Everton Fan Advisory Board have compiled a statement expressing outrage at the disproportionate punishments meted out to Chelsea and Everton in recent years, culminating with last month's whitewash and suspended slap on the wrist for more egregious fraudulent acts by the London club, which continues to evade any meaningful sporting sanction for their rule-breaking.
This relates to the Token fine deemed sufficient punishment for Chelsea's persistent rule-breaking after a Premier League investigation published its sanction agreement back in March 2026.
In his Analysis Series, Paul Quinn has today published his own assessment of The Chelsea FC Premier League sanction agreements, providing a long and detailed analysis of the charges, process, decisions and sanctions, with the case for and against the Premier League’s approach.
Paul's key findings are:
-
The Premier League used a negotiated Rule W.6.7 Sanction Agreement, not a contested Commission, to resolve Chelsea’s admitted eight-year concealment of £47,524,925.74 in third-party payments (Phase 1) and ten Youth Development Rule breaches (Phase 2), imposing fines of £10.75M, a suspended two-window first-team ban, an immediate nine-month academy ban, an unpaid £771,288 levy and full costs, but no points deduction.
-
On the law, the Board’s outcome is defensible: the settlement mechanism is legitimate, the PSR “no-breach-in-any-scenario” finding removed the trigger for a points deduction, and self-reporting plus “exceptional co-operation” (~200,000 documents) properly earned a 50% mitigation, a position the FA Appeal Board effectively vindicated on 31 July 2026 when it quashed a suspended six-point deduction as “excessive”.
-
On the merits, the outcome is hard to reconcile with Everton (10→6 points for a £19.5M arithmetical overspend) and the FA Commission’s own finding that Chelsea’s “principal and overall motive… was to gain a sporting advantage”. The firm judgement: the Premier League reached a legally sustainable but institutionally corrosive settlement, correct on doctrine, wrong on deterrence, and the stronger arguments lie with the critics on consistency and quantum, and with the Board only on process and PSR mechanics.
Reader Comments (13)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
2 Posted 04/08/2026 at 18:17:18
And Paul seems to say, the process was defensible. Chelsea's concealed payments would not have induced a PSR breach in any assessment period between 2011 and 2018. No PSR breach, therefore no Sporting Advantage gained, therefore no Points Deduction required, per the Premier League rules.
In direct comparison with Everton (and other cases), Paul explains:
In contested proceedings, Everton (PSR), Nottingham Forest (PSR) and the Manchester City proceedings, an independent Commission drawn from the Judicial Panel hears the case, finds facts on the evidence to the requisite standard, determines breach and imposes sanction in a published, reasoned decision that is subject to appeal to an Appeal Board.
The Sanction Agreement route substitutes negotiated admissions and an agreed sanction for adjudicated findings; there is no cross-examination, no reasoned tribunal decision, and no appeal.
Critically, the Phase 1 agreement itself concedes (Section 17(b)(v)) that had the League been “put to proof by the club before a Commission, it may have been difficult to establish, to the relevant standard, certain aspects of the Rule breaches now recorded in this Sanction Agreement”, several breaches were established only through the Club's own admissions.
All still very unsatisfactory...
3 Posted 04/08/2026 at 19:59:35
Everton under Moshiri and Kenwright were a basket case run like a corner sweetshop and were perfect targets to "victimize" and make an example of.
It was obvious to all and sundry that the QC leading the so-called Independent Commission had Everton in his sights and should not have been allowed on that commission given his ties to Leeds.
The whole thing stinks and we can only hope Andy Burnham uses his position to influence a more sporting way forward for all.
4 Posted 04/08/2026 at 22:54:13
The FA were doing their own investigation, and this was only recently completed and published on 31 July 2026.
The entire tone and conclusions of Paul Quinn's analysis appear to be completely at odds with the FAB Statement.
5 Posted 04/08/2026 at 22:58:15
6 Posted 04/08/2026 at 23:19:25
He provides a Defence of the Premier League’s position "as part of a balanced argument" -- but it is not a view he supports in any way.
Then he goes on to present the case against the decision and sanctions. Here, he points up in some detail the inconsistencies and two-tier policing Evertonians are so up in arms about.
I only saw it late today and really need to read his work in some detail to take it all in.
7 Posted 04/08/2026 at 23:55:03
How can anyone think that is fair vs every other club that has been sanctioned down the years?
8 Posted 04/08/2026 at 00:03:02
Despite his many coruscating condemnations of our hierarchies, none of them have had the inclination to take him on with a legal action to silence him.
To me, that means he's reliable, and they're all shits, to our cost, for decades.
Step forward, Friedkin........
9 Posted 04/08/2026 at 00:50:34
That's what pissed off the Premier League (and Burnley, Leeds etc), and why we were treated so brutally?
10 Posted 04/08/2026 at 00:56:11
I won't hold my breath.
11 Posted 05/08/2026 at 02:27:46
12 Posted 05/08/2026 at 03:08:47
Perhaps, Usmanov's warnings in Moshiri's other ear.
13 Posted 05/08/2026 at 11:49:23
There is no way anybody could say the respective treatments are fair and equitable.
Unfortunately we don’t have any media backing behind us, the club themselves, if they have complained, have made little to no noise ( typically TFG), so it’s left to a Fan Board to cry foul.
I applaud them for doing so but sadly without support it’s going nowhere.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW
-sm.jpg)
-sm.jpg)
-sm.jpg)
1 Posted 04/08/2026 at 18:05:24
We've gone over the last few seasons to ask more or less corruption at the Premier League is not explained. Apart from us, nobody gives a shit.
Unfortunately, we couldn't or wouldn't pay the top legal eagles to defend our position and it's cost us. Corruption.