Mosh for his handling of the club.

This made me laugh – ‘I remember those posters well’. You twat posters who – how could you even think of doing it you twats – said a cross word as Moshiri led us to the verge of bankruptcy and relegation.

You ungrateful bastards who our Craig can ‘recall were only too happy to revel in all the money being made available at the time’. You sick bastards. How dare you respond as events unfold. How dare you have a dig at our absentee landlord as bankruptcy and relegation loomed.

‘I remember those posters well’ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Andy Duff
17 Posted 13/05/2025 at 07:58:33
His biggest mistake was letting Kenwright and his cronies stay on.

If he'd have got people in to run the club we'd have not been in the mess we were

Christine Foster
18 Posted 13/05/2025 at 08:02:03
He'll be remembered for three things in the year to come in this order:

1. The stadium, without him it wouldn't have happened anytime soon.

2. The financial nightmare that almost killed us due to his initial trust in Kenwright, then his own inability to appoint a functioning board.

3. His desperation to sell to anyone, 777 Partners or whoever, and his management choices that left us selling our best and suffering first ever points deductions because of his management team.

Danny O'Neill
19 Posted 13/05/2025 at 08:04:56
Christine,

As always, you capture it spot on.

A leader is only as good as those he trusts beneath him. He got that call massively wrong, but made the new stadium we have needed for 30 years a reality.

Ian Bennett
20 Posted 13/05/2025 at 08:08:27
Nearly killed the club Moshiri, but the deal he did right at the end with the Friedkins was decent on his part it would appear.

A crazy time of points deduction and turning to companies like 777 pPartners, it could have ended so badly. But thankfully it didn't.

For many they will have been oblivious to it, but there was a period I thought we would either lose the club or the new stadium. Points deductions, best players sold, wonga style loans, it was a classic cocktail of a demise of a football institution.

A lunatic chairman watched on by a flacid board that just took the cash and said nothing.

Tony Abrahams
21 Posted 13/05/2025 at 08:10:39
Paul @16, I think the appointment of Benitez was the time that all those rumours about Usmanov were confirmed to be absolutely 100% true.

Everton were already an absolute train wreck with regards the way the club was being run, but the day that the sanctions started on the Russian Oligarchs was the day things really started to spiral out of control. By the good grace of god and the willpower of our fanatical fanbase, we have somehow survived.

Whatever anyone thinks of Moshiri, do yourself a favour and drive into Kirkby and look at where Bill Kenwright was prepared to take Everton Football Club. Then turn around and drive to the stadium we are moving into this August.

Christy Ring
22 Posted 13/05/2025 at 08:25:25
Again with Paul and Danny, responsible for the fabulous new stadium and used £400m of his own money, wasn't a football man, and sadly influenced by our chairman on that matter, made massive mistakes.

But our new beginning in our new home is down to him. No other owner would give up £400M — we can't forget that, and the new owners will recoup the benefits of it, with naming rights just the start.

Ian Wilkins
23 Posted 13/05/2025 at 08:44:03
For me I see him as a well intentioned buffoon, shrouded in Russian oligarch mystique. He certainly invested heavily in the club and took a significant haircut on selling the club. You can't doubt his financial commitment.

His footballing decisions and people choices were continuously poor. He aligned himself with some absolute shisters, on and off the field. Shady loans and backers, 777 Partners et al, severely threatened the club, and we should be in no doubt took us to the brink of administration.

Similarly poor football decisions led us to PSR threatened relegation.

Legacy? Our new stadium is quite an achievement, something to make us proud. The journey alongside it has been as perilous and frightening as it gets.
The Moshiri era is certainly an eventful period in our history we will never forget.

Scott Hamilton
24 Posted 13/05/2025 at 09:03:13
The guy was Alisher Usmanov's bagman. The front for a shady character whose assets were of questionable origin and were eventually frozen.

Whether he made the decisions or they were made on behalf of Usmanov, most were brainless.

The stadium stands out as a huge nugget of gold in what was otherwise a stinking turd of an era for the club. My hunch is that, in reality, the stadium was part of a bid to raise the value of the club so that it could be sold at a huge profit. As it was/is, it ushers in a new era for the club with what appear to be respectable owners.

Good riddance to the the man. Our wonderful new stadium is not his legacy, it's a miracle that the footballing gods bestowed on Everton and its fans because we'd so valiantly endured Moshiri's reign.

Steve Brown
25 Posted 13/05/2025 at 09:08:41
Moshiri made his biggest error right at the start when he didn't replace the leadership team immediately after acquisition, especially the Chairman, and hire top executive talent.

I remember him saying when he hired Ancelotti that he had aimed to spend 10% of his time on Everton, but it took up a lot more than that. Well no shit given who you left in place to run the club.

He would argue that his strategy was destroyed by two huge macro-events - the Ukraine-Russian war and Covid. But Everton (and himself) were over-leveraged due to terrible recruitment and commitment to a stadium whose cost nearly dragged the club into bankruptcy. The club became a political, dysfunctional mess run by over-paid incompetents at all levels.

However...

1) Would we have the new stadium without his investment of £450M in shareholder loans?

2) Would we have been taken over if he had not agreed to convert the loans into equity?

The honest answer to those 2 questions is 'No'.

Danny O'Neill
26 Posted 13/05/2025 at 09:26:03
Very good assessment Steve.

His biggest failing was not showing leadership from the start and installing his own management team.

He trusted the old guard that failed us for decades. Not all of them in name, but certainly in mentality, which was beaten into a generation of supporters.

He shouldn't have got involved in transfers, which was out of his lane, but maybe that's because he realised he couldn't trust those he gave the cheques to. His claim can be that he has left a legacy that we can be grateful for and I for one, hope he is at the Everton Stadium at the Christening.

His intent was well placed. He was just out of his depth and reckless when he did get involved.

I expect the new owners to put the right leaders in place, as they seem to be doing. They will manage from a distance as they do with their other 20 companies, but they will be monitoring closely and step in if we don't live up to expectations.

Martin Berry
27 Posted 13/05/2025 at 09:34:46
Let's not forget: football club history is strewn with debate about chairs and owners who made bad decisions on and off the field. I don't condone it but every club has problems, look around now.

The end result is we are now in a brilliant place, think upwards, a new stadium, owners, manager and investment to come, the envy of so many other clubs.

All this happened because Moshiri was Everton's owner;this would not have happened without him investing and getting it right in the end.

I will tell you this: sometime in the future, we will sit in the new stadium and think of him with reverence despite his on-field mistakes.

I hope he is invited to the new stadium and the fans cheer his name. He deserves it and our gratitude; without him, no stadium — that's all you need to concern yourselves with.

Dave Abrahams
28 Posted 13/05/2025 at 09:45:47
Some good posts on here.

I hope Martin @(27) your final paragraph becomes the reality in years to come true. I'd love Moshiri to be here on Sunday and get a good welcome.

Let's be honest: Sharp was welcomed back v Ipswich, so why not the man who put the money in and lost out financially in the long run?

Martin Mason
29 Posted 13/05/2025 at 09:51:34
Moshiri was a good man and could have been a superb owner. He had one problem that meant he could do nothing but fail overall and that was Boy's Pen Bil — the fraudster.

I will always thank him for the stadium which, to be fair, is a great legacy.

Roy Johnstone
30 Posted 13/05/2025 at 09:59:29
Lots of balance on here.

I can't forget his complicity in leaving Bill to continue running the club into the ground, whilst popping up when it suited him to hire managers and find a training ground sponsor.

I also think, but don't know, that any investor knocked back by Bill would have had to deal with the stadium issue, regardless if he'd been prepared to sell and relinquish control. Fair play that he put his money up.

But I can't move past Benitez frankly for either of the clowns. If Bill had any redeeming features, he would have resigned at that point. But he didn't, did he?

Martin Mason
31 Posted 13/05/2025 at 10:12:04
Kenwright was a very smart but slimy character. Any decisions such as Benitez that had the potential to be ultra controversial with the fans he let Moshiri carry the can for.

Hope for Everton started when Kenwright left us although it took us some time to turn Bill's tanker round before it hit the rocks. It has been part of the rich tapestry that is the history of Everton and now in the past.

Keith Gleave
32 Posted 13/05/2025 at 10:32:30
Having read the previous responses, a level head is needed to view his history.

1- He came in at a difficult time and we did bring in players. were they good enough is another issue.

2- The Russian invasion of Ukraine immediately deprived the club of sponsorship money, which dented the finances of the club when a new stadium was agreed.

3- There didn't appear to be any other investors when he took over and therefore we would not have had a new stadium.

So, credit or not. To my mind yes, though his over seeing management was poor.

Brian Harrison
33 Posted 13/05/2025 at 10:36:20
My view is that Moshiri was just the front man for the real owner, his boss, Usmanov.

All the managers in his reign were all interviewed by Usmanov before any deal was done. Just like at Arsenal, Usmanov's real love, where he hoped to take over from Kronke, he gifted shares to Moshiri to help challenge Kronke. But Kronke vowed he would never sell Arsenal to Usmanov even if he was the last man on earth.

Weeks after this statementm, Moshiri sold his Arsenal shares and bought Everton. Yes, we have to thank him for the stadium, but not much else. I don't think he even liked football but he did as his boss ordered and who would argue as his boss made him a billionaire.

Dennis Stevens
34 Posted 13/05/2025 at 10:49:23
Much to criticise about Moshiri's ownership, but also some praise due too.

I also dread to think where the Club would be now if Kenwright hadn't hooked the sucker he'd been hanging on for.

Dave Abrahams
35 Posted 13/05/2025 at 11:07:19
Dennis (34) Dennis I like that last line were Kenwright and hanging are in the same sentence!
Jerome Shields
36 Posted 13/05/2025 at 11:08:44
He was a figure head for Russian Monies of questionable sources, which didn't work out due sanctions, causing him to source loans from further dubious sources.

The Club was kept going by the Fans, fear of loss of wages resulting in a bit of effort at Finch Farm and the Premier League who via PSR effectively took over the running of the Club.

He also allowed Kenwright & Co to continue their gravy train of self preservation and interest to the detriment of the Club.There are questions whether £400millon.existed to be lost.

He is still trying pullover PR but this time in a suit.But you can image him wearing a pullover as he talks.

Ernie Baywood
37 Posted 13/05/2025 at 11:16:31
There seems to be an odd bit of revisionism here.

That is that Moshiri gave up 400M of his own money. Like it was some sort of gift or sacrifice for the club.

He didn't give up anything. He invested money. He also messed up and lost his money. It's a completely different thing.

Ian Wilkins
38 Posted 13/05/2025 at 11:18:41
I like that Jerome, ‘ can imagine him in a pullover as he talks’, sort of sums things up.

An amicable guy, wanting the best, but completely out of his depth, surrounded by idiots and charlatans, compounded by significant world events adversely taking their toll.

I can also hear him muttering under his breath’ I’m not a real accountant you know, I only past my part 1’s..’.

Steve Brown
39 Posted 13/05/2025 at 11:38:08
Ernie, Moshiri did not give the club £450 million of his own money.

He lent the money in interest-free shareholder loans. Therefore, he was entitled to repayment of the loans.

His investment was the purchase of the club. Two separate things.

Dale Self
40 Posted 13/05/2025 at 12:20:07
I respect the thoughtful takes above, they are what make TW a fine football community. However, I am going full ugly American on this:

You couldn't be bothered to communicate to us in the time of our greatest anxiety. Why the fuck are you bothering now? Get off, not even at the next stop, off now. Click.

Raymond Fox
41 Posted 13/05/2025 at 12:46:32
Is there anyone on here that never made a mistake.

His biggest ones were employing 'experts' who failed miserably to fulfill their remit, there's a long list of them.
Players bought were not good enough that was the problem, I think it was as simple as that.

I have no animosity towards him, his intensions were good.

Ernie Baywood
42 Posted 13/05/2025 at 12:54:41
Like I said, Dale, in the post you referred to. He didn't give the club money.
Steve Brown
43 Posted 13/05/2025 at 13:07:01
Dale, do you think TFG are communicating in a structured manner?
Christy Ring
44 Posted 13/05/2025 at 13:32:30
We all know Moshiri’s failings, leaving the chairman there no.1, but look at the bigger picture, remember the rumours that Man City owners wanted to buy the club, and maybe there was other offers but Kenwright insisted on him staying on as part of any deal, and the only gobshite who gave in was Moshiri, that’s why his offer was accepted, and that was his failing, no.2 bringing in Koeman, chairman influence, gave him an open cheque book, disaster, bought 3 no.10’s, Schneiderlin etc, sold our only striker, Lukaku, free fall ever since, but our new stadium, we have to fondly remember him for that.
Derek Knox
45 Posted 13/05/2025 at 13:52:10
Christy @ 44, spot on there mate, a catalogue of incompetency, no sympathy or anything for Moshiri. He is not exactly skint after all this, and keeps his (Corpy) Houses in London and Monaco ! :-)
Paul Hewitt
46 Posted 13/05/2025 at 14:18:51
Derek if you lost a fiver you'd be angry. Nevermind 400 million.:).
Dale Self
47 Posted 13/05/2025 at 14:58:36
Agreed Ernie and Steve, he took up a financial decision and undermined it on his own.

And Steve, perhaps a fair point but two things give them a pass. TFG have yet to make a naive move that justifies suspicion; It is early and what they've done at Roma has produced a turnaround.

Ian Wilkins
48 Posted 13/05/2025 at 15:24:08
The Moshiri Era… make a great Netflix series…
Mike Gaynes
49 Posted 13/05/2025 at 15:45:41
Christine #18, yours is the perfect summary. Steve #25, Danny #26 and Martin #27 also wrap it for me.

I do believe that a decade from now, when our club is back in its proper position of prominence in the league and Europe, Moshiri's blunders will fade into the mists in comparison to this jewel of a stadium.

And I would also point out that as bad as his football hiring decisions were within the club, he made two brilliant hires in Dan Meis and Colin Chong to get the stadium built. I think he deserves full credit for that.

And Steve #43, I would expect our new CEO to establish a new line of communications from the owners to the fans. Kinnear provided regular interviews and updates at Leeds, and he's a talker.

As I've said before, based on his longtime pattern I expect to hear virtually nothing from Dan Friedkin. As best I can determine he has given exactly one public interview in the last ten years, to the Roma website when he first took over there.

Brendan McLaughlin
50 Posted 13/05/2025 at 16:51:31
The thing with Moshiri is that, without the Premier Leagues "fit and proper persons" rules, he would have sold us to any of the sharks that were circling.

So in terms of being able to look forward with at least some degree of optimism... we owe more to the pernicious Premier League rather than our benevolent ex-owner.

How perverse is that?

Paul Ferry
51 Posted 13/05/2025 at 19:40:39
But remember, Ian (20), that Moshiri would have sold it all to 777 Partners in a heartbeat and that I suspect would have killed the club.

The Friedkin Group played him like a cat and mouse and were able to do so precisely because Moshiri was an incompetent owner with a lot less business savvy than he is sometimes given.

He was absolutely desperate to wipe his hands of us, the monkey on his back. An absentee landlord of the worst sort.

Made no attempts of any significance to cultivate the fans. Plazzy smile. Possibly bailed out of his mistakes by names we do not know or suspect.

And, so, although I do feel a tad ungrateful – not sure why – I agree with Scott (24) and I also think that ‘reverence' is a little OTT Martin (27). My hunch is that Moshiri will be an afterthought in a few years times not a figure of ‘reverence'.

Yep we all make many mistakes, Raymond (41), but we were not running a massive football club.

Dave Abrahams
52 Posted 13/05/2025 at 19:53:46
I doubt if 777 Partners were ever in the running to buy any club once people responsible for okaying the deal gave them a good coat of looking over.

Talking about getting hoodwinked, how did Kenwright manage to think Phillip Green was a financial genius and was a godsend to Everton while screwing us right left and centre? Levi did the same to him with some transfer deals with the top one being the Dele Alli deal.

Most of these deals were with Moshiri's money – never his own – he always took great care of that.

Paul Ferry
53 Posted 13/05/2025 at 20:26:12
I think that first paragraph is more or less right, Dave, but the point is that Moshiri placed his trust and faith in them before all went pear-shaped mate.
Jerome Shields
54 Posted 13/05/2025 at 22:08:26
Ernie#42

That £450 million as Steve said was loans. These were loans from a separate Company than Blue Sky Ltd that had a unknown shareholder, that had a similar shareholdings to Moshiri.So he is bullshiting that it was all his money. It was the same with the Liver building where he tried to bullshit he was majority shareholding in the owning company. He had a 30% shareholding. 70% was owned by a Liechtenstein Company of foreign shareholders.

Even with that it is doubtful any of it was his money since since he showed no material loss in his wealth during the same period.

Anyway if he lost £450 million he has no look of it.Actually it depends were this money was got from.If is of dubious means, being able to put it into Everton gave it value.If it was valueless before this there was in fact no loss to those that imputed it into Everton.

Did Everton gain. No not really because of the loans that were taken out against the Club at punitive interest rates.

TFG bought Everton's Debt and paid it off with the approval of the Premier League.Thankful Moshiri &,Co had ran out of road and Everton managed to survive.

I would not be surprised if they managed somehow indirectly to get money out of their Everton debacle.

Jerome Shields
55 Posted 14/05/2025 at 10:03:57
Moshiri brought in Benitez to get back control of Everton from Kenwright & Co. He was brought in to rattle the existing culture. The whole Benitez saga was a feud between Kenwright & Co and Moshiri & Co.

Kenwright pawns such as Barrett-Baxendale introduced him to Finch Farm. First step was an introduction to Ferguson and Unsworth, togged out in Everton track suits. He was given no money to buy anything and had to bring in friends free.

When he sacked the Head of Medical Services after the October International break, Finch Farm downed tools on him. The January Transfer Window was ignored and Kenwright & Co, via the back door media, whipped up as much resentment as they could against him. Benitez did not stand a chance.

Brian Harrison
56 Posted 14/05/2025 at 10:28:22
I do wonder what the attraction is for mainly American billionaires to buy Premier League clubs. Last year, only 4 clubs made a profit, so it can't be for the financial gain, and seeing most owners are lambasted by the fans at some point, I struggle to see the upside.

Moshiri a prime example who, along with his boss, pumped millions into our club and walked away allegedly £400M worse off. Maybe buying a Premier lLeague club is a pyramid selling scam for billionaires.

Dave Abrahams
57 Posted 14/05/2025 at 10:51:34
Jerome (55),

That's the story as I saw it, the players turned against him, never more obvious in that hammering at home in the 2-5 defeat to Watford(?) and in Benitez's' last game in charge v Norwich away a 2-1 defeat with two terrible mistakes by Keane started the rot that day. I'd heard plans to get rid of him were in place during the week when we played Norwich.

If you've got the board, players and crowd against you there wasn't much chance of anyone providing a winning team.

Danny O'Neill
58 Posted 14/05/2025 at 11:23:37
Dave @57. Benitez was always going to cause controversy. An appointment we should never have considered, let alone made.

I remember there being a poll in the summer before his appointment when the rumours started and gained momentum. There were 4 categories if I recall.

I was in the 3rd one; disappointed. I didn't want it but, when it happened, I thought give it a go. Much like the re-appointment of Moyes.

It started okay, but as soon as it didn't, it was always going to go toxic early. And it did.

I was at both the Brentford and Norwich away matches. The reaction from our supporters always speaks volumes and not just about the results.

At Brentford, the crowd turned at the end. Benitez wouldn't come near us. The players were cautious in how far they came over as we told them to go away (the polite version of the language used). I distinctly remember Anthony Gordon looking at us, visibly shell-shocked by the reaction of the supporters.

And then Carrow Road. A ground where I've witnessed Everton win the league. Talk about highs and lows. That was as low as it gets and there have been some low points in my time following the club I adore. That was the nail in the coffin. There was no going back. The supporters had spoken.

Karl Masters
59 Posted 14/05/2025 at 20:19:48
Tony Abrahams……

“Whatever anyone thinks of Moshiri, do yourself a favour and drive into Kirkby and look at where Bill Kenwright was prepared to take Everton Football Club. Then turn around and drive to the stadium we are moving into this August.”

Naill on head.

Yes, his ownership turned out to be not what we hoped for back in 2016, but his legacy is that magnificent stadium in a great location. It cost him £400M… we should never forget that.

Rob Hooton
60 Posted 15/05/2025 at 09:07:11
Moshiri meant well but was very naive, he was desperate to make Everton successful but it all went horribly wrong and he lost a fortune.

I think he deserves a warm reception at the new stadium, which is a real masterpiece, and different to many of the modern identikit stadiums you see these days.

He was a frontman for Usmanov, which was looking okay (in a very dodgy way) until Russia invaded Ukraine.


Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


How to get rid of these ads and support TW

© ToffeeWeb