The Wrong Shape

 Comments (32) jump to end

What David Moyes can't seem to accept is the shape of the team is all wrong for the players we have yet he persists by jamming the players into the wrong shape.

Great managers who win things on a regular basis, shape the team so it has a sharp, pointy end so they can win games. Everything is shaped to get the strikers into a position where they can damage the opposition. Middling managers –like Moyes – start at the back and make things safe. They won't lose loads of games but they won't win anything either.

Starting at the front end of our team; Jelavic is clearly not suited to playing the lone striker role dictated by the current shape of the team – he needs to be in and around the box, not running out to the wings. Anichebe is okay at holding the ball up but isn't a natural finisher. Mirallas is comfortable running at pace with the ball and is a real threat when he does this. A great manager would look at these assets and shape the rest of the team to get the best out of these players. Maybe play Anichebe up top and get Mirallas playing off him? Play Anichebe up top and play Jelavic as the second striker?

A great manager would then then work backwards to look at how to feed those players. We have a great crosser in Baines but don't have a centre forward who will thrive on those crosses. We have fullbacks who can steam forward but we don't have solid wide midfielders who will cover for them when they bomb forward

The point I am trying to make –and its hard to stay coherent when you are this angry after watching the shite dished up for us today – is that, if the players we have don't fit the shape, then change the shape... or change the manager!
Ray Said,     Posted 20/04/2013 at

back Return to Talking Points index  :  Add your Comments back

Reader Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Greg Lambden
353 Posted 20/04/2013 at 21:35:16
Makes sense to me Ray.

Its logical to look at the players available before picking a formation & tactics to suit. Moyes tries to shoe horn his players into the only formation he appears to know - the drab 4-5-1.

On a separate note - where is Osmans best position. He can't tackle, pass over 10 yards, gets knocked off the ball, is poor in the air & has no creativity - he's no midfielder!

Declan O'Shaughnessy
359 Posted 20/04/2013 at 21:56:36
Ray: every single one of these players was signed by Moyes, so to suggest they somehow don't fit his preferred shape is nonsense (unless you genuinely think you know more about this than he does).

On a slightly different note, this made me chuckle: "Great managers who win things on a regular basis, shape the team so it has a sharp, pointy end so they can win games". Leaving aside the razor sharp "pointy end" analysis, can I just point you to Barcelona (circa Pep) and Spain (circa the last 4 years). Both regularly play without a "pointy end" (i.e. an actual honest to goodness designated centre forward). Both have been quite successful. Go figure.

Peter Laing
361 Posted 20/04/2013 at 21:56:07
After that non-show today, once again failing miserably to perform when the chips were down I couldn't really care less if the likes of Fellaini, Baines, Pienaar jump ship. None of them have the bottle or guts when it matters, a leech of a chairman, inept Manager whenever it really matters and a team full of has been's such as Osman, Everton need to start again. Boring, predictable and now mediocre is what we have become.
Ray Said
366 Posted 20/04/2013 at 22:02:50
Declan-not every one of the players was signed by Moyes, Osman and Anichibe came through the ranks so you are factually inaccurate.

Its not nonsense to suggest they don't fit his shape-just look at the strikers he has bought over the years then asked to run the channels-Yakubu, Johnson, Jelavic to name a few.

When I say a pointy end I mean just that. Barcelona have a pointy end-he is called Messi and scored over 70 goals last season. My analysis was that great managers set the team up from the front end with the purpose being to to score and win Barcelona do it just the same way. Moyes sets his from the back and hopes, cross fingers, that we get lucky and score one. That was the pint I was making.

James Stewart
378 Posted 20/04/2013 at 22:40:27
@Peter Laing

I agree with this 100%. Where were the our supposedly top 4 players in the games that mattered? Fellaini against Wigan in the cup for example. A joke.

We do have 1 big game player and that is Jagielka. For all his limitations he always puts in a shift and its no coincidence that is wasn't there today and the Wigan game.

Dick Fearon
388 Posted 20/04/2013 at 22:10:03
Greg @ 353, I am in agreement with you about Osman's short comings (no pun intended). You missed out his slowness, inconsistency and total lack of Charisma or authority. For long periods and usually in the most crucial games he completely disappears of the radar.

Leon's fans talk about his creativity yet he often goes whole games without creating a single opportunity for the strikers, viz a viz yesterday's game.

You wonder what at his best position I say he is I would go further by saying he should not even be in the squad. I concur with Tony Marsh's view that with him in the team we will never win a thing.

Phil Davies
417 Posted 21/04/2013 at 01:26:22
I don't think it's just a case of players not playing in Moyes's shape, it's also players not playing in their natural positions; Mirallas was top scorer last season for Olympiacos playing as a forward and an occasional winger, now for us he played as a right winger and as Moyes gained some trust in him allowed him some free roam around the pitch, Naismith played as a second striker for Rangers and Scotland, at Everton he's on the wing, Bilyaletdinov was the same. Anichebe wing, Arteta wing, Osman wing, Coleman wing.

You can't just blame the shape of the team when some of the players aren't playing in their natural positions.

Derek Thomas
427 Posted 21/04/2013 at 04:05:02
We lose a game AND play poorly, so is all ' this ' ( the above and the variations on a theme on 3 other threads ) all just knee jerk frustration as the Moyesistas would have you think.

Or is it yet another rehash of the same recurring faults that drive the MOB to distraction.

The players have to take some of the blame and Sunderland have to be given some credit.

But until Moyes decides what if anything he is doing next season the real causes of Moyeses inability to change things still sit snuggly and smuggly in the Board Room.

While the much lauded 7th place trophy ( with the odd semi, 6th and 5th place thrown in as icing on the cake ) keeps the masses from going apeshit at boys pen billy ( or the banks pull the plug ).

Nothing will change.

Declan O'Shaughnessy
437 Posted 21/04/2013 at 07:18:27
Ray, both of those players have been given at least 1 or 2 contracts by Moyes, hence they were signed by him. You're confusing "signed" with "bought". If Moyes didn't want those players at the club, or thought they couldn't / wouldn't play in the system he prefers (and has done for at least 6 years now), then he would have sold them / let them leave.

My point though, is that talk of systems and formations is largely nonsense. Messi isn't a pointy end, he's one of the best players ever. That makes a difference. Whether you play him as a centre-forward, a second-striker, a withdrawn striker, a playmaker, an attacking midfielder, a wide-player or a false number nine, he will always cause the opposition problems. Barcelona have played him in all those positions by the way. Notational systems (4-4-2 etc.) are largely newspaper constructs as an easy way to explain team set-ups to readers who weren't that knowledgeable. Despite many teams setting out asymmetrically over the years, no-one has yet found a way to denote this in terms of the comonly accepted 4-4-2 nonsense.

Great managers start neither at the back or the front; they see the game and the team in its totality. They understand and work on transitions from defence to attack, and vice versa. They impose a philosophy on the team. And they get results from them. Moyes, in my view, does not have a philosophy, but he does get results in keeping with, or slightly better than, the ability of his players.

Ian Bennett
447 Posted 21/04/2013 at 08:09:26
Losing was down to the players not putting in a shift in comparison to a Sunderland side that's bounced back under Di Canio, rather than an incorrect team shape. I can understand the point that our pattern of play could be more effective, but for the rest of the season it's done relatively well.

We are a tidy outfit, but can't afford to have Jags out, an unfit Osman, nor injuries to a Gibson and Anichibe, and expect to win away from home. It doesn't happen. The ball was moved slowly in the absence of Gibson, which meant the ball got lumped forward or we got out ratted when it went short ala Wigan. Pienaar was poor, Osman off the pace, basically you can't afford to carry that much in midfield and expect to win.

Arteta talked about training at Everton when you'd have under 10 bodies. This is the issue. We will always come unstuck when we have a real first team squad of 13 players. We know that we miss another striker and someone to pay in the centre like a Fer. Moyes will carry the can yesterday, but not strengthening the squad in the same way Liverpool did in January is the true exposé.

Paul Andrews
448 Posted 21/04/2013 at 08:22:02
David buys the players then plays them out of position to make them fit his system rather than buying players who already play in the position required to fit into the system.he has always done this that is why you see centre forwards playing as track back wingers,full backs and centre halfs playing in midfield etc etc.
Paul Andrews
449 Posted 21/04/2013 at 08:30:26
I thought I was reading a post from Brendan Rogers with one of the above posts.
Mike Green
459 Posted 21/04/2013 at 08:45:30
Peter #361 and James #378 - exactly! You've summed it up for me, this is why I've had enough - it's like we're having the piss taken out of us.

Every time we have a pivotal game the players hardly ever turn up, they're fine at bullying lesser teams at home (but can still never dish out a thrashing) and pretty good at parking the bus and trying to nick one against the big boys (but unless its City almost always come away with a draw at best). I used to think 'glorious defeat' was frustrating but this is 10 times worse, when it really matters Moyes's teams almost never bring home he bacon. Gutless.

Brin Williams
523 Posted 21/04/2013 at 11:18:14
What is this 'shape' you're on about.

This team - these players - Howard, Heitinger, Neville (now gone) Osman, Pienaar, Naismith, should not be playing for Everton next season.
If we are ever to seek top four status - there has to be LOTS of changes - all of which have been discussed in great depths on these boards.
If Europe is the aim we should only have one aim and that is graphically etched on the clubs badge and it's Latin motto is exactly what we should aim for. In brief, nothing but the best. My interpretation of our future shape would therefore be something like this, not a dream but a reality - and Goodison would then become the
Supreme
Headquarters
All
Powerful
Everton S.H.A.P.E.

Paul Andrews
560 Posted 21/04/2013 at 13:59:30
I would go one further.
After 11 years of his tenure we have an ageing,unbalanced squad.
We have the top goal scorer from the Greek league playing as a track back wide midfielder.Why? Because we do not have anyone else to play there.
We do not have a creative midfielder that plays week in week out.
We have, up until recently,a full back playing in central midfield.
All in all if a new manager took over he would not be left a balanced squad.
11 years to build that takes some doing.
Ross Edwards
577 Posted 21/04/2013 at 14:59:22
Not only do we have the wrong shape, we have the wrong chairman, the wrong board, the wrong manager, the wrong players, the wrong tactics.
They all sound like sequals to that Wallace & Gromit film "The Wrong Trousers".
No doubt BK will make a film series called, "Billy & Dave". Any suggestions for titles?
Paul Andrews
595 Posted 21/04/2013 at 15:48:34
The Odd Couple ?
Paul Andrews
597 Posted 21/04/2013 at 15:49:03
Cheech and Chong ?
Ross Edwards
600 Posted 21/04/2013 at 15:57:34
I was thinking after the Fer debacle: The Dutch Cock-up.
Patrick Murphy
601 Posted 21/04/2013 at 15:56:15
I think someone mentioned a possible title on another thread 'Inglorious Bastards'
Ross Edwards
604 Posted 21/04/2013 at 16:01:37
Dave and the Personality transplant
Billy and the Lie Detector
Gavin Ramejkis
614 Posted 21/04/2013 at 16:22:21
Patrick I don't know about Inglorious, how about a plain pair of
Ross Edwards
620 Posted 21/04/2013 at 16:36:06
The Sky 4 Disasters
3 Minutes That Changed a Season
Doddy's World
Billy The Hidden Kopite
Sky 4
Bily: The £9Million Man
Paul Andrews
623 Posted 21/04/2013 at 16:52:05
Carry on Cowboy?
Clive Lewis
624 Posted 21/04/2013 at 16:50:52
Osman is the weakest link, If he plays well the team plays well, when he does not turn up we are dire, which is more often that not lately. Against Sunderland we may as well be down to ten men bacause he dis not even contribute he was a liability. He was not the only one but I have singled him out becuase Osman plays in a crucial position.
Paul Andrews
626 Posted 21/04/2013 at 16:53:52
Do The Right Thing ?
Paul Andrews
627 Posted 21/04/2013 at 16:57:06
That was the one with Spike Lee.
His Uncle Gordon had nothing to do with it
Paul Andrews
628 Posted 21/04/2013 at 17:00:24
The Departed ?
Ray Roche
631 Posted 21/04/2013 at 16:59:14
Les Miserablés...at least, on here we are.
Bobby Mallon
634 Posted 21/04/2013 at 17:05:56
Ray, you are so right... but never play Vic again. Now Vellios is a different matter. I never will understand why he doesn't play more often.
Ross Edwards
635 Posted 21/04/2013 at 17:06:40
Davey: The £4million man.
Anyone Will Do
Ross and Tim: The Moyes Haters
Henry Enzio
019 Posted 22/04/2013 at 15:52:28
Not to blame one player but, while it's popular on here to have a go at Neville, Osman and Hibbert, I believe lack of contribution from Jelavic this season has been critical to us falling short of our Champions League goal.

I believed he'd pick up from last season and continue to score goals but this hasn't happened and at times he's been an almost Torres type hindrance to our attacking play.

It says a lot for me that Big Vic has been lauded for his work ethic and hold-up play but, in the cold light of day, he is basically a very average Premier League forward — which shows how poor Jelavic has been this season.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb