As usual, the might of the G14 laughed away suggestions that winners of domestic leagues in smaller countries should be given automatic inclusion. Even going as far as to suggest the competition might be devalued by having actual ?Champions? in the League that bears the name.
Similarly, the most powerful football clubs in Europe threw out the suggestion that cup winners be allowed entry. Heaven forbid next years European Champions might have won something the previous year...
Everton?s flirtation with Villarreal aside, the Premier League, like all of Europe?s major leagues, is a farce, pandering to a rich elite. The gulf in wealth between the clubs who have manipulated themselves into the qualifying positions and the also-rans making up the rest of the league grows by the season.
Everton?s mantle, in some sections of the press as ?the best team outside the top four? only flatters to deceive. In all the major bookmakers, bets are being taken on who will finish highest up the league ? top four aside ? before a ball has even been kicked. Can this be good for the game?
Any move by football?s governing body to break this autonomy can only be a good thing and should be welcomed with open arms by the rest of the Premier League ? Everton included. Any thoughts of devaluing the competition by allowing a lesser team to represent their country is laughable. By making such a statement, as Wenger and Ferguson already have, they not only debase football, they are devaluing the FA cup! A competition they have equally claimed to be the best domestic cup competition in the world.
It?s time we call their bluff. We should no longer be held to ransom by these footballing mercenaries. As usual there reaction was to suggest a breakaway league if they don?t get their way, so let them do it. See how popular a league would be void of derbies. Void of reachable away games and where the same teams trawl out their bloated superstars time after time in front of a disinterested, disillusioned public.
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
1 Posted 13/11/2007 at 05:01:16
When we were in the big five we had no complaints, when we broke transfer records and wage records we had no complaints now we are a mid table club (and that is where we are today despite a wonderful four weeks) we complain about the old boys club.
Chelsea are not part of the G14 but have bought their way into the EPL elite, we as Evertonians hope that we will get there by clever buying and good management, however so do the supporters of Newcastle, Aston Villa, Man City and Spurs
If we do break into the elite of English football I am sure we wont be shedding a tear for the club we knock out of that group or for the other four pretenders to that club
2 Posted 13/11/2007 at 09:58:41
3 Posted 13/11/2007 at 09:59:25
4 Posted 13/11/2007 at 11:57:18
How many more are like me?
5 Posted 13/11/2007 at 12:04:52
YES it?s a shame the "top four" and the G14 have such control.
However I have NO idea what good it would do to help smaller nations champions into the competition. So 4th place in the Prem doesn?t get CL -- how does that help us (or any other team trying to break their hold)? The proposal made no sense -- it would just make it easier for Man U and Chelsea (as it?s no doubt easier to face a champion from some minor country rather than, say, an Arsenal or the Serie A/Liga equivalent).
Platini?s plan made no sense at all and in the end he caved on the part which could have helped a little (the FA Cup winner) and changed the part that helps none of the teams trying to break the G14 (the smaller nations champions part).
Complete waste of time.
6 Posted 13/11/2007 at 11:58:11
7 Posted 13/11/2007 at 12:18:25
They have absolutely no mandate from the wider football public, yet they have moulded the whole competition in their likeness to cement their power over the game.
As an Evertonian, I would never wish to be involved in such a racket.
By involving smaller nations in the tournament, nations who have earnt their place by winning their respective leagues, a marked shift is made towards the old style of European competition.
That is why it is the same debate. Anything that dissolves the power of this rich elite is good for football.
8 Posted 13/11/2007 at 15:48:15
9 Posted 13/11/2007 at 15:48:17
The fact is football today isn?t yet a monopoly, but it is an oligopoly in almost every European nation. England has its Top Four (which by the way have won every FA Cup since our last in 1995); Scotland the Auld Firm; Italy the Big Three (Juve, AC and Inter); Spain has Real, Barca and maybe Valencia; Portugal has Porto, Benfica and maybe Sporting; Holland has Ajax, Feyenoord and PSV. There?s very little chance for the so-called lesser clubs in the bigger leagues to get more than the one-off whiff of the Champions League.
Anything to dilute this concentration of power in football should be welcomed with open arms.
10 Posted 13/11/2007 at 15:57:21
Say Millwall ? the runners up to Man U a few years back ?
This doesnt make any sense to me at all.. It was hard getting into the top 4 a few years back, but I would say almost impossible to break the Top 3, we cant compete with Man U, Chelsea and Arsenal over a season.
I?m glad its staying like it is..
11 Posted 13/11/2007 at 18:17:11
12 Posted 14/11/2007 at 10:45:13
The superbowl is won by a different team virtually every year..wereas in soccer everything is won by the richest..who then get richer..and so on....performance rated wages would also ensure no more sulking prima donnas....but for this to happen the richest clubs would actulally have to want a competative league...unfortunately ..they dont
13 Posted 14/11/2007 at 11:35:55
I didn?t say we should break into the G14 I said "break their hold" ... as in dissolve their power.
[[ By involving smaller nations in the tournament, nations who have earnt their place by winning their respective leagues, a marked shift is made towards the old style of European competition. ]]
I?m sorry but that simply makes no sense whatsoever. The "top four" are still getting into the competition. It?s now easier for third; slightly more difficult for fourth. Overall that?s about even. As for these "champions" of smaller nations, while some people enjoy that the semantic issue is slightly less cloudy, in reality they provide less competition for the G14 teams. We?ve had some 7-0 and 8-0 results in the CL lately -- get ready for some 10-0 and 13-0 because these teams are going to get destroyed. Watching lesser nation champions getting destroyed isn?t my idea of dissolving the G14.
14 Posted 14/11/2007 at 22:31:33
It was under duress from the G14 that Platini altered his plans for the ’smaller’ nations. He originally wanted them to gain automatic qualification therefore meaning less places for the ’big four.’
It was because of the usual ’breakaway league’ pressure that his cohorts backed down and the new compromise I agree is no good for anyone.
Your argument abount 7-0 drubbings is extremely patronising to these clubs. If you were to apply the same logic to domestic competitions it would seem pointless to allow non league clubs into the FA cup. The fact is, these teams don’t enter the competition assuming they will win it, sometimes they even get tanked, but sometimes they win and the competition is all the better for it. Who didn’t enjoy watching FC Copenhagen taking points of Man Utd for example?
Every time UEFA balk at the behest of the G14 the rich elite get stronger. By refusing to compromise, on any issue, their bargaining strength is dissolved, semantics or not.
On a personal note, I would happily sit and watch thirteen - nils for a few seasons because I know every time these clubs come back their coffers will be swelled and they’ll be a little bit stronger. Occassionaly, although Ferguson et al would like to disagree, football springs a few suprises. Where’s your romance man?
15 Posted 15/11/2007 at 11:12:38
True though. Fact of the matter is that this makes things easier for the G14 -- which is exactly the opposite of my idea of "romance" when it comes to football.
The odd upset here and there does nothing for me. First off they?re most likely to occur in the group stages (as most of the smaller teams will be eliminated after that stage) which means the big team will have ample time to recover and still qualify. So ultimately what?s the use? At least in the FA Cup an upset means elimination -- with group stages and two legs the chances for actual upset eliminations in the CL are reduced.
As for the champions of Latvia (or wherever) getting CL money -- it?s nowhere near enough to bother the G14 ... might be enough to strengthen their squads to the point they could knock us out of the UEFA Cuo though.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment to Column articles, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.