Season › 2024-25 › News
Everton back in for Villa winger Jaden Philogene
The Mail claims that Everton have revived their interest in Aston Villa winger Jaden Philogene, who turned down a move to the Blues last summer.
The 22-year-old has made 15 appearances across all competitions for Villa this season, but has started only 4 of those games, scoring no goals after mostly being used off the bench by Unai Emery.
A young star who came up through the Villa ranks, Philogene rejoined the club last summer after spending a successful season with Hull City, where he scored 12 goals in the Championship, and saw his transfer value increase 10-fold.
However, he has failed to bring that goalscoring form back with him and looks to be another flawed acquisition following on the heels of Harrison and Lindstrøm, who have both struggled to perform effectively in Sean Dyche's ultra-defensive set-up.
Reader Comments (82)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
2 Posted 08/01/2025 at 09:38:26
3 Posted 08/01/2025 at 09:41:59
4 Posted 08/01/2025 at 09:45:17
5 Posted 08/01/2025 at 09:48:59
The right age with something to prove is a positive move.
6 Posted 08/01/2025 at 09:55:30
What worries me though is, I have a lot of admiration for Unai Emery, and think he is a pretty good judge of a player. So why (if true) are they willing to offload after just 6 months?
7 Posted 08/01/2025 at 09:58:40
8 Posted 08/01/2025 at 09:59:31
I'd add a note of caution to this potential transfer (if true)
IF Unai Emery and his team can't get this lad up to speed, despite all his attributes that PH mentions at #2. Then how would we develop and progress Jaden's abilities and career, when it has been a widely held view that Dyche hasn't improved a single player?
Yes, he would improve the attacking side of the team on the right (maybe) BUT again he is a RFd LW (which is an alternative to McNeil and Harrison I suppose - but we have Ndiaye), which means if played on the LW he's going to cut in much akin to Ndiaye; and if played on the RW, it isn't his favoured position, though potentially it might improve him and us, as he wouldn't be an inverted winger and hopefully try to get to the bye-line to cross...?
All in all, despite being 22yo and relatively cheap, I'd steer clear. He'd just be a Villa cast-off, like a Utd cast-off. or a Chelsea cast-off.
Please TFG can we fire our scouting and recruiting departments and get some people in who actually scout.
Maybe ask TFG to consider Robert Tressell and Sam Hoare to assist?
Also, I agree with Mike Doyle, if brought in, would Dyche play-him if a) he's not match fit, or Dyche fit, and B) he's not willing to work as hard back as forwards, or c) he doesn't train well?
9 Posted 08/01/2025 at 10:01:35
10 Posted 08/01/2025 at 10:15:40
11 Posted 08/01/2025 at 11:09:08
12 Posted 08/01/2025 at 11:13:56
13 Posted 08/01/2025 at 12:03:05
14 Posted 08/01/2025 at 13:00:37
As you can see at Forest - where Elanga and Hudson-Odoi are doing so well - pace and trickery are a valuable asset.
Philogene would give us much more of this. He's not Vini Junior but he'd be a useful asset for the 2nd half of the season - with the potential to become a Mirallas standard (ish) player going forwards.
There are lots of other players like him (and possibly better too) but are they available in Jan? Can we afford them?
Quite possibly not.
15 Posted 08/01/2025 at 15:32:33
16 Posted 08/01/2025 at 15:33:58
17 Posted 08/01/2025 at 15:49:12
Unbelievable that we were actually in for Diaz, Kudus, Semenyo and Gibbs-White; our recruitment is at least as bad as our management.
18 Posted 08/01/2025 at 16:15:15
The lad's young and English, we will almost certainly get our money back; if the next manager plays him, his value will soar.
Fact is you need established players to affect the starting team but, for that type of player, you have to spend money, and if we have to spend money, you don't want Dyche spending it.
We need players who the next manager wants. The last thing we need is another Tosun, Walcott, Niasse, Bolasie, Sigurdsson, Keane, Gbamin, or any of the mob who cost us good money, sat around for 5 years, and left on a free.
19 Posted 08/01/2025 at 16:15:40
I guess a lack of money played a part? Any of those you mentioned would have made a big difference, assuming they were played in their correct positions and not as auxiliary full-backs.
20 Posted 08/01/2025 at 17:13:07
We can't follow Forest template as we would break PSR rules again. I am not sure how Forest have avoided PSR again with another £100M spent this season.
Do we have anyone on here who can shed any light on our financial position?
21 Posted 08/01/2025 at 17:33:22
Please god we get some serious pace and power throughout the whole squad, surely that has to be an absolute prerequisite moving forwards.
Even the successful wingers we've had, like Deulofeu and Richarlison, didn't have searing pace. If we had fast full-backs or central defenders or midfielders, at least that would negate the opposition's pace but there's no pace anywhere. We must have the slowest squad in the Premier League.
22 Posted 08/01/2025 at 17:55:28
I agree, we must have the slowest team in the Premier League. Speed of thought is also missing from most of them.
23 Posted 08/01/2025 at 18:03:31
He is only 22 and I would be very happy if we signed him as I think he has definite potential to be a very good player.
I remember a few years ago Jarrod Bowen playing for Hull and many clubs over-looked him, including us. He signed for West Ham at 23 for £22M and he didn't turn out badly.
Also, there were murmurings about Tim for Villa, however he became a fans favorite prior to injury, food for thought folks.
24 Posted 08/01/2025 at 18:07:21
Sounds like a medicine, just what we need.
25 Posted 08/01/2025 at 18:18:27
We've been among the slowest in the Premier League for years now. We've had no dangerous pace up top since Rom and none in the midfield since the last century.
We haven't recruited a seriously speedy player since Bolasie.
26 Posted 08/01/2025 at 18:23:09
He's being bought to help Ashley Young because we all know that Philogene fortifies the over-forties!
27 Posted 08/01/2025 at 18:32:21
This manager doesn't help because all he looks for is size and height, which rarely combines with pace.
28 Posted 08/01/2025 at 18:56:14
If he hasn't made a mark at Villa then he won't here unless we have a new manager at the helm.
We need more speed, tackling and creativity where it matters; until that changes, we will stay with the bottom feeders.
29 Posted 08/01/2025 at 19:23:37
Agree Mike. We need root and branch reform in nearly all areas of the club. We need to get rid of the ancien regime and Thelwell is a big part of what and where we are now. He has to go.
Fred/Brian, he sounds more like an author of Greek Tragedy to me or was he in The Iliad?
30 Posted 08/01/2025 at 19:52:07
I remember when Andy King and Andy Gray came to the club. Both arrived when we were in the doldrums. Both were huge characters.
King, the cheeky chappy and Gray, let's kick the crap out of this lot. Both of them lifted the spirits of teammates and fans alike.
This bunch of players are too meek and mild. We need fighters who can play.
31 Posted 08/01/2025 at 19:54:50
I watched Forest the other day and a lot of them were like shit off a shovel. I'd never heard of most of them 12 months ago.
Out recruitment is horrendous.
32 Posted 08/01/2025 at 19:59:25
33 Posted 08/01/2025 at 20:00:17
34 Posted 08/01/2025 at 20:12:04
Andy King and Andy Gray can't have played many games together, if any. Andy King's second spell here was 1982-84 and Gray didn't join us till the end of 1983.
Or have I misunderstood your post?
35 Posted 08/01/2025 at 20:18:08
Whatever the reason, our recruitment is horrendous, even when we were flush with Usmanov money.
36 Posted 08/01/2025 at 20:35:35
Not sure if we can afford him or whether Dyche would play him but he has Ndiaye qualities and could get fans on their feet.
37 Posted 08/01/2025 at 20:51:48
Add to that list Guirassey, Thelwell was after him just before he hit major form for Stuttgart and earned a move to Dortmund. Not to mention Kudos now at West Ham.
There have been others who went on to do well, he has an eye for talent just before it exploded for them, he just hasn't had the financial backing, nor the club stability behind him to get them over the line.
So for the above reasons along with my view that Thelwell has performed minor miracles on a shoestring budget, I want us to give him real backing with a new contract.
We need some continuity moving into the new era and he's seen it all, he deserves his shot. I hope he is anti Dyche though and sells him down the river in his next meeting with the Friedkin's.
Philogene is exactly the sort of player we should be after, i think he needs some love. People on here who are criticising his form and choice to go to Villa, i don't know how much say he had in that. They exercised their buy back clause for a bargain £13M, knowing his stock had risen and they could make a fast buck out of the sale. Don't read too much in them wanting shot of him, even if it hasn't worked out under Emery for him.
38 Posted 08/01/2025 at 21:03:16
He's had a task trying to get anyone to Everton. In the near future, that may change.
39 Posted 08/01/2025 at 21:33:14
Broja signed with a long-term injury, Lindstrøm not helping, he re-signed Harrison and gave Coleman, Doucouré and Young extensions. Lazy signings and some shockingly bad ones. I don't think he was responsible for Mykolenko because that one is probably the worst of a very bad bunch.
The only success is Ndiaye.
40 Posted 08/01/2025 at 22:06:24
We were in for him, but the Tractor Boys blew us out the water.
41 Posted 08/01/2025 at 22:12:34
42 Posted 08/01/2025 at 22:14:45
I wouldn't trade him for the whole world…
43 Posted 08/01/2025 at 22:25:23
44 Posted 08/01/2025 at 22:50:43
My, intended, point was they both lifted the spirits of players and fans alike. We need characters like these two again.
45 Posted 08/01/2025 at 23:08:41
'Philogene latest. Medical booked after Everton Bid – Fabrizio Romano'
46 Posted 08/01/2025 at 23:33:11
What does that tell you about the attraction of signing for Everton?
47 Posted 09/01/2025 at 05:08:35
Signing for Everton or the Everton manager, whoever that may be in the near future, and/or what the new owner's intentions are given that there must be some cost-cutting measures imposed sooner rather than later and with so many players contracts up for renewal at season's end.
48 Posted 09/01/2025 at 05:35:07
Equally Beto cost £0 up front, and the only reason the total amount was so high was because the selling club was getting paid on the drip.
People taking shots at Thelwell seem to have little idea of the restrictions he has been operating under. We are dead bottom of the Premier League net spend table over the last 5 years. And nearly all our deals have to be structured in a way that is unattractive to many selling clubs.
The scouting has been decent, it's the finances that have been horrendous. Hopefully that changes now.
Also in Philogene, £21M+ is a big fee for a winger who's only stood out in the Championship. Talented guy but a little overpriced for me.
49 Posted 09/01/2025 at 05:49:48
As for Beto – we might be paying on the drip but he's still costing what he cost. The payment arrangement won't even impact PSR.
50 Posted 09/01/2025 at 06:35:13
As for Beto, won't it affect PSR as it will change the year that the payments fall in? Thought that was the whole point. And yes he was too expensive but if we'd had the finances to pay up front, the fee would probably have been under £20M (still too much in retrospect) at the time Beto probably looked the best (only?) striker that could be bought in for no initial fee.
51 Posted 09/01/2025 at 06:39:08
The Beto fee will be amortised over the life of his contract. The cash payment timing won't come into it from a Pifit & Loss or PSR perspective.
Of course cash is still important. If we didn't have much cash available (and the Esk had said similar over the last few years) then he may have been the best option.
52 Posted 09/01/2025 at 06:46:16
He is also described as one of the most desirable young forwards in Europe.
I really believe that, if not for the toe injury, we would have seen that by now.
53 Posted 09/01/2025 at 07:07:38
As for the fee I guess none of us know for sure but the language can be confusing. For example does ‘initial fee' mean the first payment or just the guaranteed payment before add-ons?
My understanding with Chermiti was that there was a guaranteed fee of around £10M but with structured payments over his contract, hence there being a small outlay that season. I think the source was Paddy Boyland (who's very reliable) but can't remember.
54 Posted 09/01/2025 at 07:12:37
They're like Forest when they came back up.
55 Posted 09/01/2025 at 07:17:45
We had PSR and the very real threat of insolvency to contend with.
The £1.75M was reported to be the initial payment for Chermiti. The remainder of about £9M was due on appearances etc.
As Ernie says, we spent £0 on Beto, which inflated the fee to be paid later to €25M (about £22M).
There are plenty of true things to moan about at Everton. No need to moan about things that aren't true.
56 Posted 09/01/2025 at 07:18:09
Will we be back for him in the summer? Probably. We never learn.
57 Posted 09/01/2025 at 07:19:14
It is a sad state when players are preferring Ipswich to us, with new owners, new stadium etc, etc. Worrying times as everyone we are allegedly linked with thus far, seems to fall through!
58 Posted 09/01/2025 at 07:42:35
I have no idea what Friedkin and co are doing. I hope they do.
59 Posted 09/01/2025 at 07:46:02
I think the only reason Forest have avoided further sanctions is their dodgy deal with Newcastle for Anderson and some 30 year old Greek keeper
Did the same as us with Dobbin and Tim
Looks like they put his transfer in at about 20M
There's an article on him on the Athletic but I don't have a subscription for that.
The also got decent fees off Lyon for Mangala and Niakhate.
Apparently Lyon are in real danger of doing a Rangers and being demoted to the bottom of the football pyramid unless they sell players asap
We should be fishing around them for some bargains
Promising Striker, Winger and CM options
60 Posted 09/01/2025 at 07:50:12
Apparantly he is big mates with Greaves, who joined Ipswich in the summer, and they had already agreed to go back for him. Sounds like speculation that we were in for him to me.
UTFT
61 Posted 09/01/2025 at 08:38:19
1. We have the disadvantage of the disastrous 2016 to 2020 / 21 period. This is when we massively inflated the wage bill while reducing the quality in the squad - at the same time as signing rapidly deteriorating players - effectively burning through hundreds of millions in transfer fees but getting nothing back in resale.
2. Moshiri pulled the plug at the end of 2020/21.
3. Stadium costs.
4. Rubbish commercial side of the club.
In the same period since 2021, we'll run smaller clubs have been able to spend heavily due to TV revenues - and their player development strategies are often very good, generating money to reinvest in the playing squad.
Clubs like Bournemouth can now compete with the likes of AC Milan in the transfer market.
Meanwhile, since Moshiri pulled the plug our investment in players has been less than Watford, Sheffield Utd, Norwich, Luton, Burnley and Leeds - and is €100m adrift of Wolves, our closest rival in low investment in the Premier League.
We are €230m adrift of Ipswich in that period. Significant when our entire squad cost only about €220m to assemble.
62 Posted 09/01/2025 at 08:42:06
Dyche is inert, and useless. The squad is as weak as ever. We have a new ownership who are somehow more useless.
We're going nowhere, the club are completely inert, and the fanbase are finished. We haven't got the energy to yet again drag a bunch of useless wankers to safety.
63 Posted 09/01/2025 at 08:58:44
TFG only took over a couple weeks ago, during Xmas, give them a chance maybe? Ink has barely dried. The squad hasnt changed since August so not sure about it being weaker and there are currently 4 teams below us.
Lets get the win this evening and see what happens before Villa. 3.5 weeks till the transfer window shuts and as we know, most transfers happen towards the end.
When we get McNeil, Tim and Garner back well be more solid.
Not all doom and gloom. Could be a Southampton fan!
64 Posted 09/01/2025 at 09:04:15
Just look at Luton relegated last season and now just two points and two places above the relegation zone.
Dropping down would be the end of this club IMO.
65 Posted 09/01/2025 at 09:22:47
66 Posted 09/01/2025 at 09:37:06
The atmosphere at Goodison is awful, we play awful football, and with new owners and a manager who could lose his job any day, there's no guarantee of what might happen at Everton at the moment.
At least at Ipswich he can be assured of a few things: getting a game, playing decent football, playing in a stadium where the atmosphere is fun and they're enjoying being in the Premier League, and playing for a manager who likes to play expansive football.
I'll also wager he's got some sort of get-out clause if they go down that stipulates he can go back to a Premier League club if they do (or something of that nature).
What will he get at Everton? Awful football, a near toxic Goodison, owners with no plan that we yet know about, a manager who plays ancient shite football, often refuses to play players for no apparent reason, appears to hold grudges, has nailed-on favourites, and if we go down, he'd probably be forced to stay because we're a 'big club' and thus won't fire-sale new players.
All slightly hyperbolic and entirely without foundation in fact, but you see where I'm coming from – we're just not that attractive.
67 Posted 09/01/2025 at 09:40:04
Blow # 1: He has the ability to get past a full-back and get balls into the box from the right – just what we need.
Blow # 2: Delap will shortly be being hailed as the new Isak.
I regard his decision to join Ipswich instead of us very bad news. Let's have some good news soon please TFG.
68 Posted 09/01/2025 at 09:45:48
Nothing to do with Dyche or the new owners this is down to the league wanting to protect the big guns with the psr nonsense.
Does anyone have any sympathy with Thelwell and Dyche for trying to sign a player only to be gazumped yet again?
Martin @59,
How is buying Anderson and a Greek keeper avoiding PSR for Frrest?
Are Ipswich avoiding PSR due to this being the first season in the Premier League so the EFL rules don't follow on, similar to the Leicester situation?
As Wolves fans sang “It's just not football anymore!”
Fed up of bureaucrats and accountants running the game. It's not sport anymore.
James @66,
What a load of drivel, no mention of money at all. You even said yourself nothing in your post is fact – just you slagging us off. We are in a bad enough spot as it is without our own fans spouting shite.
69 Posted 09/01/2025 at 09:58:03
Can anyone show me a link that shows we made a bid or even approached the player? (Daily Mail does not count.)
70 Posted 09/01/2025 at 10:02:44
If you prefer to say I'm "spouting shite" because it makes you feel big & strong, and superior in your opinion, that's fine. I'm a big boy and can take it from strangers on the Internet.
Also, I just had a look at the net spend for Ipswich and they've apparently not broken any rules, and them buying Philogene doesn't appear to have anything to do with PSR, but you're welcome to your opinion. :-)
71 Posted 09/01/2025 at 10:16:27
Yep.
A 'toxic Goodison' is a bigger problem than some fans like to admit. If any, this is the time to get behind the team – no matter how bad they are.
72 Posted 09/01/2025 at 10:55:18
We all know we are in a dire position. Making negative stuff up is obviously your choice.
It's like a negative feeding frenzy on here. A win or draw might get 100 posts. A Dyche press conference 200 posts. A defeat gets 300 posts. It's just a bit tiring.
As for Ipswich and PSR, where did you look that up? How can buying a player not impact PSR?
73 Posted 09/01/2025 at 11:22:30
74 Posted 09/01/2025 at 11:28:57
We are Everton, and we will come back to the top table but its going to take time.
The stadium and new owners will be the catalyst for great things and the envy of many.
Unfortunately we are in a bad place and need to win games which look unlikely at the moment.
I think this month, the transfer window and Tim, Jimmy, Yousef and Dwight coming back sooner than later may just save Dyches neck, that said I still expect him not to have his contract renewed and then we will see drastic changes.
75 Posted 09/01/2025 at 11:35:46
I wonder what your experience of Goodison is. Yes, as widely reported, the fans are making their frustration known at the moment. rightly so. The footy has been garbage, but the man responsible for that is on borrowed time. Over the next few months when the chips are down, the Goodison faithful will (as they always have done) create an atmosphere that simply cannot be matched elswhere. They may well have a very jolly cheerful crowd at Ipswich. In fact, experience tells me they do, but Goodison shakes to its foundations when the fans are called upon to pull us out of the shite. The player will not experience anything like that at Portman road, or anywhere else for that matter.
And there is a very definite reason to believe Everton will stay up and Ipswich wont. They have played a game more than us, they have less points and their goal difference is inferior. Yes it's possible that Ipswich (and Wolves) can find a consistency that has eluded them all season, but History tells us that is highly unlikely. Even after our depressing, dreadful goal drought. its still advantage Everton
I don't believe the reasons you gave for a player choosing Ipswich over Everton would even occur to a player. Any player
76 Posted 09/01/2025 at 11:44:27
77 Posted 09/01/2025 at 12:02:23
You say it's possible Wolves and / or Ipswich can find some consistency. I guess, like most of us, you look at both teams upcoming fixtures. Doesn't make pleasant reading for either of them.
In the next seven games Wolves have Newcastle (A), Chelsea (A), Arsenal (H), Aston Villa (H), Liverpool (A), Bournemouth (A), Fulham (H).
Ipswich have Brighton (H), Man City (H), Liverpool (A), Southampton (H), Aston Villa (A), Spurs (H) Man Utd (A). Let's be honest, who can see either team getting many points out of those fixtures?
Now before anyone says it, yes, I know our next few games are just as tricky, but if we can stay ahead of both Wolves and Ipswich, and maybe pull away from them, things might look a little rosier come the next international break.
78 Posted 09/01/2025 at 12:27:15
We didn't spend only £1.75M. We may have transferred cash for that amount but we spent over £30M on Beto and Chermiti. That's the commitment we entered into and the amount that will be amortised over their initial contracts.
That's what goes into the P&L. That's what goes into the PSR calculation. That's how football transfers work generally. There's a fee, there's an accounting treatment on the books, and there's a cash payment structure that is purely between the two clubs.
The cash payment structure wasn't to beat PSR. More likely it was to have enough cash to be able to pay the bills, ie, stay solvent.
But we did still spend that money, just as your home cost a lot more than your first month's mortgage payment.
79 Posted 09/01/2025 at 13:25:17
You raise another really important point too - that we haven't just been hindered in our business by PSR and arbitrary bureaucrats etc - we have had quite a challenge just to keep out of insolvency.
Anyway, it is a bit of a worry that Ipswich have now outbid us on a few players (including Philogene it now seems) - and have more scope to spend (or transfer cash) or both. It will have a big impact on the sorts of candidates who might be prepared to step into the helm in place of Dyche...
80 Posted 09/01/2025 at 16:25:52
Colemans extension and Doucoures 160k a week extension were a waste of money too.
Were in no position to make these kind of mistakes and its a major factor in putting us in real danger of relegation.
Bloody hell hes gone as I was typing this!!
81 Posted 09/01/2025 at 22:14:21
We failed the PSR test because we were being run unsustainably.
82 Posted 10/01/2025 at 12:19:37
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW


1 Posted 08/01/2025 at 09:25:34
We have to sign full backs. It would be good to sign a proven attacking force. But who would join us to play defend and counter in a relegation dogfight?
I believed we were to slow to replace Lampard with Dyche, and that nearly cost us. Now we are doing the same again.
Drastic action is needed. Signing a bench warming, non productive winger is NOT a priority.