Such a number is hard to grasp in isolation, and visiting the website for The Injury Index doesn't really help. The site provides tables of data on days lost to injury, number of games missed, and wages 'lost' as a consequence of those injuries, categorized by team, by player and by type of injury.
But what does it mean to have 'lost' wages? These are wages that are not lost in any meaningful sense. The wages are paid to players, week-in & week-out, whether they are injured or not. All the money ends up in the bank accounts of the rich and perhaps no-so-famous footballers, irrespective of their match fitness or performance.
While the number quoted seems staggering, it turns out that Everton are solidly mid-table, whichever way you cut it. Jean-Philippe Gbamin doesn't even make the players table for the current season, which cuts off below the top 40 at wages lost in excess of £750k.
This must be a mistake as Gbamin lists in the three-season table (he's only been with us two seasons) as missing 74 games (36 + 28 = 64?) at a total 'loss' of £4,717,142.86.
The Injury Index lists Everton as having 80 games missed in the Premier League so far this season; by my reckoning, tracking this on a game-by-game basis, the number should be 123 (150 overall, including cup games).
Reader Comments (23)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
1 Posted 31/03/2021 at 14:05:57
2 Posted 31/03/2021 at 14:24:11
I was thinking from the perspective of the club's coffers. Since the squads are effectively locked in twice a season (at the end of each transfer window), any replacements for injury are almost always already on the books, and therfore already on the payroll. So no direct financial 'loss' due to an injury.
I'm not sure what you mean by the wages of the injured players being lessened by the wages of their replacements? Unless you are aware of a rather Draconian contract clause inserted that says, roughly speaking, "If you are injured, your wages for games that you miss shall be reduced by the amount of wages paid to the player replacing you."
It'd never fly! But we should check with Jerome. He knows about this sort of stuff, I think.
3 Posted 31/03/2021 at 14:24:24
4 Posted 31/03/2021 at 14:30:00
5 Posted 31/03/2021 at 14:35:01
But that would actually make the injury a financial benefit to the club, not a loss!
6 Posted 31/03/2021 at 16:06:11
7 Posted 31/03/2021 at 16:11:53
8 Posted 31/03/2021 at 17:11:32
The players get paid whether they play or not, right?
If you have a 25-man squad, every minute of every game you have 14 players being paid for not playing, whether the reason is injury or manager's decision or they just forgot their shinguards.
If an injured player is being paid for not playing, it means another player who would normally be paid for not playing is being paid for actually playing in place of the injured player who is being paid for not playing, so you still have 11 players at any one game moment being paid for playing and 14 being paid for not playing. (Unless Schneiderlin is on the pitch, in which case the numbers are 10 and 15.) Are you following me on this?
And outside of that 90 minutes, you have all 25 players being paid for not playing, whether they are practicing or rehabbing or eating or in bed with their girlfriends or driving a Lamborghini 102 miles an hour with no license. Or whatever.
I am now going to sit quietly and suck my thumb.
9 Posted 31/03/2021 at 17:15:13
10 Posted 31/03/2021 at 17:17:15
11 Posted 31/03/2021 at 17:22:00
12 Posted 31/03/2021 at 17:24:05
It would be more lucrative running a "Teach yourself Scouse" course here in Florida.
Ive currently got them all Gobsmacked about chinwagging.
13 Posted 31/03/2021 at 17:26:43
Also on the injury front I see Godfrey and Davies are injured now after playing for the U21s.
14 Posted 31/03/2021 at 17:34:59
If they're injured on international duty, then the federations step in supposedly. However for the minnow nations that could be a huge expense - Bale? George Weah type etc?
15 Posted 31/03/2021 at 17:48:47
16 Posted 31/03/2021 at 18:29:34
17 Posted 31/03/2021 at 18:45:50
18 Posted 31/03/2021 at 22:13:09
19 Posted 12/04/2021 at 07:57:04
Lost wages is a real unknown to me. With the money players are on I can't see there not being some type insurance cover by the Club or Player. Another factor could be the Club and Players legal view on anything that affects valuations.
I do think there has been a miscalculation as your figures have pointed out. The compilers of 'The Injury Index ' are not use to or expect the scrutiny you apply, which posters on ToffeeWeb are familiar with. Lucky for them they don't have a public forum you can get on to. They possibly might have to close up shop.
In the future I will now view 'The Injury Index ' with scepticism, with tongue in cheek.
20 Posted 12/04/2021 at 08:13:29
21 Posted 12/04/2021 at 08:29:29
Everton did take risks regarding injuries in the transfer market, because the actions of those that did Manage the Club. They did compromise their effectiveness in securing the players they required.
22 Posted 12/04/2021 at 08:40:11
23 Posted 12/04/2021 at 09:07:24
However, given the size of the wages and high risk of injury (and therefore claim on insurance) I wonder whether there are such policies. £50m is a big aggregate claim. You hear more about players claiming if they are forced to retire through injury.
Anyway, like Mike says, the wages are not lost as such as we would be committed to paying them anyway. The real lost wages are on players like Tosun and Bolasie and, dare I say it, Iwobi who shouldn't have been bought in the first place.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.