Defence Must Improve

By Thomas Rooney :  22/09/2008 :  Comments (20) :
The most obvious flaw in Everton's play right now, as has been well documented, is their defence. A total of 12 goals have been conceded in five Premier League games and when you consider that only 33 were conceded last season it its entirety ? there does seem to be a distinct lack of normality about leaking so many goals.

So, why has this been the case? It is still the same back five as last year, so what can be done to improve things? Well, I have been a regular supporter of playing Joleon Lescott in his preferred position of centre back for quite some time now. I honestly think that is where he should play. It's only a suggestion, but how about moving Phil Jagielka to right back (where I saw him operate for Sheffield United on a number of occasions) and bring in Leighton Baines as the regular left back. This would then free up Phil Neville to play in the holding midfield role that he has great success in. Perhaps that is what is needed ? a bit more protection for the back four.

There will be many of you arguing that things shouldn't be changed on the back of five games. However, what concerns me most is the teams that Everton are conceding these goals against. It has been two a piece for newly promoted Stoke and Hull as well as one strike for fellow Premier League new boys West Brom. Then, in the two home games so far, Everton have conceded three to Portsmouth and three to Blackburn. This accounts for half of Rovers' goals in the league so far this season and highlights the fact that it could be Everton's problem.

Fair enough, it's not as if the start to the new campaign has been disastrous ? David Moyes's men are sitting in 9th after all. However, again I point you to the teams they have played. I suppose seven points out of nine on the road isn't too bad, but all away games have been against teams that were promoted last year. The games at Goodison have perhaps been more of the problem ? two defeats and six goals conceded against teams that finished below Everton last season. Only four games were lost at home last year ? so what has changed? Are the crowd expecting too much? Are the players buckling under the pressure of this expectation? Or is it simply a poor run of form that will correct itself in time?

Looking at the fixture before the season started, I think a lot of football bets would have been placed on Everton having more points at this stage of the season. Of course, football is never predictable, but with Liverpool, Chelsea and Manchester United to come in the next few games ? I would imagine that the home defeats so far could be increasingly costly. Certainly in terms of Everton's position in the table come the end of October. It is also a worry how the defence will cope with Rooney, Torres, Gerrard, Drogba and co when they have struggled to shut out the attacking prowess of Hull and Stoke City.

It isn't all doom and gloom though ? far from it. The attacking ability in the team is looking fantastic right now. With Tim Cahill and Leon Osman returning to fitness, Louis Saha making his first appearance and Steven Pienaar still to come ? things look bright going forward in terms of support for Yakubu.

Of course, much of the focus is now on Saturday's game with Liverpool at Goodison Park. There is no doubt that the football odds will slightly favour a Liverpool win and the defence must improve if Everton are to emerge victorious. Having said that though, as long as Everton score more, I don't think anyone will care how the defence perform. 5-4 victory anyone?

Reader Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Alan Ross
1   Posted 25/09/2008 at 09:16:44

Report abuse

The name Rooney surely must have been a give away. Once a tosser always a tosser.
Alan Ross
2   Posted 25/09/2008 at 09:26:40

Report abuse

The name Rooney surely must have been a give away. Once a tosser always a tosser.
Derek Thomas
3   Posted 23/09/2008 at 06:48:35

Report abuse

What ever the question is in midfield, Neville is NOT the answer!!

When you say Neville a great success, I begin to doubt you sanity, nevermind your credentials and with all your links to betting and odds sites I think it may be a promo in disguise that slipped under the ToffeeWeb Towers radar
Michael Hunt
4   Posted 23/09/2008 at 07:51:25

Report abuse

Captain Neville’s main problem in the middle was lack of creativity when alongside Cars. However, both Fellaini and Castillo seem to have better, more positive distribution generally. There have been games where Nev has excelled for us in the middle e.g. Vs Spurs last year and notably once successfully shackling Viera when at Manure. So could be worth ago? Also, his leadership as Captain will be more effective from the middle...
Rather have Hibbo than Jags at RB though for the bigger games coming up, he must be back soon?
Dave Wilby
5   Posted 23/09/2008 at 08:38:16

Report abuse

Why are there 2 links to a betting site in your article?
Brian Waring
6   Posted 23/09/2008 at 08:36:03

Report abuse

Thomas, you are taking the piss?
" This would free up Phil Neville to play in the midfield holding role, that he has great success in " Err, when?
Did you acctually watch any of the games when he was in midfield?
His ball distribution was woeful. Keep him at right back, and well away from midfield.
Richard Harris
7   Posted 23/09/2008 at 09:21:37

Report abuse

Thomas Rooney wrote "This would then free up Phil Neville to play in the holding midfield role that he has great success in"
I must have blinked and missed that one :0)
Phil Neville as a right back yes but never again as a midfielder !!
Ciarán McGlone
8   Posted 23/09/2008 at 09:45:06

Report abuse

Neville in midfield!

Holy good god.

Castillo?s been a revelation, Fellaini cost us a fortune... and you want the hapless Neville back in the centre of the park???

The mind boggles.
Dominic Bobadilla
9   Posted 23/09/2008 at 10:13:58

Report abuse

Forgive me Mr. Rooney, but I suspect that you are some sort of an infiltrator.

To suggest that Neville play in midfield is downright outrageous. That man is a security risk.
Marc Williams
10   Posted 23/09/2008 at 10:11:22

Report abuse

Thomas - This has got to be a wind up !

When exactly did Pip Neville play well this " holding midfield role that he has great success in " ???
Please be specific as everytime I’ve seen him in this role he’s been dire, so like many on here I’d love to know when he’s acheived this.
Even my 10 year old daughter can see how poor he is in midfield, you should see the disappointed look on her face whenever he has been named in that position.
Brian Richardson
11   Posted 23/09/2008 at 10:40:45

Report abuse

TW editors, it may not be my place to say this but I think you should remove this article. As far as I can see, it is a blatant attempt to drive traffic to a gambling website - and a clumsy attempt at that.

"I think a lot of football bets would have been placed" ... Who talks/writes like that? Surely "a lot of bets" would have sufficed?

While we’re talking "gambling", I’d put a few quid on Thomas Rooney being one of many pseudonyms for BetFair as they try to infiltrate a variety of fan sites.

Shame on you.
Tom Edwards
12   Posted 23/09/2008 at 10:55:19

Report abuse

Have to agree with many postings above. This is clearly an online betting website making clumsy attempts to send punters their way. By the way, I think the only safe bet regarding the derby is that at least two of our players will be sent off!!
Russell Buckley
13   Posted 23/09/2008 at 10:54:42

Report abuse

Thomas if this is a serious article I can only come to two conclusions, either you have never seen Phil Neville play in midfield or you are fucking crazy. I like Phil and he is a decent right back, but he can’t pass a ball from midfield to save his own life.
Neil Pearse
14   Posted 23/09/2008 at 12:01:25

Report abuse

Michael and Lyndon, not sure what Toffeeweb policy is on having articles directing readers to commercial gambling sites. But this is certainly such an article. Quite amusing, since the guy clearly gave himself away by his ludicrous comments on our esteemed captain in midfield! Perhaps he could organise a bet on how many times Pip finds a blue shirt more than ten yards away?
Barry Sherlock
15   Posted 23/09/2008 at 10:35:19

Report abuse

You should see the disappointment on my face whenever he is picked IN THE TEAM!!!

He is poor in midfield but he is also poor at right back. He is a media man - end of. He can talk to the press and well thats about it really. I can see him taking Ian Ross’ position and that would be "tactically" brilliant.
Mick Beb
16   Posted 23/09/2008 at 16:44:41

Report abuse

If this is a betting website trying to get us all on their site the made a massive mistake. By Saying Neville should be moved in to midfield probably caused most people to stop reading and not get to the links.

I know i did!!
Michael Hunt
17   Posted 23/09/2008 at 17:37:05

Report abuse

Thomas ’Betfair’ Rooney, Are there any odds on Everton Football Club being crowned Premier League Champions, say in the next 10 years, and parading the Trophy in front of the massed ranks of ’Everkirkbonians’ on the pitch at Destination Kirkby. In betting parlance, would that be a ’dead cert’ or a ’looong shot’??
Michael Kenrick
18   Posted 24/09/2008 at 22:07:35

Report abuse

Well, apologies to everyone who was offended by Thomas Rooney?s links to betting sites... and his rather stupid statement about Phil Neville in midfield. I admit I was in a hurry and only scanned this brielefy, but I did know about the betting links ? he had asked for our permission.

I guess I?m puzzled in a way. I should state I?m not a gambler, and think the whole business is a mug?s game with only one winner ? and that?s not your average punter. But I got the impression that betting was now very widely accepted across all tiers of society and I guess that I was wrong. Judging by the reactions, some see links to betting sites on a par with links to internet porn! Well, each to his own...

I can?t imagine Thomas will be writing for us again somehow...
Alex Doyle
19   Posted 25/09/2008 at 20:35:00

Report abuse

I honestly don’t think Lescott’s best position is centre back, despite being put there for England. His defining season was at left back, where his marauding attacking skills were to the fore. The back remains the same, but the absence of Carsley is all too obvious. There is not the same protection there and the change in personnel will take time to bed in.

Still, we have got what we have been asking for, a more progressive Everton side trying to play attacking football.
Ben Jones
20   Posted 26/09/2008 at 00:49:17

Report abuse

I dont think Lescott playing left back is the problem, because he played centre back in the games against Blackburn, West Brom and Portsmouth and he was awful... I?d still drop him and play Baines left back.

To be fair with Phil Neville though, he?s not a very good midfielder... though everybody seems to focus on distribution all the bloody time!! But what about his defensive capabilities? I do think he?s a good defender, and I remember he won us the game against Spurs last season, because of his performance. I do agree I would choose Fellaini or Castillo ahead of him, but the criticism of Phil Neville is too harsh!!

I mean he tries his heart out for the team and fans still dont like him. What?s everybody got against him? It?s ridiculous.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment to Column articles, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and MailBag submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb