English football in the 2025-26 season stands at a crossroads in terms of its relationship with the gambling industry. As the final campaign before the Premier League’s voluntary ban on front-of-shirt gambling sponsorship takes effect, the prevalence of betting brands has not diminished but rather reached new heights.
This is driven by a closing window mentality, where clubs outside the established elite are maximising short-term yields to fortify their balance sheets against the looming regulatory shift and the increasing constraints of financial sustainability rules.
Across both the Premier League and the English Football League (EFL), the gambling industry provides a secure layer of commercial stability that is difficult to replicate with traditional retail or service brands.
In the top flight, 11 of the 20 clubs have maintained or secured new front-of-shirt agreements with betting firms for this season, a figure that highlights the gambling premium, the willingness of operators to pay significantly above other sectors for the high-intensity global exposure the league provides. This premium is particularly vital for mid-tier and lower-table clubs that lack the global retail footprints and diversified commercial portfolios of the larger clubs.
In the EFL, the dependency is even more acute and structurally embedded. The league itself remains anchored by its title sponsorship with Sky Bet, a partnership estimated to be worth approximately £40 million annually to the 72 member clubs.
For Championship, League One, and League Two sides, gambling revenue is a key contributor to the difference between operational viability and technical insolvency. The following analysis provides a breakdown of this commercial matrix, examining the granular mechanics of kit sponsorship, stadium saturation, and broadcast advertising expenditures.
Reader Comments (3)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
2 Posted 15/02/2026 at 16:07:38
Football finance "experts" project an additional £50m in revenues from the new stadium, we have new commercial deals with Pepsi and Budweiser, and the sales of Goodison and the women's team go straight to revenues as well, so this season's numbers could be significantly higher.
3 Posted 15/02/2026 at 16:09:01
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW
1 Posted 15/02/2026 at 15:34:35
You'd think the ban on 'front of shirt' gambling adds would be the beginning of the end. But Paul makes it clear the income from gambling means it will continue to fund a huge chunk of our football...
In Everton's case: £12M (or is it 'only' £10M?) from Stake.com represents 38% of the club's total; commercial revenue. Although that must be only an estimate as the club's revenue for 2024-25 has not been published by the club yet -- nevermind 2025-26, which won't come out for another year!
Campaign groups such as The Big Step have argued that the voluntary ban is a smoke screen that does nothing to reduce the actual volume of gambling advertising, given that front of shirt exposure accounts for only 9.66% of total gambling messages during a broadcast. The research suggests that the 2026 ban will have a negligible impact on the number of betting logos fans see, as brands simply transition their spend to the more effective LED and social media channels.
That is until there's another attempt to change the rules relating to gambing adds in football.