The Corinthian Way

 Comments (35) jump to end

Off the pitch, Everton are an example to no-one. It seems to me that we are badly run – despite what the media think. On the pitch, we are limited and that has a lot to do with the board. We can, however be different.

Why can we not be an example of how the game should be approached? No diving, no cheating, no protesting to the referee... I looked at the Bluemoon site after the Man City game and I saw examples of what bitter (Sky) Blues really are. We were mocked for treating the game like our cup final. Is that not how it should be? I don't begrudge any working class lad the chance to earn a fortune. I do expect 100% from every player in every game. This is the one thing that costs nothing:. Good attitude, respect and decency. – I believe, if we took and promoted this attitude, we would be a sponsor's dream. The rest cheat – and it might gain them some points – but why not be different? Frankly, in the past, I have criticised Moyes for not playing the cynical game... but, if he is going to have integrity, let's take it to the limit.

Andy Crooks, Belfast     Posted 21/03/2013 at 01:05:17

back Return to Talking Points index  :  Add your Comments back

Reader Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Tony I'Anson
944 Posted 21/03/2013 at 06:24:17
"Which ever way we play it, we play it fair and square."
Derek Thomas
948 Posted 21/03/2013 at 06:56:30
When a penalty is given against us I will expect the keeper to lean on which ever upright he fancys thus making no attempt to try to save it. We were guilty of the transgression and should accept the penalty ( both senses of the word ) we should not try to weasel out of paying for our sins by attempting to thwart justice.

We should also sign up De Canio and Adam Gilcrist as fair play coaches.

Ralph Basnett
949 Posted 21/03/2013 at 07:02:13
But how many nearly games would we have won if we had not taken the 'moral high ground' and took that tumble when their was contact in the box, or climbed all over a ref when we want someone sent off?

How many teams against us and others get offsides and free kicks for protesting and we just accept? It is a competitive league and we need to be more competitive.

Whilst I would not like a ratboy kind of diving player or players the likes of Chelski, Manure or the Redshite climbing all over officials, it has been a long time since our captain has regularly been vocal to a ref when a decision has been wrong or not quite gone our way... Nice teams always come last!!!!!

Timothy Sebastian
950 Posted 21/03/2013 at 07:12:31
When you say Everton should be an example to other clubs, do you mean when Captain Pip takes a dive in the derby match, or when Jelavic drops to the ground at the slightest touch, or when Fellaini elbows or head-butts an opponent? I think we've got a long way to go before we can be touted as an example to other clubs.
Nick Entwistle
955 Posted 21/03/2013 at 08:25:39
We're better than most but not perfect. Jely is embarrassing some times.

Ralph, cheating is not being more competitive. It's cheating. Can't stand talk of contact etc; if a player chooses to go down he's chosen to cheat.

I think the difference with Pip Neville's dive is that he was bollocked for it and fined. Other club's managers would say "Better luck next time".

Paul Andrews
956 Posted 21/03/2013 at 08:35:10
I would rather we fight, kick and snarl our way through every game.

Coming bottom of the Fair Play League every season would suit me fine.

Ralph Basnett
957 Posted 21/03/2013 at 08:37:36
So Nick you are happy to lose another deby because the Suarez goal stands or we lose an FA Cup Final 3-1 meaning a comeback less of a chance by being honest and saying, "Yes, ref – the ball was behind the line"?

Me, I don't give a shit about being called a cheat, I just want to win something and not be a nearly team, we damned decent upstanding professionals. Sometimes so-called cheating is using flaws in the system to gain advantage, ie, if the ref can't see it, you do it!

Did you ever play football, or any sport? If so, did you never attempt to gain an advantage? Sport for the professional sportsman is a job, most people will shaft others in work to get on, just a factor life......

Ray Roche
960 Posted 21/03/2013 at 08:31:07
Timothy Sebastian @ 950

Timothy, the fact that Neville dived and was roundly criticised both on here and by most Everton fans only goes to show what an out-of-character event it was, both from the player and as a club. Neville came out and apologised straight after the match and also admitted that Moyes had fined him.

Indeed, Neville's pantomime dive was, or would have been, funny were it not for the fact that it made it more difficult to retreat to the moral high ground as a result of it. Having said that, there were no club provided "Neville Is Innocent" tee shirts for the players and fans alike to mince about in wearing a victimised frown.

As for the Fellaini headbutt, that was clearly wrong; however, had the referee been up to the task, he would surely have given a penalty to Everton for the initial grappling on the part of Shawcross, which would have saved us the trouble of paying Fellaini to sit in the stands for the duration of his suspension. A suspension, remember, that some RS supporting journos wanted increasing to 9 matches. So, no hint of favouritism there, then, eh?

Everton have got a long way to fall before we reach the depths plumbed by the RS, Man Utd, Man City etc.

Kevin Tully
961 Posted 21/03/2013 at 08:57:02
Nice guys just aren't winners I'm afraid.

Man Utd, Chelsea and even the great Barcelona surround the ref for every decision, even if they are three up.

You gain every advantage available to you – remember the Clattenburg Derby? We accepted Hibbert being sent off after the ref had pulled out a yellow, just because Gerrard said he was going to shoot.

Nothing said in the press, nothing about Kuyt nearly cutting Neville in half, we never complain, and it makes it easier for refs to give a penalty, send our players off, or just give any decision against us, because we roll over.

Ralph Basnett
962 Posted 21/03/2013 at 09:03:36
A lot of teams use the lack of strength a referee has to use the powers he is given to make decisions which makes a player use these to his advantage (cheat), whilst this in not right who is the fool who doesn't use it to his advantage? Those less than successful as Everton such as Manure who for years have crowded refs to a point where the ref will automatically give a 50/50 decision to Manure to avoid confrontation, or the shite and ratboy constantly diving but will get a majority of decisions be it right or wrong.

If a ref does not book or overturn decisions then it will never be a fair playing field, and if not fair all around unfortunately teams are having to gain other advantages be it holding or bullying or being over aggressive.

Each year it seems that the referees are give a specific offense to concentrate on be it offsides or foul throws when they should be concentrating on all rules.

How many professional footballers can't actually take a legal throw in which we constantly see on to yet it is let go by refs, our kids watch it and see it as being okay and the rules at grass root fail.

Moral high ground is great if it earns you points or puts money in the bank, otherwise just another description used of the nearly rans.

Nick Entwistle
963 Posted 21/03/2013 at 09:05:23
Ralph, I don't know what you're referring to specifically but a win through cheating doesn't make me happy. A cup final win with a last minute dive? Happy? No.

The PL have no desire to tackle the problem. I sent an email to them in the summer about fair play and they sent me the DVD they had produced and sent to all PL clubs designed to show players what standards were expected in the forth coming season.

What I received was a two minute film of match footage of players surrounding the ref, some argy bargy with children in five a side courts then copying these actions. This was set to a rock version of 'I want to be like you' from the jungle book.

Not one second showed players diving on the ground, and presumably not one shit was given by any player having seen it.

Barry Rathbone
965 Posted 21/03/2013 at 09:05:38
Andy I actually think as a club we're pretty good regarding how we're viewed these things tend to be "of the moment" – Ronaldo diving at Utd and Bale at Spurs.

Only long ball merchants get a sustained bad press (Stoke, Wimbledon) doubtless due to the perpetual fighting for the knock on.

If any club is reviled club for lack of Corinthian spirit, it's Liverpool, but if manslaughter and racism is on your CV amidst insufferable snide and arrogance, what do you expect?

Ralph Basnett
966 Posted 21/03/2013 at 09:17:42
Nick, I think we both want the same thing - to go to the match, which I do home and away, and watch a game on a fair playing field. unfortunately it will never happen and if teams are using diving, pressure on referees and any way they can to bend the rules then they will, eventually, if referees can't be stronger, and I am at a loss to know why they can't, and I think technology will help, then maybe they should not be doing the job.

As referees are not picking up on infringements and more and more players are getting away with them they will always happen. The issue is not with the players it is with referees as if they punished infringements then surely they would not happen?

Nick Entwistle
967 Posted 21/03/2013 at 09:24:04
It definitely is with referees. They have somehow got themselves into a position where any action taken needs to be expressed without doubt in the rule book.

There isn't one ref where you can think he'll be in charge today and take no rubbish.

Then again there is a Spanish referee where you have to more or less take someone's knee cap off before you get a free kick. He was the one in charge of Celtic and Juve 1st leg. Got bad press for his reffing at corners but all the games he takes charge of in Europe become full blooded, competitive and honest because the players know that lying on the ground holding their ankle will not work. That part of the player's mind is left behind and it all becomes about football.

Patrick Murphy
971 Posted 21/03/2013 at 09:56:38
In a perfect world, and on a level playing field, a Corinthian spirit would be desirable but, in the cash-fueled sport that is football, there is little chance of it happening. With clubs, players, agents and fans demanding continued success, every available means of winning is employed by every team, even Everton.

What has happened over the past decade or so is that referees seem to 'lean' in favour of those teams and players with fame or money or both. They appear to have a pre-planned agenda regarding certain teams or individual players, witness the game on Saturday where once again at Goodison the away side appeared to gain the benefit of the doubt in most of the 50-50 decisions.

Add to that the media circus surrounding certain decisions dependent on who the offender was are highlighted to suit their agenda. Saturday's game at Goodison was a bit feisty at times but it was never dirty, however, the media almost to a man felt they had to mention the robust tackling of Everton and how it bordered on the illegal, which in its own way puts pressure on the officials to react when they next take charge of Everton.

Let's see what we all think of the Corinthian spirit following the Stoke game...

Paul David
977 Posted 21/03/2013 at 10:32:48
I think Everton are more honest than most teams, if not all teams. It's one of the things I do like about Moyes. I despise all the cheating in the game but the truth is that being honest does us no favours.

I think refs are glad when they see they have us, they know they'll get an easy ride if they get things wrong. Other clubs put pressure on refs and make them think twice about giving decisions against them.

The huge number of poor decisions we've had go against us is down to us being 'nice'. It pays to cheat or act like a twat in this league. In fact, it's encouraged by the way the FA do fuck all to stop it.

Andy Crooks
979 Posted 21/03/2013 at 10:42:07
Against City we played hard and mostly fair. If Pienaar had stuck to that, we might not have been hanging on grimly.

Which of us can tolerate the ridiculous wrestling that goes on at corners etc, Why can Everton not lead a campaign to have the FA stop ignoring it? Nice guys are not losers, weak guys are. Hard fair tackles, and we have players who are good at them, are much more effective than snide, cowardly attempts to injure an opponent.

Ralph Basnett
989 Posted 21/03/2013 at 11:52:07
Andy, for many years Everton managers produce 8mm, videos and DVDs and all have been ignored by the people who run the game.

As already stated, if you are not one of the darling teams that fits into Sky's remit on how the game is to be run for the good of us all (or certainly those with a financial vested interest), they you will neither get a decision, on the tv to earn you more money anything.

Referees are paid huge sums in relation to the average man with large bonuses and still can't get simple decisions right, they choose to attach themselves to the footballing superstars and believe by winning them over they will somehow be associated with them and therefore admired and respected as such instead of trying to earn the admiration and respect.

The biggest problem with the working man's game is that it no longer is, it is Sky's goose that lays the golden egg and therefore will dictate who will have the most supporters by giving it the most coverage, select its pundits and its Sky Four. (How many ex Everton, Stoke, Reading etc players do we regularly see on the TV?)

Not only are some clubs, ours included, rich men's train sets but to a certain extent football has become both Sky's train set and cash train.

If it was so concerned with how the games where officiated, it has the clout to do anything about it. However, it is in Sky's interest for bad decisions to be made and teams to have in-team and cross-team grudges – makes for good viewing.

John Keating
991 Posted 21/03/2013 at 12:39:31
Agreem Andy, hard fair tackles. Diving is a disgrace and has to be stamped out, whoever does it – including our players!

All this crap wrestling at corners – what's that all about !!?? What is needed is one referee to give 20 penalties in one match and that would be that sorted. Unfortunately that is what it'll take to stop it.

Bill Gall
994 Posted 21/03/2013 at 12:29:40
Everton to me are not doing any more than playing within the laws of the game. The major problem is what has been highlighted on numerous occasions and that is poor officiating.

Swarming around a referee after every decision is unsportsmanlike conduct and the referee should start booking some of these players to stop it. As far as diving goes, once again it is unsportsmanlike conduct and should be punished.

The reason that it is getting out of hand is the failure of the governing bodies not recognizing this behavior starting to creep slowly into the game and stopping it earlier.
Fifa as the governing body should stop ignoring this problem and for a change show some leadership and direct referees to stamp it out.

Harold Matthews
996 Posted 21/03/2013 at 12:59:56
Giving officials an easy time is actually quite stupid. Something the Germans realised many decades ago.
Andy Hegan
997 Posted 21/03/2013 at 13:03:48
At times over the years I have been frustrated at our lack of cynicism, our naivety sometimes when others play the referee to a strategic level and include cheating as much of a tactic as anything else.

But you're right, I would hate a Carragher, Gerard, or Suarez playing for my team as every time I see them play I come away hating the world in general for allowing the injustices to go unpunished.

I can live with getting away with something the referee missed sure, but we will never achieve anything without a good team, not a cynical one.

Ross Edwards
998 Posted 21/03/2013 at 13:09:57
I think we should deduct 5 points from a team for any player caught diving, this would be a strong deterrent hopefully for Mr Suarez and Mr Bale as the rate they dive at would put Liverpool and Spurs in League Two.

I also think we should get rid of Blatter and get that Frog Platini away from the top job in world football, he's as mad as a box of frogs (quite literally) and Fifa's proposal to move the World Cup to Winter in 2022 is absolutely ludicrous.

Platini's hatred of England and English football with his desire for Spanish football and Barcelona is also ridiculous. Maybe the French haven't got over Agincourt yet.

Tony J Williams
002 Posted 21/03/2013 at 14:03:45
"Swarming around a referee after every decision is unsportsmanlike conduct and the referee should start booking some of these players to stop it" – All this takes is a ref with some balls to state loudly, "Anyone who isn't a captain or part of the incident in question who is standing by me is five seconds is going to get booked – Get away from me!" and then start booking them if they are still there giving it mouth.

It would stop all this crowding around the ref crap in one game.... especially as it would be highlighted on match of the day/sky first and the ref could back it up by giving an interview telling the press exactly why he did it and will continue to do it in every game he officiates.

It really is that simple but no-one has the balls to do it.

Tony Waring
003 Posted 21/03/2013 at 15:11:33
A couple of weeks ago, I posted on TW that I intended writing to the FA about all the cock-ups committed by referees, who I think have a lot to answer for — and that's borne out by the comments above.

My particular beef concerned the antics that go unpunished in the penalty area when corners are being taken. Well, I duly wrote to the FA, who replied... but never addressed a single item of my complaint. But I'm sure you will be as delighted as I am to read that ....

"We do appreciate all of the feedback we receive from supporters. This feedback is collated and used to build a picture of public opinion and is subsequently fed back internally within the organisation. Please rest assured your comments will form part of this feedback process".
So relax, guys... the nosebags are at the ready to gobble up anything edible which you care to send the jobsworths at the FA — and there is now no longer any doubt as to what FA stands for!
Patrick Murphy
017 Posted 21/03/2013 at 16:24:35
It's alright Tony, now that the FA have appointed former BBC DG and Manchester United director Greg Dyke as Chariman, I'm pretty sure there will be a radical overhaul of the way Referees oversee games - NOT!
Peter Warren
037 Posted 21/03/2013 at 19:14:45
The biggest flaw about the refs is their lack of authority. It's unbelievable. I don't understand why they take so much shit. They have the ultimate power. It's not a foul penalty booking goal until they say it is and similarly they can give all these even if they're "wrong".

I never see any other sport where refs take stick off the players. It's like letting the lunatics run the asylum. Nuts!!!

Tom Bowers
043 Posted 21/03/2013 at 19:58:51
Very few teams are exempt from all the garbage spewed out on the field these days. They have been well schooled in all the arts of closing down skillful players by fair means or foul and many skillful players try to con the referees with a lot of success simply because, despite assistants and fourth officials they, the officials still get a lot of things wrong.

The Mcmanaman affair was a disgrace. One of the officials should have seen it. How many do we need? All the players previously sent off for similar sometimes lesser tackles must be outraged.

Getting back to Everton, it has to be said the midfielders are the worst bunch of tacklers I have ever seen.

Mark Frere
044 Posted 21/03/2013 at 19:41:43
What annoys me about refs is that they are paid vasts sums of money for doing their jobs really badly! Then after the game a manager critisizes them for their woefull decisions and gets fined. If a player or anyone who gets paid to do a job doesn't do it well, they deserved to be critisized. It gets to point where managers wont even say what they really think because it will cost them a lot of money in fines
Andy Crooks
047 Posted 21/03/2013 at 20:33:14
How about David Moyes saying something meaningful and important when he supplies a sound bite to brighten up the international break.

Maybe, "I have seen enough of the cheating that masquerades as top class football. Everton will be different. I have told my players that I will not accept diving, harassing referees or over the ball challenges. We will be hard and fair. I challenge every manager in the league to support me. Kick out the cheats".

What would be wrong with that?

Patrick Murphy
052 Posted 21/03/2013 at 21:15:20
That would certainly contrast nicely with LFC's MD on Breakfast TV this morning saying how much Ratface is loved by all of those who support the RS, by the way I think he's going to win Player of the Year, that certainly flies in the face of the Corinthian spirit.
Tom Bowers
057 Posted 21/03/2013 at 21:18:13
Player of the year should be awarded to the man who exemplifies professionalism,consistency and leadership and not just to a player who scores goals. Without his teammates, a goalscorer is nothing!

From Everton Jags is deserving followed by Bainsey. Kompany of City is another... Ratboy is just an asshole.

Andy Crooks
062 Posted 21/03/2013 at 21:51:28
If Suarez wins Player of the Year from either the players or the writers, the award will be rendered meaningless. He is the most disgusting man I have ever seen play professional football. A racist, coward and cheat.
Shane Corcoran
063 Posted 21/03/2013 at 21:51:05
Who wants to win if it's by cheating?

Why don't the players just take performance enhancing drugs and be done with it?

Ged Simpson
097 Posted 22/03/2013 at 02:56:20
"However, it is in Sky's interest for bad decisions to be made and teams to have in-team and cross-team grudges – makes for good viewing." Ralph I totally agree.

Another point – watch rugby and learn. Strong refs and much better behaved players generally. And the "class" argument doesn't wash as 1) is same in league and union and 2) presumes the working class can't behave with discipline.

This is a football problem and contributed to by the media, the pundits and all the others looking to make a few quid from glib comments on yet another controversial decision.

I remember kids at school like the modern player – always running to teachers or mummy because they didn't get their own way. Pain in neck, then as now.

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb