So what next?

 Comments (71) jump to end

As I've seen repeatedly from many of my Sky 5-supporting friends over the years and indeed experienced in professional life, the problem with success is that you can never have enough.

Once that initial euphoria following an amazing result or a great signing dies down, the nagging questions begin to build at the back of your mind 'how can we build on that?', 'how could it be better still?'', 'what next?'

So it is then, that after an amazing opening match (in which we not only won 3 points pre-October and beat championship challengers, but also played like we deserved to win (...for at least 60 minutes!) and following on from some genuinely smart, quick and incisive transfer activity (selling off assets we could live without and bringing in creative talent), I find myself asking precisely those questions.

Specifically, I've been thinking of who else we can bring in before the window closes to add further momentum and strengthen the squad. In fact I've been doing more than thinking, I've been feverishly checking every outlet from ToffeeWeb and Kipper to Sky Sports and the BBC roundup for any whiff of who could be next.

As my desire has yet to be sated, I've decided to try and feed myself by running through the players we've been linked with (and some I wish we were) and surveying the chances.

Adam Johnson

  • The player: A tricky winger with some real class who's not made the grade at City, but could give us options on either flank and supply more ammunition for Jelavic, Naismith and Felli!
  • The price: At one point it looked like a loan could be on the cards, but now £10M offers are on the table.
  • The verdict: Sadly I think this ship has sailed

Michael Owen

  • The player: In his prime a genuinely world class forward with pace, skill and an eye for goal. Sadly that prime was pretty much a decade ago, now the pace has gone and he has more of an eye for horses than the onion bag.
  • The price tag: Available free and possibly even on pay as you play, but even then has high wage expectations.
  • The verdict: At one point last week this looked like it might be nailed on, fortunately that has cooled somewhat in last few days because I frankly don't see what Owen would bring us aside from some tips form the track. For me he's effectively a less motivated and potentially even more injury prone version of Saha who can't play up front on his own.

Clint Dempsey

  • The player: Combative and skillful forward playing off the front man, with an uncanny eye for goal and typical American persistance and fitness.
  • The price tag: Sounds like it'll be in the £8-12M bracket
  • The verdict: On one hand he looks a ready made replacement for Tim Cahill, but on the other he's quite expensive, at the latter stage of career and we already have a few 'in the hole' options (Felliani, Naismith, Berkley, Osman). A good player in short but maybe not quite the right fit now.

Charlie Adam

  • The player: A creative ball-player who pulled the strings and notched a fair few goals in an attacking Blackpool side but who has struggled at Liverpool (along with many others).
  • The price tag: Not confirmed, but thought to be c.£5M (down from the £6.75M that Liverpool paid)
  • The verdict: Obviously the time at Liverpool muddies the waters a fair bit and he hasn't covered himself in glory there, but he's a versatile player able to make things happen and for a keener price this could be a route to adding some strength in depth.

Matt Phillips

  • The player: A young wing-player with premiership experience and an attacking bent.
  • The price tag: £Unknown, but would likely be £3-5M
  • The verdict: I think this could be a good move if the price is low enough and it doesn't preclude any other loans or moves.

M'Baye Niang

  • The player: To be honest I know very little about him, apart from the fact he's a highly thought of young forward from France.
  • The price tag: Rumoured to need at least £6M to prize him away.
  • The verdict: I'm all in favour of bringing through promising youth players, we should have a clutch of at least 3 in or on the cusp of the first team every year. However, I think in McAleny, Vellios, Gueye and Big Vic we have enough of our own attacking prospects that aren't able to get a real run as it is, without shelling out big money for another one.

So what do you think? Feel free to rip into my evaluations, I'm certainly no expert, and also suggest who else we might reasonably pick up in the next 9 days.


Chris James, London     Posted 22/08/2012 at 02:49:39

back Return to Talking Points index  :  Add your Comments back

Reader Comments

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer


Leung David
294 Posted 22/08/2012 at 15:43:02

Before the arrival of Mirallas, Moyes said he "wants at least 2 more." Which position of you guys think is the 1st priority to strengthen??

GK: With Howard and Mucha backing up, GK is surely not we are looking for.

CB: we have 3 world class CB and 1 promising youngster in this area. But we saw how Man Utd suffering with only 1 CB and a makeshift of Carrick, just hope our CB keep heathly and no more Hibbert makeshift in the CB position.

RB: We have Hibbo, Captain and Coleman, but in long term, we need a player with Baines' calibre to partner Mirallas or Naismith in the right flank like the Baines-Pienaar partnership.

LB: Baines, Baines, Baines... Who else?? Captain? Distin?? or Bidwell, Garbutt???

DM/CM: If Fellaini deploy in the "Cahill" role this season, who we can start our game in this 2 position in this 4-2-3-1 formation? I can name Gibbo, Ossie, Junior (haven't see him play, no sure), Barkely and Captain (again?! O.o), but it seems not an assurance area in the team.

RM/LM: Glad we have Pienaar, Mirallas, Naismith, Ossie, Anichebe, Magaye and Coleman play in this position.

AM: Fellaini is our target man this season. But Mirallas, Ossie, Naismith and Barkley can also play in this position.

CF: Jelavic, Mirallas, Naismith, Anichebe and Vellios. Is Niang signing for us?

Conclusion: In an ideal world, I hope we can sign a RB, LB (as cover), DM and a CF. But if I can only choose one, I hope we can sign a classy DM to partner Gibbo (assume Fellaini playing AM every game this season).

Julian Batti
303 Posted 22/08/2012 at 16:27:25
Surely Micah Richards must be available? One of the finest defenders I know of.
Brian Bates
327 Posted 22/08/2012 at 16:56:01
Think Phillips of Blackpool is out of our price range, I've read somewhere that they've turned down a bid in the region of £9-10mil.

Now Adebayor's back at Spurs, how about a cheeky £5mil bid for Defoe?
Phil Davies
330 Posted 22/08/2012 at 17:04:44
Phillips seems a Championship player, doesn't have a good first touch and that is pretty much essential for premiership football. If we do still have money to spend I feel it should be first nature to be looking to take advantage of the money crisis in Spanish football, some amazing bargains to be had like Michu for only £2m.
Kieran Fitzgerald
340 Posted 22/08/2012 at 17:28:43
Even if Moyes does get all of the 12m we got for Rodwell, he has already spent half of it on Mirallas. I would like to see him sign a specific player for a specific position but I think he may go for a utility player.

Brian, I would like to see Defoe come in but I think he would want regular first team football and there is no guarantee of that at Everton. I think he would get to be the main forward at a lot of clubs but we already have Jelavic as our star forward. I think he might be worth a punt though if he was to get games as Spurs are having a clear out at the moment. We could get him at a decent price.

I know nothing about it but I think that the Greek top division could be a buyer's market right now. You would presume that football there as a business is as skint as any other type of business. There could be a lot of bargains to be had.

Si Cooper
356 Posted 22/08/2012 at 17:50:58
When David Moyes said he was looking for 2 more players I think he specified striker and pacey right midfielder. Could argue Mirallas is player that fills both (as well as being an option for left midfield), but if depth and options were on his mind then the manager is possibly still looking at that area.

I have severe doubts about whether Big Vic, Gueye or Vellios will ever become first-choicers so don't think we are covered in the front areas for the future and so think someone like Niang could still be in the reckoning if everything stacks-up with him. I could be wrong, but I think we are normally quite quick to rule out triallists if we weren't impressed by them (prepared for egg on face on that one).

Buying from the Premiership and Championship rarely gives the value for money that you get from the continent (though you get a 'known quantity') so hopefully we are scouring those leagues if we haven't already identified who we would like.

Paul Hughes
376 Posted 22/08/2012 at 18:57:48
I'm not sure about the previous "rarely get vfm from Premiership and Championship".

I'd say that Cahill, Lescott, Baines, Gibson, Howard, Distin, even Neville, all represent value for money.

It's just a matter of picking the right player at the right time.

Adam (reluntantly, Beardsley he ain't) or Phillips may just do the trick.

Sam Hoare
385 Posted 22/08/2012 at 19:19:14
Not sure we need another striker necessarily. Given that we usually only play one and Jelavic has ample cover in Mirallas, Naismith, Fella or even Anichebe or Vellios for a few games.

In DM/CM however we only have Gibbo and Fella (who I think should be starting higher up as in mondays game) before we rely on the likes of Neville, Heitinga or the kids.

Shame we didn't snaffle Diame on a free or even Huddlestone on a loan. If we could hijack Arsenals loan for Nuri Sahin that would be awesome otherwise would suggest scouring the french league for either a sturdy ball winner in the Tiote/Essien mould or a ball player in the Cabaye mould. Think 5m should get someone pretty handy. Would have taken Alou Diarra for 2m but west ham beat us there.

Si Cooper
387 Posted 22/08/2012 at 19:20:09
I did make my comment relative, Paul, and there are always going to be exceptions.

However, most people, I think, would accept that there is now something of a premium on players already established over here and if you are forking out £5 million for Adam or nearer £10 million for Phillips (according to recently quoted figures) I for one would be interested to see whether that sort of money could attract someone with superstar potential from a league that is not so awash with money.

Paul Hughes
388 Posted 22/08/2012 at 18:57:48
I'm not sure about the previous "rarely get vfm from Premiership and Championship".

I'd say that Cahill, Lescott, Baines, Gibson, Howard, Distin, even Neville, all represent value for money.

It's just a matter of picking the right player at the right time.

Adam (reluntantly, Beardsley he ain't) or Phillips may just do the trick.

Trevor Lynes
391 Posted 22/08/2012 at 19:28:44
What happened to the three day trial M'Baye Niang supposedly had with us ?

I believe that the win over UTD gives BK breathing space and he will hang on to the rest of the Rodwell money.
I still see our squad as being too small for a successful campaign this season.
DM has stated that he needs more squad players and that he would be using the bulk of the Rodwell money to strengthen the squad.

Naismith is untested and so is Marallas.
We know what Pienaar brings to the team and Jelavic has done well so far.
But, this does not camouflage the fact that we have poor cover in more than one position.

All the top teams have decent cover for every position and they only loan out players they will not be using.
We always loan out a whole host of players and just hope we don't have too many injuries or suspensions.

I would like to see another two added to the squad to provide competition and cover.

Paul Hughes
392 Posted 22/08/2012 at 19:34:37
Don't know why my comment got repeated - refresh gremlins. Si - I take your point, there is a significant premium on Premier/Championship players.

I think that needs to be balanced against the greater risk of "second tier" overseas players adapting to the Premiership game.

Si Cooper
393 Posted 22/08/2012 at 19:30:35
Sam, I get that Felli was tremendous on Monday, but are you not at all interested in seeing how things turn out with the likes of Naismith, Mirallas or Osman playing in that position? Isn't it possible that Naismith or Mirallas may actually turn out to have more goals in them, and Felli would still be able to get into the box pretty frequently?
Si Cooper
395 Posted 22/08/2012 at 19:42:28
Like you said Paul, "It's just a matter of picking the right player at the right time."

I am just hoping we can get someone better than either Adam or Phillips for what Adam will cost us.

Sam Hoare
401 Posted 22/08/2012 at 19:56:54
Si cooper (393). I hope i'm open minded and sure that Mirallas and other could do a good job there but I reckon Fellaini in that role is nigh on unplayable and since he started playing there last season we haven't dropped many points. If it ain't broke...
David Chait
405 Posted 22/08/2012 at 20:04:00
I feel all is solved if Fella partners Gibson and Naismith in the hole. But how do you change a winning team...

It would still be my first choice.

Si Cooper
407 Posted 22/08/2012 at 20:05:25
It is a team game Sam, and one player having an outstanding season won't get us very far. Some defences will be a lot more robust than Man U on Monday, and I can almost guarantee that in future games one of the centre-backs will be told to needle him throughout until he leaves his foot in or lashes an elbow out in retaliation.

I am not talking about dropping Fellaini and think he has matured to the extent that he will be unplayable playing anywhere in the centre of the team, but to accommodate him where you want to permanently does not leave room for both Mirallas and Naismith and also requires the urgent recruitment of a defensive midfielder.

Naismith is supposed to be a goalscorer and also capable of bringing out the best in Jelavic, and Mirallas is supposed to add pace, trickery and an eye for goal. With Fellaini playing a bit more withdrawn, it also gives the likes of Pienaar (plus two from Osman, Naismith and Mirallas) someone to play the ball off to while they buzz around finding space or dragging players out of position.

Peter Warren
410 Posted 22/08/2012 at 20:19:27
Been saying for years that Fellaini should be played furthe forward. Don't drop him back. I have no idea where Naismith plays never seen him play apart from in old firm match when he didn't really have a set position.

We need ano striker If Defoe available for 5m bite their hands off. I would love someone in centre mid of the ilk of Dacourt or Hutchinson - unfortunately seems unlikely Barkley will get in the team this season and more likely to see Neville or Heitinga there

Pat Finegan
411 Posted 22/08/2012 at 20:14:26
Villa and Man U are 2 very different sides. Felli and Gibson could play in the middle of the park and dominate the game or Fellaini can push forward and be used as a target man if Moyes thinks that is more effective. I like Neville in the squad against the big teams. His leadership was key Monday night.

I think we can definitely afford to have Felli further back against lesser opposition and have Jelavic, Naismith, Pienaar, Mirallas and/or Osman leading the line. We have the capability to play Villa off the park this weekend regardless of what the tactics are.

Nathan Ford
412 Posted 22/08/2012 at 20:25:36
As a team, on the whole I'd like to see us improve the squad with a young right back. I'd love to see us sign James Hunt of Huddersfield; he's an exceptionally pacey attack-minded full-back who is 21 years of age. He was fantastic last season and has started even better this season.
Ian Bennett
419 Posted 22/08/2012 at 21:03:46
Play him upfront again. Villa are pretty small at the back apart from Clarke with Dunne out injured, and even he is not that tall.

If Fellaini can bully the new centre back Vlaar, than we could be in business again. Drag Vlaar out of position and get Jelavic and Mirallas working behind Clarke. It looks a pretty poor Villa squad, although 3 points hasn't been too regular at Villa Park.

Sam Hoare
430 Posted 22/08/2012 at 21:33:57
Si Cooper. Read my post again. I'm not talking about just one game but quite a few games including the tail end of last season when Fellaini playing behind Jelly worked extremely effectively. If that tactic is deliverings wins and points for the team then I see no need to change it for the sake of experimentation.

I would probably play the same team as vs Man U with maybe Osman coming into centre for neville and being replaced by mirallas or naismith on the wing.

Dave Whitwell
459 Posted 23/08/2012 at 00:20:45
When Mirallis is ready I'd like too see Osman in the centre switching with fella, with either nev or gibs holding, pienaar & Mirallis on the wings, re incoming I still think we need more squad depth for genuinly pacey wingers so would like another winger if poss, what about a cheeky loan bid for Nani if fergie wants shot?
George Blundell
461 Posted 23/08/2012 at 00:21:32
Fellaini clearly plays well in the more advanced role, however I feel that this is most suited in games where we are under the cosh, he is an outlet, someone that we can lump it long to. This works against the likes of United, however I feel when playing the lesser teams he should play the more withdrawn role (where he can still be dominant and effective).

In terms of who next?Although not technically someone that we have bin linked with (this season), but Kyle Naughton has now had to consistently impressive seasons with Leicester and Norwich, wouldn't have thought he would cost the earth (unless Levy wants his money back (£6m?))


Howard
Naughton Jagielka Heitinga Baines
Fellaini Gibson
Mirralles Naismith Pienaar
Jelavic

I wonder if Naughton would be happy to sit behind Hibbert for a season or two? He's gonna have to sit behind Walker forever if he doesn't move though.

One thing I definitely don't want to see -> us selling Heitinga

Also sign Moysey up!

James Martin
464 Posted 23/08/2012 at 00:38:48
Fellaini should not be dropped back, our goal per game stat increases by a ridiculous amount when he is played further forward. His passing tends to be too unadventurous from holding mid whereas Gibson has the oace of passing and the angles to move us forward as a team. Fellaini's best role is the role he played on Monday.
Si Cooper
468 Posted 23/08/2012 at 00:35:02
Sam, I am assuming that DM has brought in both Naismith and Mirallas to play them rather than simply as squad players. They were simply not available last season and Naismith may need a while to get to full fitness, but they are here now and could seriously improve our starting eleven.

It may be that one or both is unable to adapt, but if they are as good as we hope then I would expect them to join Pienaar as part of a fluid trio backing up Jelavic.

I think this formation is likely to provide us with the maximum amount of creativity and goal-scoring potential, and think that is sufficient to 'relegate' Fellaini to a generally more withdrawn position (but given license to swap in and out of the attacking quartet when the opportunity arises).

Your option means we can only be as good as we were during the run-in last season and on Monday, mine means we could be even better, but you don't even want to look at it and are advocating using some of our meagre funds to buy another defensive midfielder.

Vijay Nair
473 Posted 23/08/2012 at 01:18:04
Nathan, did we not just sign a young fullback? Ben McLaughlin. Granted he's only 17 but apparently he play right across the back four.
James Stewart
478 Posted 23/08/2012 at 02:00:12
I don't think any of the players pointed out in this article would be good buys.

I think we may see one more signing but I wouldn't be surprised if its a loan.

I would like to see a central playmaker brought in or another winger personally. We still haven't replaced arteta. Moutinho would be ideal or a slightly cheaper version of him somewhere. Surprised Moyes didn't go for huddlestone I know he has admired him for years.

Andre Gaule
493 Posted 23/08/2012 at 04:06:59
All things considered... I think we need a playmaking midfielder. we now have enough options in attack, given our resources. A high quality attack minded right back would be nice but don't think its essential. Cover in midfield is probably a better option. Someone who can provide cover in the defensive midfield role.Ideally someone who can play with flair naturally on the right side of midfield.
Jason Lam
495 Posted 23/08/2012 at 04:07:59
Replacing like for like Moyes will buy another centerback to replace Yobo.
Derek Thomas
518 Posted 23/08/2012 at 08:54:28
Coming in? don't care.I do however worry about some one going at 11.59pm 31st Aug.
Eric Myles
520 Posted 23/08/2012 at 09:04:55
Julian #303, Richards is out for 10 weeks due to injury so we might just be able to pick him up at Christmas.
Ged Simpson
524 Posted 23/08/2012 at 09:01:13
We have very little money at the club and this seems to me like spending the little pocket money we have straight away.

Maybe we should keep £5m for January and buy then depending on what the first half of the season tells us we need most..

Sam Hoare
525 Posted 23/08/2012 at 09:04:54
Si, i'm all up for trying pienaar, Mirallas and Niasmith behind Jelavic but surely you can see the sense in what i'm saying. Football is about results. We have found a formation that is working extremely well.

I am talking about using an approach that we have seen working to great effect and you are talking about trying something where we don't know how well it will work.

I have no doubt as injuries/tiredness occur and rotation is necessary that the team will change and different approaches will be tried. If they work then I will advocate sticking with them too. But as I said earlier...'If it ain't broke....' Mirallas and Naismith will both get chances very soon to show what they can do but Fellaini in an attacking role allowed us to beat arguably the best team in England over the last 5 years relatively comfortably. You won't persuade me that its a bad idea to try that again.

As for buying a central midfielder that is where I think we are now short. We usually play 2 central midfielders and in my opinion we have only Fellaini, Gibson and possibly Osman who I would be happy to see get a prolonged run in that position. We now have more options up front in the one strikers role where we have Jelavic, naismith, Mirallas and Fella who could all play there. Do the maths 3 into 2 is less covered than 4 into 1.

Kieran Fitzgerald
526 Posted 23/08/2012 at 09:15:39
Ged, very good point. If we have an injury worry, or need a player who can help us push on in the second half of the season, that 5m could and should be kept for January.
Sam Hoare
527 Posted 23/08/2012 at 09:16:51
Article in the DM this morning linking us with Doyle and Stephen Ward from Wolves. Please God no...
Kieran Fitzgerald
529 Posted 23/08/2012 at 09:18:53
Heard on Irish radio this morning that apparently we have confirmed our interest in Kevin Doyle. That's all that was said, it was included in that to minute sports roundup you get after the news. Don't know how true this is or where it came from. I would have mixed feelings about Doyle. He works extremely hard and can hold the ball up well. From the last couple of seasons though, he won't score a lot and has been on and out of the Wolves team with injuries.
Sam Hoare
530 Posted 23/08/2012 at 09:32:11
Would have taken Doyle a few seasons back but think we have moved on from that now. He's a good worker but would probably cost 5m or more and thats not great value for a soon to be 29 year old who probably would not start unless a few were injured.
Phil Walling
533 Posted 23/08/2012 at 09:33:24
Turning it round a bit-who do you see going out? Rumours abound that Heitinga is far from happy and Victor has his admirers (away from Goodison Park!).
I think most of us are assuming that the likes of Baines and Jags will be staying but it will be an unusual window if somebody doesn`t move on ` at the death`.
Eric Myles
537 Posted 23/08/2012 at 10:07:53
Kieran & Ged, if the banks don't take it maybe use that £5 million for Donovan in December?
Kieran Fitzgerald
542 Posted 23/08/2012 at 10:09:05
With the recent signings we have made, we don't need Vic to make up the numbers. If we got a couple of million for him and got him off the wage bill at the same time I would be happy.

With Hetinga, the guy is quality and he definitely adds to the first team. If he is not happy at not being an automatic pick though, and will be a source of discontent in the dressing room, then get rid.

I don't think Felliani will go this season. If this finally is the season where he shows his full promise, then I would expect a big offer next summer. He is the type of player you would buy as part of a major rebuild you take on in the summer.

Kieran Fitzgerald
545 Posted 23/08/2012 at 10:24:42
Eric, cracking idea. While his age is not ideal, what he would bring over a season and a half or two seasons, both on the pitch and in terms of marketing would be huge.
Jimmy Sørheim
546 Posted 23/08/2012 at 09:47:24
Agree with you Sam Hoare. We need Naismith or Mirallas to hit the ground running on the right wing.

If we can not find a great right winger then our results will suffer for sure. Naismith would be my bet for right winger, while Mirallas is a contender with Jelavic up top.

It is crystal clear that after having both Drenthe and Donovan here last season as right wingers, we were much better in our attacking football. Our problem is not defensive, the big problem is finding a top quality right winger.

Jelavic needs many chances to find his goal touch again, I do not think we are able to create enough chances as things stand. I hope Naismith can fill the role as right winger, he needs to start games now if we are to find out if he is good enough there or not.

It would be unwise to wait until January before spending the rest of the money. It might very well be gone by then with Bill paying the bills so I think Moyes is under a lot of pressure to find the right player. I would steer away from spending the money in England, as said before Greece and Spain are having money troubles and it would be wise to look for top players there.

This whole season depends on Moyes buying correct, and that to me is nerve-wracking. We need to get back into Europe, then we have more money to spend.

Chris Davies
554 Posted 23/08/2012 at 11:09:38
It wouldn't be right without mentioning Manny Fernandes now would it?..

_____________Howard________________

Hibbert_____Jags____Heitinga____Baines

________Fernandes___Gibson___________

___Mirallas_____Fellaini_____Pienaar_____

_____________Jelavić_________________

If we get an injury to any of the front 4, Naismith can come in.
An injury to the DM's, Neville (or hopefully Barkley or Junior) can come in.
Neville for Hibbo. Distin CB cover and Baines.. er.. er... Baines'll be fine :)

Vic Flange
563 Posted 23/08/2012 at 09:19:47
Fellaini's position is centre mid, where he would have totally bossed Utd on Monday's form, he doesn't have the game to bring Jelavic into play, just like Cahill.

He might get a few goals but to the detriment of our best striker. I thought that was the whole idea of signing Naismith & Mirallas.

Any how, if Moyles plays Felli in the middle, where would he be able to give Nev a game EVERY week?
Tom Harries
569 Posted 23/08/2012 at 12:43:44
I'd love to see one or maybe two more players coming in, on loan if necessary, but most of all I don't want to see anyone LEAVING!
Si Cooper
571 Posted 23/08/2012 at 12:17:03
Sam, Neville and Heitinga can cover for Fellaini and Gibson as the 2 in a 4-2-3-1, with Osman in a pinch (not his best position much as right-wing isn't either).

What you, and quite a few others admittedly, can't see (or are choosing to ignore) is the type of players Moyes has targeted as squad additions, and who he has recently let go. He has brought in Naismith and after selling a defensive midfielder (who could have provided cover behind with Fellaini permanently pushed forward) he declared he wanted further attacking options (two more, at least) and has subsequently bought Mirallas as well as looking at Niang. Now he is supposedly interested in Doyle and Ward (as cover they would do if cheap or on loan, but not as potential first-choicers).

What does this all point towards? Simply that Moyes is not looking to play Fellaini just behind the striker long-term. I am, for one, pretty pleased about that because I am one of those who has noted and mentioned Fellaini's steady improvement over the last couple of years and truly believe he will be the best midfielder in the country this season and, as a team, we will be better with the right combination of pace, trickery and creativity just in front of Fellaini and just behind Jelavic.

Suddenly, after beating a ham-strung version of 'arguably the best team in England over the last 5 years' everyone is ignoring the fact that we need Jelavic to be scoring regularly in a season when he is likely to get a lot more defensive attention. How do we do that? By employing the likes of Naismith, Pienaar and Mirallas to pull the defenders out of position and then slip the ball to Jelavic who will be able to concentrate on finding that bit of space he needs to operate in. If it had been a fully fit pairing of Vidic and Ferdinand on Monday, Vidic would have competed with Fellaini much more effectively than Carrick did and Ferdinand would have stuck to Jelavic and effectively neutralised him.

Of course it is a results business, but the idea is to find a team that gives you the best chance of winning the next game, and managers should always be looking to improve their team / formation / tactics to stay ahead. It is not a case of 'if it ain't broke....' you are advocating, it is 'even if it could be improved, why bother' which is what doesn't make sense to me.

If we have got £6 million to spend I would be happy for it to be spent on another pacy attacking option, and then see what defensive midfielders we can pick up on loan.

Paul Smith
575 Posted 23/08/2012 at 13:10:54
I can't believe we haven't gone in for Huddlestone on loan from Spurs. He's a good ball-playing midfielder and Moyes was interested before. I would also like a full back and keep everybody else and be very happy.
Mike Allison
576 Posted 23/08/2012 at 13:21:13
Si although you generally talk a lot of sense I disagree about Osman. I think his best position is absolutely as one of the two in central midfield and he's put in some storming performances there, especially as he's surprisingly intelligent defensively. It also suits him because he can be neat and tidy, keep the ball moving and maintain possession without ever having to cross or shoot.

Chris I'd love Manny but I think he's signed on at Besiktas now. Owen Hargreaves is still available on a free. It seems an absolute no brainer if we can get the contract terms in our favour, some kind of pay as you play deal.

Otherwise I'd spend the pocket money on this Niang if he's good enough. At 17, barring injury, he's going to be worth three times that in a few years and he may follow Mirallas in coming here to be at a good time where he'll still get playing time, and he could be a game changer from the bench.

Finally, I've a feeling Landon Donovan's contract runs out at the end of this MLS season, which would be in about November/December. If I've got that right and understood it correctly, that would mean he could sign permanently for free in January. I stand to be corrected on that one though.

Terry Smith
577 Posted 23/08/2012 at 13:45:06
I spoke to a old work mate of mine in Blackpool who is a Blackpool fan. He said the word round there is that there is a deal in place which includes Matt Phillips with Anichebe going the other way. I hope to god this is true
Sam Hoare
581 Posted 23/08/2012 at 14:14:57
Si, I for one would not be happy with Heitinga or Neville as a long term fixture in central midfield. I'm definitely not alone in this though that does not necessarily mean i'm right.

Not sure why you think i'm ignoring what type of players Moyes has brought in. I think its great that we have more attacking players and players who will offer something different. As I said they will get used and hopefully add to the mix.

The fact remains that your argument is based on conjecture 'If Vidic was marking Fella this' and 'If he drops back that' whereas all I am saying is that since Fellaini has played behind Jelavic it is a fact that we have been a top 4 team.

You're idea may well improve us and no-one will be happier than me if it does. I also think you might be right that Moyes long term idea is to play Fellaini further back but you won't convince me that starting Saturday with roughly the same team that comfortably beat Man u on monday and that comfortably beat a strong Newcastle team and many others at the end of last season is a bad idea so please stop trying to.

Si Cooper
583 Posted 23/08/2012 at 14:11:42
Mike, Ossie has many more qualities than he has faults but his two main faults, as far as I am concerned, are lack of stature and lack of pace.

He will do a decent job for you wherever you put him, but he is not the best option we have for wing or defensive midfield duties. If you analysed his contribution on Monday night I think you would find that his best work was done in and around the opposition penalty area where his neat short passing and quick feet make him difficult for defenders to deal with.

Further back he was pretty much reduced to playing balls to the feet of more advanced players and trying to get onto the return ball, most of which were unsuccessful. He generally has no presence in the air in a truly competitve situation and struggles to get back and tackle even moderately paced players once they are a couple of yards beyond him.

At the stage of his career he is, these things are only likely to get worse, and I don't want to see him reduced to chasing shadows or more easily brushed off the ball and dispossessed. Using him in at the fore-front of the centre-midfield will give his career improved longevity, though it may be in a part-time capacity.

Shane Corcoran
584 Posted 23/08/2012 at 14:46:45
Ok, so here's a rumour I read yesterday. I sent it in to TW but it didn't hit the rumour page. Not very exciting.


http://hoganstand.com/ArticleForm.aspx?ID=175837

Lyndon Lloyd
585 Posted 23/08/2012 at 14:49:08
I emailed ya back, Shane. We covered this one a couple of weeks ago when it first came up.
Shane Corcoran
586 Posted 23/08/2012 at 14:55:58
Ha, I thought the previous one referred to the lad we bought last week. Sorry Lyndon, there was me thinking I was Magnum PI. I didn't get the mail though.
Si Cooper
587 Posted 23/08/2012 at 14:35:34
Sam, if the following quote was only meant for the short-term, "....and Fella (who I think should be starting higher up as in mondays game)..." , then I am in agreement, but in the long-term it is simply one of a variety of options, some others of which may prove to be even better.

If you truly believe that our improved form at the end of last season was mainly (or solely) due to Fellaini playing in a more advanced role then I don't agree with you. To me, the impact of Jelavic and Pienaar was at least as important, and for this season we will need to work harder to ensure that Jelavic gets the same opportunities as he will undoubtedly be targeted by opposition managers. Bringing in Naismith and Mirallas makes perfect sense as they should both contribute in terms of goals scored and chances created for Jelavic to convert.

If you believe that the defence we faced on Monday was the best that Man U can muster, or even of average quality for the Premiership, then I believe you are plain wrong. On that basis, do you expect Fellaini to be 'unplayable' in that position week-in, week-out.

Si Cooper
591 Posted 23/08/2012 at 14:57:58
Sam, if the following quote was only meant for the short-term, "....and Fella (who I think should be starting higher up as in mondays game)..." , then I am in agreement, but in the long-term it is simply one of a variety of options, some others of which may prove to be even better.
If you truly believe that our improved form at the end of last season was mainly (or solely) due to Fellaini playing in a more advanced role then I don't agree with you. To me, the impact of Jelavic and Pienaar was at least as important, and for this season we will need to work harder to ensure that Jelavic gets the same opportunities as he will undoubtedly be targeted by opposition managers. Bringing in Naismith and Mirallas makes perfect sense as they should both contribute in terms of goals scored and chances created for Jelavic to convert.

If you believe that the defence we faced on Monday was the best that Man U can muster, or even of average quality for the Premiership, then I believe you are plain wrong. On that basis, do you expect Fellaini to be 'unplayable' in that position week-in, week-out?


I don't, but I do think he could be if given a little more room to operate in. Add in a tricky goal-scoring player in front of him and behind Jelavic and I think we could be better than we have been.

I think the manager has this vision as well and that is what he is working towards. I see no reason to assume we have already reach our peak and abandon the attempt to get even better.

Jay Harris
592 Posted 23/08/2012 at 14:18:41
I think we need to consider where we would be most vulnerable if we get a long term injury say for example to Gibson who seems injury prone or even to Bainsey who thankfully appears to be the fittest player at the club (but nevertheless).

Also Pip will not be up to playing every game.

I would love to see Manny Fernandes back sitting alongside Fellaini as MF anchors.

Other than that I think we need a wide player in the Trevor Steven mould and Donovan would fit the bill.

While I think Adam Johnson is very skillfull I also think he is wastefull and we have not got the pace to get back if he gives a ball away and the opposition break.

Jeremy Benson
594 Posted 23/08/2012 at 15:18:16
I think any transfer activity now is going to depend on availability and other deals. I think there are quite a few transfers "stacked up", whereby one club sells and there's a chain effect of those funds being used to purchase which then passes on to the selling club to purchase...etc, etc.

It wouldn't surprise me if we signed another player, nor if we didn't. There doesn't seem to be much spare cash in the premier league this transfer window, and clubs seem reluctant to let squad players go (can't believe the bbc gossip saying that chelsea have turned down a £30million offer for luiz. Surely thats a joke?). When is the next tv payment due?

If it were down to me which position I would fill, I'd buy a left-back to cover baines. Unfortunately, we'd never get a left back of any quality as they know they'd have to play second-fiddle. So I think a talented youngster with good prospects, or just about any championship left-back would do me.

Mike Allison
603 Posted 23/08/2012 at 15:44:17
Si, "Further back he was pretty much reduced to playing balls to the feet of more advanced players and trying to get onto the return ball"

Remove the 'reduced' angle and you've got the main reason I like him in that position! I also think you're slightly underrating him defensively, whilst I'm not saying he's a holding player, he can do his job, knows the angles to close down and has picked many a pocket of a player whilst tracking back. My main point though is that he's worth a place in there as a playmaker, keeping the passing ticking over nicely.

You're right about his strength and pace, but isn't centre mid the place you can get away with that? Hold a position rather than have to sprint everywhere, and leave aerial balls to the centre backs and centre forwards, reading the second balls. Having said all that, I've often thought the 'Cahill' role would be perfect for him as you say, but we currently don't play to his strengths and have always expected that player to compete physically and aerially.

All in all I agree that Fellaini and Gibson should be first choice as those two players in the 'engine room', though it remains to be seen if Naismith, Mirallas or a possible new signing will fill what I think of the 'no.10' position just off Jelavic. It would seem that Naismith should be due a go with Mirallas on the right, and the two of them interchanging with each other, and possibly Pienaar, during a game for the sake of variety.

Anto Byrne
609 Posted 23/08/2012 at 09:50:36
Vic wants more football; I reckon if he was played as an out-and-out centre-forward with a fast tricky winger, he would do well. I hear he is off to Wigan.

If Jonny goes, can Duffy step up this season? We do have Vellios who was our leading scorer last term until Jelly arrived. League Cup fodder perhaps?
Si Cooper
611 Posted 23/08/2012 at 16:02:16
Mike, we are mainly in agreement, but I think Ossie's ability to compensate for his deficiencies has to become a losing battle at some stage. With the players now available he is going to increasingly look a poor second choice, in my opinion, in all positions apart from the central position of an attacking midfield trio.

I get what you say about how Cahill was used (and Felli more latterly) but I believe we may be seeing an evolution into another way of supporting a genuine predatory goalscorer, i.e. a trio of creative players flowing around (to the side of, behind, and even in front of the striker, that we have only sort of touched on with Moyes previously.

It is all about getting the right blend of characteristics throughout the team. If we are talking about Pienaar, Naismith and Mirallas as those playing just off Jelavic then we may be sacrificing some defensive attributes which could be countered by a more physical presence just behind them provided by Fellaini and Gibson.

I think Felli is just coming into his prime and will continue to dominate possession playing just in front of Gibson who, thanks to an obvious improvement in his fitness, I expect to have a great season as well (fingers crossed on injuries).

I just get the impression from what DM has said that he is looking for more pace and creativity in attack, which switches some of the onus to combativeness onto your central midfield players to ensure the balance is right.

Mike Allison
619 Posted 23/08/2012 at 17:20:13
Si that's basically what I'm hoping is happening. Being an Evertonian I get very suspicious when things seem to be going well though.
Ian Glassey
646 Posted 23/08/2012 at 19:02:19
I would like an out and out right winger Matty Phillips.. And a central midfielder Steven Defour who I rate very highly and we have tried to sign him before.....
Brian Williams
666 Posted 23/08/2012 at 20:04:57
I think, other than maybe a season long loan deal, that we're done in the transfer business for this one.
I think if you look at what we've spent on Pienaar and Morallis (spelling?) even taking into consideration what we got for Yobo, and Cahill? and consider that the bank will want some...that could be it.

I hope I'm wrong, but won't be totally gutted. We've brought in three very, very good players.

Jon Ferguson
690 Posted 23/08/2012 at 20:47:27
I'm sure Moyes said we had no need to sell before Rodwell and so all the money raised would be reinvested. That leaves 6 mil as far as I can see. We've lost loads of wages over the last two years and so that shouldn't be am issue.
Denis Richardson
695 Posted 23/08/2012 at 20:47:48
Would look to sell Vic to be honest. I just cannot see him ever being good enough for a starting place and I just don't rate him. Bring in one more central midfielder and one or two loan players to beef the squad up and see if they are worth signing at the end of the season. One of the loanees should be a striker.

With Mirralas, Naismith, Osman, Pienaar and Barkely, we've got the creative midfield part covered.

Use the remaining money from the rodwell sale to pay down some of the debt (yes we still have loads and despite a great result against the mancs our balance sheet is still not great).

Ian Bennett
697 Posted 23/08/2012 at 21:13:13
If we sign anyone with a fee they have to be below 25.

The squad has a number of aged players, we have no money apart from sell to buy, so we need to be careful when we sell Rodwell. Saying all that, I'd take Donovan and berbatov in a hear beat on loan/free if ever possible.

Gary Hughes
738 Posted 24/08/2012 at 01:48:54
So what next? We should go to Villa Park & turn over a very poor team. What will actually happen next? On the evidence from last season when fantastic home victories against City & Chelsea were followed by inept draws against Wigan & QPR, we will probably grind out a turgid draw against a piss poor team there for the taking. Sorry to be a pessimist but I've been an Evertonian far too long to expect succesive quality performances.
Mike Corcoran
428 Posted 26/08/2012 at 23:36:51
That's what I was expecting Gary but seems we have a handy crew together now who feel like a big happy family ready to tear a new one for all in its path.

Phil Walling
699 Posted 29/03/2013 at 21:03:00
One year roll-over contract until something better comes along. So we shall have this bloody farcical uncertainty every year from now on.

And in spite of all this our esteemed chairman has `a million, billion, trillion per cent confidence` in him! (QUOTE)

But then, we all know that Kenwright is nothing more than a lachrymose luvvie... and that`s the least dangerous thing about him!

Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.



© ToffeeWeb