Season › 2014-15 › News
Agent: Ba had agreed terms with Everton
"It wasn't an easy transfer, it took a month of talks," Bulut is quoted as saying by Turkish-football.com. "But at the end we achieved our goal, Demba Ba always wanted to join but we had trouble convincing Chelsea.
"There were around five clubs interested in Ba, actually Everton had agreed terms with Ba but we clinched the deal last minute.
"Ba was intrigued by the prospect of playing in a country with a muslim majority as well as the Besiktas stadium project and the interest shown by the fans."
The 29 year-old Senegalese striker completed a £4.7m move from Stamford Bridge to Besiktas today.
Further comments from Bulut may hint at Jose Mourinho's plans for Romelu Lukaku as well, with the agent suggesting that the Chelsea boss is only looking to offload one of his strikers.
"Chelsea had four forwards," Bulut continued. "Mourinho wanted to get rid of one of them and as a result had no reservations with the club letting go of Ba."
The decision still seems to rest with Lukaku, however, who has indicated that he needs to find a new club for guaranteed first-team football and is mulling over his future during a post-World Cup holiday with his girlfriend.
Reader Comments (81)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 18/07/2014 at 07:27:33
3 Posted 18/07/2014 at 08:05:51
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vodafone_Arena
I do realise that labour costs will be far more expensive in the UK but still, seems ridiculous that people expect that redeveloping Goodison would cost 𧷤m or so.
4 Posted 18/07/2014 at 08:20:31
More importantly, does that mean he was lined up as our main CF for next season? An average aging player like him?
5 Posted 18/07/2014 at 08:20:44
I am getting concerned that this is slowly taking the look of a classic David Moyes summer transfer window.
We are waiting on Lukaku to make a decision says Martinez but have we actually made a concrete offer for him?
What happens if Lukaku says he wants to leave Chelsea and it sparks a bidding war?
I can think of Spurs, and a few others who would be ahead of us. There is also the fact Chelsea will say to Everton 㿀 million so then what? We donÂt spend that kind of cash do we?
It sounds like from what Roberto says we have already agreed a price or deal with the bosses at Chelsea and itÂs merely down to Lukaku but I wouldnÂt hold breath.
ItÂs late July and youÂd think seriously the deals we still need to conclude are: Besic – get that tied up quickly; Traore – if heÂs coming on loan again do it.. if not move on; Lukaku or that marquee 20-goal striker; and finally a pacy wide player.
6 Posted 18/07/2014 at 08:25:33
Still think heÂs a twat though.
7 Posted 18/07/2014 at 08:32:35
8 Posted 18/07/2014 at 08:34:44
I think a reaaly good season at Everton + uncertainty of regular playing at Chelski have swayed LukakuÂs way of thinking and there are "complications" to iron out, so Roberto must be waiting for that one.
It would be nice to see a signing or two in the next few days to settle our frustration/impatience.....the Besic saga is really dragging on, for example......
9 Posted 18/07/2014 at 08:53:25
10 Posted 18/07/2014 at 09:12:43
11 Posted 18/07/2014 at 09:24:07
13 Posted 18/07/2014 at 09:22:59
Ray Roche
Robbie said we were in a good financial position, and we didnÂt have to sell.
14 Posted 18/07/2014 at 09:31:45
15 Posted 18/07/2014 at 09:34:52
Maybe weÂll stick him up front if it comes to it.
16 Posted 18/07/2014 at 09:35:13
IÂm pretty sure if Kenwright had got Ba for say ٧M, then we would have finalised the basic deal and be looking at another. As this hasnÂt come off, then we may have to shell out the big bucks for Lukaku and other deals will suffer...
Also, Swansea have not even been approached about Bony so forget that one.
17 Posted 18/07/2014 at 09:10:21
18 Posted 18/07/2014 at 08:54:30
19 Posted 18/07/2014 at 09:46:21
Secondly until we bank the TV money in August we probably donÂt have the hard cash available immediately that some of these deals may require.
Three - itÂs not like going to the supermarket with a list of items and picking them off the shelf. I reckon any player of the required ability will have more than one club showing interest and that also complicates the transfer process and can be very time consuming.
Proof of that if proof is needed is the latest rumour that Juve are showing interest in Lukaku.
20 Posted 18/07/2014 at 09:56:53
Like the fellow posters have said on here, he has shown mercenary traits, and besides heÂs another with African team commitments come the African Cup.
I must admit it is frustrating to hear of other clubs making additions, although, having said that, I canÂt help think some of our rivals are paying way over the top, for some players who we have rarely heard of!
I hope it will all pan out in our favour at the end, and as always trust Roberto to make the right choices for the club!
21 Posted 18/07/2014 at 09:56:19
I know a leopard never changes his spots, BUT you would think on the back of last season performances and the fact we are playing in Europe this season that all of the above points you have made would have been addressed by the board.
The air of optimism around the club this up-and-coming season is huge. I donÂt buy into the theory that we have to wait for the banks to give us the green light before the club can eventually go shopping for new players.
22 Posted 18/07/2014 at 09:56:03
IÂm very disappointed about Ba, but I still believe that Lukaku is slowing up our transfer business. I think we do have the funds for him, and want him, and the waiting could work out well or fuck us over. On the plus side, if Besic is confirmed, we would have brought in a young promising DM and experienced Premier League quality (Barry) already, with 4 weeks to go before things kick off.
As I see it now, we must concentrate most of our funds on a top quality striker, and a creative left sided midfield player. IÂd then like to see an additional attacking midfield and then perhaps a young cb for the future, and the return of Traore for numbers.
I think next season will depend largely on the quality of the striker and the left sided midfielder. (I assume that would be a priority, or a right sided player to allow Mirallas to shift to the left. I see that as a weak area in the team with no prospect of immediate improvement unlike the AMC area occupied by Barkley.)
23 Posted 18/07/2014 at 10:18:40
24 Posted 18/07/2014 at 10:24:06
I can understand the frustration and others will detail what they see as to the whys and wherefores of our lack of transfer dealings so far. But I really wouldnÂt worry about Newcastle getting their dealings in early and making a statement, for 2 reasons:
Reason 1 — they are Newcastle United.
Reason 2 — Alan Pardew.
To paraphrase JayZ, we (may) have problems, the Barcodes ainÂt one of them.
25 Posted 18/07/2014 at 10:23:10
Failure to sign that goalscoring striker will let down the rest of the good work done by the team, we have witnessed what happens when your play is outstanding but you donÂt have anyone with a killer instinct.
Traore and Kone are decent options for the bench but we need that talisman, the type of play that saw Lukaku almost hit the 20-goal mark last season (something IÂm sure he would have achieved if he had started with us in August) and not suffered the bad injury at Anfield which kept him out for a month in February.
26 Posted 18/07/2014 at 10:32:44
Pablo, Robbie can say what he likes, he has just been given a new bumper contract, and may well be toeing the line, just as our old manager did. All I DO know, is that instead of having our new signings, should we sign anyone that is, at our pre-season training getting to know their new team mates, we are as usual, seemingly waiting for some Sky money to appear so Bill can bring someone in at the last minute.
We SHOULD have the money, or at least the profit, from the Fellaini sale. McCarthy was presumably bought from the proceeds of the Jelavic and Anichebe sales plus the reduction in wages from those two and others who left.
27 Posted 18/07/2014 at 10:49:50
As for Kenwright and the clowns, they didnÂt invest when the club finished 4th in 2005 so what makes people think they will invest this time around. The club bumped up and improved MartinezÂs contract as a way of saying "shutup a toe the party line". I would not be surprised if Martinez walks away in a season time and says "IÂm not the man for this job working with these imbeciles."
I may be proved wrong between now and the end of the window, who knows. However, I think something drastic has to happen (in a negative way) at this club to make these custodians realise once and for all that they are not the right fit to take EFC forward. They screw over the club and more importantly the supporters season after season... and one season it will stop!
28 Posted 18/07/2014 at 11:00:13
Bastard!!! The Premier League doesnÂt need the likes of HIM!
At least now heÂs gone, we can get back to players only moving to clubs for less money.
[Shakes head, despairs at level of argument...]
29 Posted 18/07/2014 at 11:06:49
If heÂs a mercenary then I think most players are. Coleman should have stuck it out at Sligo Rovers. Look at them now in the Europa League.
30 Posted 18/07/2014 at 11:07:32
31 Posted 18/07/2014 at 11:12:41
33 Posted 18/07/2014 at 11:23:11
IÂm just questioning the Mercenary tag.
I think heÂs an excellent finisher but doesnÂt do enough else to warrant buying him.
34 Posted 18/07/2014 at 11:26:42
35 Posted 18/07/2014 at 11:26:42
36 Posted 18/07/2014 at 11:34:45
37 Posted 18/07/2014 at 11:35:22
BK: "Demba, 60k a week?"
DB: "IÂll have some of that, Bill"
BK: "Roman, how much?"
RA: "{£Insert cash amount}"
BK: "Nevermind, hey ho, I tried"
38 Posted 18/07/2014 at 12:42:12
There is no way we were going for both Lukaku & Ba, that would mean we were intent on spending approx 㿊m on two strikers.
I am resigned to the fact we will fall short in our pursuit of our No 1 targets this season. Shit.
39 Posted 18/07/2014 at 13:19:46
It just seems that so many of our fans love to fall for the boardÂs bs.
40 Posted 18/07/2014 at 13:25:52
41 Posted 18/07/2014 at 13:26:58
43 Posted 18/07/2014 at 13:31:45
44 Posted 18/07/2014 at 13:49:42
45 Posted 18/07/2014 at 13:50:05
46 Posted 18/07/2014 at 14:11:55
I stand to be corrected of course but this is from the Notes in the June 2013 Accounts:
The Group meets its day to day The GroupÂs current overdraft facility and
working capital requirements through
an overdraft facility and a bank loan.
Additionally, because of the predictable
nature of football club revenue streams,
the Group has obtained further funding
post year end through the securitisation
of future guaranteed revenues, as is
common industry practice, and as it has
done in the past. This funding replaced
an existing loan and is repayable in
August 2014. Based on ongoing dialogue
with the existing and potential funders,
the Directors are confident that this facility
will be replaced by an equivalent facility
on repayment.
bank loan expire on 31 July 2014. The timing
of the expiry of the current facilities on
31 July 2014 allows the GroupÂs bankers
and the Directors to agree appropriate
facilities for the following season based on
performance in the 2013-14 Premier League
season and reflect activities, including
the GroupÂs player trading activity in the
January 2014 transfer window and the start
of the summer 2014 transfer window.
47 Posted 18/07/2014 at 14:11:23
Of course I would, but how would it look to a prospective employer if I have had itchy feet three times in two years? If Everton want stability, they certainly wonÂt get it from someone like Ba.
48 Posted 18/07/2014 at 14:15:24
49 Posted 18/07/2014 at 14:00:25
The truth is of course the complete opposite - that they ALL go for Âmore money if they can.
Reality = if heÂs a mercenary, they ALL are.
Your response (oddly) to my pointing this out is – "So give your reasons as to why you would have liked to see Ba at Everton then Eugene?"
See if you can grasp the following (I promise itÂs simple)
Me pointing out that your "heÂs a mercenary" argument is piss-weak (see above) does in NO FUCKING WAY even hint that I would like to see Ba at Everton.
If you disagree, please point out which specific bit of my post alludes to me wanting him at Goodison.
(I repeat, youÂre not thinking this stuff through – maybe thereÂs a venting.com somewhere youÂd benefit from.)
50 Posted 18/07/2014 at 15:28:20
Do you have proof that every player who moves on has gone for more money, do you have stats to prove this? I could say that your point is ÂshitÂ. LetÂs leave it at that as we beg to differ on ÂopinionsÂ.
51 Posted 18/07/2014 at 16:14:41
52 Posted 18/07/2014 at 16:19:14
53 Posted 18/07/2014 at 16:44:43
54 Posted 18/07/2014 at 17:28:35
55 Posted 18/07/2014 at 17:55:37
Not as gutted as Lukaku would be if he signs for the lovable neighbours.
I would imagine he could not walk around in the city, such would be the amount of bad feeling.
56 Posted 18/07/2014 at 17:59:57
57 Posted 18/07/2014 at 18:06:03
58 Posted 18/07/2014 at 18:07:47
And him ALONE being labelled a mercenary is selective and consequently, disingenuous bollocks.
Two more things.
1) Your post is going to confuse Kunal as, although youÂre agreeing with his view, you say "but good mate of mine, a Toon supporter told me.." - thereby not being able to show the facts, stats, photographic evidence that he insists on.
2) You add "All about going to the highest paymaster in order to support his extended family" What!? So not only does he support his own family, but his EXTENDED family to? The lousy money-obsessed, greedy, selfish mercenary twat!
Why couldnÂt he be like the rest of the non-mercenary lads in the prem and buy himself a few streets, apartment buildings, walled and gated garish mansions or race-horses?
59 Posted 18/07/2014 at 18:17:32
Two bids of 19mil suggests perhaps that Chelski have outlined the low 20s as a realistic selling price, which I think is good news for us. I think we will spend at least 30million this summer given the massively increased television money, the net transfer profits (16mil ish last season?) and wage decreases. I think we could get in Lukaku and Besic, with some money over for an another midfielder. I think we will pad out the squad with 2 or 3 loans as well.
I expect we will know more about the Lukaku situation when he returns to Chelski after his delayed summer holidays. Given the inflated prices of domestic transfers this summer (off the back of tv money increases), I think a fee around 20million would be more than fair (Debuchy: 10-12mil, Lallana 25mil, Shaw 30mil, Lovren 18mil rejected).
We cannot compete with the teams above us in terms of spending power, but we can look to invest in youth and bring together a team with promise for years to come. If we did manage to bring in Besic and Lukaku (unlikely but realistic nonetheless), we would have Besic, Lukaku, Oviedo, Coleman, McCarthy, Stones, Robles and Barkley all under the age of 26. The likes of City and United could not boast such impressive youth prospects, and it would give us alot to look forward to.
60 Posted 18/07/2014 at 18:53:00
..tick Tock Kenwright
61 Posted 18/07/2014 at 18:49:34
62 Posted 18/07/2014 at 19:08:17
He thinks Ba is a mercenary because he chases the money. ThatÂs his opinion. Not every player necessarily chases the money. Someone mentioned Arteta and I think I remember Richard Wright taking a pay cut to come to Everton. IÂm sure there are others. I donÂt see the need to treat him like a child with your "see if you can grasp" comments.
And I was the one that questioned the statement in the first place.
63 Posted 18/07/2014 at 18:58:28
LetÂs hope IÂm right anyway because itÂd make me sick watching him play for the gobshites.
64 Posted 18/07/2014 at 19:23:37
And what a cunt he is...
65 Posted 18/07/2014 at 19:21:57
66 Posted 18/07/2014 at 19:15:14
This whole Lukaku pantomime is really getting tiresome. The guy obviously doesnÂt want to sign and I really hope we have plans in place and not placing all our eggs in one basket .
Lallana and Lambert both signed during a World Cup in which they were involved, yet we are still hearing this bollocks about Lukaku not making a decision before, during or after? This following a season where we had the opportunity 7 days a week to sit him down and get a straight yes or no!
I am worried about the lack of talk about a playmaker also. Last season we relied on Osman and Pieanar who usually did a half each because they are past it, so whatÂs this seasonÂs plan?
Barry, McCarthy, Gibson and even Besic if we get him are all defensive midfielders and in my opinion Arteta was never replaced. Barkley for me still needs another season of man management before he could do this role week in, week out.
67 Posted 18/07/2014 at 19:56:25
My opinion is that players generally move to enhance their playing careers. Player from mid-table clubs move to clubs better positioned to win trophies, e.g. Lescott, or players move down in order to get first team football, e.g. Pienaar coming back.
When neither of these situations is obvious then the reason that sticks out is money. Would you agree?
68 Posted 18/07/2014 at 20:16:42
69 Posted 18/07/2014 at 20:03:48
There are two/three/ (whatever) teams who can offer almost guaranteed CL football and most players would want that and would (want to) move to get it
(itÂs not of course 100% guaranteed - worked for Rooney, didnÂt work for Fellaini)
Most players however donÂt get the chance because those teams arenÂt interested in them, or if you prefer, theyÂre only interested in the very best.
So letÂs first take that group, those good enough to get a move to the top. All these players have agents and the agents are successful if they (remember they) can squeeze out the maximum amount from the buying club.
The players IÂm sure are delighted in doubling/trebling their wages, but itÂs not them doing the negotiating.
Then there is Âthe rest which involves deals that involve the likes of Pienaar to Spurs (and back).
Players considered good enough to play in the Prem but not right at the very very top of it.
Again, they have agents to negotiate their deals and keep in mind, players in the PL on what they would probably consider Âshit wages (eg: 15 grand a week), on contracys longer than 3 years, are multi-millionaires when they put pen to paper.
After they sign?
Well some get on with managers, some fall out, some get selected, some donÂt.
Some are quiet and easy to manipulate, some never stop moaning and demanding.
Some are from other countries and other continents and have no real feel for where they are, some are local and play for local sides.
Some arenÂt that arsed about money, some chase every penny.
In essence, they are (great wages, flash cars and big houses aside) a bit like the rest of us - a bit of a mixture.
Now regarding Demba Ba, the Âreason for him being singled out as Âa mercenary by Kunal (a particularly nasty accusation in my book) was as follows - "He moved from West Ham to Newcastle to Chelsea, everytime for more money"
This I might add from someone with the nerve to ask me for stats as proof and admonish me for making Âassumptions (as shit-house rabble-rouser Richard Littlejohn might say, you couldnÂt make it up)
You ask do I agree there are "some players who are more obviously moving for money than others?"
Of course, absolutely and 100%, and the key word is some - that was exactly my problem with the ÂBa is a mercenary - ONE feller, being accused on the basis of nothing other than but heÂs played for three clubs and Kunal fancies a vent.
Demba Ba may very well be a mercenary, but the accusation is completely invalid for two reasons. 1) The Âevidence presented is pure guesswork 2) So are loads of other players...and loads of agents...and clubs...and Sky...
70 Posted 18/07/2014 at 20:36:19
Lukaku wonÂt be playing for us this season, in my opinion, and if in the unlikely event he does, itÂs quite obvious he has no great desire to!
Our problem is that which centre-forward can we attract of sufficient quality that will want to play for us? Not too many names spring to mind!
71 Posted 18/07/2014 at 20:55:49
Why express that tone in your post against a fellow supporter? I can only imagine you were bullied at school when you were young and you couldnÂt fight back and now is the opportunity to show your hand over the internet.
Bullies donÂt win, they just show arrogance and ignorance. ItÂs a real shame as I used to quite enjoy reading your posts in the past, which I will bypass from now onwards. Seriously mate you need to have a day off.
72 Posted 18/07/2014 at 21:20:53
And I saw Ba play as well, and he is a very good striker. He scored better than 1 in 2 for Newcastle and West Ham despite spending five barren months on the wing following CisseÂs arrival.
73 Posted 18/07/2014 at 21:33:49
74 Posted 18/07/2014 at 21:23:40
75 Posted 18/07/2014 at 21:25:25
But..fair enough, presumably, you wonÂt just be impugning and insulting Ba on TW (behind the safety of you computer etc blah waffle).
You will ACTUALLY be seeking out Demba Ba and telling him to his face "You only moved to West Ham then to Newcastle then Chelsea, for more money - youÂre a mercenary."
No?
Thought not.
By the way, all that that two-bob psychobabble (bullied at school – dear me, yaaawn!) heard it all before, usually from people who have posted nonsense and donÂt like having it pointed out.
76 Posted 18/07/2014 at 22:14:36
77 Posted 18/07/2014 at 22:18:19
79 Posted 18/07/2014 at 22:21:26
80 Posted 18/07/2014 at 22:28:02
There is a difference between having it pointed out/explained and using a tone. YouÂre clearly ignorant! Lay off the pills.
81 Posted 18/07/2014 at 22:35:23
Apparently, there are 101 words that end in an ÂitisÂ
What Âitis would describes the affliction that Evertonians suffer from during any given transfer window? Moyesitis was awful, your hair turned red and you attacked random strangers outside a wine bar every time you had the bullet. There are plenty more of us out there, suffering, hurting and our relationships are straining.
Peace and love blues, peace and love. Ringo was right after all.
82 Posted 18/07/2014 at 22:46:39
Now with his scoring ratio at the Barcodes, paying ٥-10M for him and paying him 㿼k a week does not seem unreasonable.
His move to Turkey is for the same weekly wage as he received at Chelsea...
As far as I see it, if OFM didnÂt fancy taking the gamble on him, then subsequently earn the profit that Newcastle did, well...?
83 Posted 18/07/2014 at 22:58:51
As for Eugene and Kunsal, I agree with both of you (well I donÂt agree with KunsalÂs point but I donÂt see the problem with him stating it). IÂm not sure why itÂs gotten so aggressive but I reckon that one of you is definitely Osman.
84 Posted 18/07/2014 at 23:17:34
If I understand your question, try this:
Select the bit that you want to be a Link, and then hit the green URL button below the Your Comment box.
85 Posted 18/07/2014 at 23:25:30
To lighten the mood I posted this earlier on a different thread but people probably weren't arsed copying. Check out number 4 Very funny.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


1 Posted 18/07/2014 at 07:03:11