COLUMNIST PAUL TRAILL

Match Report - It's the winning that's important now

By Paul Traill :  15/03/2009 :  Comments (12) :
Back in the day, Ste and I used to meet at Hamilton Square to get the train to the game... so it was a nice little trip down memory lane as we did the same for yesterday?s victory over Stoke City.

The plan was to get to the pub to watch Manchester United play Liverpool. Astonishingly the kopites spanked the champs 4-1. Terrific! That?ll make them angry in time for our precious semi-final in five weeks time. Gary arrived and, with the team news relatively obvious, most of the pre-match chatter regarded travel arrangements to Wembley and acquisition of season tickets next week.

We arrived at the ground nicely in time and, as is the norm now, the teams switched ends before kick off. Jo led the line up front with Cahill in support. Fellaini, sporting braids, was tasked with playing the creative role in midfield with Osman and Pienaar on the flanks. Neville held. Yobo maintained his place at the back which?ll give Moyes a selection headache once Hibbert returns. As for Stoke, James Beattie returned to a good reception from our support with the rest of the team made up of Premier League has-beens such as Rory Delap and Liam Lawrence and thuggish looking Championship players like Ryan Shawcross.

The Stoke fans got up Gary?s nose with their persistent vociferous support, with Gary labelling them a smaller version of Newcastle United. He had a point. A look at their honours list showed they haven?t really won much, with their League Cup victory over Chelsea in 1972-73 the one thing that stands out. Regardless it contributed towards a good positive start by Stoke and it took Everton a while to get going in this game.

The first goal came just as the Stoke fans were in full swing of belting out ?Your support is fuckin? shit?. Jo wriggled free into the box after a neat ball from Fellaini and hit a fierce low shot which seemed to catch Thomas Sorensen by surprise and went in past the Dane?s outstretched arm.

Slightly against the run of play, we had the lead. This got our support going a bit and Everton, led by Fellaini more so than anyone else, got into their rhythm, doubling their money when Joleon Lescott pounced on a rebound when Sorensen pushed out a headed effort by Cahill. Lescott looked to me like he may have been offside but nevertheless the goal stood.

I felt that, had we scored a third goal before half-time, the floodgates may have opened and we?d have gone on to a rout. That third goal didn?t come before the interval though Osman probably came the closest after fantastic feet in the box produced an opportunity which he curled narrowly wide. We had a beer downstairs at half-time and had a quick scan at the other half-time scores in what was a lively day for goals in the Premier League.

Failure to seal the game with the killer third goal before the break almost came back to haunt us in the second period as Stoke battled their way back into the game. Early in the second half, a stunner of a header by Ryan Shawcross from a Liam Lawrence corner gave Stoke a platform to get something out if this one. This set the tone for the second half and Stoke will feel aggrieved not to have gotten something from this game having pressed throughout, though will look back to rue their timid first-half performance.

Whilst they were in and around our box quite a lot, they just didn?t test Tim Howard anywhere near enough though; this was enforced by some pretty rock-solid defending by the boys in blue. The Blues eventually wrapped the game up in stoppage time when Fellaini, who was woeful in the second half after a strong first period, beautifully controlled the ball following a punt upfield by Baines before smashing it past Thomas Sorensen via a deflection off a Stoke City defender. Game over.

We nipped for a quick pint after the game to let the traffic pass on, before getting the train back. On the whole, not a convincing performance by Everton but, with the injuries we?ve got and the position we?re in at the moment, it?s all about results at this stage of the season.

Player Ratings:

Howard: I don?t think he could do much with Stoke?s goal and despite a lot of pressure from Stoke was generally untested throughout. 6

Baines: Did OK. 6

Lescott: Good game. Got on the scoresheet and contributed well towards shutting Stoke out when they put us under pressure in the second half. 7

Yobo: Had a good solid game though distribution was as poor as ever. 7

Jagielka: Is doing a stable job at right back. Obviously centre-back is his best position but he?s certainly dependable in this position also. 7

Neville: Good and solid. Broke things up well. 7

Osman: Fine if not spectacular. 6

Pienaar: Fine if not spectacular. 6

Fellaini: I thought he was outstanding in the first half and really got us going, though in the second half his passing was atrocious. I felt at the time that, despite this, it was worth keeping him on as he has a good presence and is always a goal threat, and low and behold, he took his goal brilliantly at the end. 7

Cahill: had a good first half though was subbed at half-time with a calf strain. We missed him in the second period. I do hope it?s not too serious. 7

Jo: My man of the match. He put in a good shift and got on the scoresheet as well of course. 7

Subs: Saha (for Cahill): Hardly noticed he was there. 5

Rodwell (for Jo): Not on that long so difficult to judge. Got stuck in. 6

Reader Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


John Foat
1   Posted 16/03/2009 at 08:58:06

Report abuse

It seems Moyes has gone to having no defenders on the posts for corners when one on the back post would surely have prevented their goal.
Paul Gladwell
2   Posted 16/03/2009 at 09:00:06

Report abuse

Just a little bit of criticism here for Moyes: why did he not have a defender on either post during corners? It cost us a goal and very nearly a second goal. Howard Kendall swore by this rule and I am sure if you checked it out at the end of the season, a man on the post will save you at least five goals a season.

Half of Goodison gets wound up about leaving nobody up during corners and if Pienaar and Osman are not on the posts then surely you may as well leave them upfront, Boro were leaving two upfront last week meaning we were bringing three back.

Tony George
3   Posted 16/03/2009 at 09:32:53

Report abuse

This was a tactic that brought much grief early in the season. I know from his coaching course notes that Moyes is an advocate of ?being first to the ball at corners? but you can?t always expect defenders to out-jump the opposition and Fellaini didn?t even leave the ground as the ball flew over his head to be met by Shawcross who is about six inches shorter! The big fella would have been better deployed on the line but you won't convince our manager of that, I assure you!
Peter Bourke
4   Posted 16/03/2009 at 10:51:35

Report abuse

This highlights the value of Tim Cahill. I think you'll find Tiny gets to most balls when defending corners, but the major culprit was Yobo. He was a statue when the ball came in and he was next to Shawcross just as the corner was taken and just became an observer. The quicker Hibbo is back and Yobo goes back to the bench, the better.
Kevin Quinn
5   Posted 16/03/2009 at 13:57:32

Report abuse

We definitely should have a man on both posts at corners. People may argue that it leaves us light in the box to mark men but, seeing as we have 11 players in the 18-yard box when we defend corners, then we can afford to have a man on both posts.

Maybe if we counter attacking team from corner situations you could understand but seeing as our last counter attack was in 1908 there is no reason not to mark the posts. Great result anyway tough game against pompey at the weekend.

Micky Norman
6   Posted 16/03/2009 at 17:19:31

Report abuse

Kevin Quinn... 1908, love it! I think we should always leave Pienaar up front at corners and wide free kicks remembering how Kanchelskis used to be used to take the pressure off after a clearance.

Surely Moyes can see how many defenders come up and score against us. Two in two weeks and plenty before. But on Saturday Yobo went to sleep as Shawcross pulled away from him. If you defend like that it makes it very difficult however the team lines up.

Paul Daly
7   Posted 16/03/2009 at 18:26:20

Report abuse

Kevy Quinn ? that 1908 counter-attack ended in Sam Chedgzoy punting the big leather bladder into the Preston goalie?s hands only for Sandy Young to shoulder charge the ?keeper over the line right??? In the cup.... yeah I remember that, who could forget.......
Alan Kirwin
8   Posted 16/03/2009 at 21:44:26

Report abuse

Seemed to me that Howard misjudged the ball for Stoke’s goal. Also seems to me that he’s appeared a little edgier of late than we’re used to.

I just wonder if this uncertainty or chinks in armoury has anything to do with the switching of Jags to RB and return of Jobo. I rate Howard very highly and think he’s been brilliant for us. I also have massive regard for Joseph and what he’s given us from the moment he arrived.

But there’s no escaping the change, however minor, in Everton’s apparent impregnable defence. I think something’s not quite right and, worse thing is, I’m fairly certain I know what it is.

The defence is unbalanced and we look more vulnerable. Our clean sheets are drying up against poor teams. Hibbert is still 2 - 3 weeks minimum away (& won’t be immediately match fit). I will be nervous going to Villa, Chelsea and Wembley with things as they are.

My solution? simple; Jobo played RB for Nigeria several times and has the pace to make it work. Jagielka’s game is all about positioning and reading the game, to the extent that he was starting to make it look almost easy. So, 1, Jags immediately back in the centre. 2, Jacobsen to RB (as he is a RB) or, if Moyes thinks he can’t cut it, then Jobo is sacrificed to RB.

It’s just the bleedin obvious & getting by against Newcastle, Mboro & Stoke does not prove we’ll get by against Villa, Chelsea & ManU.
Anthony Dyer
9   Posted 17/03/2009 at 00:12:00

Report abuse

Alan I know exactly where you are coming from as I too favour a Lescott/Jags pairing at the back. I suspect that Jags being the newest and the quietest player has had to reluctantly accept his new role.

Yobo and Jags blamed each other for the original corner which led to Stoke?s goal. Jags blamed Yobo for not covering his back and Yobo blamed Jags for switching off.

Moyes does not have the luxury of altering his back four especially as he wants that CL spot. Jacobsen is untried in the PL and as he will probably leave in June DM will not take a punt on him. With a lack of midfielders we cannot take Neville out of the midfield so in all honesty until Hibbo returns we will see the same back four for the next few games.

As regards Howard, I can?t understand why he seems to lose concentration at this stage of the season. It is something the Manager and Coaches need to address as we don?t want his ?slips? and ?errors? costing us as we enter the most crucial part of the season.
Paul Gladwell
10   Posted 17/03/2009 at 08:58:18

Report abuse

Maybe knowing no one was covering behind him on the line had something to do with him and his decision making, I thought he was part fault too.
Mick Jones
11   Posted 17/03/2009 at 11:54:37

Report abuse

Tony George, if you watch the Stoke goal again, Yobo loses his man who then has a free header and scores ? it doesn't go over Fellaini's head.
Steve Jones
12   Posted 17/03/2009 at 12:14:17

Report abuse

Paul,

Cahill wasn?t the second striker. From the off, he was clearly playing centre-mid with Fellaini just behind Jo. Clearly Cahill still gets forward form that position but he was definitely sitting deeper.

Cahill was always looking for the ball and kept things moving. His substitution meant Felly got pushed back into centre-mid and we lost our shape. Without Arteta I think Cahill is better in the midfield than Felly.

Second half was poor and I left the ground happy with the result but worried about how we?ll fare against tougher opposition. points.

Agree with all the posters on the back four, we look disjointed. I?d be tempted to move Neville in at right back, drop Yobo and move Jags back across. Rodwell looks far more comfortable in centre-mid than Felly but we can still revert to a 5 if we?re looking overrun.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment to Column articles, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb