Season 2012-13
Opinion
Talking Points
To be or not to be – that is the question….
In a previous thread, Patrick Murphy makes a really interesting point – “No manager that has not played for Everton has won a trophy!”
I thought this couldn’t be true so had a look into it.
In the early 20th Century we won trophies under Dick Molyneux, Will Cuff and Thomas McIntosh, none of whom played for Everton from what I can see. I’m happy to discount these though as they were club secretaries as opposed to team managers.
The first true team manager was Theo Kelly (1936-48), who won the League Championship in 1938-39. From what I can see Theo never played for Everton either, so I think he essentially disproves Patrick’s theory.
However, since Theo Kelly we’ve had twelve different men at the helm and I might be wrong but……
Four have played for Everton and never won anything (Cliff Britton, Johnny Carey as a guest, Billy Bingham and Colin Harvey – though many credit Harvey’s appointment as first team coach as crucial to Kendall's success).
Five have never played for Everton and also never won anything (Ian Buchan, Gordon Lee, Mike Walker, Walter Smith and David Moyes to date).
But, in the post-War era, every trophy we have won (4 Championships, 3 FA Cups and the ECWC) have been won under three managers, all of whom played for Everton – Harry Catterick, Howard Kendall and Joe Royle.
The interesting point in all of this is Catterick played under Theo Kelly – the last manager before him to win a trophy. The next manager to win a trophy was Kendall – who played under Catterick, and the next after that was Joe Royle, who also played under Catterick.
So – following this rule the next manager to win a trophy for Everton will have played for either Kendall or Royle.
Most candidates from Kendall's days are past it now but would Andy Gray have cut it had he come? Maybe Peter Reid could’ve brought us glory at his peak…? And who from Royle’s teams could have a go at it now…..? Big Dunc anyone…….?
Football has changed beyond recognition in recent years, and the formula may no longer work in the modern game, but Patrick Murphy’s right – history says winners at Everton have played for them, and not only that – they have also played under someone who’s won something for Everton.
A pool of people, who unfortunately, are increasingly getting a bit thin on the ground.
Mike Green, Posted 14/04/2013 at 11:28:04
Reader Comments
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
700 Posted 14/04/2013 at 16:43:33
I agree Declan, Gary Speed's sad demise was a great loss to football. Imo he would have been a strong candidate to succeed Moyes, particularly if it was felt an Everton 'link' was a pre-requisite for the job.
If Moyes goes, my money's on David Jones,
704 Posted 14/04/2013 at 16:55:45
706 Posted 14/04/2013 at 16:56:00
On a different tack we've also got Bilic as a candidate: played under Kendall Mk III, has made some waves already in management....
713 Posted 14/04/2013 at 17:28:59
714 Posted 14/04/2013 at 17:30:11
722 Posted 14/04/2013 at 18:01:22
728 Posted 14/04/2013 at 18:31:25
Who else would have fancied us for a crack at that! ;-)
739 Posted 14/04/2013 at 18:49:05
Maybe that we either bred, attracted, or kept winners in the past but have lost that tradition? Maybe if you've won at Everton in the past you know what you need to do to do it again, but it's so long now we just know how to aim for 4th. Maybe that we no longer attract the calibre of person that would even know how to win with Everton. Maybe, simple confirmation that the world has changed.
Another meaningless statistic is I think we are currently on our longest trophyless streak in our 135 year history (if you discount the 5 years of WWII), aligned with the longest spell we've gone unmanaged by someone who's played for the club.
I'm not suggesting we make Franny Jeffers manager, I'm suggesting we've lost the way of winners, a way we developed and promoted as a club.
751 Posted 14/04/2013 at 19:25:47
This attitude then permeates down to the people who run the club, managers and players in particular, most of the people now involved have no idea what it's like to run out at Goodison to play in an Everton side aiming to win trophies and so they see what they are doing as being successful in its own right. You only have to look at the broo-ha-ha that takes place if our loveable neighbours fall into the lower half of the table there is a massive hue and cry and everyone involved with them demand that the situation is sorted out and quickly.
As someone said earlier it does raise questions about what we have been doing for the past 50 years and especially the last 20, we have become a club of also rans who can give as good as they get on any given day but over the long term are unlikely to be challenging for honours. That for a lot of our fan-base is hard to swallow, but when you look at the facts of the matter that is exactly what we have become. I think many fans probably invested too much expectation in the arrival of David Moyes and perhaps hoping he would do for us what another guy from PNE did for the other lot, given the different financial circumstances surrounding the game now compared to when he did it, that was too great an ask even for the most talented of managers.
Where does that leave us and how do we address it? It seems to me we''ll just have to grin and bear our way through the coming years and hope someone, somehow can transform us into what we used to be, unfortunately as each year passes the chances of that happening become ever more slim, but as always we live in hope.
761 Posted 14/04/2013 at 20:15:12
I wish this Financial Fair Play rule would change everything and put all teams on a near-level playing field. But I fear the big clubs will get around Financial Fair Play.
I was watching Brad Pitt in Moneyball the other day. Brad Pitt is David Moyes. That film is about Everton. Watch Moneyball and you will have more understanding on what David Moyes is dealing with.
782 Posted 14/04/2013 at 21:21:54
I'd suggest Moyes was "Art Howe" the belligerent manager incapable of innovative thought and happy to stick with the same old same old.
783 Posted 14/04/2013 at 21:21:15
His substitutions would be unorthodox to say the least..,
785 Posted 14/04/2013 at 21:34:20
787 Posted 14/04/2013 at 21:55:09
792 Posted 14/04/2013 at 22:08:16
He is a company man, a good one, but one who would sooner finish a few places higher in the league. [I don't know this for a fact, I'm just going going on the evidence.]
816 Posted 14/04/2013 at 23:35:48
863 Posted 15/04/2013 at 11:34:08
I'm neither a Moyes fan nor a hater but I think the amount of Moyes bashing that goes on here is ridiculous. We'll never actually know if he's a good manager unless he is given a season of good money to spend without having to sell. And, to be honest, I'd rather trust Moyes with our money than someone like Lennon.
875 Posted 15/04/2013 at 12:54:30
I figure Amokachi would be perfect, knows a few Qatari billionaires and could turn Victor into the new, well, Daniel Amokachi......
That aside, there is always super-sub McCall at Motherwell, surely better than another old firm "winner". What's it take to win a title at Celtic, anyway, I'm sure Moyes could do that too.
877 Posted 15/04/2013 at 13:14:24
878 Posted 15/04/2013 at 13:13:15
Agree Gary Speed would have been a candidate for a top job. But it wouldn't have been us.
888 Posted 15/04/2013 at 13:59:18
There's an argument to say that our success in the past had more to do with financial clout than continuity any way.
However, the two most successful footballing trophy winning "dynasties" there's been in English football are Liverpool and Man Utd.
I think most people would put the Man Utd story mainly down to Ferguson and continuity, and the Liverpool story down to Shankly and then the "Boot Room" tradition that followed on from it rather than money as such. How much have they won since that tradition fizzled out, and how much money have they thrown at it over the years? It'll also be interesting to see how Man Utd fare once Fergusons gone.
Abramovich has thrown bucketloads of money at Chelsea and got a decent return in silverware — but my guess is he feels short-changed and it took the temporary appointment of a former player to deliver the Champions League anyway.
Spurs have spent millions and are only just getting their act together and would you put your house on Man City winning the league next season?
So, yes, it is a load of old rubbish but if you look at real success at clubs it usually comes where the prime movers have the best interest of the football club at heart, rather than the business.
895 Posted 15/04/2013 at 15:24:52
very good pont that I totally agree with.
Characters win things and influence others albeit when Ferguson has gone I doubt we will see another because all the power is in the boardrooms these days and they will not allow another Clough, Shankly or Ferguson although I could be proved wrong if Mourhino comes back to Chelsea.
897 Posted 15/04/2013 at 15:51:40
Stuart, good points, and if Mourihno took over and you gave him fuck all I guarantee he'd win fuck all as well.
902 Posted 15/04/2013 at 15:59:24
Money is a massive factor and I'm playing devils advocate as much as anything here, but did Mourinho have stacks of money at Porto?
And how come the only silverware Man City are still in for is the FA Cup having been dumped out of the Champions League, then the Europa Cup and now trail Man Utd in the League by 15 points? And how did we manage to beat them 2-0 a few weeks ago......?
919 Posted 15/04/2013 at 18:21:15
972 Posted 16/04/2013 at 00:26:35
We have underachieved this season and that is not a criticism of David Moyes. He has built a good squad on the cheap and that, rather than his coaching is what I think he excels at. We have been desperately unlucky at times and we are not far away.
126 Posted 16/04/2013 at 14:52:16
you'd lose Shane - Joe Royle was a ginger.
132 Posted 16/04/2013 at 14:36:00
Jesus wept.
At the time you're writing this there is no reason to believe that we will not finish in the top 4, maybe even 3rd, this season, ahead of last seasons Champions League winners and teams who've thrown money around for years to build their squads and you think we will be UNDER achieving?
Figures released today have us down as having the 10th highest wage bill and we are currently in the top 6 and looking up and you think we've UNDER achieved?
Unbelievable.
It's not rocket science, money doesn't always equal success but no money equals no success. You know, like being Catholic doesn't mean you will be the Pope but not being Catholic does mean you won't.
We've missed chances yes, but do you think all the other teams have put the ball in the net every time they've had a chance?
418 Posted 17/04/2013 at 12:22:36
Could bring him up as manager.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


698 Posted 14/04/2013 at 16:20:14
From Joe Royle's team there would have been one stand-out candidate in my opinion who was bound to go and manage us at some point; he supported Everton, played for us, that person was the great late Gary Speed, a player and a manager I respected greatly. Sadly we'll never know.