Season › 2012-13 › News
Fifa kick back late loan deal
No Vadis Odjidja-Ofoe for Everton
Everton have confirmed their failure to secure the services of young Belgian star Vadis Odjidja-Ofoe on loan. Fifa have confirmed that Everton were too late in completing the required paperwork and have kicked the loan deal into touch. However, Everton claim on their website that they lodged the relevant signed paperwork in advance of the international transfer deadline on August 31.FIFA have today refused to ratify the loan transfer of Vadis Odjidja-Ofoe to Everton from Club Brugge.The Echo claims Everton did their bit but Club Brugge were late filing documents on transfer deadline day. But then they confusingly say Vadis put the blame on Everton for being late with their loan request.The decision comes despite both the Football Association and Premier League giving their full support to the loan agreement and Everton lodging the relevant signed paperwork in advance of the international transfer deadline on August 31.
An Everton spokesman confirmed the Club will consider all available options before making any further comment.
Quotes or other material sourced from EvertonFC.com
Reader Comments (173)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer
2 Posted 07/09/2012 at 20:54:10
What I would like is a bit more detail, as it seems strange to take nearly a week just to decide to whether a deadline was missed or not.
Did we get our paperwork to the FA in time, and have they messed up by not processing it quickly enough, or was our paperwork just not ready in time? The second scenario I can accept as it seems likely that this was a rush job and the time was always against it, but if it is the first I want heads to roll.
It is a shame though. I was happy enough with our transfer activity this time last week, now it is like having a really good night out but finding in the morning you have lost a tenner on the way home!
Have to hope everyone plays well enough that we aren't left saying 'if only...', and maybe it will happen in January.
3 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:20:07
4 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:24:56
5 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:27:08
6 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:29:58
7 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:27:17
8 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:29:07
Is what you have written at 282 official as well? That would be an obvious example of double standards.
Possibly not a good idea to take on Fifa but they should have to give a proper account of what has happened. Holding my breath now...
9 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:37:41
10 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:36:19
I'm not sure about an appeal...It seems we have grounds for one, but I can't recall any recent ones.
11 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:36:33
I was really hoping that Nev and Heits would stay out of midfield so let's hope this desire to play Fallaini up front isn't shown often.
12 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:34:44
Ofoe was a last ditch attempt to sign a midfielder and unfortunately we were late in getting the deal done.
We've lost one of the last twelve games without him so we just have to get on with it and maybe try for him again in January if Moyes is determined to get him.
13 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:41:23
I can just imagine him coming to a rival team and coming back to haunt us at some point in the future.
14 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:45:31
15 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:46:16
I notice Mirallas went off at half time today for Belgium, hope he's not injured, or early optimism may start to drain away a little.
16 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:44:52
"Watch this space" or "Don't hold your breath"
Your choice
In other news:
"And who is this Everton? Aren't they in Chile?"
"No, this is the other Everton, from Liverpool."
"Ah! Liverpool, why didn't you say Liverpool – OK, make the exception for the 5 timers."
"No, you misunderstand, Fifa World Team of the Year, 1985..."
17 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:48:14
Well, I hope we see Barkley, but Neville will probably step up, along with Hibbert and Osman. As you were... And optimism takes a knock.
18 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:47:46
19 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:48:43
Shame as this guy looked the business. Bets are off that he ends up at another club now in January...
20 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:57:06
21 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:57:07
22 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:59:18
Mirallas has some kind of injury too. Sometimes you need a few injuries and some adversity to find what you're made of I guess. Could be the making of Barkley... But Moyes won't trust him, is my betting.
23 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:52:29
24 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:59:41
25 Posted 07/09/2012 at 21:54:40
Hmmmmm.
26 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:13:19
27 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:16:07
28 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:16:27
29 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:01:06
If Neville or jonny play a lot of games in midfield this year, it will be depessing. Get some magic water and sponge on Gibbo's leg quick!
Can we at least sort out a loan for January NOW so the lad can join 1 Jan 2013?
30 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:17:20
31 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:17:08
32 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:20:18
http://www.hln.be/hln/nl/2730/Belgisch-Voetbal/article/detail/1497646/2012/09/07/Vadis-mag-niet-naar-Everton.dhtml?utm_source=RSSReader&utm_medium=RSS Normal Service?
33 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:19:10
34 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:16:07
From the statement on the OS the club haven't given up on this yet. European Court here we come???
35 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:20:20
36 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:21:36
37 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:21:10
38 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:28:22
Classic Toffeeweb nugget.
39 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:36:25
40 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:56:11
41 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:48:20
Oh well, suppose if we'd have wanted him badly enough we wouldn't have dawdled.
Although must admit, I was like a kid at Christmas on deadline day and the YouTube clips of this guy just heightened my excitement and expectations — I should have known better, this is Everton!
42 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:57:59
This one is seemingly just down to not having enough time to get it done or maybe encountering double standards thanks to a jobsworth.
43 Posted 07/09/2012 at 22:59:45
44 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:03:01
Maybe he means that it was always going to be tight because negotiations didn't start until we got in touch late on Friday (after our moves for Essien/ Nzonzi had failed and his dealings with Fulham had come to nothing).
It is that, or he is stating out right that we messed up.
45 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:03:49
46 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:08:13
Probably just a tactical sub with Wales having had the centre half sent off, Belgium then brought an out and out striker on.
47 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:12:45
48 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:01:11
No drama, though, Fellani will have to drop back to his normal position, with Naismith or Mirallas in the Cahill role.
49 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:16:34
Followed by withdrawing in silence to consider their options BS. It's shockingly pathetic, or am I reading it wrong?
50 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:16:21
There again, I'm just an old cynic.
51 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:08:56
52 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:19:33
So the idiots at Fifa just disrespected our great club. Everton and the FAs should start legal proceedings to force Fifa to agree the deal due to victimisation as they allowed Spurs and not us. Get a grip, parasite Fifa.
53 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:19:05
We were waiting on other targets and when they fell through we were too late to do the necessary paperwork on VOO. End of.
54 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:27:11
http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/2012/09/06/liverpool-law-firm-advised-on-everton-fc-transfers-99623-31772656/
55 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:27:58
Who's telling porkies here, and why?
56 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:32:43
If, on the other hand, it's a cock-up by a FIFA administrator then that person is the very opposite of a jobsworth - it is someone NOT doing their job!
57 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:32:49
Used jobsworth because people are claiming other clubs have had the rules bent for them, and the club are claiming that they did their bit in time.
58 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:33:59
59 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:38:45
Is it possible, however, that the club did indeed submit in time but some administrative cock-up between the respective FA's meant it wasn't processed before the deadline. In that case the FA's would back the deal but a 'jobsworth' at FIFA could look at the timing and rule it out on that basis. That would be unfair and we would have a good case.
Suppose we all need to wait and see what actually happened before we can point the finger.
60 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:42:49
But today, Everton seem to be in denial. Significantly, they don't quote the 11 pm deadline, but the 31 August deadline...
I just wonder if some numpty thought the deadline was midnight...
That's my contribution to the conspiracy theory. If true, it ranks alongside Messers Gosling and Nyarko for sheer incompetence. (There was another one but thankfully I've forgotten it.)
61 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:41:45
People are indeed claiming other clubs have the rules bent for them. Sheer paranoia. Just before the cup semi final, there were a lot of people on here saying that LFC should be known as 'The Victims' because they were full of self pity and thought the whole world was against them. Well, let's try and avoid doing the very same thing shall we?
I repeat: either the club did NOT get it though on time (which I am inclined to believe) or FIFA have fucked up, in which case someone has not done their job properly. But the whole point of a deadline is to provide a meaningful cut-off point. If 1 minute late is actually OK then so is 5 minutes or 10 minutes of whatever. There simply has to be a point which is "too late".
If we appeal successfully then I'll be chuffed because the lad looks useful.
62 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:53:19
Ah well... Pip gets to be midfield general all season.
63 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:51:46
Got to give Barkley a run out now... Please not Neville centre mid.
64 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:49:45
When exactly did we submit the paperwork?
Did any other club get an extension that we didn't also exceed?
Are the EPL and the two respective FA's really happy to back the deal?
From what was on the OS last Friday no-one should have been unaware that the deadline for transfers was 11 pm. There did seem to be a belief that loan deals may get treated slightly differently, though that may have been limited to the fact that they were quicker to process.
65 Posted 08/09/2012 at 00:01:52
As I have said, I used it on the basis that there may have been double standards applied in this situation (based on the information that is being touted by the club).
66 Posted 07/09/2012 at 23:54:44
I don't know who's telling the truth. Neither FIFA or Everton cover themselves in glory when it comes to truth telling.
67 Posted 08/09/2012 at 00:10:27
No doubt Robert Elstone will be down the Citizen's Advice Bureau in the morning, saying: "It's really unfair. It was 11.59 and I was going to sign the loan form when my pen ran out of ink. I scratched my name on the paper with a dagger but FIFA said that was no good. Naturally, I had a bit of a funny turn, as a result of which I lost my job. What are my chances of claiming disability benefit?"
68 Posted 08/09/2012 at 00:17:55
Personally have never really agreed that the transfer deadlines are a good thing, creates a very artificial market and if we're going to argue it down to its legal bones, surprised how it escapes the European restraint of employment transfer?
69 Posted 08/09/2012 at 00:20:24
For instance, if you can prove that you pressed the 'send' button at 10:55, but some failure of the internet meant it didn't get through to the FA until 11.04, should you be penalised if someone else pressed 'send' at 10:56 and their's went straight through (I am presuming the use of modern technology in this case).
We need to hear exactly what happened before we can decide who to castigate.
70 Posted 08/09/2012 at 00:21:26
Part of me thinks, the guy was behind N'Zonzi in the pecking order - how much would he have featured anyway?
The other part - we just lost one of the most exciting Everton signings in years.
FIFA won't turn back now. It's practically mid September. Let's just get on with what we've got.
Fellaini in his best position is a big bonus to me. Please don't put Phil there!
71 Posted 08/09/2012 at 00:33:17
I wonder if we can pin this 'Deadline, what deadline?' fiasco on Big Vic? Worth a try, I'd have thought...
72 Posted 08/09/2012 at 00:28:39
73 Posted 08/09/2012 at 00:41:20
74 Posted 08/09/2012 at 00:37:14
Bad luck? Conspiracy? Johnny Foreigner doing us down? Well, I'll settle for complete and utter fucking incompetence. The kind of amateur, mind-numbing incompetence that has permeated this club for years.
Surely to God someone was overseeing the last day of the transfer window and had some sort of contingency plan in mind?!? Oh, sorry it's Everton... We don't do things that way.
75 Posted 08/09/2012 at 00:44:04
Not exactly a Ewing Theory but a derivitive. Let's see what happens now we lost this great player.
The Ewing Theory in brief: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=The%20Ewing%20Theory
76 Posted 08/09/2012 at 00:51:32
77 Posted 08/09/2012 at 00:50:04
78 Posted 08/09/2012 at 01:31:37
However, it would make sense to leave Neville at right back and move Pienaar into the creative central position.
Put Oviedo into left midfield and switch Fellaini to central Midfield to cover Gibson.
Pienaar is our most creative player anyway. Alternatively, leave Osman with Fellaini in the centre and put Pienaar out on the right.
It's the versatility of Pienaar that helps us here.
Then, either Naismith or Mirallas can support Jelavic.
No panic guys. Although again, I am gutted.
79 Posted 08/09/2012 at 01:40:30
341
What? Oh dear!
80 Posted 08/09/2012 at 02:24:30
81 Posted 08/09/2012 at 03:31:44
82 Posted 08/09/2012 at 04:12:31
83 Posted 08/09/2012 at 04:35:32
Disappointing yes but we have a ver good young midfielder in roass Barkley with the potential to be the very best and he cost nothing. Perhaps we can use him?
84 Posted 08/09/2012 at 04:23:09
85 Posted 08/09/2012 at 04:40:17
1) Oviedo will NEVER join Everton - not in January and not next summer either. Because either HE or Brugge or BOTH will be totally pissed of at Evertons inept, inefficient, indecisive dilly dallying.
2) Spurs, Man City or the even the RS will snap him up in January.
86 Posted 08/09/2012 at 04:48:42
3) FIFA will not change their minds no matter how much Everton cry.
87 Posted 08/09/2012 at 04:01:13
So I'm all optimized out. Murphy hates us and has conditioned me to expect nothing these days. No signs yet that anything's about to change. If we were one game away from winning the league, another World War would probably break out.
88 Posted 08/09/2012 at 04:48:07
89 Posted 08/09/2012 at 05:00:33
90 Posted 08/09/2012 at 04:53:17
91 Posted 08/09/2012 at 06:11:37
92 Posted 08/09/2012 at 06:19:33
93 Posted 08/09/2012 at 06:53:46
People keep saying he is not playing well for the Under 21, well that maybe because he is fed up playing at a level beneath him, fed up that players who are no better than him are starting even when they don't play that position.
Take Vellios: he had a good season last year and where is he now? I'll tell you where he is: pissed off and getting Under-21 time because he is not very versatile, and that's what it all boils down to.
If you can play 3 or 4 different positions then you play irrespective if you're not very good at a couple of them. If you are specialised at one position then your fucked. That was Rodwell's problem, and it's now Barkley's and Vellios's problems too. Barkley needs games at centre mid with Gibson (when fit) or one other and that for me is Heitinga — top pro.
95 Posted 08/09/2012 at 07:31:31
96 Posted 08/09/2012 at 07:25:19
Rory, sadly I can't disagree. At least when it comes to the numpties running the club. Strongly suspected this deal was doomed when we had heard nothing by Wednesday.
This must be frustrating for moyes as he needs another central midfielder, have the club a list of at least 3 (apparently) and the managed to miss out on them all. Now we are short in probably the most important position on the park. Would say Neville playing regularly in midfield destroys any shot we had at top 4.
97 Posted 08/09/2012 at 07:50:15
Most of us were happy with our transfer dealings before the deadline, most of us weren't convinced we would sign anyone on deadline day. To quote Meatloaf, "two out of three ain't bad". Time to move on and support what we have. If you get depressed watching Neville in midfield, suggest you don't watch! Personally, I wasn't depressed watching him against Man United.
On a positive note, I had a very positive experience buying Swansea tickets yesterday. Very efficient service by phone and I had a confirmation email before I had hung up. What will I moan about now?
98 Posted 08/09/2012 at 08:08:38
Gotta get on with it now but what does my head in on here is people saying play Barkley now, have these people watched him play he is totally wet behind the ears even more so than Rodwell when he come through. There is no way you could rely on him every week he nedds to physically and mentally mature I'd loan him out anyway and put Junior on the bench he looks a lot more at it than Barkley at the minute.
99 Posted 08/09/2012 at 08:17:49
I almost completely agreed with your post until your comments about the ease of buying tickets for the Swansea match. Don't expect us to fall for that one. We weren't born yesterday, you know. What next? You think our marketing department is excellent? Unbelievable.
100 Posted 08/09/2012 at 08:43:18
Not fully aware of all the transfer deadline regulations but the comment stating Everton failed to lodge the relevant signed paperwork in advance of the international transfer deadline on August 31 does not make sense to me. Did Meireles not sign for a Turkish club after this date as their window closes later than ours (as does the Russian window). Does this deadline only close as per the national regulations and so if both parties feel this has not been breeched, orhas been done so in an acceptable manner (i.e. similar to a Moutinho extension) where can the issue lie.
Like most have been really pleased with this windows activities but based on other players comments, particularly Kompany (and not You Tube) feel we have not only lost out on a potential bargain but we will not have the opportunity to sign in Jan as someone else will come in for him.
101 Posted 08/09/2012 at 08:52:24
Having said that, the skulduggery that goes on within the corridors of Fifa is truly shocking. Full set of greedy cunts.
102 Posted 08/09/2012 at 08:45:55
Disappointing yes, but some of the whining is over the top. And I know whining when it comes to Everton.
103 Posted 08/09/2012 at 09:04:50
Yeah - claim THIS!
- grabs ball-bag, Paulie Walnuts-style and thrusts hips -
104 Posted 08/09/2012 at 09:16:00
It may however, force Moyes's hand into giving Barkley more game time and introduce some of the younger players, although the recent run of losses in the reserve league may indicate the depth may not be there.
I do feel we are covered in midfield, possibly better than last year, I just hope we have a bit more of an attacking approach rather than resorting to Phil in centre mid against teams like Norwich and QPR who do not necessarily have the play maker that needs to be stifled.
Gibbo flipping Ireland off could be a saving grace come then end of September.
I still feel really positive about the season, more so than in the recent 4 or 5 years. Hopefully we will have a good run, and the fact we are on TV more times before the end of the month is a bonus. What with the Man Utd game, that means we will have been on TV 4 times in September – I think that is the same number we totalled up before Christmas last season. Almost parity with the RS.
105 Posted 08/09/2012 at 09:10:19
Obviously it's unfortunate as we need the cover, but as has been said above we had two targets ahead of this guy who didn't come off, so this was a last minute grab.
We're not the only ones to miss out (Spurs and Liverpool had terrible windows comparatively) and in previous years we've always managed to sneak in a cheeky one before the deadline. This time we didn't quite manage it and Fifa aren't cutting us any slack, which I agree seems a bit ludicrous considering the fact that the rules have obviously been bent elsewhere.
Clearly it's not ideal that Gibson's out and Rodwell's gone (although to be frank I never thought Rodwell was that good for us – still can't see what £12-17M has been paid for), but Felliani can move back (with Mirallis, Pienaar, Osman or Barkley ahead) and if push comes to shove we've always got the Neviller!
106 Posted 08/09/2012 at 09:44:38
There is not a shred of evidence that they “fucked up” thats why I dont bray about it. They made a late attempt to get what they saw as a very good but non-priority player late in the window and whilst believing that they had got the papers in on time EUFA has not accepted this. Tragedy of International proportions, how can they do this to us and lose a game as well.
Remember they actually know about transfers and running a football club, you don't
107 Posted 08/09/2012 at 09:51:00
108 Posted 08/09/2012 at 09:51:54
He was 3rd choice it would seem, and I am sure other options be out there with another half of season if we don't snap him up then. His fee might go up, or by the same token it could drop if he is unsettled and fails to put the performances in.
Perhaps we should go in for Lucas: When he plays for the RS, they are going to win the _____ [fill in your own gaps]; when they lose, it's because he isn't there. Sounds class....
109 Posted 08/09/2012 at 10:03:34
Neville and Heitinga are both limited in that role and playing out of their best positions. Osman is more creative and lacks the physicality and power to play the role perfectly and the players you mention are all very much attacking rather than defensive midfielders. Fellaini seems to be doing the biz nearer the top end of the pitch and so, unless Moyes drops him back, we are light in the defensive area of the pitch if Gibbo gets a knock. Especially when we want to play two deeper in the midfield.
Personally, I think if we can get the creative attacking players in full flow i.e. three from Mirallas, Naismith, Pienaar, Osman buzzing behind the Jellyman, then Gibbo and Fellaini can sit further back and hold and pass long and short to keep us pressing forward with good shape and plenty of movement to unlock the back door of our opponents.
Squad depth would be that much better with Vadis Odjidja-Ofoe on board, since he looks to be able to step into midfield and play a deep midfielder role, exploding forward when the opportunity is there. Hopefully BK has some pics of Septic Bladder and Michelle Plasticbikini spitroasting Monica Lewdinski to facilitate a successful appeal.
110 Posted 08/09/2012 at 10:29:16
"Remember they actually know about transfers and running a football club, you don't"
In other news.
Gazza knows about self-control.
Dale Winton knows about natural coloured skin.
Gordon Ramsey knows about not being a twat.
Etc blah.
Seriously, is it some 'uninformed dumb posts for charity' thing you're on?
Get your pea-brain around this.
I am not a military strategist, nor a general, nor have I ever been in any branch of the military.
But I KNOW......the charge of the light brigade was a total fuck up.
See how it works?
Consequently, your 'logic' is piss-weak.
"Not a shred of evidence"?
If Everton had all summer to sign the player and missed out by an hour (or whatever) they fucked up.
Plus to anyone touting the 'shit happens' theory - bollocks.
Far more accurate would be shit, lies, bullshit, fuck-ups happen....a lot!
111 Posted 08/09/2012 at 10:59:20
112 Posted 08/09/2012 at 10:48:00
Overall the squad remains stronger but still thin in terms of numbers. I'm worried that Ross B is now looking very much like he isn't going to have enough defensive quality about him to be that holding player in centre mid but surely still has it in him to be quality in the attacking midfield role. So why not put Felli back into the holding role and give Ross a chance in the more advanced role ? There will be chances now for Oviedo and when fit Junior. Plus Mirallis will only get stronger with games.
It's a bit of a let down but all will seem brighter when we beat the Toon under the lights at Goodison and hopefully Sunderland give the shite a going over.
113 Posted 08/09/2012 at 10:58:20
The point being we want to see your piss-strong rantings supported by hard facts.
114 Posted 08/09/2012 at 11:13:14
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/everton-fc/everton-fc-news/2012/09/08/everton-fc-blues-miss-out-on-vadis-odjidja-ofoe-after-club-brugge-paperwork-gaffe-100252-31792275/
Michael or Lyndon - on ToffeeWeb, how do I/we make website links into hyperlinks (ie, so you can click on them and automatically open the web page)? Any advice much appreciated.
115 Posted 08/09/2012 at 11:08:13
116 Posted 08/09/2012 at 11:18:17
The details don't matter.
The facts are we wanted him and...didn't get him.
If this was some one-off fuck up, of COURSE you could not blame them, but it isn't.
That you choose to ignore the past is up to you.
I see it as part of a pattern and if you want evidence of that, just let me know.
117 Posted 08/09/2012 at 11:24:17
The facts are we wanted him and...didn't get him.
If this was some one-of fuck-up, of COURSE you could not blame them, but it isn't.
That you choose to ignore the past is up to you.
I see it as part of a pattern and if you want evidence of that, just let me know".
Eugene, I'm not ignoring the past – I'm asking about the present. You claim this is part of a pattern; it might be, it might not. It might have been cock-up, it might not. Is it so difficult for you to see that I'm not making any claims, except that you haven't given us any facts about the attempted transfer – other than we wanted him and didn't get him!! Are you adding that one to your list of obvious statements like Gazza, Dale Winton etc?
118 Posted 08/09/2012 at 11:36:31
Have we fucked up before......?
119 Posted 08/09/2012 at 11:37:44
120 Posted 08/09/2012 at 11:48:45
Ray@429, no I can't remember mate, when was the last time we lost a player due to late paperwork. Or should I say lost a player due to late paperwork by somebody else.
121 Posted 08/09/2012 at 12:03:04
122 Posted 08/09/2012 at 12:07:42
123 Posted 08/09/2012 at 12:02:34
Next, we do not know that Everton has fucked up... the indications are that we have submitted the necessary paperwork on time.
Next... clearly, unless you have no knowledge of football, so many deals are completed on transfer deadline day. It's not the case that every club waits to do last minute business without reason... the richest club in the league tied up 4/5 signings on the final day. There are a variety of reasons for this, which we could all speculate upon.
With respect to the player mentioned, he was also at the very most, a third-choice option. We do not know how many central midfielders were enquired about before, but we do know because of the intense coverage on deadline day, that deals were being attempted with Essien and N'Zonzi, both of whom offer Premier League experience and present less of a risk factor...
The transfer of Essien, providing he recovered fitness, would have been the coup of the Moyes era in my opinion, with regards to a high profile name. Indications are, that we also enquirer about Romeu. We haven't therefore missed out on a first choice... weve missed out on someone we tried to buy because other targets failed to materialise.
Finally... what other fuck-ups, Gosling aside, have we been involved in, and do you consider Everton to be a worse club in this respect than other teams in the Prem? Because, from where I look at it, various high profile clubs have made more transfer related errors than us of late: Liverpool's bizzare decision to leave themselves with two strikers and fail to land a cut price Dempsey... Arsenal's lack of striking depth and their rushed business last summer, not to mention constant contract issues. Spurs' failure to land Moutinho... etc etc.
How are we, as a club, worse than the majority? Or do you believe making transfers happen is as easy as it is on Football Manager?
124 Posted 08/09/2012 at 12:19:18
125 Posted 08/09/2012 at 12:20:45
126 Posted 08/09/2012 at 12:25:11
127 Posted 08/09/2012 at 12:21:34
We've been involved in some real crackers over the years, some stunningly funny...
• Muller who thought his salary would be tax-free
• Signing Nyarko on a deal longer than his work permit
• A centre-half with a fear of heading the ball
• Bakayoko
• Leaving Nigel Martyn sitting in a warehouse in Birkenhead before giving him directions to Leeds
• The Moutinho "delegation"...
Anymore, anyone?
128 Posted 08/09/2012 at 12:26:14
Been a positive window on the whole, this or Essien would have been the icing but, hey, shit happens.
As for fuck-ups, Spurs and Liverpool hold the medals in that respect! Cash to spend, long term targets well and truly identified, but end up missing them.
Gibson getting injured is of concern, as he has been the glue that holds our midfield in its best position.
129 Posted 08/09/2012 at 12:43:24
The difference is that this is an almost serious problem for the club.
130 Posted 08/09/2012 at 12:52:43
We don't know how highly the club rated him. The fact that he was further down the list than Essien and Nzonzi may simply represent the fact that they were seen as more realistic targets in terms of price and known quantities. Maybe the club was actually thrilled when he became a viable target following the breakdown of his move to Fulham and Bruges desire to offload a player who wanted a move to the EPL.
I am not angry, I am disappointed and that has been sharpened by a lack of information on the process of transfers and the progression of this one in particular.
131 Posted 08/09/2012 at 13:06:20
Having transfer windows is the problem.
132 Posted 08/09/2012 at 13:09:41
I presume letting deals take place after the individual association's season has begun is to cater for injuries but this possible benefit is vastly outweighed by the hassle of transfers being allowed post kick-off.
133 Posted 08/09/2012 at 13:18:33
134 Posted 08/09/2012 at 13:21:32
135 Posted 08/09/2012 at 13:39:25
136 Posted 08/09/2012 at 14:03:23
137 Posted 08/09/2012 at 14:09:48
138 Posted 08/09/2012 at 14:34:29
139 Posted 08/09/2012 at 15:45:04
Our midfield is Gibson, and Fellaini, Osman can cover for Gibson, but Barkley is not ready and Junior is injured. Looks bleak when we resort to playing Neville as a midfielder.
We must avoid playing Neville at midfield at all cost, he does nothing for us there. Heitinga is also weak at midfield. I would go for Barkley over Neville every time. Neville is a 35 year old defender, not a midfielder.
I think the Belgian club fucked the deal, they maybe did not want to let him go.
140 Posted 08/09/2012 at 16:23:31
We lost a couple of million when he left for nothing. I wonder if anyone got the bullet for that one?
£10m up front for Rooney was daylight robbery – the best young English player of his generation.
Krøldrup was signed for £5m and never even given a go, what was that about ?
Yakubu was a beauty – West Ham offered £6m, we refused and they then offered £2m!! Did Blackburn really pay £1.5m for a striker who went on to score 17 League goals?
Don't even get me started on Yobo – the longest transfer saga in modern day football.
It may not have been the club's fault on this one, but their track record does not fill you with confidence.
141 Posted 08/09/2012 at 16:33:43
142 Posted 08/09/2012 at 16:54:55
2 World Wars, Heysel, Parkie's knee and Bracewell's Floating Bone, for instance
143 Posted 08/09/2012 at 17:12:13
I am still in a better frame of mind than I have been for most transfer windows in recent seasons, so maybe some of the doom mongers on here should take a large glass of red, go and sit in the sun, and reflect on how shite they've felt in previous years. And if that doesn't work, have a few more glasses...
Editorial Team
144 Posted 08/09/2012 at 17:22:11
The HTML code for making a live link in a post is like this:
[a href="http://..." target="_blank"]Liverpool Echo[/a]
...except that you must replace the square brackets with angle brackets, <, >.
And when you do that, it looks like this:
The syntax is unforgiving, so don't make any mistakes!!!
145 Posted 08/09/2012 at 17:27:32
Personally, I'm going for a large glass of ice-cold French cider, but each to his own...
146 Posted 08/09/2012 at 17:05:43
Some people just believe all the hype about certain players without watching them: Barkley has great potential but is not ready to step up to the mark yet. Sending him out on loan will do him the world of good.
147 Posted 08/09/2012 at 17:33:07
148 Posted 08/09/2012 at 17:31:27
Editorial Team
149 Posted 08/09/2012 at 17:39:51
150 Posted 08/09/2012 at 18:06:18
How about this: I state, with a basis in fact, that we have one of the best transfer records in the last decade, in the Premier League. I make this claim based on net spend, and I'll cherry pick some, like you have:
Bought Arteta for £2M... sold for £10M.
Bought Cahill for only £1.5M!
Bought Lescott for £3M and sold him for £24M – 8 times his value.
Bought McFadden for £1.25M and sold him for £5M
Bought Baines for £5M, Jags for £4mil, Gibson for £500k, Saha on a free and Jelavic for £5.5M?
Yeah, but we are worse than everyone...
Remember when Alex Ferguson lost it one summer, and filled his team with the likes of Kleberson, Djemba Djemba and Miller? Remember when United spent £7M on a Portuguese lower division player theyd never seen play? Remember that goalie from Italy?
Remember when Liverpool let Carroll go, and then failed to bring in another striker, because they couldnt find £2M for one of the best bargains in recent Premier League history? Remember when they bought Aquilani for £20M and then let him go out on loan twice, before a cut-price move to Fiorentina? Or signed Henderson for over £16M, when Steve Bruce supposedly told his chairman he thought they could get £4-6M for him?
Or when Liverpool paid £20M for Downing who somehow managed to not be involved in the assisting or scoring of one goal during a whole season? Or when they brought Carroll for £35M?
And Chelsea paid £50M (?!!!) for Torres, and wasted £25M+ on Shev, and all that money on Crespo, and on Mutu, who they subsequently fired? Or remember Bogarde? Or Casiraghi? How many appearances did they make between them?
Did you know that Arsenal, and one of the lower division sides I can't remember, both had Yaya Toure on trial? Arsenal also had a chance to sign Ibrahamovic, but would only take him on trial first, so he rejected them? And had a chance to sign Christiano Ronaldo.
I could go on... Please get out of your heads the notion that our failures are somehow unique...I can only assume it comes from an unawareness of other teams failures, and because we, as fans of Everton, remember our errors in comparison to other teams. We are no different to the rest, and I think we are better than a lot of teams, most especially our floundering neighbours.
This guy wasnt our main target. Its unfortunate now, because weve all got excited, and we need a centre midfielder. But Gibson, even if he is out for a month, will only miss 3 prem games, and a Capital One game away to Leeds... Fellaini alongside Neville, is still one of the better central mids in this division... and yes, I say Neville, because we need someone disciplined, and Heitinga has been even worse than Neville in games in which I've seen him play in a midfield position.
Against Newcastle, we could line up with: Howard, Hibbert, Jags, Heitinga, Baines, Neville, Fellaini, Pienaar, Naismith/Osman, Mirallas and Jelavic...
One year ago, we lined up against Villa with: Howard, Hibbert, Jags, Distin, Baines, Barkley, Osman, Rodwell, Fellaini, Drenthe and Vellios...
Its got a lot better, hasnt it? And from the looks of things, we will have the capacity to bring someone in in January, and perhaps Donovan and Cahill on temporary loans.
151 Posted 08/09/2012 at 18:08:33
152 Posted 08/09/2012 at 18:03:52
I am just preparing myself psychologically now for a month of Neville in the middle. No matter what happens, I much prefer our captain at right back – he knows his stuff there!
153 Posted 08/09/2012 at 18:19:16
Maybe you are missing the point – the point I was trying to address was how we conduct our business, not our net spend or successful purchases. I believe Moyes has had excellent value for money during his tenure.
I would ask what other club in the Premier League has lost money because a player's contract ran out without someone even realising??? The Gosling debacle was gross mis-management – nothing to do with our transfer policy.
I also believe we let Rooney go because we were desperate for money and got shafted on that deal. Again, poor business on our behalf – what deal do you think Daniel Levy would have put together if they were selling Rooney?
154 Posted 08/09/2012 at 18:49:49
Can anyone shed any light on whether we can appeal given the ratification by FA, UEFA, etc.? It seems that club officials are convinced that they did everything right.
(Before we get any conspiracy theories, this loan deal went completely under the radar as far as I can see. There was no lead-up to it so the usual "pacify the fans with an ambitious but empty gesture" theory goes out of the window. And if the FA, UEFA et al ratified it, how can it be a cock-up by the club? I speak with complete humility on the subject as the rules and regs of transfers are a mystery to me.)
155 Posted 08/09/2012 at 19:03:40
156 Posted 08/09/2012 at 18:57:19
And with respect to Rooney...we got over 25million for him. We were not shafted. He was a fantastic prospect, with a very good strike rate, and over 25million for him was a decent figure, even if we would have liked to have seen more. In the market now, with Man City and Chelsea competing with Man United, we would have got alot more...but we sold him in 2004, not 2009, or 2012, and therefore retrospectively applying his future progress, or current market conditions, to his price, seems unfair.
And Kevin, if you bring up examples of poor transfers, and talk of 'how we conduct our business', then the good business we have done, has relevance.
157 Posted 08/09/2012 at 18:54:14
158 Posted 08/09/2012 at 19:10:41
When you talk football, you seem to talk sense, Could you consider the possibility that when you talk about the running of Everton, you might be wrong the odd time? When you defend the board every single time, it just makes it difficult to spot the one time you might just be right.
159 Posted 08/09/2012 at 19:37:19
We are never going to do well with Neville in our midfield, he is past it for sure; once a very good defender, now just a shouting captain standing still while others run their legs off. It irritates the crap out of me how Moyes can play him in midfield, while he has the choice to put Fellaini, Barkley, Osman and Junior there.
I hope Neville will refuse to play in midfield, where is his dignity? How can he play there knowing how little he contributes there? Going forward, Neville is invisible, he hardly pressed the WBA players while defending so I think it should be crystal clear to everyone that Neville is NOT a midfielder and never will be.
Without Gibson, our midfield will suffer, but it will suffer less if Moyes does the smart thing and plays Fellaini there alongside Osman or Barkley. Personally I would prefer Barkley because he is stronger then Osman.
Moyes's unwillingness to play Barkley will become very clear the next few games because, no matter how shit Neville plays, he will never replace him with a youngster like Barkley. Moyes has gone stale, he needs to take a chance on the few youngsters we have when opportunities presents themselves, like now with Gibson being out.
Moyes is overrated when it comes to blooding through youth, facts speak for themselves. Rodwell was the only young player from our youth system that got to play regularly, now he is gone and Moyes will rather play Neville then take a chance on Barkley. It is disgusting, we as fans should demand that our best youngsters get playing time.
It would be nice to start demanding that Barkley gets to play, force Moyes into action. Otherwise Moyes will let Barkley rot away in the reserves just like he did last season. Am I alone in wanting our best young local lads to play first team football?
160 Posted 08/09/2012 at 20:08:49
Slightly surprised there wasn't a classic "bog off knobhead" response but hey this is Toffeeweb and you never know the direction a debate goes in, why we could even have an HTML lesson in the midst of rowing about who screwed up a transfer.....
However, one simplistic but telling question remains unanswered.....if the paperwork was late for our transfer and the "deadline" is sacrosanct, then how can Spurs be allowed an additional hour to try and complete a deal or how can ANY paperwork, even that delayed by slow fax machines etc, ever be allowed to stand if arriving as much as a second beyond the deadline????
161 Posted 08/09/2012 at 20:59:30
162 Posted 09/09/2012 at 03:06:18
163 Posted 09/09/2012 at 03:37:44
164 Posted 09/09/2012 at 04:34:20
Sepp Blagger is a disgrace, not only to football but humanity. I don't care what anyone on here says about paperwork and rules, there are two sets of rules, and Everton are condemned to share a city with with a poor downtrodden fallen giant, who's players and fans bring the game into disrepute regularly, but play on past glories to coerce the powers that be to bend to their every whim.
We can't sign a player, even though we have a small depleted squad, due to the other side's incompetence, yet the rules can be bent out of shape when the kopites demand to be in the CL, despite the one city, one club rule.
We suffered the heartache of a European ban for doing no wrong at all. When Leeds were kicked out Europe in 75, no other English club went with them. Guilty by association... how fucking unfair!
165 Posted 09/09/2012 at 05:50:15
REWARD
$10,000 reward
For one Connor McAleny.
Bright young Up and constantly Not Coming talented striker...
Also known as 'The Invisible Lad'
Was once labelled the new Michael Owen, wanted in connection with a 'New Contract', Connor has been missing for months now; possible hideout Newcastle??...
To be continued... or not.
166 Posted 09/09/2012 at 06:13:21
When the board does something that warrants me criticizing them then criticize them I will and same with DM too. The problem is that in general I, like you, dont really have a clue what the board is doing in any given situation but the difference is that I dont speculate and then find fault with what Ive speculated. Of course I can be wrong but I try to not say anything that I cant defend in logical discussion thats all. I have no monopoly on being right. When Im wrong Im sure that somebody on here will correct me.
Where the board has failed is in not getting much needed investment into the club but I can also understand why they havent been able to. I completely understand their policy, a very brave one, of selling assets to buy players in a gamble to get us moving forward via success on the field.
Read what Jim Knightly says above, I couldn't have put it better myself. Remember that for every opinion denigrating the club there are equal and opposite ones to balance them. They are being heard now that's all.
167 Posted 09/09/2012 at 06:47:39
168 Posted 09/09/2012 at 07:41:06
169 Posted 09/09/2012 at 10:18:30
170 Posted 09/09/2012 at 10:26:17
171 Posted 09/09/2012 at 10:41:20
172 Posted 09/09/2012 at 13:42:08
Anyway, if you'd like to phrase your question as one that can be answered I'll answer it.
173 Posted 09/09/2012 at 19:24:52
174 Posted 09/09/2012 at 10:18:30
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


1 Posted 07/09/2012 at 20:43:03