COLUMNIST PAUL TRAILL
Match Report - It's the winning that's important now
The plan was to get to the pub to watch Manchester United play Liverpool. Astonishingly the kopites spanked the champs 4-1. Terrific! That?ll make them angry in time for our precious semi-final in five weeks time. Gary arrived and, with the team news relatively obvious, most of the pre-match chatter regarded travel arrangements to Wembley and acquisition of season tickets next week.
We arrived at the ground nicely in time and, as is the norm now, the teams switched ends before kick off. Jo led the line up front with Cahill in support. Fellaini, sporting braids, was tasked with playing the creative role in midfield with Osman and Pienaar on the flanks. Neville held. Yobo maintained his place at the back which?ll give Moyes a selection headache once Hibbert returns. As for Stoke, James Beattie returned to a good reception from our support with the rest of the team made up of Premier League has-beens such as Rory Delap and Liam Lawrence and thuggish looking Championship players like Ryan Shawcross.
The Stoke fans got up Gary?s nose with their persistent vociferous support, with Gary labelling them a smaller version of Newcastle United. He had a point. A look at their honours list showed they haven?t really won much, with their League Cup victory over Chelsea in 1972-73 the one thing that stands out. Regardless it contributed towards a good positive start by Stoke and it took Everton a while to get going in this game.
The first goal came just as the Stoke fans were in full swing of belting out ?Your support is fuckin? shit?. Jo wriggled free into the box after a neat ball from Fellaini and hit a fierce low shot which seemed to catch Thomas Sorensen by surprise and went in past the Dane?s outstretched arm.
Slightly against the run of play, we had the lead. This got our support going a bit and Everton, led by Fellaini more so than anyone else, got into their rhythm, doubling their money when Joleon Lescott pounced on a rebound when Sorensen pushed out a headed effort by Cahill. Lescott looked to me like he may have been offside but nevertheless the goal stood.
I felt that, had we scored a third goal before half-time, the floodgates may have opened and we?d have gone on to a rout. That third goal didn?t come before the interval though Osman probably came the closest after fantastic feet in the box produced an opportunity which he curled narrowly wide. We had a beer downstairs at half-time and had a quick scan at the other half-time scores in what was a lively day for goals in the Premier League.
Failure to seal the game with the killer third goal before the break almost came back to haunt us in the second period as Stoke battled their way back into the game. Early in the second half, a stunner of a header by Ryan Shawcross from a Liam Lawrence corner gave Stoke a platform to get something out if this one. This set the tone for the second half and Stoke will feel aggrieved not to have gotten something from this game having pressed throughout, though will look back to rue their timid first-half performance.
Whilst they were in and around our box quite a lot, they just didn?t test Tim Howard anywhere near enough though; this was enforced by some pretty rock-solid defending by the boys in blue. The Blues eventually wrapped the game up in stoppage time when Fellaini, who was woeful in the second half after a strong first period, beautifully controlled the ball following a punt upfield by Baines before smashing it past Thomas Sorensen via a deflection off a Stoke City defender. Game over.
We nipped for a quick pint after the game to let the traffic pass on, before getting the train back. On the whole, not a convincing performance by Everton but, with the injuries we?ve got and the position we?re in at the moment, it?s all about results at this stage of the season.
Player Ratings:
Howard: I don?t think he could do much with Stoke?s goal and despite a lot of pressure from Stoke was generally untested throughout. 6
Baines: Did OK. 6
Lescott: Good game. Got on the scoresheet and contributed well towards shutting Stoke out when they put us under pressure in the second half. 7
Yobo: Had a good solid game though distribution was as poor as ever. 7
Jagielka: Is doing a stable job at right back. Obviously centre-back is his best position but he?s certainly dependable in this position also. 7
Neville: Good and solid. Broke things up well. 7
Osman: Fine if not spectacular. 6
Pienaar: Fine if not spectacular. 6
Fellaini: I thought he was outstanding in the first half and really got us going, though in the second half his passing was atrocious. I felt at the time that, despite this, it was worth keeping him on as he has a good presence and is always a goal threat, and low and behold, he took his goal brilliantly at the end. 7
Cahill: had a good first half though was subbed at half-time with a calf strain. We missed him in the second period. I do hope it?s not too serious. 7
Jo: My man of the match. He put in a good shift and got on the scoresheet as well of course. 7
Subs: Saha (for Cahill): Hardly noticed he was there. 5
Rodwell (for Jo): Not on that long so difficult to judge. Got stuck in. 6
Reader Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
Half of Goodison gets wound up about leaving nobody up during corners and if Pienaar and Osman are not on the posts then surely you may as well leave them upfront, Boro were leaving two upfront last week meaning we were bringing three back.
Maybe if we counter attacking team from corner situations you could understand but seeing as our last counter attack was in 1908 there is no reason not to mark the posts. Great result anyway tough game against pompey at the weekend.
Surely Moyes can see how many defenders come up and score against us. Two in two weeks and plenty before. But on Saturday Yobo went to sleep as Shawcross pulled away from him. If you defend like that it makes it very difficult however the team lines up.
I just wonder if this uncertainty or chinks in armoury has anything to do with the switching of Jags to RB and return of Jobo. I rate Howard very highly and think he’s been brilliant for us. I also have massive regard for Joseph and what he’s given us from the moment he arrived.
But there’s no escaping the change, however minor, in Everton’s apparent impregnable defence. I think something’s not quite right and, worse thing is, I’m fairly certain I know what it is.
The defence is unbalanced and we look more vulnerable. Our clean sheets are drying up against poor teams. Hibbert is still 2 - 3 weeks minimum away (& won’t be immediately match fit). I will be nervous going to Villa, Chelsea and Wembley with things as they are.
My solution? simple; Jobo played RB for Nigeria several times and has the pace to make it work. Jagielka’s game is all about positioning and reading the game, to the extent that he was starting to make it look almost easy. So, 1, Jags immediately back in the centre. 2, Jacobsen to RB (as he is a RB) or, if Moyes thinks he can’t cut it, then Jobo is sacrificed to RB.
It’s just the bleedin obvious & getting by against Newcastle, Mboro & Stoke does not prove we’ll get by against Villa, Chelsea & ManU.
Yobo and Jags blamed each other for the original corner which led to Stoke?s goal. Jags blamed Yobo for not covering his back and Yobo blamed Jags for switching off.
Moyes does not have the luxury of altering his back four especially as he wants that CL spot. Jacobsen is untried in the PL and as he will probably leave in June DM will not take a punt on him. With a lack of midfielders we cannot take Neville out of the midfield so in all honesty until Hibbo returns we will see the same back four for the next few games.
As regards Howard, I can?t understand why he seems to lose concentration at this stage of the season. It is something the Manager and Coaches need to address as we don?t want his ?slips? and ?errors? costing us as we enter the most crucial part of the season.
Cahill wasn?t the second striker. From the off, he was clearly playing centre-mid with Fellaini just behind Jo. Clearly Cahill still gets forward form that position but he was definitely sitting deeper.
Cahill was always looking for the ball and kept things moving. His substitution meant Felly got pushed back into centre-mid and we lost our shape. Without Arteta I think Cahill is better in the midfield than Felly.
Second half was poor and I left the ground happy with the result but worried about how we?ll fare against tougher opposition. points.
Agree with all the posters on the back four, we look disjointed. I?d be tempted to move Neville in at right back, drop Yobo and move Jags back across. Rodwell looks far more comfortable in centre-mid than Felly but we can still revert to a 5 if we?re looking overrun.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment to Column articles, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.


1 Posted 16/03/2009 at 08:58:06
Report abuse