Silva: It could have been five

In the first half we would have caused any team on the planet problems our passing, movement and closing down was second to none. We could have scored more, had our most shots on target in a half for 7 years .

There were some sublime performances, Gomes and Gana shone like beacons on the pitch . A joy to watch them yesterday.

Well done to the manager and the team.

A great time to be facing Arsenal at Goodison, players and fans will be buzzing. It will be a way tougher match but more of that first half performance and we will be too good for them.

Some really horrendous shooting. I'm convinced they don't practice that in training.

I couldn't work out if it was because Everton were great, or the hammers were so poor, but as some people have mentioned on the other Lyndon thread (it's normally negative Michael's, or maybe he's the jinx!) if the crowd over the park had dominated like this, it would have been all about how great they are?

I was made-up to be watching Everton make the game look so easy, but that would have probably changed if West Ham got one back, so we have definitely got to be scoring more, when we have created that many chances, because otherwise we just won't push on?

But I'm happy for him and happy he's enjoying leading the line making good forward runs. Using the channels and getting support upto him quickly.

It's simple but if the forwards make good forward runs its then down to the midfielders and defenders to make good, quick forward passes.

It goes wrong for us when we start playing backwards passes. The less involved our goalkeeper and central defender's are in a match the better.

There wasn't a bad performance but shout out to Bernard who was great, all action, good running and creativity. Gomes so relaxed and good in possession. Coleman who played well for Ireland and appears to have found an extra yard of pace again.

I think folks should stop asking whether it was because we were good or because the opposition were shite. It's simple: We were good, the passing was accurate, we consistently made space, we consistently exploited the opposition giving us space, and we never gave the opposition a chance to settle. That display would have given us a good chance of victory against any team.

If we can develop this obvious ability into more consistency, there's every reason to anticipate us competing at the top quite quickly.

The big thing that stuck out for me yesterday was that they gave West Ham no space whatsoever, closing down and winning the ball the majority of the time, this I hope will be repeated against all teams we are due to play.

I have always advocated that we have the nucleus of a decent team, but there are a few areas that need improving obviously, and also providing genuine competition for places.

There's still a lot of very expensive deadwood to offload which won't be easy, with the inflated salaries and contracts attached to many of them.

The midfield of Gana, Gomes and Gylfi has to be the mainstay now, it's the strongest trio we have there at our disposal and Bernard is a class above most on the left.

I think the defence should remain as it is now also regardless of whether Mina makes the last two weeks of the season or not, get him fit and sorted for next season not worth aggravating his injury even more.

DCL has improved his overall game and hes a miles better option than Tosun as he's far more able and mobile, but he really does need to fine tune that finishing especially when he has more time to think about it he so oftentimes snatches wildly but maybe that will come, I still think he will benefit from a top class experienced centre forward next to him next season rather than isn't having to rely on him as the most senior striker at the age of 22.

This side will improve. I am not apprehensive about playing Arsenal next. I am actually looking forward to the litmus test.

Arsenal will find it more difficult to shepherd Everton down dead-end channels. Our midfield support and final-third play has improved so much.

I can imagine that Brands and Silva have a plan to make more use of existing players than many might imagine, particularly if the team starts gelling consistently and putting on displays like yesterday's.

Can't agree with your belief that there's not as much deadwood as many people think.

We have an awful lot of loan players on high wages with 2 years or more to run on their contracts that may prove difficult to shift because of the absurd salaries Everton pays them.

Sandro, Mirallas and Bolasie are the highest profile ones. Of the players at Finch Farm, Schneiderlin may have featured recently, but he is very much at the margins. Theo Walcott is possibly another unnecessary luxury.

We need the first three - minimum! - off our books to generate transfer money and free up their wages to pay incoming players.

Together with the 'natural wastage' of Jags and Baines' time coming to an end; the fact that both Kouma and Gomes are not our players; the possibility that clubs may come in for the likes of Gueye and Richarlison, and it's not difficult to see Brands and Silva will still have their work cut out to not only shape and add to the squad with ready-to-go players, but also to retain the bulk of players they genuinely want at the club.

It will be interesting to see who from the academy they wish to promote to the first team squad, also.

Confidence is key, of course, but this chap is only 26 and he may turn out to be a top asset over many years. Not everything Koeman and Walsh did was bad.

I am hoping Dowell will come good, the lad has talent, but each time he goes on loan he gets rave reviews then tends to fade out a bit. I know Forest had a change of Manager which didn't help him, but I have faith in Marcel Brands. Marco is not totally off the hook yet!

One is Gomes' defense, of which I've been critical (OK, actually derisive). Yesterday was flat-out the best defensive performance of his career, going back through his Barcelona years. He was sharp into the tackle, winning ball after ball with perfectly timed challenges on his feet, no sliding or reaching. Only one dumb foul, and one really intelligent foul to prevent a Hammers counter. It was shocking. It was great.

Another was Coleman. Obviously his pace is back -- and to all the skeptics here who thought he was "done", hah! -- but it was his physical defensive work on Arnautovic and Antonio that really impressed me. Both are real physical handfuls, and both tried Seamus on the right side, but he muscled them off when necessary.

Tony mentioned Keane's passing, and I'd say the same about Zouma. And Picks' distribution yesterday was massively improved.

Next up is Richarlison. He was unusually indecisive on the ball yesterday, maybe because he's unaccustomed to the right side, and rarely tried to beat defenders off the dribble. But did anybody notice how often he and DCL brought down Pickford's long balls with a touch and then turned to distribute? And Rich stood up strongly to defenders on his back without once flopping onto the pitch and wailing for a foul. Instead he turned and created, and his release of Coleman for the second goal was elegant. This game was a big step in his maturity.

And finally, Bernard. So glad to see him score, because he's been working his ass off, but it was those bursts into space and those cutback dribbles that were slicing their defense to pieces. He's finally fully adjusted to the pace and physicality of the Prem. MOtM for me. Just think how good he's going to be next year.

I think maybe Mirallis' days with us may be over, but then again who's to say how he might perform in a well functioning side? Regarding Sandro, the guy has struggled, but that doesn't necessarily mean he'll continue to struggle. Similar with Bolasie after his return from that ACL. Regarding Baines and Jags, the management have known for a long time about their twighlight stage, so we can only assume that's part of the plan.

What I'm saying is, players can come up trumps in a well functioning team like yesterday. Not long ago people wanted rid of Keane, and earlier this season Coleman. People say Kenny isn't good enough to replace Coleman, but maybe we should cut him some slack because he's come into Everton sides that have looked shite. Davies has come in for some terrible stick. I could go on.

We can be premature in our judgements in our eagerness for progress. Too often, we think the players are shite, need shipping out, when maybe they're actually very good and just need to be in a good set-up.

Connolly has started a string of games recently for Bolton.

And I don't know if you saw, but I posted something yesterday about Pennington, who apparently has been the sole bright light in a disastrous season for Ipswich. Sport Bury picked him as player of the season for them.

Stan #20, agree with your general point, but I don't think anybody's been premature about Mirallas.

Funnily enough too, I was reading about Mirallas who has been offered to Fiorentina (I think), for around 7M Euros, and they are not interested, so he could end up back with us.

Would love City to win the remaining seven and that our draw with RS a few weeks ago will be instrumental in RS losing it.

Watched it in the Carters in Kirkby surrounded by them wearing replica tops, hats, scarves etc. One of them asked me if we ‘show passion' like this at those ground.

I replied “Yes, maybe not in the pub but in the ground, yes.”
Pricks!

Not being someone given to being reactionary or too quick in dismissing players as being 'unfit for purpose', I don't agree with the opinion you are offering, that is:

The named players could still do a job for us in a well functioning side.

From your posts you are clearly someone who likes to apply rational and logic to your opinions.

Applying such rational and logic, is it not reasonable to conclude that Silva (and Brands) gave the likes of Mirallas, Sandro and Niasse (Bolasie was injured) every chance pre-season to impress and claim a place in the squad, but failed to do so?

Mirallas will be 32 in October. Since January 2018 he has not featured in a competitive game for Everton.

On returning to Olympiacas, a club where he is worshiped, he was one of many players the club president publicly criticized. They couldn't send him back quick enough at the end of his loan.

He has not held down a regular place for Fiorentina in Italy this season and, in spite of fishing for a permanent move, it doesn't appear as if they are willing to take him off our hands.

Sandro has not only struggled with us, he has totally, but TOTALLY, failed to revive his fortunes in La Liga, a league and culture he is familiar with.

Since joining Everton, in 54 competitive games with 3 different teams, in two seasons he has scored one single goal.

Bolasie turns 30 in May. It is 15 months since he returned from his ACL injury.

He chose himself to cut short his season long loan to Villa in January, much to the chagrin of Everton's management according to reports.

Rather than find a place for him on our roster, the club rapidly arranged another loan to Anderlecht, where he seems to be doing 'ok'.

Your examples of 'not long ago people wanted rid of Keane, and Coleman, that Kenny isn't good enough to replace Coleman' is, IMO, not the same discussion as the question of whether ageing and failing loan players can realistically return to the fold next season.

You could make a case for the loaned out players possibly if they were part of the squad at Finch Farm THIS season. They aren't. They were seen as surplus to requirements. They are not up to speed at all as to how Silva wants the team to play.

Our loaned out younger players fall under a different category. To give them valuable game time in league football they wouldn't get by remaining at FF. But you don't reference them Stan.

Now Sandro and Vlasic are similar in age and profile in that we paid for them and they are foreigners.

From what we know and how they have performed out on loan, Vlasic may fall into the category you argue for. He has a chance to join the squad next season. Sandro, I would suggest, does not.

As things currently stand we have a full roster with no vacancies. All our loaners WILL return in the summer meaning we will be overstocked with unwanted players.

I repeat, we simply have to find a way to move out players, to both generate transfer funds and free up wages. That way we can freshen up the squad as the manager desires

Including Pickfords cockup that 4 points theyve stolen that they didnt deserve.

They really must have a deal with the devil.

Thanks to the quality of our front three and some excellent MF work from Gomes and Gana the back 4 werent really troubled at all and I doubt if Pickford has ever had an easier game.

It will be a different game against Arsenal and will require patience and support if we are to continue our winning streak.

Still some good signs for optimism at EFC,nin these final weeks of the season. In my view our best performance this season, and for the last few years at an away game.

Still the luck of the RS, will run out, before the season is over.

We signed some poor players on huge contracts. Gave new contracts to really,really poor players and now are funding their lifestyle. Chances have to be taken in the transfer market. Sandro is an example. However, the contract of the lamentable Mirallas is an example of incompetence that would, in the real world, result in those responsible being rendered unemployable.

I hate the phrase "dead wood" because we are talking about people here. I think we need to bring the young players back and give away the rest.

I like Bolasie and it is not his fault that an utter, out-of-his-depth, got-lucky, PE teacher – the biggest thief we have ever had (after Martinez), signed him. But we are going to take a huge hit. Let us get it over with.

Always hard to say about young prospects and whether they will progress if brought back and given time.

Sometimes one has to look at the likes of Rooney and say that if they haven't broken through by age 18 or thereabouts then they will just be fringe players or Championship fodder.

We raved for a while regarding some youngsters like Vaughan, Jeffers and even Barklay but they didn't do what we had hoped for at Everton. The same may be said of Vlasic, Dowell and Baningamee in due course.

Everton could be on a 5 game unbeaten run currently only for that pig of a second half against the Barcodes so that run could arguably be a turning point for Silva as a pointer for next season's hopes providing the right moves are made to further solidify the squad.
I don't think the likes of Niasse, Tosun nor Walcott should be part of next season.

We could field a team of deadwood...

Stekelenburg
Martina, Galloway, Williams, garbutt
Mirallas, Schneiderlin, Bolasie
Walcott, Sandro, Niasse

On the bench:
Tosun, McCarthy (questionable?), Besic, Tarashaj

There have been so many threads and posts on ToffeeWeb saying we need an overhaul, get rid of the deadwood (whatever that means, we're not pruning a fucking cherry tree!), criticising players, criticising the manager, criticising Kenwright et al. But who the fuck knows?

So far as I can see, we've got a cracking squad of players, and they just need organising.

And equally Stan, nor am I saying you are wrong and I am right. I am challenging your opinion with my own. That's all.

And I agree, none of our players are out-and-out crap. But with some of them, you can make a very reasoned and rational judgement call on whether to retain them, based on the known and a reasonable bank of data over a long time.

In the past, for example, I have defended Kevin Mirallas. Now, I see him as a liability, someone who is potentially occupying a locker on our roster and consuming a salary which could be better invested elsewhere. Given the direction his performances were going, it was folly on the club's part to offer him two quick (improved!) contract extensions when they did.

I have to say your view that we've 'got a cracking squad of players, and they just need organising' [in particular, the players popularly seen as needing to move on]' strikes me as a touch vacuous, simplistic and unrealistic.

If we followed that strategy, we would never move anyone on because we would be eternally hoping they will come good 'with a bit of organizing'.

The continual recycling and refreshing of the squad is a natural process in professional football. Players you sign in the hope they will be an asset prove to be a liability. Players who were good see their powers wane. Everton is not yet a club that (financially) can 'carry' as many players as we do who contribute nothing - absolute NOTHING - to our match day squad, but who continue to drain our financial resources.

Brands very early in his reign spoke in detail on this very issue: the need to get off the books players that are a financial drain, but who don't play.

It appears Stan you have a bit of a bee in your bonnet on this question, possibly motivated by your perception of having too many threads and posts saying we need a complete overhaul, as if it's a majority view.

I don't think that's the case at all. I'm quite sure the overwhelming majority of Blues accept we can't 'start over from scratch' and switch the whole squad. That we need to retain our better players, recruit better players to complement them, whilst thinning out those so far out on the periphery of things that they have fallen off the horizon.

To opine, as you appear to be doing, that such players need retaining 'cos we don't know what the future holds and that they will come good again with a 'bit of organizing' strikes me as optimistic in the extreme, to the point of being out-and-out folly.

They're all being paid by Everton, and are either not playing or not performing.

Therefore - deadwood.

And they're on around 𧿘k in wages per week between them.

A lot of very expensive deadwood

Do you think that Chelsea are paying Zouma's wages? Or Barcelona paying Gomes? We have paid a loan fee for those two as well because they sure as hell haven't just given them to us for a season.

He has also got to find the cash to stump up for Gomes and Zouma, and a new deal for Gueye - they appear to me to be our top priorities so apart from those deals, or unless The Mosh's mate Alisher comes in with his spare 𧺬million, I can't see us spending without selling.

The good news is that of the team that started against West Ham, only 3 of them are over 26 years of age - Coleman 30, Sigurdsson 29, and Gueye 29 and going on their performances on Saturday they have each got at least a couple off seasons left with us.

I have got a feeling that if we have a good run, in money will appear from “somewhere” - let's hope so. A win against Arsenal might be the catalyst. A big, big, game for us that one.

I'm not disagreeing that we need to offload players, as you say it's a natural process. But I can't consider them deadwood, that's a terrible term (IMO) for players who've been playing in a consistently dysfynctional-looking set-up.

The West Ham game was a beacon of hope against all this, and if we can continue such form then the problems of retaining the best players and replacing others will reduce. And good form like that is based on good organisation.

This would be the logical way of continuing to move towards the "planned" objective, which if Saturday can be replicated consistently the above "squad" wouldn't be too far off what both the managements and us the fans want.

Same again next week please, Blue Boys.

“It is a very, very good opportunity for us” Silva said.

“Let's see what the position is of his own club, we know our position and we know Andre's position also, so let's see what we can do."

“Let's see if we can have Andre permanently in our club.”

For me the most exciting takeaway from these quotes is "we know our position and we know Andre's position also" - sounds like both club and player are keen and that this going through really is going to boil down to money and Barca...

Have to say - we all lambasted Silva for dropping him after the last international break despite playing him in every game over Christmas, but he has been electric since.

I get your point about some of the 'doom and despondency' by some posters about all things Everton, but it's just venting IMO and is not to be taken seriously.

I wouldn't get hung up on a single word - 'deadwood' - as you appear to be also. The English vocabulary is what it is. And deadwood is being approprately applied in this case, I believe.

What are the alternatives? 'Leeches?' 'Parasites?' 'Freeloaders?' 'Sponges?' 'Blood-sucking-vampires?'

The truth of the matter is that in a short time successive managers have thrown a lot of money at a good number of players, given them long term contracts on inflated salaries, and too many of those players have simply not delivered. Recruitment has not been balanced or circumspect and this is the chaotic situation Brands and Silva inherited. On that they have my sympathy.

In an earlier post you railed at the use of deadwood because we are talking about people, not a cherry tree. But the analogy is a good one. You don't have to be a horticulturist to know trees - plants in general - benefit from removing deadwood and dead leaves and flowers, keeping said tree or plant healthy, and allowing new more vigorous branches and flowers to grow and bloom.

A professional football squad is no different. It is always in flux and MUST be periodically pruned and groomed to ensure it remains healthy, rather than wither and die.

And in your reply to Kevin's perfectly legitimate post @ 36 in which he puts up a complete XI, plus subs, as possible deadwood, do you not see the irony of your reply @ 38 given the point under discussion?

"Kevin@36: Are you serious? About 10 of those players haven't featured anywhere near the 1st team for ages, so I can't see how they're relevant."

They're very much relevant because Kevin's selection lists 15 players who potentially fill up squad places, at a cost (Kevin's estimate) of £800,000 per week in salaries.

It's not sustainable or realistic to retain them under the terms of your original premise, that they MAY come good playing in a more organized team.

For many of them, IMO, they have already shown themselves not to be fit for purpose and, if at all feasibly possible, we simply need them off our books.

A centre back (hopefully Zouma)
A centre midfielder (hopefully Gomes)
A striker (tricky one this, someone to replace DCL, or a short term option like Giroud, Abraham on loan, or someone younger like that kid that's being compared to Mbappe)

I would personally say a wide midfielder as well as I believe that Dowell will be better in the centre. I'd also include Joe Williams in the squad.

That means a shopping list of 4 players, of which, 2 are already at the club.

The last thing we need, in my opinion, is to sign someone who will block the progress of Calvert-Lewin, or someone like Tosun who'll be sat collecting big money on a 3 year contract. That's why it's tricky at the moment.

DCL has come on again this season and will progress more . He needs to convert more of the half chances to cement his place. It will be interesting to see who Brands can bring here . A 25 goal a season striker would be a game changer for us and could get us into the top 6 maybe further [ calm down dear] .

Regarding the players you mention on £800k/week, the club will offload any players that Silva and Brands don't consider in their plans. There seems to be an assumption that such players will be difficult or impossible to offload, but the reality is that players do move on, usually willingly because ultimately they want to play football. Of course, the worst case scenario of not being able to transfer them is a possibility, but surely an improbable one if the management arrangements under Brands are clear enough.

So all-in-all, I agree that Brands has a problem to solve, but at the same time I think that on ToffeeWeb the problem is probably exaggerated.

There also quite a few cases were players refuse to move or settle and sit there nice and tight. I struggle with the concept that somebody,say Mirralas, would agree a deal and move on for game time. He has played very little football over the past few years, so might not be that bothered.

At £800k per week that is worrying for us.

Would that team avoid the drop? I wonder.

Andy Crooks @34 -

I couldn't agree more. It's time to cut the cord and move on, inasmuch as it's possible. Even if we take an economic hit for doing so, I think it would be in our benefit long term. Spot on.

How about that team vs the youngsters - who would win? Who would survive relegation?

Stekelenburg
Martina, Williams, Galloway, Garbutt
Mirallas, Schneiderlin, Bolasie
Sandro, Tosun, Niasse

Vs

Virginia
Kenny, Holgate, Feeney, Robinson
Davies, Williams, Dowell
Vlasic, Calvert-Lewin, Lookman

Silva feels that he can't work with more than 25 or so players. Probably in the same way teachers moan about teaching big classes.

I think if we cull enough that some of the “deadwood” come back into the first team squad of 25, then we might be surprised by a resurgence or two. For example, I cannot see how it is possible to offload Schniederlin. He costs £23,000,000 and picks up £120,000 per week, or £6,200,000 a year. Who's going to pay those wages for the next two years? Who's going to do that and give us some money on top as a transfer fee? I can't see anyone. So, he continues to be a (very expensive) squad player, as he is right now. I'm not saying he suddenly can become busquets, but maybe with better players around him, and some inspiring coaching, he can get back to his best and contribute more.

Bolasie and McCarthy are all about recovery. It appears to me that I and others wrote Coleman off a bit too early. Perhaps, Bolasie and McCarthy also need time and then they can overcome their own career threatening injuries. Granted, Bolasie is a limited player for me, but McCarthy was a big favorite of mine when partnered with Barry. If that McCarthy can be restored, then that energy and drive could work well with Gomes. This would mean that if Gueye does leave for PSG in the summer then we don't need to him and can spend the money on a different type of midfielder.

Brands has a few headaches to sort out in the summer, but I'm optimistic he'll get things sorted and learn lessons from Walsh's reign and not repeat the same mistakes.

Oddly enough, I think the group of veterans win most heads up games, but the youngsters would stand a better chance of survival.

The younger kids play with heart, and don't put it in cruise control. I could see them battling to safety.

The older players are jaded often, and can't be arsed. They have more talent (presently! only more talent from experience and not "raw talent"), but I think they'd be more apt to "pack it in" as it were.

Who knows? Interesting!

Some of these players are taking their employer (Everton FC) for a ride! Frankly, that pussy-foot situation pees me off. Do the job or go!

Or am I delusional? Ant body else feel this way?