24/05/2025 21comments  |  Jump to last

Everton are set for a massive payday after securing the 13th place in the Premier League standings, regardless of their result against Newcastle United at St James’ Park on Sunday.

The Blues have picked up 45 points ahead of the final matchday this season and are set for a higher finish than the likes of Wolves, West Ham, Manchester United, and Tottenham Hotspur.

TBR’s finance expert Adam Williams told Everton News that the club’s 13th-place finish could result in them pocketing over £140m in prize money.

“Last season, the club that finished 13th – which was Fulham, on that occasion – got around £130m in total prize money from the Premier League,” Williams said.

“For Everton, I’d expect them to actually receive quite a lot more than that as they have been on TV more, with each domestically broadcast match worth just less than £1m to the club.

“I haven’t got the figures to hand, but let’s say they were on TV 20-25 times throughout the season. That’s going to give them a total prize money of around £140m.

“I think you can also add a little bit extra from the international equal share and central commercial pots too, which have increased in 2024-25. My estimate is that they will be on around £142-145m in the final figures.”

David Moyes deserves plenty of plaudits for turning Everton’s season around. The Toffees were just one point above the relegation zone and in a precarious situation when Moyes took over from Sean Dyche.

He led the club on a nine-game unbeaten run and put plenty of distance between them and the dreaded red zone.

The Blues, who have struggled with PSR issues in recent years and have also seen points docked in the league as a result, are in a much better position now. 

“PSR is much less of an issue for Everton now ahead of the move to Bramley Moore Dock, but they do still need to show some restraint,” Williams admitted.

“An extra £10-15m in prize money than last season is going to help them in the transfer market. With an extra £40m or so coming from Bramley-Moore Dock, I’d expect to see a more lavish summer transfer window than Everton fans have become accustomed to seeing in recent years.”

Everton are expecting a busy summer ahead with plenty of movement. The squad needs a major overhaul and new owners the Friedkin Group are expected to back Moyes with significant funds.

The Blues have already approached Ipswich Town striker Liam Delap, although a deal is far from done.

 

Reader Comments (21)

Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()


Bobby Mallon
1 Posted 24/05/2025 at 14:53:17
Very nice.
Robert Tressell
2 Posted 24/05/2025 at 15:39:28
Is it just me or are things starting to fall into better shape since TFG took over?
Craig Scott
3 Posted 24/05/2025 at 20:06:45
It's all relative.

Presumably the 12 clubs that finished above us are going to get more to spend than us to compete for the players we may want to buy.

Brendan McLaughlin
4 Posted 24/05/2025 at 21:01:37
Craig #3

Of course it is.

We just have to buy better for less... a knack we seem to have lost. Let's hope Moyes still has that in his locker.

Mike Gaynes
5 Posted 25/05/2025 at 03:06:22
Not just you, Robert.

I think we may be in for a rough time early next season -- integrating this many new players and execs into the club over one short summer is bound to be a bumpy process -- but long-term I'm the most optimistic I have been this century.

Eric Myles
6 Posted 25/05/2025 at 03:20:09
I find the headline a bit misleading as the article goes on to say that it's only "an extra £10-15M in prize money than last season" and then they count in an extra £40M from BMD.

Where does that "extra" come from? Only ticket sales or projected other income streams? And surely we're going to have increased "Other Operating Costs" that will eat into that £40M so it's not just profit.

Danny O'Neill
7 Posted 25/05/2025 at 05:16:54
Brendan, totally. As I continuously say, it's how you spend, not what you spend.

Mike, I'm always cautious about introducing too many players in one swoop. We may not have a choice, but we do, as you say, need to be careful in our dealings and initial expectations.

Eric, I can only assume (that's it) that there has been an increase in TV revenue, so the monies awarded for league placings.

The Everton Stadium will generate more revenue from increased corporate facilities and being used as a multi-use arena. We already have the England v Australia Rugby League this year and have been chosen as a venue for the Euros. Concerts, boxing and more will follow.

Craig Scott
8 Posted 25/05/2025 at 09:10:29
Danny.

Caution not to integrate too many new players at once inevitably means we renew the contracts of some mediocre out-of -ontract players who have contributed to our parlous league placings over recent years.

We're in the position of knowing what these players can and (more crucially) cannot do over some time, so who of all of them should we retain in the interest of remaining cautious?

The outcome from that approach, as has been demonstrated, is more mediocrity, so what have we got to lose by ridding ourselves of most if not all of them and taking the gamble on younger hungrier players on lower wages?

Logic dictates that you choose another horse to bet on than the one you've been backing over a period that hasn't come in better than 13th despite a better trainer.

Eric Myles
9 Posted 25/05/2025 at 09:18:37
Danny #7, exactly, the £10-15 million is increased league placings, not what I'd call a massive payday that the headline states

And any future income on possible non-football use can't be booked as income / spending money unless we actually have confirmed bookings that can be borrowed against.

If the £40 million is purely against increased football revenue then we will have increased Other Operating Costs to set against that, more stewards, security, policing, cleaners, utilities etc. Which would also have an effect if it's non-football revenue.

In short, we need to be looking at the increased profit that we will have available for investment, not the increased revenue.

Danny O'Neill
10 Posted 25/05/2025 at 09:41:48
I wasn't talking about retention. I was agreeing with a point made about an influx of players taking time to gel.

Apologies for any misunderstanding.

Brian Harrison
11 Posted 25/05/2025 at 10:21:35
This summer will be a very busy one, as Moyes said tomorrow everybody who is staying will know as will those being let go. Moyes said 5 loan players like we have now is to many and ideally he wants only 1 or2.

Does he sign Alcaraz, hasn't started many games under Moyes so, although I would like us to sign him, I don't think Moyes is yet convinced.

I am sure they will have identified the players they would like to sign, but identifying and signing players are very different.

I would like to see 3 first team players signed, obviously a right-back is paramount, another striker to compliment Beto and Chermiti, and if we aren't going to play Ndiaye in the Number 10 role then that is a position that needs filling.

Michael Kenrick
12 Posted 25/05/2025 at 11:36:10
I just hate these kinda headlines, which are so typical of Everton News and Goodison News, and the other sites that seem to be from the same clickbait stable. This is just the money Everton get for competing in the Premier League.

At the other extreme, there's this one:

Everton miss out on millions as Sunderland promoted to the Premier League

Oh really? Why is that then? Well, as someone already pointed out, it's the 45% parachute payment that Sheffield Utd don't get now, which (the story says) is recycled back to all Premier League clubs — presumably in increased merit payments?

Ian Burns
13 Posted 25/05/2025 at 12:31:20
Mike G - I wholeheartedly agree with your post. A too large an overhaul is not something I personally wish to see but the problem with these sorts of articles and headlines it gives supporters a false sense of hope and expectation.

Talk of contact with such as Rory Delap for example, turns to frustration/disappointment when he eventually signs for Man Utd or Chelsea.

Obviously we need recruitment and we need players of quality which far exceeds what we have at present – but one or maybe two steps at a time please, Mr Moyes.

Ian Bennett
14 Posted 25/05/2025 at 12:49:04
It'll come down to a good pre-season. The recruitment team will need to start early, and avoid pre-season tour of 10 players plus kids out of the academy.

We need fitness and evolve the patterns of play. Certainly the last couple of years before Moyes, it's been hard to see what we are trying to achieve.

Premier League status has been known for a while, so it'll be on the club to bring in good quality and early. They've money to spend and a wage budget to allocate.

John Chambers
15 Posted 25/05/2025 at 13:10:11
Just read an article in The Athletic and they predict we will only get about £3M more from the premier league payout this season.

Yes, we will get about £12M more from our league position merit payment but, as we have been on TV fewer times, we have a reduced “Facility fee”.

Dale Self
16 Posted 25/05/2025 at 13:13:52
John, I believe we have around 142 million pounds coming from finishing 13th and our above average TV appearances. Maybe this is including US TV where we have been regularly featured with the glamour clubs on peacock.
Ian Bennett
17 Posted 25/05/2025 at 13:30:59
I'd read we were £5.8M down on the TV facility fee, but £12M up on placing fee plus other fees, £5M more from international share.

We received £132.2M last season.

Stephen Williams
18 Posted 25/05/2025 at 15:20:13
It’s not so much what our revenue is for this season that determines our spending limits. It’s far more what our revenue will be next season that matters particularly as salaries and fee amortisation for new players will commence only in that season.
Without knowing the minutiae of our finances it’s difficult to predict for sure what scope we’ll have but using guesswork informed from typical season ticket costs, total capacity and ‘standard’ vs ‘hospitality’ ratios of Goodison and HDS, I estimate that we’ll have c. £35m net increase in gate money plus the HD sponsorship, say £8m plus additional events. Let’s say c. £50m a year net increase. If we are able to finish top 10 and have better cup runs then with the inevitable increase in tv appearance revenue, it’s not unreasonable to assume we’ll have £60m - £65m more to play with for the 2025-26 season.
Given that players are typically signed on 4 - 5 year contracts then a transfer spend of up to £250m - £300m is possible. Not that I’m expecting this (well not all in one season) but it shows the scope possible particularly if the new players’ wages can be serviced using the c. £900k a week salary savings of the out of contract players.
Martin Berry
19 Posted 25/05/2025 at 23:22:37
I would not trust any Manager other than David Moyes, to get things right at Everton on the squads future comings and goings.
You can bet that players coming in will be solid, hard working players with the right attitude.
We have a more experienced Manager now than the one who first came through the doors as a young man.
We are in safe hands.
Bob Kerr
20 Posted 26/05/2025 at 20:51:45
Anjishnu: 2 quick points and please excuse my non-accounting and limited memory.

1. Did the Franklin Group not stick Everton with a £300M loan? Over 50 years at (say) 5% would this not require £6M per year capital and £21M per year interest repayments, ie, £27M per year in total debt servicing costs? Accountants, please help…

2. Surely the Burnley compensation case against Everton has still to be resolved. This could require £10M - £15M immediate repayment to Burnley under the P&S rules violation?

John Chambers
21 Posted 26/05/2025 at 21:14:22
Bob I think you have oversimplified your calculation. If it was a “mortgage” at 5% I think the annual repayment would be nearer £17M, still a significant sum.

That said, I'm not sure what type of “loan” it is, ie, is it a “traditional” loan or is it a debt facility we can call on when needed in which case the payment would be the interest only.


Add Your Comments

In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.

» Log in now

Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.


How to get rid of these ads and support TW

© ToffeeWeb