Interested buyers to keep their counsel going forward
The investment group seeking to buy Farhad Moshiri out of his position as Everton's majority shareholder have issued a statement expressing their regret at the public manner in which their takeover bid has been covered in recent days.
Under the banner of KAM Sports, LLC and represented by former Manchester United and Chelsea CEO Peter Kenyon, the Minneapolis-based Kaminski family have been in talks with Moshiri over a reported £500m purchase of Everton, with a commitment to provide the funds to complete the £500m construction of the new stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock.
Those negotiations hit a roadblock last week when Moshiri's camp briefed the English media that, as far as he was concerned, any deal with Kenyon's group was “dead†but the Kaminskis maintain that their interest remains very much alive and that they are keen to keep discussing a takeover even though their period of exclusivity has expired.
The respective parties reportedly spoke over the phone within the past 48 hours but the word is that Moshiri's stance has not changed. Furthermore, there are believed to be two more consortia interested in buying the Blues, one from China and another based in the United States.
“As a general principle, we prefer to conduct our business in private to create the fairest environment for those involved, and in this particular situation, to minimize uncertainty for fans of Everton,†the statement from KAM Sports read.
“It is regrettable that this has not been possible. We respectfully remain interested in acquiring the club as we believe its fans deserve nothing less than the best, and our offer to achieve this stands.
“However, in consideration of all Everton fans, we will not be making further public comments at this time."
Meanwhile, The Athletic suggest that Moshiri could be willing to sell 30% of his holdings in order to help fund the stadium build while keeping the makeup of the current Board of Directors intact, with perhaps the addition of one more representative of any new investor in the club.
Reader Comments (29)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
2 Posted 05/07/2022 at
He's not one of us, he shouldn't use that phrase.
3 Posted 05/07/2022 at
This is the single most irksome thing about Moshiri, he's meddled, he's been erratic, despite this, he always backs his board members, they may have good intentions but they are always likely to show up their short-comings in the cut-and-thrust of the modern game.
The clubs hierarchy needs new blood, and lots of it, not the same old faces trotting out the same old plattitudes, leading to the same old outcomes. Sell or don't sell, that's Moshiri's right, but to continue doing the same things with the same people, is stark-raving bonkers.
4 Posted 05/07/2022 at
5 Posted 05/07/2022 at
6 Posted 05/07/2022 at
7 Posted 05/07/2022 at
8 Posted 05/07/2022 at
9 Posted 05/07/2022 at
10 Posted 05/07/2022 at
11 Posted 05/07/2022 at
If Moshiri only wants to sell 30% of his shares to help fund the stadium, then this still leaves a massive shortfall in funds? I think this is just even more speculation, and hope that it's resolved soon.
12 Posted 05/07/2022 at
He's 76 and still won't fulfil that promise.
Come on, Bill, retire gracefully. 🤨
13 Posted 05/07/2022 at
Plus nobody has worked harder to provide Everton with a new ground, so perhaps that's what Mr Kenwright is waiting for, before he retires and takes his well-earned rest?
14 Posted 05/07/2022 at
Apparently worth a lot of billions.
15 Posted 05/07/2022 at
16 Posted 05/07/2022 at
17 Posted 05/07/2022 at
18 Posted 05/07/2022 at
Obviously there's a bit of negotiating to be had, but they (the consortium) are talking like they mean business.
19 Posted 05/07/2022 at
What is confirmed is there will be no unveiling in Minnesota. Moshiri seeking to sell 30% of his share to fund the Stadium does not make financial sense.
Getting a place on the board with the same continuing Board Members for such a purchase, would take some real convincing by Moshiri, given his tenure as an example at Everton.
20 Posted 05/07/2022 at
So one waits for another offer and the other waits for their patience to run thin. I'd say it's going swimmingly! Bring on the fish puns just for the halibut.
21 Posted 05/07/2022 at
22 Posted 05/07/2022 at
23 Posted 05/07/2022 at
24 Posted 05/07/2022 at
25 Posted 05/07/2022 at
26 Posted 06/07/2022 at
Interesting. I do believe that was the holding that Alisher Usmanov had in Arsenal when he was trying to oust Stan Kronke. Kronke refused to budge or change and Usmanov got very frustrated and eventually agreed to sell his holding to Kronke.
I wonder if any investors will be as frustrated as Usmanov when they see what their 30% stake gets them. The only benefit will be when Moshiri finally sells up and the 30% of the sale price exceed the cost of their initial investment.
27 Posted 06/07/2022 at
Selling 30% of his 94% of holdings means he still remains owner with 64% of shares..
They are just ending the exclusivity of the agreement and rumors are there are other parties involved, but there has been no word of any other consortium being interested.
The sale of shares is a private transaction and although there is a figure that represents the buying of a share ( not sure but it was around 3500 pounds a share,) - after Moshiri purchased his shares.
The cost of buying enough shares to become owner of Everton is a private negotiation fee that represents the value of the club you are buying including its debts.
Has there been any indication of other interested groups or just rumors.
28 Posted 08/07/2022 at
29 Posted 08/07/2022 at
But perhaps you've heard something new? Looks like it's something already 3 days old from The Athletic and being recycled by Paul Brown of the Daily Star.
So it's not new really if it just reinforces what appears to have been Moshiri rejecting their advances. He holds the ultimate veto, after all, and if the deal isn't good enough for him, then that's the end of the road for the Kenyon Klan.
Supposedly there are other interested parties but they are doing a better job of keeping a lid on things, if true.
I personally doubted the many claims put forward that Moshiri wanted to sell up. It's not true: he wanted funding to finish the new stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock. But as more infrastructure is completed, perhaps he can leverage against it for simple loans and still get it done without outside investors? Presumably with all the construction monies now "ring-fenced" (Eeek!) from profitability and sustainability concerns.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW


1 Posted 05/07/2022 at
Is it because he wants to keep control of the stadium development and its associated money-making opportunities?
Is it because Usmanov believes he can make a comeback and wants to retain the opportunity to waste more of his money through legitimate business?
Is it based on Kenwright's advice as he doesn't want to be shunted out?
Is it because the finances have been dressed up and he wants to ensure that no wrongdoing is uncovered although you would have expected that to come out in the due diligence process?
Or does he simply want a bidding war?