18/12/2025 46comments  |  Jump to last

Jack Grealish has hyped up teammate Iliman Ndiaye, calling him “the most skillful player in the Premier League.”

Speaking on a Stan Sport podcast, Grealish argued that while Bukayo Saka and Jeremy Doku might be two of the most effective wingers in the world, in terms of pure skill, Ndiaye beats them.

"Ndiaye is the most skilful player in the Premier League. In terms of pure skill, yeah,” said Grealish.

"I'm not sitting here saying, oh yeah, he could be the best, but skilful. Saka, for example, is so good, one of the best wingers in the world. But he's not skilful."

Comparing Ndiaye with his former Manchester City teammate Jeremy Doku, Grealish elaborated, "Like, Doku, for example, you wouldn't put him in, like, I don't know, a small five-a-side pitch. But Ndiaye wouldn't even need that space at all. Yeah, yeah, yeah. No matter where he is. He's just in and out, whereas Doku, like, you know, might need a bit of space for his, like, pace and stuff. Saka as well."

Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall, signed from Chelsea this summer, also agreed with Grealish’s assessment. Drawing comparisons with Cole Palmer, the Everton midfielder said, "Yeah, but see, Cole... Cole's like... In terms of pure skill, like, you ain't gonna see Cole doing skills like anywhere, so I'm feeling that. Cole's just more silky and moving his body."

Ndiaye, who arrived from Marseille in 2024, has been a revelation for the Toffees. He finished as the top scorer last season and so far this season, he has contributed four goals and two assists across 16 Premier League appearances despite being played out of position.

Everton will miss Ndiaye sorely in the upcoming games, with the Senegalese having left to join his national team ahead of the Africa Cup of Nations in Morocco.

 

Reader Comments (46)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()


Dave Abrahams
1 Posted 18/12/2025 at 14:06:56
Well if Ndaiye and Everton start playing in a five a side league we are well in — Thanks Jack that’s absolutely brilliant thinking! KDH’s sentence is equally brilliant—- we’ve got the brains of Britain playing for us— ffs give it a rest.
Raymond Fox
2 Posted 18/12/2025 at 14:29:40
Jack wants to pipe down, athough the other clubs will be well aware by now that Ndaiye is a talent.
Dave Abrahams
3 Posted 18/12/2025 at 15:53:21
Raymond (2),

Definitely about Ndiaye -- plenty of clubs are looking at him now and I've repeatedly said we should be offering him a new contract.

He's playing for peanuts compared to a lot of players in our squad and for me he's the standout player this season.

Raymond Fox
4 Posted 18/12/2025 at 16:37:07
You're correct, Dave, one of the usual Top 6-8 finish clubs will try to turn his head. The least we can do is offer him an attractive contract which puts him up there with our best-paid players.

He is a standout class player and will be for many years to come. If we want to be up there challenging, we must keep the likes of Ndiaye along with our other top players, there is no other way.

Kieran Kinsella
5 Posted 18/12/2025 at 17:10:09
Dave,

I'm not even sure exactly what Dewsbury-Hall was attempting to say.

Ajay Gopal
6 Posted 18/12/2025 at 18:04:04
Our next big sale I think.

Will he beat the Lukaku fee? Maybe…

Ian Bennett
7 Posted 18/12/2025 at 18:25:37
Brennan Johnson is up for sale at Spurs apparently.

Pacey and versatile forward, I'd be interested in him at the right price.

Paul Griffiths
8 Posted 18/12/2025 at 19:36:43
This is shite right? Someone has made this up.

'Yeah, yeah, yeah. No matter where he is. He's just in and out, whereas Doku, like, you know, might need a bit of space for his, like, pace and stuff.

[Erm, 'assessment' Anjishnu].

Yeah, but see, Cole... Cole's like... In terms of pure skill, like, you ain't gonna see Cole doing skills like anywhere, so I'm feeling that.

Looks like JG and KDH have become honourary scousers, 'like'.

Kieran Kinsella
9 Posted 18/12/2025 at 20:37:19
Talking of five-a-side, does anyone remember that five- or six-a-side tournament we were in during the late 80s or early 90s? I can't remember the purpose of it but it was on TV.

Other teams put out nimble Ndiaye type players but we went with Southall and Sharp who weren't exactly built for small indoor football and I remember we did quite poorly.

Paul Griffiths
10 Posted 18/12/2025 at 20:52:55
That was the Daily Express five-a-sides thing Kieran, that started in the late-60s, I think. It ended in the mid-80s.

I don't think that we ever won it and might not even have made it to a final.

Ian Bennett
11 Posted 18/12/2025 at 20:56:00
We've been playing 5-a-side all season...
Chris Spragg
12 Posted 18/12/2025 at 21:56:45
We have a decent squad size for a 5-a-side comp!
Paul Hewitt
13 Posted 18/12/2025 at 22:19:58
Ian @7.

Looks like Crystal Palace is his likely destination.

Michael Kenrick
14 Posted 18/12/2025 at 22:29:58
Hardly earth-shattering gems of wisdom from our star players. Although Gooners may be a little taken aback at the revelation that Saka is not skilful.

But no further elaboration provided. Instead, Dewsbury-Hall chimes in... but Kieran, I agree, what was he trying to say?

I suppose I could listen to the podcast... or just sit here and stick pins in my eyes.

No wonder so few footballers become decent pundits.

Paul Griffiths
15 Posted 19/12/2025 at 01:07:53
So many threads these days, sometimes three or four in one day, and the number of these that would have made it onto the much missed MK/LL ToffeeWeb would be small.

So many threads with a number of responses you could count on the fingers of one hand, or, if lucky, the fingers on Sean Kearns's three hands. And so much repetition. Three recent threads on player X, another three more player Y, and one more on topic Z.

Tony Abrahams
16 Posted 19/12/2025 at 06:58:23
Quantity over quality, Paul, exactly the type of thing that has made a lot of bookmakers very rich over the years.

That was a little bit snide because, if I'm being honest, I don't even notice the gambling advertisements, but it's sad to see what ToffeeWeb has become.

It's become rare to witness a sensible debate anymore, whereas repetitive, and pointless (unless it's just about being argumentative and trying to score points) threads, have become ten a penny.

It's sad, I could see the way it was going the other day, on the thread where Connor has decided to throw his hand in, but looking at things objectively, I suppose it's just a sign of the times.

Paul Griffiths
17 Posted 19/12/2025 at 07:04:32
Tony, mate, imagine this version of ToffeeWeb winning best fans site of the year like we did before.
Tony Abrahams
18 Posted 19/12/2025 at 07:49:44
It's the same everywhere, Paul. I watch GB News and, although I agree with quite a bit of it, I also have the wisdom to see that the reporting does at times become very one-sided.

I used to read The Guardian, something you have said you do yourself, but I've come to the conclusion that it is often reporting on personal agendas rather than the truth.

“Life has become more about being right, and less about having an open mind and trying to learn from other people with a different perspective -- IMO”

Being a parent, the biggest thing I wish for my children is happiness, but not far behind is hoping that they have an open mind. This actually isn't easy nowadays because having certain views can actually make you come across as being racist, just like having certain views about our manager automatically makes you a hater in the eyes of some people.

Maybe it's just me but there really doesn't seem to be much middle ground around at the minute.

John Williams
19 Posted 19/12/2025 at 08:50:29
GB News is certainly not a news channel, it's use is to promote extreme right-wing views.

Most on that channel would struggle to find a job in other media outlets.

Tony Abrahams
20 Posted 19/12/2025 at 09:08:07
That's a very valid point, John, but it also shows footage that the mainstream media brush right under the carpet.

"Let's pretend it isn't happening or it's not real" doesn't wash with everyone though.

Seriously, I knew Trump had won the American election after reading certain news outlets, especially The Guardian and watching ITV News.

I didn't know for certain he had won but I did go to bed thinking "It looks like Trump is gonna be back in the White House when I wake up tomorrow". I had that feeling because I felt that the only balanced reporting I witnessed was by the BBC who seemed to be the only ones reporting on facts rather than a personal agenda.

Jeff Spiers
21 Posted 19/12/2025 at 12:12:48
John @19,

We need a good old Marxist channel.

Martin Berry
22 Posted 19/12/2025 at 13:37:44
The vultures will be circling, but Everton know his worth and hopefully we will get him tied down with a lucrative contract long term.
Dale Self
23 Posted 19/12/2025 at 13:48:27
The threads thing... I am fairly sure the number of threads is a heavily weighted factor in google rankings, more so than individual posts on threads. So it will look odd while the site tries to compensate for the loss of older contributors.

Try to find some rewarding interactions, even if from the snarky side, and keep showing up. It could make a turnaround and regenerate some decent action.

I will refrain from the news thing. That has polarized to the point of polemics posing as information.

Paul Griffiths
25 Posted 19/12/2025 at 17:44:28
Great post Tony (18). At least we don't go to Tik-Tok or Instagram for our news like your dad does.

I try to stick to my tried and trusted Guardian and NY Times with all their foibles. I don't have a conspiracy theory about the BBC. Not much choice over here: NPR, CNN, and a nutty right wing shock-jock can be diverting.

Dave Abrahams
26 Posted 19/12/2025 at 20:48:36
Paul (25)

Stop trying to wind me up. I wouldn't know Tic bleedin Toc or Instagram from the old stop press in the Echo but I know a bullshitter and a phoney just by watching them speak on TV.

For instance. I truly wouldn't vote for Farage if I was offered £10,000 or more, yet speaking to people, they would — they think he is bleedin wonderful.

And that orange-haired xxxxTrump — there are saner people in lunatic asylums than him but millions love him in that lunatic asylum called America where you live.

Come home, lad, Crosby isn't Paradise but it's safer!

Paul Griffiths
27 Posted 20/12/2025 at 05:46:30
Sorry Dave, need to stop, but your responses always make it seem worthwhile!

Farage is dangerous and lacks judgment. He understands fuck all about immigration which he thinks he understands. Nor can I stand that twat who sits next to him in the House of Commons on his left who looks like a John Collier's window dummy.

Watch this space, mate, I think that things are starting to turn over here. There are some optimistic signs. Ah, after 25 years, I miss Crosby and me mate more and more. We'll give it perhaps four or five years and pack things up. Most of all, I want my season ticket back.

At least we're putting up a decent scrap in the cricket, 153-3. Great to watch this time of night with good wine.

Derek Thomas
29 Posted 20/12/2025 at 07:13:41
Jeff @ 21; what's up with the BBC mate, not Marxist enough for you?
Mark Murphy
30 Posted 20/12/2025 at 08:22:21
Dave,

“For instance. I truly wouldn't vote for Farage if I was offered £10,000 or more.”

I'm very relieved to hear that. I sincerely hope the rest of the populace take a look over the pond and see what populist shite looks like and results in.

Mark Murphy
31 Posted 20/12/2025 at 08:29:06
“£37 billion lost in trade. £100 billion in lost output. 14% of UK exporters gone. Britain's economy is collapsing — and Brexit is at the centre”

Meanwhile… Hey! Look over there - a boat full of immigrants coming to steal our jobs!

Ged Simpson
32 Posted 20/12/2025 at 08:42:37
Mark 31: been on it early?

Should be a 12.00 rule on our new site for twaddle.

Jeff Spiers
33 Posted 20/12/2025 at 09:03:51
Derek, forgot about the BBC. I rest my case
Steve Brown
34 Posted 20/12/2025 at 09:37:34
I understood why people voted for Brexit, as we entered a trading federation and ended up with a European parliament. But I didn't think making the country poorer for a generation was not a good idea, so I voted Remain.

Now a study published last month in the US says: “By 2025, the Brexit process had reduced UK GDP by 6% to 8%, investment by 12% to 18%, employment by 3% to 4%, and productivity by 3% to 4%.”

What benefits has Brexit given us that offset that huge economic cost? Certainly not control of our own borders as net migration spiked to record levels in the period 2015 to 2025.

Anyway, back to the football. 1-0 to Everton.

Martin Farrington
35 Posted 20/12/2025 at 10:48:56
Politics!!!

The EU is an unelected governance that siezed power and made up its own rules. Forced a so-called parliament on the people without any say nor putting it to a vote.

It makes laws that come from itself and cannot be challanged. A president you cannot elect! A mass of international political parties none of whom appear on your ballot paper. A corrupt regime that has never balanced the books.

Billions of taxpayers' money missing without recourse. A court system so diversified that there is no common ground except for their own laws. Laws which de nationalise countries' identities and over-power entire legal systems.

No border control. No right to keep out criminals nor unwanted EU migrants. No sanctions against countries allowing non-EU citizens to cross their lands to gain access to other countries' lax benefit systems and weak deportation enforcement.

An ECHR hell bent on protecting the individual of illegal status no matter what. Criminal offences soaring in nations unable to protect their borders, especially murder, rape, trafficking, fraud and other serious offences.

Having to divert billions a year to keep those illegal migrants in accomodation and 'basic' status, health and education etc. Money taken from areas of society where it is most needed. Oh, there is so much more.

The original sell was a common market for trading without bureaucracy. Europe outside of trade has nothing in common.

Business has suffered to a degree, true. But not so significantly it justifies a political grab, that is not a democracy and has no name to cover actually what it is.

I live in Spain. I have come here legally. I went through the financial and regulatory process to become a permenant resident, meeting minimum income demands and property ownership. I worked hard to get to that status. I contribute financially. I pay into their Social Security (€300 a month.) I pay tax etc.

I am not rich. I voted for Brexit. I won't ever agree to a state which has never been requested then elected by its populous. If the EU had been put to every country and it received an overall majority vote, with pre announced legislative rules, laws and terms of governance, then I would have no objection even if I had voted against it.

Nuff said. No more politics

Jeff Spiers
36 Posted 20/12/2025 at 11:25:19
Martin @35,

Your post is so accurate.

Frightening times ahead.

Kevin Molloy
38 Posted 20/12/2025 at 12:06:03
There's no question Brexit has been a crock. But it was always intended to be.

The whole things was a psy op. We were all at each others throats for 5 years solid. Divide and rule. If we had honest politicians it might have led to good things but it was drowned at birth.

It ended on one day, and the next the Covid psy op began. Covid ended 3 years later, and the next day, Ukraine began, flags aready. It's been non stop now for ten years.

Having said that, staying in the cartel, why would you do that? This week, the unelected Ursula elected to pass €90B of European taxpayers' money to Ukraine. That money will disappear, and nobody will know where, like all the rest.

Now Jean Claude in Paris might not be best pleased about that, but he has no say. It's not about democracy, it's about the coming totalitarianism. It's so big, it's unchallengeable.

Jeff Spiers
39 Posted 20/12/2025 at 13:22:53
Kevin.

Humans have been at each others throats for millenia. That's the way the evil bastards like it. Divide and conquer. Keep the peasants down. Have them fighting amongst themselves. Still working. The history books will tell you this. The banks rule everything.

Any how. A merry Xmas and a safe New Year to you all. Stay safe.

Mark Murphy
40 Posted 20/12/2025 at 13:51:34
Yeah, sorry Ged - I broke my own rule. Please ignore my little episodes in future.

Not on it yet but will be soon! Up the fucking Toffees!

Dale Self
41 Posted 20/12/2025 at 15:13:32
Remember, Cameron only put Brexit up for a vote because he thought it would shut up types like Bojo and Farage.

That was a Right fuckup there.

Raymond Fox
42 Posted 20/12/2025 at 15:46:12
We don't want the EU back, we have bugger all democracy as it is.

Our democracy is highly flawed but it's the best of a bad job.
Big business is getting bigger and bigger and that can only be bad for so-called civilisation. Too much power in too few hands is bad news.

Most of our immigration has come from the Commonwealth countries, I think I'm right in saying, not the EU.

John Williams
43 Posted 20/12/2025 at 16:13:02
Martin 35,

It says a lot about a person who votes for their country to leave the EU. Then pisses off to live in another EU country.

Best keep your own thoughts to yourself.

Brent Stephens
44 Posted 20/12/2025 at 17:17:39
Britain has one representative on the European Council, which determines the direction of the EU. Only one vote when all other countries get one vote each! Bloody democracy. Shocking. It's so unfair.

Britain has, I think, 2 European Commissioners on the European Commission, the same as other EU countries. Again, where's the bloody democracy in all this?

Britain sends MEPs to the European Parliament to vote on issues, the number of MEPs based on our population size, like other countries. Bloody democracy. It's all so unfair.

I think I read that Britain voted for 90% of the EU directives when we were in the EU, and Britain actually drafted many of those directives. Why didn't we get more of a say?

Dale Self
45 Posted 20/12/2025 at 17:46:55
Outrageous Brent!
Martin Farrington
46 Posted 20/12/2025 at 17:54:35
John you entirely missed the point.
Michael Kenrick
47 Posted 20/12/2025 at 17:55:28
Sp Brexit never happened, Brent?

And we remain full members of the EU?

Darren Hind
48 Posted 20/12/2025 at 18:31:22
The BBC. Brexit. Unemployment, Investment, Trump. Covid... Farage

I'm off for a walk down Boundary. We're playing the title favourites so Hopefully somebody will mention Everton

Brent Stephens
49 Posted 21/12/2025 at 00:20:04
Had not has, Michael! Clearly.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


How to get rid of these ads and support TW

© ToffeeWeb