-sm.jpg)
The Friedkin Group have injected £38M into Everton to cover the compensation payment that the club have been ordered to pay Burnley by a Premier League commission.
Though Everton have not made official comment, the share issue has been made public by Companies House. Last month, Everton were ordered to pay Burnley around £38M in compensation for a breach of financial rules, the largest financial penalty ever imposed on a Premier League club.
The verdict came via a Premier League independent disciplinary commission and arrived despite Everton's 10-point deduction releating to the same £19.5M breach in November 2023. The punishment was later reduced to a 6-point penalty.
Burnley lodged a complaint following their relegation to the Championship at the end of the 2021-22 season. The Clarets argued that had Everton's punishment been applied in that season, rather than 2023, the club would have stayed in the Premier League at Everton's expense.
Everton confirmed the club will appeal the compensation punishment in an official statement last month.
"Everton Football Club is surprised and angered by the decision of a Premier League Independent Disciplinary Commission to order a compensation payment to Burnley Football Club in relation to Everton’s PSR breach in June 2022.
"Everton has appealed the decision and is clear in its belief the ruling is fundamentally flawed in both law and fact.
"The Club does not recognise the findings of the panel in determining Burnley’s relegation from the Premier League in May 2022 was caused by a sporting advantage gained by Everton due to a breach of Profit & Sustainability Rules, for which a substantive sporting sanction has already been received.
"This ruling sets a dangerous and unworkable precedent for English football, given it is constructed on a principle that a club can be in breach of financial rules at any point in a financial year.
"Everton believes the panel’s ruling misrepresents the clear evidence presented by its legal representatives and that an appeal will be successful."
Read more - Stefan Borson's deep dive into Everton's legal battle with Burnley
Reader Comments (45)
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
2 Posted 31/07/2026 at 09:38:59
3 Posted 31/07/2026 at 10:03:15
But I'm not sure this is always the right way to go about things with regard to running a football club?
4 Posted 31/07/2026 at 10:31:27
Who would want to own this club?
5 Posted 31/07/2026 at 10:57:53
Everyone would want to own this club right now.
6 Posted 31/07/2026 at 11:11:03
I'd like to see how many would try if TFG ever sold.
7 Posted 31/07/2026 at 11:13:06
Reasons? See my earlier post.
8 Posted 31/07/2026 at 11:27:32
Anyone who wanted to double their investment immediately.
9 Posted 31/07/2026 at 11:36:08
It would cost around £800M to buy the club now.
No way it's ever going to be worth £1.6B... ever.
10 Posted 31/07/2026 at 11:40:12
11 Posted 31/07/2026 at 11:43:14
But there is a ceiling on us.
12 Posted 31/07/2026 at 12:01:53
They took the debt, refinanced it away from the 14% interest loan Boys Pen Blue Bill tied us into to finance arrangements with The Friedkin Group's banks of JP Morgan and Metro Bank at circa 6% interest.
So I would say TFG will be looking at a lovely profit if they sell.
13 Posted 31/07/2026 at 12:06:05
A lot more than £50M, mate.
14 Posted 31/07/2026 at 12:26:00
I agree but TFG's own cash was £50M, all the other debt was consolidated with JP Morgan and Metro Bank. So plus £350M, yes. However, that is now secured against the club -- not TFG. Anything over £50M will be TFG's profit as any new owner will continue paying the debt.
Moshiri takes a lot of stick, but he drove the new stadium and then walked away losing £500M to allow TFG to refinance.
15 Posted 31/07/2026 at 12:36:27
Also, the club had no say as to when the points deduction took place, so if Burnley are indeed entitled to compensation, then their claim should be against the FA, not Everton.
The club accepted the points deduction in the season they were given it so cannot be held accountable for something over which they had no control. No case to answer.
16 Posted 31/07/2026 at 12:40:05
“Manager David Moyes revealed that he had been told by owners The Friedkin Group that the decision would not negatively impact on his summer transfer budget.”
Because TFG don't have any more summer transfer budget anyway?
17 Posted 31/07/2026 at 12:48:18
TFG paid £25M for the shares with another £42.3M deferred consideration. If I remember rightly, I read that was to cover any PSR-linked claims. I think that is one of the reasons the original deal fell over.
18 Posted 31/07/2026 at 12:49:25
My point mate. TFG have doubled their stake. Still being minge bags though.
19 Posted 31/07/2026 at 13:05:20
My bet is the so-called recruitment team couldn't tell their arse from their elbow.
20 Posted 31/07/2026 at 13:31:00
PSR is to help keep clubs in check financially but it's perfectly acceptable for Billionaires to buy football clubs using a leveraged buyout.
21 Posted 31/07/2026 at 14:05:28
22 Posted 31/07/2026 at 14:06:31
Moyes has stated he will have the final say with regard to players coming in.
I await his excuses when we start the season with next to sweet fuck-all!
23 Posted 31/07/2026 at 14:10:16
Where is the right-back?
24 Posted 31/07/2026 at 14:35:00
When of course, if TFG hadn't bought us, this decision would have literally forced us into said bankruptcy. Meanwhile Chelsea and City sail on with financial crimes which dwarf our petty infraction.
I detest these corrupt bastards.
25 Posted 31/07/2026 at 14:48:14
Chelsea have been fined £10M and given a suspended ban from registering new players for two transfer windows for breaching rules relating to payments to agents between 2009 and 2022.
But the club have had a six-point deduction, which was suspended until 30 June 2027, "set aside" on appeal.
Just feck off to a Euro Super League permanently and take the rest of the Sly Six with you, for fuck's sake!!!
26 Posted 31/07/2026 at 14:56:15
Meanwhile we drift £15M over the limit in a 3-year period, and it's cost us at least £50M.
27 Posted 31/07/2026 at 14:58:32
Everything but actually putting a bid in.
28 Posted 31/07/2026 at 15:04:46
29 Posted 31/07/2026 at 15:09:46
Like Fifa and Infantino, they're not even trying to hide the corruption any more. How more obvious can it be? For me, they're all corrupt; Fifa, Uefa, Premier League.
Just like politics etc, no accountability and no taking responsibility. After all, Who is going to make them pay/call them to order? They have the money, so therefore, they also have the power.
It's Bruce Hornsby (that's just The Way It Is)!
30 Posted 31/07/2026 at 15:13:02
31 Posted 31/07/2026 at 15:17:29
I don't believe that Moyes is even looking for a right-back that has been needed for at least the past 2 seasons. He wants a midfield player who is able to play at right-back, a position that I believe should be filled with an experienced player in this position -- not a Jack of All Trades.
32 Posted 31/07/2026 at 15:55:36
But the club have had a 6-point deduction, which was suspended until 30 June 2027, "set aside" on appeal.
Not corrupt -- don't make me laugh.
33 Posted 31/07/2026 at 17:00:25
34 Posted 31/07/2026 at 17:04:13
Is Infantino in charge of the Premier League as well???
35 Posted 31/07/2026 at 20:18:00
Would any of us play roulette in a casino we knew cheated? Would any of us play poker knowing the dealer was cheating? No, we wouldn't... but we are expected to follow a team, some for vasts amount of money, knowing the game is now corrupt to the core.
VAR, a great idea in principle, has made it easier for the enablers to ensure results go the way the Premier League wants them to go.
Yes, you could say, I am totally and utterly dejected with football right now.
36 Posted 01/08/2026 at 03:53:35
With him being a blue, and a good one who goes the games, I doubt he'll get involved.
These alleged charges of City and Chelsea hang high but every man and his dog knows nothing will happen.
Meanwhile, back in the real world, the lesser lights, ie, us, Leicester, Forest etc, are hit with fines and points deductions galore, it absolutely reeks, it really does.
37 Posted 01/08/2026 at 04:07:44
We only posted an £8.7M loss in 2024-25 after the sale of Goodison and the women's team. 2023-24 saw a £53M loss, so roughly scope for a £52M loss in 2025-26 basis the £105M PSR cap.
However, our commercial revenue increased dramatically last season with the new stadium; I have seen sources quoting a commercial revenue in the range of £200-250M. That seems to indicate headroom of £100M+ for transfers this summer.
If we don't spend the money this summer, it will be because TFG have decided not to. Or cannot get their targets. I don't think Hackney and Johnston will move the dial much in terms of player strength.
This is a weaker squad than we had last season, as it stands.
38 Posted 01/08/2026 at 07:02:40
Were we the only club considered to have broken rules? If not, why don't other clubs' indiscretions count towards any compensation?
39 Posted 01/08/2026 at 07:40:02
I'm from Burnley. My family and friends are Burnley fans.
Sounds like an opening statement at an AA meeting, Lee!
40 Posted 01/08/2026 at 08:23:09
I only watch Everton -- and that on TV from the other side of the world -- out of habit, just to see if that boring KITAP1 twat Moyes can put together one piece of joined-up football.
I've been to the new stadium once just to 'sign on' as it were... and I never did find my stone on the big floor of names.
Even if I still lived in my old house in Garston, if I did 3 games a season, I'd consider I'd put my self out enough. And they wouldn't be Monday night 8 pm kick-offs either, sod that for a game of soldiers! It's a total arse of a place to get home from with my knees.
Fuck em all... but I'll still be watching, what else you gonna do?
41 Posted 01/08/2026 at 11:30:40
42 Posted 01/08/2026 at 13:20:20
New cash injection by Roundhouse Capital takes cash commitment so far to £373M
The additional share issue involved (221,954) prices them at £175 per share and increases the total number of shares outstanding to a whopping 2,198,935. On that simplistic basis, the club is valued at £385M.
43 Posted 02/08/2026 at 02:13:09
44 Posted 02/08/2026 at 12:47:07
45 Posted 02/08/2026 at 13:53:08
If you get the HTML syntax right with the URL button (that is, the full URL between the quotes, and the text title between the angle brackets), it should work.
But if you have to go back in using the Edit button, that trashes any links.
Add Your Comments
In order to post a comment, you need to be logged in as a registered user of the site.
Or Sign up as a ToffeeWeb Member — it's free, takes just a few minutes and will allow you to post your comments on articles and Talking Points submissions across the site.
How to get rid of these ads and support TW


1 Posted 31/07/2026 at 09:15:48
I hope they get to the play-off final and completely dominate the game but are unable to find a richly deserved goal... then get beat in the last minute with the oppositions 1 and only shot on target in the whole match!