As Evertonians, we can stomach bad performances. It’s hardly like we’d be able to get by if we were’t able to, given the nature of some of the displays in recent seasons.

We can, to an extent, stomach a lack of quality. Again, if Evertonians hadn’t been able to put up with a lack of quality, then how could they have even got through most of the Premier League era? This is a club, after all, that has not won a trophy in almost 31 years.

But when bad displays and a lack of quality come with a lack of effort, then that is the straw that breaks the camel’s back.

On Monday against Leeds United, Dwight McNeil served up a performance that should signal his time at Everton coming to an end.

It has been a largely prolonged, drawn-out, miserable experience. But it has been a long time coming. And a display like this one should be the final nail in the coffin.

McNeil was not the only poor performer against Leeds, especially in a dismal first half. Nobody in an Everton shirt was close to the standard that is expected or required.

But for McNeil to stand out for how poor he was says everything you need to know.

It was clear from the outset this season that McNeil would no longer have the key player status that he had enjoyed under Sean Dyche. It was also clear, as it has been for years, that Everton are a team severely lacking in pace down the flanks.

Everton made a mess of the summer window when it came to buying a much-needed right winger. Tyler Dibling, at 19, was not the answer in the short or medium term, and Everton tried to run before they could walk in purchasing him. Thankfully, Dibling is a talented, high-potential prospect who hopefully will get his chances down the line and will come good. But he was the wrong fit for what was needed right now. Moyes and the rest of the transfer committee must hold up their hands — they got it wrong.

But that does not mean Dibling should have to wait behind an out-of-position and out-of-form McNeil to play on the right.

There is no way McNeil is a better option, offensively, than Dibling in that role.

McNeil was signed in 2022, and reportedly, then-Director of Football Kevin Thelwell and manager Frank Lampard felt the former Burnley man could potentially operate from the right, cutting in on his stronger left foot and exploiting his long-range shooting ability.

Yet it really is baffling how that could even be a thought process, if they had actually spent time watching McNeil earlier in his career. He is one-paced, terribly one-footed, and not particularly agile. None of that equates to a wide player who thrives when asked to play an inverted role.

So, nearly four years later, how have Everton ended up in a position where McNeil is still being asked to start on the right wing?

Let’s be fair here. McNeil has done his bit since his arrival. He played a crucial role in Everton staying up in 2022-23, as he really stepped up once Sean Dyche arrived, playing out on the left but with the freedom to drift inside in a more narrow shape.

He kept up those performance levels in 2023-24, again scoring some vital goals (and some great strikes) as Dyche steered Everton away from danger. And he is clearly a well-liked member of the squad.

But McNeil had not suddenly become a top-quality operator. He has a great left foot, and works hard. That is, essentially, it.

And as soon as more has been asked of him. As soon as the expectations have been raised, he has failed to deliver.

He was injured when Moyes arrived last January, and by the time he did get back in the team, Iliman Ndiaye had (rightly) established himself on the left. McNeil had been playing as a number 10 at times under Dyche prior to his injury, but that skewed the structure of the whole midfield.

Last season, Everton didn’t have the options, so it was understandable to see McNeil feature on the right when needed. But how have they allowed themselves to go through a whole summer window, and most of a winter one, and still have that be the case?

With Jack Grealish out for the majority of the season, the answer to Everton’s right-sided conundrum cannot be McNeil.

He is lost there in an attacking sense, and defensively, he is all over the place. He was disciplined against Aston Villa, tucking inside to perform a role that Dibling would have been unable to, and that should be to McNeil’s credit.

But bar one neat assist against Nottingham Forest late in December, McNeil has offered absolutely nothing this season.

He has been dragged off at half-time several times, including on Monday. He has been at fault for the opposition getting in down his side, including Leeds’ goal, as he failed to track James Justin and then made a half-hearted attempt to get back.

McNeil can only be getting in this team because of his Premier League experience (Moyes’ favourite crutch to lean on) and supposed work rate.

But how much evidence to the contrary must there be before Moyes and Everton, finally act?

McNeil will not be here beyond the summer, and there is a good argument to say he should not be here now. Everton go with the safety-first route far too often, instead of making a swift decision on players who are no longer good enough.

McNeil could have, and should have, been moved on last summer, and replaced with a winger with genuine pace and a little bit of know-how. Everton could still have signed Tyler Dibling, but he at least would have had time to develop. It is not his fault that he is not the profile of winger Everton required.

A move away would suit McNeil, too. All involved need a fresh start. But Everton are petrified to cut the cord, and as sure as night follows day, you can expect to see him back on the right wing, and back underperforming, as the season goes on.

Enough is enough. Please, let’s move on.


Reader Comments (104)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()


Mike Powell
1 Posted 28/01/2026 at 15:21:54
There is a few of them who hopefully won't be here next season.

There is at least 5 who aren't good enough.

John Williams
2 Posted 28/01/2026 at 15:48:34
I don t think he has recovered from the injury he suffered last season. I always thought his best position was inside playing midfield.

He may have had his time with Everton, but it's not that easy getting rid of players, you don't just hand them their P45 -- he has a contract.

Ajay Gopal
3 Posted 28/01/2026 at 16:15:24
I think it is also important to highlight his positive contributions this season -- his assist for the Nottingham Forest win, his shot that resulted in Barry scoring the winner against Villa, come to mind readily. There is a good player in there and I refuse to get on the bandwagon that says he is a useless player.

A player does not become bad overnight. He could have a bad day or he could be utilised in a way that minimises his strengths. Moyes has his favourites and he will play them no matter what.

Dave Abrahams
4 Posted 28/01/2026 at 16:15:46
Anjishnu...

Right, so Dibling is going to come in and do more than McNeil? I can't wait for that...

Jesus, any more good ideas to improve the team!

Kieran Kinsella
5 Posted 28/01/2026 at 16:20:54
I think McNeil's story is complex. Last year, when his form dipped, it was revealed his partner was seriously ill. I don't know her status now but something like that is going to have a major effect on your mindset and work performance.

The other thing with McNeil is that his strength is also under Moyes his weakness. That is his ability to drive through the middle and create chances or try his luck with strikes from distance. It's his weakness due to his propensity to lose the ball.

If you have Gueye and AN Other dedicated to picking up lost balls and covering his sloppiness then he can look decent. But if you want to progress as a team, you can't have central midfielders solely dedicated to cleaning up his mess, especially since he's not that good anyway by Premier League standards at attacking in that way if you look at his output of goals and assists.

I think Moyes's intolerance of risky moves leading to loss of possession means he is now less inclined to surge forward. But when he doesn't do that, he has very little to offer.

I think also having Ndiaye and Grealish as better quality risk takers versus the sterile Harrison and Lindstrom means there is even less reason to gamble with McNeil as a sloppy creator.

So, while I don't think his attitude is to blame, I do agree he's not good enough if we are to be more than relegation battlers. But, as others said, if he leaves, we won't generate much or any fee.

Mark Murphy
6 Posted 28/01/2026 at 16:21:30
"We" very soon became "they" and "Everton" Anji!
No need to pretend mate, I think we know.

Re McNeil -- in my opinion, he's still got a role to play in our compact squad until the summer but only as a sub. As disappointing as Dibling, Alcaraz, Iroegbunam and Rohl may have been, they are here for the long term and should all be ahead in the queue.

McNeil just isn't fit enough since last season.

Bill Hawker
7 Posted 28/01/2026 at 16:41:31
I've got no issue with McNeil coming of the bench late in a game but he shouldn't be starting matches for us. I just don't think he's ever really recovered from the injury he had and I don't think he's fully fit.

That said, we should be looking to improve or upgrade positions in the squad constantly. Right now, right-back, left-back, and the striker positions are much higher priorities.

Mike Gaynes
8 Posted 28/01/2026 at 16:52:55
John #2 and Murph #6, agree.

"Get rid" and "swift decision" are easy to say but, as we've seen during the recent crisis, this is still a thin squad vulnerable to injury; we don't have the luxury of just dumping players, at least not without knowing whom we will put out there instead.

Kinnear says the next phase of the squad rebuild will happen in the summer. I think we can all be pretty sure Dwight McNeil will be gone then.

Ian Bennett
9 Posted 28/01/2026 at 16:58:20
He's had good games and poor games. He can be anonymous all game, and create or score. He isn't pleasing on the eye.

Like Mykolenko, I think we need better than Dwight McNeil. The issue is we don't have anyone on the right that is smashing it.

Perhaps the answer is play Dibling every week till he comes good; with decent players coming back, perhaps the group can carry him...

Ian Wilkins
10 Posted 28/01/2026 at 17:06:51
Given the squad depth, lack of, we can't get rid of anybody now unless there's a replacement, a better replacement. There appears to be interest in Beto (good time to offload if we can bring in another striker).

Good time to offload McNeil (to a Premier League struggler?) but only if we bring in another wide player. I think we need another wide player irrespective, allowing the chance to send Dibling on loan to get some playing time somewhere.

Shaun Parker
11 Posted 28/01/2026 at 17:17:47
If McNeil does move on, please can he take Mykelenko with him? In my view, he is the worst left back we have ever had.

Can't head, can't cross, can't shoot, has zero awareness to mention just a few. On another note, has anybody ever seen Dibling smile? 🤔

Kunal Desai
12 Posted 28/01/2026 at 18:07:03
I'd have more faith in someone from our fifty odd thousand fanbase in attendance to put in a more committed effort and performance than this excuse of a footballer.

Give him away to Dyche please.

Peter Mills
13 Posted 28/01/2026 at 18:13:41
This is an unpleasant article.

McNeil was poor on Monday. He was not in the game. He looked like he was uncomfortable on the pitch. Who knows what was going on with him?

Putting the Leeds game to one side, I may have questioned Dwight's ability at times, but he has always had a good attitude, often under very testing personal circumstances.

Quite unnecessary, Patric.

Christy Ring
14 Posted 28/01/2026 at 18:25:00
He was poor against Leeds, had his problems off the field.

But, for me, to single out one player in an article and say "Enough is Enough" is totally wrong, way over the top.

Patric Ridge
15 Posted 28/01/2026 at 18:27:09
Peter Mills #13,

I can assure you it was not meant as a hit piece, or as an 'unpleasant' article.

Ultimately not every piece can be positive. Dwight's performance on Monday wasn't just bad -- there was a clear lack of effort.

I did note that this isn't normally the case. I did also note the positive impact he has made this season, at times, and also just last week, lauded his discipline v Villa.

But he has had plenty of chances now under Moyes, and we are having to stretch to pick out 1-2 good moments. What's worrying is that desire seems to have completely left him.

All footballers are humans and that is always taken into account. But he has also simply not been very good for quite a while. He is being played over a player who should or could be Everton's future. That is the manager's choice, of course... but then repay the manager's faith!

Shaun Parker
16 Posted 28/01/2026 at 18:46:24
Would anybody take Sterling until the end of the season?
Dale Self
17 Posted 28/01/2026 at 19:00:04
I think Kieran is getting it right. As a long time McNeil supporter, I believe he has checked out with Moyes.

Moyes put his arm around him after the Villa match. I thought that would be the beginning of some sustained better form. I would love to have heard what was said.

John Collins
18 Posted 28/01/2026 at 19:39:24
Shaun,

I'd prefer Euros thanks

David West
19 Posted 28/01/2026 at 19:54:55
He was never blessed with pace and since his injury he seems to have lost not a yard of pace but a 20 yards of pace, he's a shadow of the silhouette that once was our key player, even if it was in a very poor Everton side.

Rohl, Dibling, Armstrong or Alcaraz could all fulfil that role with more desire, purpose. Pace and threat now.

I'm not Patterson's biggest fan, but McNeil offered him nothing in that first half. No cover, no width, no runs down the line, nothing!

The whole right side is weak now Ndiaye is on the left again; McNeil exposes that even more.

Rod Harrington
20 Posted 28/01/2026 at 20:04:26
Peter (13), I completely agree.

Zero need for this negativity, it brings nothing. TW has morphed into a gambling advertising website which is unpleasant enough without the toxicity.

Patric Ridge
21 Posted 28/01/2026 at 20:08:39
Rod #20,

It's simply an opinion piece :) It's absolutely fair to disagree, but it was not meant to be a hit piece.

I have written several positive articles on this site, if you'd wish to read them.

Dave Abrahams
22 Posted 28/01/2026 at 20:25:24
Sorry Anjishnu for my post blaming you for this headline.

I'm a fan of McNeil because I know he is better than he has played this season and he is still a young player. Some of the problem is he has hardly played this season, and yet only recently he had a good hand in the win v Forest away and came on as a sub in the home game against them, he was very good in that game.

Last week v Aston Villa, he had a decent game and his shot on goal provided the chance for Barry to add a brilliant touch to score that winner. If a certain player had made that shot, then it would have been as a great assist instead of being derided by a couple of posters as a weak shot and a poor save by the Villa ‘keeper.

Sorry, Patric, when I wrote my earlier post, I was thinking exactly what Peter wrote @13 but thought it had been written by Anjishnu who writes from India, I think

You definitely should know better as a committed Evertonian — that was a personal attack, to me, and out of order. If McNeil isn't sold in the next few days then Moyes will need and use him during the rest of the season.

Liam Mogan
23 Posted 28/01/2026 at 21:10:01
The lad has never had pace, but is slower than ever this season. He can't get in the game and whilst he does run about a bit, he has become totally ineffective.

He has had some good performances for us down the years, but all his weaknesses have taken over this year. Loses the ball, dribbles backwards, can't keep up with runners defensively etc.

He reminds me of Dele Alli, in that everything he had seems to have disappeared all at once. Maybe he also has some non-football things going on. If he does, my sympathies are with him, but at the moment, he shouldn't be getting game time.

Laurie Hartley
24 Posted 28/01/2026 at 21:24:32
I was quite surprised to see McNeill allow Justin a free run into our box. For me, it was totally out of character and reminded me of Schneiderlin.

Shaun # 16 - I would take Sterling no worries if we could cut a deal. He has pace and doesn't get injured and I reckon he has a couple of years left in him.

Derek Thomas
25 Posted 28/01/2026 at 21:51:39
Laurie @ 24; you know mate, that's such bad an idea (from the ex rs perspective... and I always thought he was all Sky darling hype) it might just be good, get him on a loan until the end of the season, he can help us (?) while putting himself in the shop window.

How many loans do we have left up our sleeve though?

Can he be any worse than McNeil or Dibling, knowing us, yes.

Rob Dolby
26 Posted 28/01/2026 at 22:09:32
I agree with Peter 13.

People have short memories. We bought McNeil when we didn't have a pot to piss in. When fit and having a run of games, the lad can play.

McNeil did stink the house out on Monday. Do people think he decided to play inside and try to condense play on his own? Or was he playing to orders from the manager who picks the team and formation?

Moyes could have taken Mykolenko off at half time and played McNeil as a wing-back — he wouldn't have looked any worse than our left-back.

Dale Self
27 Posted 28/01/2026 at 23:21:11
Good line, John @18.

You have had more than a few of late. Keep it going.

Derek Knox
28 Posted 29/01/2026 at 01:34:23
I didn't get the impression that this was an unpleasant article or assassination of McNeil. However, quite the opposite: I believe it expresses the feelings of most supporters.

I have said to my mate, on many occasions, that every time McNeil has played this season, he has been lethargic and non-productive. Yet, I couldn't believe how he was getting selected over others with a better attitude and ability.

Kieran Kinsella
29 Posted 29/01/2026 at 01:47:07
When this was posted, it was attributed to Anjush. Now it's Patric.

Is Patric a pseudonym for Anjush? The AI boy? I thought Patric was a credible poster until now.

Nicolas Piñon
30 Posted 29/01/2026 at 01:52:03
Mykolenko and Jeane are worse. You can be pretty sure of that.

There's a good player in McNeil on the bench at least. For the other two... not even that if we want to make progress.
Nicolas Piñon
31 Posted 29/01/2026 at 01:57:54
That's if we don't mention Beto...

Don't get me started please!
Paul Griffiths
32 Posted 29/01/2026 at 03:54:42
Got a question for #8, Mr. Gaynes: ‘Kinnear says the next phase of the squad rebuild will happen in the summer'.

Can you provide me/us with a link where Kinnear directly says this unequivocally? Now, I'm sure that it is there but I just want to see it for reassurance.

Peter, you mention Dwight's ‘very testing personal circumstances'; Patric (15), you refer to the blind-bleedingly obvious but no less important for that, ‘All footballers are humans and that is always taken into account'.

Strangely, I cannot recall who, but I definitely remember reading a recent post in which someone said that ‘circumstances' are not relevant when it comes to evaluating a player and his performance.

I'm glad that you agree with me and I think it was Tony-A, an actual professional footballer, that this view of the irrelevance of ‘circumstances' is, quite frankly, utter garbage.

Paul Griffiths
33 Posted 29/01/2026 at 04:02:26
I noticed that too Kieran (29). I'm struggling to think how that might have happened. It makes me wonder what on earth is going on and who is who and what is what.

The second article Patric posted today on -- yawn -- what does Calvert-Lewin's departure mean for us now has been written twice before on these pages (might be once, to be fair, might be three times) and it is, quite frankly, arguably an opportune attempt to squeeze out a few posts.

A thread put up by Anjishnu today has attracted exactly no responses so far.

It is inconceivable that this could have happened say two years ago, when we got one considered article a day, if we were lucky, and sometimes went a couple of days without one. I know which one of these modus operandi I prefer...

Paul Griffiths
34 Posted 29/01/2026 at 04:05:05
Can one of you or one of you who might also be the other fella please get back to us about the many questions you have had about the edit button that we were last told three weeks or so ago would be sorted out with a word with the 'tech' folk?

This lack of activity/updates is somewhat unprofessional and borders on indifference or disrespect or both.

Eric Myles
35 Posted 29/01/2026 at 04:30:22
Paul #32, there was an article on TW a few weeks ago where the CEO said as much, damping down expectations of any recruitment in this window.

Can't find it now though in News Archive and a search for Angus Kinnear surprisingly yields no results. Methinks it's not only the Edit button that's wonky.

Eric Myles
36 Posted 29/01/2026 at 04:44:10
Kinnear Article

I beleive this is it Paul.

Another thing that's wonky, this comment window doesn't allow me to paste text that I copied from the above article.

Paul Griffiths
37 Posted 29/01/2026 at 05:05:26
Cheers Eric!
Mike Gaynes
38 Posted 29/01/2026 at 06:38:09
Eric #36, thanks for finding that. The exact line that stuck in my head was "...we will avoid short-term fixes that will weaken our hand for phase two of our rebuild next summer." But I couldn't remember if it was in an interview or how to recover it.

FYI, if you right-click you should be able to paste anything in this response window. Not sure why you hit a snag but it usually works fine.

Tony Abrahams
39 Posted 29/01/2026 at 07:41:26
Every single member of staff waking up thinking with every sinew about how they can make sure that the School of Science is on its way back.

Hearing powerful words like this just makes me think Angus is just another version of Marcel Brands saying things like money can make you lazy.

Jimmy Carr
40 Posted 29/01/2026 at 08:05:17
It'll be all Dwight on the night. Even when he was good, he was never that good, but unless we have a replacement lined up, and a taker, he's here ‘til the summer. Everyone's allowed a bad game now and again. He'll probably be starting the next game.

So yeah, Kinnear did say there is a phase two coming. He won't have written that himself, it'll have been the PR team. They need to tone down the style.

I see Keith Wyness (yes, I know) is predicting that a deal for Grealish will definitely get done in the summer.

Paul Griffiths
41 Posted 29/01/2026 at 08:28:08
Tony, what came out of his mouth in the link Eric posted is trebly disheartening. Cinq? A tripe-text of cliches, stereotypes, caricatures, and what he thinks is our culture.

TFG do not get us. Full stop. They try, bless. They search for the right expressions, but 'COYB' or 'respect tradition' just sound hollow, rehearsed, and practised.

Apparently, Saint Daniel the Absent is, as a poster said with his 'guarantee', 'falling for us'. When asked for his source, a link, or evidence, said poster ignored multiple requests and was silent like Saint Daniel the Absent.

I don't believe a single word that comes out of whatshisname's mouth, except that they will do little or nothing this window. Anyone who takes his words about the summer is at this point the gullible elderly person in the studio audience who claps along like a puppet when asked to clap by the fella with the board.

Let's see what happens. We need new players in this window, not next, and if these Yanks and their co-opted flock knew anything about who we are and what we need, they would take action.

The alternative is what some think will be cruise-control to the end of the season. They might be right. Let's see.

Another interpretation: Saint Daniel the Absent, who really enjoys going to Roma games, will, like Kenwright, treat us as his train-set or one more 'franchise' to play off against others -- I hate that fucking Yank meaning/word, just like 'offense', 'roster', or 'dude'.

TFG have backed Roma with a splash of cash this window. They have done fuck all for us so far... and don't give me 'well first season'.

The to me lemmings who put faith in -- what is his fucking name -- and his mouth and believe that it is the literal truth appear desperate and sordidly gullible to some -- less so on the right side of the Atlantic.

Me? I really hope that they are right.

(Interesting that according to Whatshisname, there never was a plan for the January window. Did you watch the first half against your beloved Leeds, soft lad?)

Paul Griffiths
42 Posted 29/01/2026 at 08:30:16
This Benitez edit button FFS.
Darren Hind
43 Posted 29/01/2026 at 08:31:09
I agree with those who think this piece is unnecessarily nasty.

A similar article could have been put up about 7-8 of our players after the Leeds match. Most of our players stunk the gaff out. I think whoever penned this piece is simply scapegoating.

The accusation that a player didn't try is just about the worst one that can be levelled

John Collins
44 Posted 29/01/2026 at 08:33:09
McNeil plays central or doesn't play, for me.
Paul Griffiths
45 Posted 29/01/2026 at 08:45:33
A trite let's see if me or Mr Roy can get a reaction unnecessary piece of writing, Darren. Love the idea that it is an opinion and therefore swerves the 'nasty' accusations. Sorry, Patric, Mr Roy, or whoever wrote it, it does not.

I don't believe that in 99 per cent of times, footy players do not 'try'. It does not work out, perhaps, or they are not good enough, but they try. I thought that McNeil was shite v Leeds but I believe that he tried. He was one of six or seven of our lads who were first-half shite and could have been subbed.

I was hoping that it would be Tarkowski for Branthwaite, Gana for Dewsbury-Hall, and McNeil for Dibling... Dwight was just one of six or seven shite players in that unforgivable first 45 minutes.

Harry Diamond
46 Posted 29/01/2026 at 08:48:49
Kieran @29,

Patric's submissions are sent via email and Anjishnu then loads to site. He would have just missed changing the user name on initial post.

Paul @34,

I'll chase the edit button fix (again). Unfortunately it's out of the hands of the posters you see on here and the MoveUp tech are stretched across 10+ sites. I can assure you the request is not being ignored.

Philip Devlin
47 Posted 29/01/2026 at 08:51:58
Paul Griffiths,

Your obsession with Mike Gaynes is getting really creepy.

Bill Fairfield
48 Posted 29/01/2026 at 09:01:49
I think McNeil is an honest enough lad, but we need better than we've got in a few positions.

The squad lacks power and pace. Until this is addressed, we'll just trundle along as we are.

Paul Griffiths
49 Posted 29/01/2026 at 09:02:52
LOL, Mr Devlin, nice try.

If 'obsession' means responding to and not forgetting some of the stuff that Gaynes posts on here, then guilty. On the other hand, instead of giving subsiding ballast to incorrect posts, tell us what you think, newbie, instead of croaking out one-line fluff.

I'm all ears, Devvers, come on, try and write more than a single line and jump on board and add your powerful voice to what I criticise in Gaynes. Go on, lad.

My erm 'guarantee', far more true bred blues are in my conversation. I hear from them every day. Go on lad, say something meaningful. I dare you.

Philip Devlin
50 Posted 29/01/2026 at 09:13:15
Why so angry all the time, Paul?

Nearly every post I read of yours on here is spittle-flecked anger -- directed at TW writers, TFG, other posters… it gets tiresome scrolling through it.

Maybe try chilling out a bit. Do breathing exercises. Something, anything.

Paul Griffiths
52 Posted 29/01/2026 at 09:25:35
Ha Ha Ha Ha. Angry Devvers? Nah. Sometimes, okay. Not least when, like you, your new bestie Gaynes never responds to criticisms or requests -- many, by now -- for clarification.

Again, say something that matters and is meaningful, that I can reply to. Respond to the question(s) I asked of you. Be meaningful. I believe in you, I don't want to think of you as another light wind-up merchant.

I truly believe that you have something substantial to say about the Gaynes agenda rather than ad hominem pinpricks.

Go on, lad. You have substance.

Darren Hind
53 Posted 29/01/2026 at 09:25:39
Philip Devlin,

Your developing obsession with coming on a footy website and never talking about footy, is what's really creepy.

If you've got anything to say about the game, the club, the manager, or anything else to do with Everton, say it.

Who knows what would happen if you ever talk about Everton? Mine may not be the only response you ever get on here.

But if you are going to continue with your idiotic attempts to snipe at other posters from the sideline, you can forget any ideas of ever getting any more.

Ray Jacques
54 Posted 29/01/2026 at 09:38:43
We are all entitled to an opinion and the differences are what make this forum largely enjoyable.

I roll my eyes with disappointment and say a swear word whilst shaking my head whenever McNeil is selected as he will disappoint 9 times out of 10. However, I feel singling him out for a full article is unfair.

The needle on the drossometer (as someone described it a few days ago) was smoking in the red at half time against Leeds and it wasn't all down to him.

If I cast my mind back, then I could write the same article thousands of times about Everton players from mad Bernie Wright up to Niasse.

I find this a little unfair on the lad.

John Collins
55 Posted 29/01/2026 at 09:47:35
Ray,

Me too.

A pointless article that can do nobody any good.

Paul Griffiths
56 Posted 29/01/2026 at 09:48:45
'If I cast my mind back, then I could write the same article thousands of times about Everton players from mad Bernie Wright up to Niasse.'

Love that Ray. But why start with Bernie and end with poor old Oumar? Henry Stanley Buck from the1909 squad was pants, and we did have Jack Harrison.

Philip Devlin
57 Posted 29/01/2026 at 09:49:29
Oh look. It's the other angry poster, Darren. Hi Darren.

I'm not sure what you mean by a “developing obsession” when I've only posted a couple of times, but yeah, you crack on mate.

And you having a go at someone else on here for “sniping” at other posters? That is really quite special. My advice to Paul Griffiths is the same to you -- you can't keep thinking you can steam into other posters with angry, personal insults and then clutch your pearls if it's flagged up to you.

Like I said, do some yoga or take beta blockers -- just drop the angry keyboard hardman routine. It's beyond tedious.

As for Everton? Patric's right -- McNeil couldn't be arsed the other night -- hugely at fault for their goal. He needs moving on. There. Boom!

Ged Simpson
58 Posted 29/01/2026 at 09:53:23
TW seems to now have a number of self-appointed editors posting under the guise of "debate". Who needs the edit button!

Read article re McNeil. My ignorance, but was he once good? Hope any movement in transfer window doesn't bring in a player who was once good but suspect it may, as aren't they the kind of players sold in January?

Mark Murphy
59 Posted 29/01/2026 at 09:58:05
John Collins (are you a St Helens lad by the way?),

I agree that McNeil should only play central if at all, but as I mentioned earlier, only if Dewsbury-Hall, Alcaraz, Dibling or Rohl are not fit to play.

Going forward now, assuming a fit squad, Dewsbury-Hall should be in the middle with Ndiaye to his left and Dibling to his right. Garner and Rohl behind them, Barry up top.

I can understand McNeil being used on the left if there's no option -- for example, when Ndiaye was at Afcon and Grealish was out, but Dwight should not be anything now but a squad filler.

On saying that, I truly hope he rams those words down my throat on Saturday if he does play a part.

John Collins
60 Posted 29/01/2026 at 10:07:48
No Mark, are you from that way?

I agree with your points on McNeil 100%.

Darren Hind
61 Posted 29/01/2026 at 10:08:01
Phil Devlin,

Another post expressing your anger and tedium? You've posted half a dozen times to say that?

Try developing an opinion instead of this attention seeking daft-arsed obsession and you may be taken seriously.

In the meantime... See ya!

Paul Griffiths
62 Posted 29/01/2026 at 10:12:01
Oh dear Devvers, 57. Poor. Write something meaningful, lad. Respond to issues, not your ad hom trite. I still believe in you, but LOL1

'You can't keep thinking you can steam into other posters with angry, personal insults and then clutch your pearls if it's flagged up to you'.

Here's a challenge for you, Devvers. Give an example, on this thread, of Darren or I 'steaming into other posters with angry, personal insults.'

Go on, I believe in you.

'The angry keyboard hardman routine'. I believe that you can give us quotes on this thread to back this up. Just do it, Devvers. I don't want to think of you as tedium. Sadly, your suffering icon Gaynsey might not be thrilled by your 'support' as plastic and inarticulate as it is. It's a bit like Kristi Noem and Donald.

Say something substantial about issues and questions. For the third time now, I dare you. Give me something about Everton that I can respond to. I would just hate to file you under K.

Seriously, as a professor and writer, I am busy. You have one last chance for me to respond to something meaningful on issues raised or fuck it, you're done, no more words.

No more words, Devvers, FYI, were the last words ever written by Americas's, imo, greatest ever short story writer, Raymond Carver. Try the collections 'What We Talk About When We talk About Love' or 'Cathedral'.

Brian Harrison
63 Posted 29/01/2026 at 10:33:21
With only days left of the transfer window, it looks like there will be nobody coming in and TFG have decided to keep their powder dry till the summer.

I think it's probably right to wait till summer, but our recruitment team need to do better than last summer. I believe we have the nucleus of a good side well capable of European football, but we do need goal-scoring additions and some pace added to the side.

Ndaiye is a wonderfully gifted player... I just wish we could get him more central, as his ability to go past players is there for all to see. I just wish we could get him into a situation where he only has to beat one man on the edge of the box, which would give him a better goal return.

I am at a loss to know what we do with young Dibling. In all his appearances, we haven't even seen a glimpse of what he showed while at Southampton. I know he is young but I have seen a lot of youngsters have more of an impact than Tyler has in the 6 months he has been here.

It's obvious his confidence is low and maybe the fee paid and the expectation that came with that has also contributed to his slow start. I am sure the coaches are working extremely hard with him to help him reproduce the form he showed at Southampton.

I think getting this lad playing again is far more important than what we do with McNeil, who will probably leave in the summer.

Steve Brown
64 Posted 29/01/2026 at 10:38:36
Patric, I thought the content and tone of the article was fine.

Your conclusion was also spot on. McNeil has lost motivation, his commitment has dropped, and his quality is questionable. If Grealish had not been injured, I would have tried to move him on this month. Regardless, he cannot be a starter.

He might be good enough for relegation-threatened squads, but no team in the Top 10 of the Premier League would buy him.

Philip Devlin
65 Posted 29/01/2026 at 10:39:38
You sure you're busy, Paul? Busy on here maybe. Busy ranting and screeching at other posters that “They're done” if they don't respond to your hysterical demands.

It is quite funny... (Your detailed fantasy about Mike Gaynes in a cheerleader's outfit the other day was quite disturbing though).

Like I keep saying to both of you, try breathing exercises. It works wonders, curing angry, self-appointed gatekeepers.

Raymond Fox
66 Posted 29/01/2026 at 10:42:50
Queue McNeil having a good run of form and scoring one or two worldies!

That's what usually happens when a player gets mullered on here.

There's a decent player in there. I think he looks unhappy with playing in a position he is not suited to.

Okay, you can't down tools though, you have to get on with it... but I think that's the trouble, his best position is not where he is getting picked.

If you sell, you have to find a player as good or better; it's not that easy.

Paul Griffiths
67 Posted 29/01/2026 at 10:43:51
Brian @63, what do you think, mate? Will Ndiaye be with us next summer?

I have little faith in Kinnear's ventriloquist formatted December words. We might well need -- with potential summer outgoings: Ndiaye, Beto, Keane, Tarkowski, Mykolenko, McNeil, Patterson, Iroegbunam -- a dozen new players.

No way on earth do I trust Saint Daniel the Absent and our crack recruitment team to do the job after last summer's first team squad B- window. No way. I hope I’m wrong. I really do.

Steve Brown
69 Posted 29/01/2026 at 10:50:14
Paul @ 67, you have a stalker mate.

Best check that taser in case he turns up at your house.

Dave Abrahams
70 Posted 29/01/2026 at 10:52:07
Brian (63);

I think you are correct in saying TFG will not be signing any players in this window but they are showing their manners with “Ladies before Gentlemen” — they have signed two for the women's team.

I think in the case of Dibling, we should use an old-fashioned remedy to get him going — a good hard kick up the arse! Because, at the moment, he looks like he's got the making of a fine big lazy so and so!

Brian Harrison
72 Posted 29/01/2026 at 10:59:52
Dave @70,

You and I are old enough to remember some players who might have had more than just a stern word on the training ground with Tyler Dibling.

Obviously he showed plenty of potential at Southampton, and I was honestly excited when we signed him. But he has showed nothing so far... and Moyes plays him or McNeil against Brighton -- what a choice.

I know when he was younger, Dibling moved from Southampton to Chelsea but went back after a few months with homesickness being the cause. Now, for professional footballers, they become nomadic during their careers so it's something Tyler will have to get over if he is to be successful.

Kevin Molloy
73 Posted 29/01/2026 at 11:14:02
I really can't stand this guy Kinnear, he's an absolute bellend.
Mark Taylor
74 Posted 29/01/2026 at 11:42:00
There are three fundamental weaknesses with McNeil. He has no right foot at all, is unbelievably slow, and he is the type of footballer who takes an age to build back up to his peak if he hasn't been playing.

That peak isn't very high but it was decent, especially more centrally. He has a shot on him (provided it's his left foot) and is not afraid to try his luck. That earned us a goal recently.

But overall, his performances are seriously underwhelming. The picture in my head is, when the ball goes past him, his head goes down (literally, not metaphorically) as he tries to get up a bit of speed. He chugs, not runs.

Dynamic he is not... and in a side that lacks that quality, his presence conspires to make us look even more lethargic. His value is impacted by the fact we have a wide choice of Number 10s, probably his best position, that all offer more than he does.

The stock of players in wide positions (full back and wide forwards) is parlous and has been for years. Dibling has been entirely underwhelming and has been disinterested but rather as with Barry, I think we have to take the plunge and give him an extended run, and hope he shows steady improvement with a little bit of love (as Barry has been doing to be fair). His ceiling is certainly much higher than McNeil's and we just have to make £40M players work.

Mark Murphy
75 Posted 29/01/2026 at 12:17:21
John at 60 - yes I am but I haven't lived there since the early 80s.

I asked as I went to school with a John Collins, a very good footballer and a good blue to boot.

Martin Berry
76 Posted 29/01/2026 at 12:21:12
McNeil seems to have been off it this season; not sure what is going on as he is still young. His performance against Brighton a couple of seasons ago is a distant memory.

As for Dibling, he needs space to show off his strengths but it#s not easy on the wings when two stack up against him. I see him driving forward through the middle in the future and causing havoc.

That will raise eyebrows and maybe a chuckle or two but remember he is still so young, and compare with Grealish and Ndiaye when they were 19, patience is needed!

Paul O\'Neill
77 Posted 29/01/2026 at 12:23:16
I think it's beyond unfortunate that, as Evertonians and on ToffeeWeb in particular, we have to single out one player and lay into him.

This article is nonsense. It's assumed knowledge and conjecture from beginning to end. Or as much of it as I could be bothered to read.

Years ago, everything was Earl Barrett's fault, more recently Michael Keane... and now it's McNeil's turn. If a player has a loss of form, by all means point it out, but a character assassination is infantile.

John Collins
78 Posted 29/01/2026 at 12:51:47
Mark 75,

"A very good footballer"

Thats deffo not me, mate. I asked as I wanted to ask what the ratio of Blues was in St Helens nowadays.

I worked up there many years ago, seemed to be a split of Man Utd and Liverpool fans mainly.

Dave Abrahams
79 Posted 29/01/2026 at 13:00:50
Paul (77),

Being honest, Joe Royle bought Earl Barrett and told us he had a Rolls-Royce engine. Earl was a decent full-back but didn't have the other parts to go with the engine.

With Michael Keane, we've had over eight seasons to make our minds up about his over all value. McNeil hasn't had a good season but was hardly played in the first months of the season.

On Monday, most of the team looked lethargic to say the least in the first half. including Moyes watching and doing nothing except looking exasperated and Irvine looking fed up listening to him.

Ian Bennett
80 Posted 29/01/2026 at 13:13:28
Earl Barrett was a centre-back at Oldham, but Joe Royle was happy to play him at right-back over Matt Jackson.

I suspect fans back then didn't bellyache over the point, as they do now.

James Marshall
81 Posted 29/01/2026 at 13:38:09
He's a squad player. Why would we want to get rid of him? He's not a starter, he's only been playing due to injuries, suspensions and Afcon and now you're slagging him off and calling for him to be sold?

Sorry but the OP is way off the mark here. McNeil isn't a brilliant player, but that's why he's a squad player

Without him, we'd have been playing Dibling every week and he's a dreadful footballer. I know he's young but his attitude looks awful to me.

Ray Jacques
82 Posted 29/01/2026 at 14:18:31
Funniest thing I remember about Earl Barrett was him being sent off in an away game, I think it was midweek.

Joe Royle was asked in his after-match interview why he thinks Earl was dismissed by the referee and he answered dead pan 'for heavy breathing' and exited right.

End of interview.

Jimmy Carr
83 Posted 29/01/2026 at 14:25:00
Philip Devlin

Just scroll past the posts and say nothing. It's easier that way.

Si Cooper
84 Posted 29/01/2026 at 14:42:52
Kieran (5) and Peter (13) are right in that we should all be wary that we aren't seeing the entirety of what players are struggling with when we judge them from what we see during a game. It's very easy to say the hefty wages should be inspirational but stress can be very insidious.

Dwight McNeil has (always had) his limitations but I agree with those who believe he is always trying to do his best.
He does, unfortunately, have an awful habit of literally allowing his head to drop when he is obviously struggling which doesn't help him project a positive and combative demeanour.

The whole team looked a world away from the one that faced Villa 8 days before. It would be fascinating to see how different (or not) their match-day preparation was for those matches.

Philip Devlin
85 Posted 29/01/2026 at 15:41:41
Jimmy @83. True, very true. Although a little holistic intervention can work wonders every now and again.

John Collins @78, my turn to wonder if I know you -- did you work for SVC in London in the late 90s?

Rob Dolby
86 Posted 29/01/2026 at 17:25:03
McNeil playing orthodox left-wing, plays to his strengths and whips the ball into the box. A couple of seasons ago McNeil created loads of chances but we couldn't finish them. He is one-footed and is lethargic looking, I am sure the GPS stats will tell you that he isn't the slowest or laziest person on the team.

It's down to Moyes to get a tune out of players. McNeil probably has 300 Premier League appearances so that should tell you he is a Premier League player. Play to his strengths and he can contribute.

I know Dibbling has looked lost but what role did he play for Southampton? He certainly wasn't asked to defend or run around like a loon.

As a club, we aren't buying the finished product. We need to coach and develop players -- that's where the coaching staff earn their money.

We have an average group of players. McNeil is one of our more productive players since he arrived. I know that's not saying much.

I can't wait until Keane is back in the team -- that will boil Patric's piss... or whoever is submitting the articles.

Shaun Parker
87 Posted 29/01/2026 at 18:05:14
I see Sterling is being ‘chased’ by 7 champions league clubs. He’s just not good enough for Everton 🙈🤷🏻‍♂️
Shaun Parker
88 Posted 29/01/2026 at 18:10:31
Dwight McNeil was one of our best players last season. This season he has hardly featured. Probably lost the motivation under Moyes who does have his favourites
John Collins
89 Posted 29/01/2026 at 18:12:43
Phillip 85.

No mate, I worked in London in the 80s but not for SVC

Jay Harris
90 Posted 29/01/2026 at 18:42:00
Dave #79,

I was chatting to Peter Beagrie one time and asked him what he thought of Earl Barrett.

His response was instant and sharp "He is shite".

John Collins
91 Posted 29/01/2026 at 18:54:13
Shaun,

Sterling has not played in any competitive football for 8 months.

Get him in now he should be match fit by end of March

Ian Bennett
92 Posted 29/01/2026 at 19:25:10
Sterling is a no for me.
Paul Griffiths
93 Posted 30/01/2026 at 06:35:09
Jimmy Carr 83 - Philip Devlin Just scroll past the posts and say nothing. It's easier that way.

He is utterly unable to do this Mr. Carr, as his entire raison d'etre is to stick his head in where it is not needed to get a reaction.

A better response Jimmy, might be to ask to PD to say something about Everton.

Derek Thomas
94 Posted 30/01/2026 at 07:09:16
Rob @ 86: Re Dibling: "He certainly wasn't asked to defend or run around like a loon"...this is a short summation of a good part of a Premier League players job description nowadays, maybe if he had been asked...along with a few others they mightn't have gone down...and maybe the scales would've fell from the eyes of whoever wasted £35Million on him
Jim Bennings
95 Posted 30/01/2026 at 07:15:34
McNeil has reached the end of the road at Everton.

He was a decent enough signing, scored some big goals but his only attribute is his left foot, his right is for standing on only, he can't head a ball, he's got zero pace, infact he's one of the slowest players we've ever had.

If you want to progress as a club you need better more dynamic players than the likes of McNeil and Mykolenko, they were Dyche type players, they were players just to do enough to keep you up.

Mark Murphy
96 Posted 30/01/2026 at 07:36:55
I’d LIKE to see McNeil on the bench on Saturday with Ndiaye on the left and Dibbling right with KDH centre.

But, as poor as McNeil has been lately I don’t think Dibling has done any better.

Ndiaye plays mainly on the right - Senegal had him hugging the right touchline - and I don’t think I’ve ever seen Dibling play left, so for the time being, until we bring in a replacement for Grealish, I think for balance, Moyes will stick with McNeil.

Hopefully it’s a temporary loss of form and fitness and Dwight will come good again soon, but the writing seems to be on the wall as far as his Everton place is concerned.

Until he moves on though, we should get behind him with the rest of the team.

John Collins
97 Posted 30/01/2026 at 07:48:09
Mark 96,

Dibling must be a better player than the one we are watching,the player we are watching doesnt look to get on the ball as much as he should be,looks intimidated by it all tbh.

Playing on the right as a predominately left footed player means he, more often than not,checks back onto his left foot and mostly takes the easier option of going square or back.

I would like to see him play wide left with instruction to get the cross in earlier.

I advocated McNeill playing high up the pitch centrally last season,his best position imo,there are a couple ahead of him for that position there though.

I don't think hes got the game as a track back wide man

Lee Courtliff
98 Posted 30/01/2026 at 08:21:29
Ray #82, that was against Newcastle away in February '95. We had 2 men sent off and lost 2 nil, it was bizarre to watch us play a considerable length of time with every player back in our own box, we lost 2-0.

In typical Everton fashion we did the same thing a month later away at Leicester and blew a 2 goal lead to end up drawing 2-2.

It was Barrett and Horne(?) against Newcastle, Ferguson and Samways against Leicester. I watched both games on the Jumbotron or whatever it was called at Goodison.

Mal van Schaick
99 Posted 30/01/2026 at 08:48:09
I’m sure that the manager and the owners will have seen McNeils performances and will make any decision about him in summer, but for me he hasn’t been very enthusiastic about playing for Everton, his head is down most of the game at the thought of chasing back to defend and he is careless with the ball. I know that Dibling hasn’t hit form yet, but I would persevere with him and use McNeil as a sub.
Mark Murphy
100 Posted 30/01/2026 at 09:16:07
John, I think Dibling looks out of depth and terrified.

I hope I’m wrong but I can see him moving back south as soon as he can.

Mark Murphy
101 Posted 30/01/2026 at 09:18:13
And if he is a leftie then that makes his reluctance to shoot when he had the chance the other night mystifying.
Philip Devlin
102 Posted 30/01/2026 at 09:53:57
John 97 Apparently he’s quiet and shy in training as well. I reckon he’s desperately homesick like he was at Chelsea. That, and he’s tasked with playing a different role than that at Southampton where he played a lot deeper, beats man and played the ball on to runners. I’m not sure he’s a crosser of the ball at all. It’s going to take at least another season for him to come out of his shell.
John Collins
103 Posted 30/01/2026 at 10:14:31
Was talking on the same subject yesterday Phil with a few Blues.

One suggestion was for him to bring his family up here.

No idea if that would work, but worth a go as its not working for him at the moment.

First thing we need to do is stop the moaning at the game when the kid, or indeed any of our young players, lose possession.

Any confidence he has, and it doesn't look like he's got much, will evaporate

John Collins
104 Posted 30/01/2026 at 10:16:25
Mark 101,

100% definitely should have taken the shot on, whether with left or right foot.

Confidence issues again mate?

Mark Murphy
105 Posted 30/01/2026 at 11:20:10
Almost certainly, John.

He needs time on the pitch, probably best away from the pressure of the HD.

Meanwhile, get him rooming with that young Aznou lad. He certainly wasn't lacking confidence when he came on briefly in the cup game.

I just hope he shows the same when he next gets the chance, which I personally am eagerly awaiting.

John Collins
106 Posted 30/01/2026 at 11:34:40
Me too Mark, we probably won't see him play at full back just yet but he deserves another go higher up the pitch.

Love a player who's first thought is to play forward

Macc Gordon
107 Posted 30/01/2026 at 11:46:26
"McNeil could have, and should have, been moved on last summer"??? There was no chance of that happening after scoring 4 goals & 9 assists during an injury hit season including the 2 assists in our last home game at Goodison. He has been the main reason we have won at Forest for the last 3 seasons. We'd have been relegated with you in charge.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


How to get rid of these ads and support TW


© ToffeeWeb