Should the Toffees sign Jack Grealish on loan?

This is his last big chance to make the World Cup squad. He was played out of position by Guardiola, and he has a huge incentive to show what he can do in his best position playmaker.

He would be a huge coup in my opinion.

Assuming we did, would it cause unrest in the dressing room?

I'm pretty sure that is the case with all players from all teams. I doubt there's many players who are on the same wages anyway.

Plus you pay for what you get. Grealish is a big name, who would bring much more commercially than anyone else in the team.

If we get the best of Jack, he could transform our attack and we won't look back.

As for meeting his wage demands, with both Doucoure and Calvert-Lewin off the payroll, that's about £250k per week saved.

Also, I think that might encourage some that they haven't been able to get over the line to maybe reconsider.

If the aim is to build a young, hungry-for-success team, would a done-it-all, won-it-all, seen-it-all figure suit?

It's not that I am totally opposed to the idea… and it wouldn't surprise me, if it happened, that he would be a catalyst for the rejuvenation of Everton; however, in light of recent links and my instinct of what made him great was that fleet footedness and burst of acceleration which I don't think he possesses anymore.

I think he would be a very good player for Everton but not a great player; considering he has never been the most prolific, and the costs involved, I would prefer to proceed with other links.

I think Jack would be best as a Number 10 and so, from what I have been reading about Fofana over the last few days, as well as a player in Tyler Dibling, who I view to be like the old Jack Grealish (with perhaps more end product), they would be the direction I would go, if possible.

They would allow the likes of Ndiaye, Alcaraz and McNeil all to play in their more favoured central position yet still provide cover wide or, in McNeil's case, as a wing back where necessity requires.

If we were to raid Man City, I would much prefer to sign McAtee as I can see him having a really big season wherever he ends up.

You sound like he would not bother to play.

I believe top professional players have ambitions wherever they play. I believe a player like Grealish who has, as you say, won it all, would consider it a challenge to help a team with Everton's reputation that has languished in the bottom part of the league for more years than is healthy, to get them to the Top 10 in the Premier League and, if possible, win a trophy.

We've signed too many players too late in their careers over the past decade.

Someone with genuine creativity, who can travel with the ball and release an Ndiaye, Fofana etc?

He's not the answer to the pacey right-winger requirements but, on a loan for £150k a week, he would elevate the way we play and attack.

It would be the end of the big punt from Pickford and would encourage us to have the ball for more than 30% of the time.

It would also give Alcaraz and Ndiaye genuine competition for places.

People will say "What about Gray and Reid?" Well, neither man was of the status of Alli, Grealish, Whiteside pre-Everton.

Even beyond Everton, these types who seem to lose their way dramatically for one reason or another in their late 20s (Harry Kewell, Jesse Lingard, Wilshere, Hargreaves, Brolin, Paulo Future) seldom enjoy a lasting swansong elsewhere.

Usually, they just add to the wage bill.

If he was a right winger with a good history of being available, it might be different… but it's not quite the right fit for me. Though a year's loan on a decent deal could be fun for both parties.

Trust the club, its manager and new owners not to make the same mistakes of the Moshiri era. They've offloaded some high earners and, if the financial figures say it works, then so be it.

Let's not forget that Grealish was a £100M player and England international not long ago. Compare him to Blomquist and Harrison (both good pros by the way) and let's celebrate that we are aiming higher.

We're building a squad which is a blend of youth and experience, maybe our fan base needs to be optimistic instead of always looking for negatives.

If Ndiaye and McNeil are best in the middle, then that would leave space for Grealish on the left. It would give Moyes more options.

Kieran - Harry Kane has made a good move at a relatively late age.

Ha ha — always got those two mixed up!

Why should supporters fret over his pay? It is beyond our control, so get him in and enjoy it.

I think a lot of people can't get excited about a transfer unless they've seen the player perform at the level we aspire to. There's a sort of logic to that.

But for as long as I can remember, we can only afford that sort of player once they've passed their peak or been broken in some way (injury, drink, drugs or mental health).

I think there's also a bit of keeping up with the Joneses going on too – with a lot of this summer's gnashing of teeth being down to heavy spending by the RS.

Whatever people may claim about a professional's motivation, quite a lot of professional footballers hit a point where they can't really be arsed anymore.

I don't think Grealish has hit that point – and I don't think he's broken either – but he has passed his peak now. And I don't think any clubs with proper money seem interested (other than in Saudi) which kind of undermines the keeping up with the Joneses thing.

That said, if we could do a deal on his astronomical wages and keep him fit, he could be a really interesting loan signing. It would sell shirts too.

Loss or retention of speed depends a lot on how you train.

A real gent of a man, a role model to many and went on to be a captain of Everton, lifting it when it was on its knees.

Some had him as finished when he went to Turkey.

Footballers who flop after a huge transfer fee but then recover their best form or anything close following a move to a new club... rare as hen's teeth.

His wages would be equal to Harrison and Holgate last season if Man City cover 50%.

Puts things in perspective a bit.

Although I don't really get too involved in discussions over transfer fees, budget and wages, as that is down to the club and accountants to figure out, but I wouldn't want to do what Villa did with Rashford.

I said it elsewhere, but they allegedly paid 75% of his £300k a week wages for 10 games.

He did well at Villa but his achievements and abilities are to me overly vaunted. He's good, but not great, and never has been.

His chances of getting another England cap are slim to nil when you look at his many, younger, very good competitors. His chances of getting another club who'll cough up enough to maintain his obscene salary, even with a 50% input from his current corrupt club, are also slim.

A club desperate to stay in the Premier League might splash out, but I hope a club envisioning a tilt at European competition would not massively spend nigh-on a wage fortune on a nigh-on 30-year-old with a history of getting well-pissed when it suits him.

We've had way too many such mega-rewarded shites, haven't we, Dunc?

If Grealish on loan is the best possible use of the Holgate and Harrison wages... so be it. I don't think it is, though, and I don't expect Everton to sign him cos hopefully we've better options.

But what the fuck do I know?

If he's going to be the talisman that Dunc was... sign him up.

Paying 50% of his fees for a year would be the same as signing someone for nearly £8M. At that price, he's worth the gamble for one season.

A player like Grealish adds to the capability that gets a team pushing through the Top 10 in my opinion.

Add in a Fofana, Douglas Luiz, a right-back, and another striker, and it's definitely looking upwards. The style of play would improve, and the job of selling Everton on and off the pitch gets easier.

Do I want to spend £50M on Grealish? No, I don't. I just want him to elevate us into a position where we can go for a better, younger, hungrier player in 12 to 24 months time. If it works out better, great. If it doesn't work out, he would be sent back.

We've cash, opportunity on the pitch, a good manager, a good crowd, and great facilities. This club is moving forward.

Yes, it was Ancelotti spending yet more of Moshiri's backer's dosh but, if Grealish could do the same, plus we give him back to Man City after a year, maybe two?

If Jack was James...

* but only because it seems we might be struggling** to get a full squad and its a punt of the - Any port in a Storm - variety.

**you'll know it's bad if Harrison comes back.

We're done with overpaid 30-year-olds on 4-year contracts... or we should be.

Christ, even Ferguson himself now admits to having been a career-long shyster, as he grovels about looking for income from somewhere.

Not saying he wasn't a shyster but a player nonetheless... Imagine Duncan if he could have been arsed!

He'd be our most talented player by far, bringing an even higher level of electricity than Ndiaye (who could easily slide into the middle behind Beto). Our biggest need isn't any particular position -- it's players who can score and make goals, and Grealish fits the description. Okay, he's not a right wing, but we'll get one of those. A Grealish, like a James Rodriguez, falls into our reach only once in a while.

And I think we'd be getting a highly motivated, almost desperate player. His only slim chance to make the England side for the World Cup is to do brilliant things between now and next May. It's his last opportunity to make something special out of his underperforming career. I believe he'll bust a lung for Moyes.

We have had a fair number of loan signings who have made absolutely no impact in recent years. He might be past his best, but I could not see him adding to that particular list.

Given he loves a bevvie it's too big a risk for a player past his best.

I hope the club swerve him, even on a 50% wages deal the club would end up paying obscene wages which could well upset plenty of other players in the squad so how would that benefit the team.

Young, hungry, quick and skilful is the profile of player the club needs to add energy and pace to the team.

If the club get the young players that we are rumoured to be looking at blend these in with the old experienced heads we have (Tarks, Coleman, Pickford) and that could be a potent mix.

How often do we hear the plea on ToffeeWeb for our recruitment strategy to focus on young players with potential and sell on value?

Throw them a Grealish bone and they are like Pavlov's dogs.

It would have been a move the Mosh would have made and we all seen how that shitshow ended up.

He has a very good range of passing, he can carry the ball, he can beat players, and he has imagination. He was in the Guardiola straitjacket at City, and it didn’t suit him. He needs to be given freedom to express himself, and hopefully Moyes can offer him that here.

We have been crying out for players who can keep the ball, who can get us up the pitch, and who can do the mercurial. Grealish is such a player, and surely he’ll be desperate to be in the England squad for World Cup 2026. He needs to start games, and lots of them. He can do that with us.

Discussions on here quickly become overrun with the money side of things - wages, terms, transfer fees - but I think for all of us all that is just a Championship Manager distraction that makes us feel like we have some understanding of how a football club is run when in reality none of us really do. What we can speculate on with impunity is which players can improve the team, and I think Grealish can do that. And players like Fofana and Kubo carry a far greater risk for me at this stage, probably because I do not know them very well and always prefer to trust my own judgement than scouting reports and YouTube highlight reels - but I have watched 1000s of minutes of Grealish and, in the correct system, with the appropriate amount of give in his leash, he’s a fantastic footballer who can improve us. I don’t know who else we might be able to attract that I think could offer that level of improvement as quickly as he might - even if it is just for a season on loan. Hard hard yes.

Brendan (38), your analogy doesn’t work if the dogs actually are getting the bone. Then they are just dogs and the reaction is perfectly normal.

Discussing wages and/or discussing players we're rumoured to be after... it's all Championship Manager stuff.

No-one knows if we're getting this particular bone though but many are just salivating when the "clickbait" bell rings.

I'll roll over and you can tickle my tummy if it comes to pass.

‘Throw them a Grealish bone and they are like Pavlov's dogs.’

Incredible. He’d be the best player at the club by fucking miles. Also, the pavlovs dog reference sounds smart but doesn’t actually work or fit.

Just the notion smacks of desperation to me Brendan.

The desperation of signing someone who two seasons ago was a major force in a treble winning side. Could get Harrison back I suppose.

even on a 50% wages deal the club would end up paying obscene wages which could well upset plenty of other players in the squad so how would that benefit the team.

Yes. 100% let’s make sure our current squad who have won nothing in their careers don’t get upset if we show ambition and sign a player who has won ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING. Who cares if it puts a few over paid noses out of joint?! It could also make them raise their games. Do city or Liverpool worry about what the squad think when they award big contracts? No, because they don't think like relegation clubs. Wake up.

He did well at Villa but his achievements and abilities are to me overly vaunted. He's good, but not great, and never has been.

I mean, this is incredible. He started virtually every game when they won the fucking treble. He pretty much got Villa promoted on his own as a young player and then stayed and was magnificent for them before signing for city and winning everything. The first season he didn’t start for city since signing they won nothing. Could be a coincidence. But yes. Over rated.

Let’s get lindstrom back.

The lack of ambition is astonishing. The shit we’ve been forced to eat has become steak to some people. We had Jack Harrison and lindstrom last season, we could have a slight chance of getting Grealish and already it’s a bad move for an over rated player. Nothing is over good enough. What player, if not grealish, do we think is good enough?

Ok now if you have that name ask this question- would he sign for perennial relegation strugglers?

No?

Ok so remind we why we shouldn’t sign Grealish (over rated too old etc…)

This is why we are fucking shit.

The bad :- His form has been inconsistent over the last few years.

The ugly:- He is a well known party animal and we know what that does to professionals as they age.

Plus for me he is too similar to Ndiaye.

We need a mf general not a juggler.

"The desperation of signing someone who two seasons ago was a major force in a treble winning side. "

I could not have made the point better.

Although Jay #46 just did.

What about that would you NOT want to see in another Everton player?

I say the more similarity, the better.

'Will the turd eventually flush'?
I guess it was on a Leeds site and talking about the promoted teams this year being way better than the last 2 seasons i.e. that's the only reason we stayed up. The quality of player we're linked with now, including Grealish should mean we'll be nowhere near the pan come the flushing time.

Just posted on The Athletic:

During a press conference in Chicago on Tuesday before their Premier League Summer Series game against West Ham, Moyes reiterated that Everton were “hoping to have done more business” by now and said “we’re just stalling a little bit in some departments.”

He said: “The truth is we are not getting them over the line at the moment, so that’s a fact. We’re not getting a lot of the deals done that we were hoping to do, we’re continually reassessing and moving on if things are not coming to fruition. So we will keep doing it and we’ll keep trying to get the best players as we can. We want to challenge ourselves to get good players if that is possible, and we’re trying to do that but we’re finding it quite difficult.”

Asked if he had been surprised by the setbacks, Moyes said: “My first thought was ‘yes, I was surprised’ because Everton is such a big club. Great traditions, what the club has stood for over the years, the new stadium is an exciting new move for us. But then you have another thought and you think again — ‘we have been around the relegation positions the last five years and not far off the bottom.’

“The fact of the matter is we’ve got to rebuild trust in people who should come to Everton and show that the club is going in the right direction and that we’ve got a new future. We’re all desperate to give the supporters something again. Let’s hope we can pull it together for them and get them a team to be proud of by the start of the season.”

Moyes continued: “The one thing I’ll do is tell Evertonians immediately when I can give them information. I’m telling them straight at the moment. We are having a bit of a struggle getting ones in quickly enough, but we’re trying to do players who could give us a chance of challenging to be one of those teams in Europe.”

Asked by The Athletic if the issue in getting players into the club is external or internal, he said: “We want to get it done. I don’t know if I can answer your question as clearly as that. We’re desperate to get everything moving on, we know that time’s running out, we’ve probably had five weeks, six weeks certainly, probably more since the end of last season. We got to start getting moving on because it will not be long till the window starts to get a bit closer to the end.”

He added: “Hopefully things will start to fall into the place. We are just beginning (to think) ‘my goodness we are just not getting enough over the line.’ We are actively working on it. It’s not like we are a club waiting to sell a player in order to bring ones in. We are actually in the market. I would like to say it’s a big pot of money because that would be great thing for Everton. But that is not really the situation. What we do have is money to spend but we have to spend it wisely.”

Moyes, who declined to comment on reported interest in Manchester City’s Jack Grealish, also urged caution about new full-back Aznou. He said: “This boy’s a young boy. Maybe not quite ready yet, but we hope he will be shortly. We see a lot of good things in him, technically very good, he is athletic. He might just need a little bit to get himself built up and ready for the Premier League so.

“We won’t be putting him under any pressure and we won’t be giving any guarantees to the supporters of seeing him right away.

“We will be observing him ourselves. We’ve heard lots of good things about him – what we’ve seen we liked.“

Emphasis for me is that the club IS telling us everything it can when the time is right.

I would sooner have a Declan Rice type than another Ndiaye if you get my drift.

We had the same comments when James Rodriguez signed (the only top quality player at the club since Kanchelskis).

Medium/low ability + sweaty application x weepy nostalgia = success.

Hasn’t worked for 30 years but you never know!

Looks like there are going to burst a few blood vessels over this rumour as it runs it's potential course.

I've mentioned earlier, that wages could be a stumbling block. But we supporters shouldn't fret over that. The alleged interested clubs would decide if they can afford it, not us, so no point fretting over it. Moshiri is gone and I think our current bean-counters are a bit more astute.

On the player, he is without doubt very talented and needs to get his career back on track, in what could be his last major move, and maybe somewhere like Everton could provide him the platform to do that.

He was the big fish at Villa and worshipped by their supporters. It started well for him at City, before he became immersed amongst a huge squad of some of the best talent in global football, so didn't feature as regularly as he would have wanted to.

As well as the Everton and West Ham links, I did think about the possibility of a return to Villa. His boyhood club and they can offer European football. But given their constraints, finance would possibly come into the equation. Already fined and walking a think line with rumours they may have to sell another key player.

If there is anything in this, I'd be glad if he signed, but until that happens, it is in the rumour pile, so I won't lose any sleep.

Big, shiny new stadium or not, we are not an attractive proposition to top of the line players. Thirty years of winning nothing. Five years of relegation battles, mismanagement, merry go round of managers, points deductions, attempted murder, public displays of fan anger etc…players and agents will take that into account.

The only solution, in my view, is you have to pay exorbitant fees and wages if you want to get the players you NEED. Notts Forrest, Man City (pre-arab takeover), Newcastle etc… have done it before and are now reaping the rewards. Speculate to accumulate.

There’s no one out there dying to play for Everton. If you have the money, use it. If not, accept more bottom half finishes and the occasional relegation struggle.

For me it’s more about the opportunity cost. Would I like to see Grealish in the team? Yes. Would I like to see Grealish in the team if it means Fofana and/or Assane Diao going to one of our rivals instead of us? No.

Difficult to know all the financial permutations of course and maybe we can have our cake and eat it. Grealish on loan with no obligation sounds like a good idea but I’m not sure that’s what city want and they may well insist on an obligation to buy around £35/40m.

I think a lot of us are scarred by the Moshiri recklessness era that nearly saw us drop into the abyss.

But, as I said above, I think I've got more confidence in this still relatively new regime.

I appreciate it's hard to forget the depths we sunk to. We all lived every minute of it. And the steady decline goes back way longer than that.

As a support base that has been hurt, we are like a heard of Elephants that can't forget. And we won't, so I get the caution.

I feel optimistic about what lies ahead. I know I always come across that way, but this is different.

There is concern, there is impatience and understandably so. If the owners, the Board and the Manager don't get it right, we'll soon let them know.

But….

Andrew what ‘failed entity’ are we being linked with?

The one with three league titles in the last four years? A fa cup, league cup, club World Cup and champions league?

I think the batteries in your faliure-ometer may need replacing.

The new owners have to cut their cloth and bring in players they are willing to pay the money for. This transfer window isn't looking good for them or us.

We can't start the season without a right side to the pitch.

If (still a big if) this happened, it's not like we'd be signing David Ginola, Paul Gascoigne or a washed-up Wayne Rooney. No way should Rooney's legs have been gone at 31, but it was clear they were.

Grealish is a bit different. Probably still in his prime for the next few seasons, and he has been far from a failure at Man City.

We'll see how this one plays out. Right now, I'm keeping more of an eye on the potential signing of Fofana, which still seems to be a possibility, as much as any transfer can be.

Grealish is now past his exceptional best – but he's nothing like broken.

Personally, I think TFG have their heads screwed on and will not saddle the club with stupid financial liabilities.

If we get him, it will be because the finances make sense. If we don't, it might be because West Ham are run by idiots and do a daft financial deal. And Grealish may prefer London, of course, too.

Hutchison and Dibling are probably much better long term signings but, in truth, there's no crystal ball with them either.

I agree with most of your sentiments apart from the fact that it's a different world now and top players are very very wealthy.

For all their professionalism, I just don't think they have the same motivation at 29 as a young up-and-coming player has.

Also, ask yourself: Why are Man City selling Grealish?

Grealish is not finished but how much of the player he was is left in him?

I think he is too much of a financial risk for Everton to take a chance on him. I hope the club make the right decision.

That is classic Moyes. Lower expectations and then say, in not so many words, its not his fault and he's doing the best he can. I'm not sure his comment will attract players and I think he should keep his mouth shut in public. If he has an issue with his employers, keep it behind closed doors.

I'm sick of this transfer window when we thought there was some optimism to be had. But then why would we be attractive? Only the new stadium. We haven't got an Ancelotti, we haven't got European football and we can't give huge wages due to PSR.

So YES sign Grealish. Not only would he be better than anything we have, he'd bring experience of winning and might make others think about signing on too.

It's hard not to read things into them.

He didn't forget to take that little black notebook with him, did he?

I think he can smell the coffee so this could be a preemptive strike to cover himself. It's up to TFG to either put up or shut up. Either way, Moyes wins.

If Napoli are interested then living in Italy and Champions League football will be too good to turn down.

With our wonderful amazing fans behind him he would turn on the football charm in bucket loads.

Or we could just sign Jack Harrison.

Just musing at the thought of Jack in amongst the utter chaos of Naples!

The blank look of bewilderment as he attempts to cross the road outside the Tunnel della Vitoria or try to figure out which ferry to get on for Capri.

Let's not forget that this is the same Jack who got lost in Birmingham (his home town) wearing odd flip-flops.

He says there is money to spend but there is a budget and the problem with trying to do deals nearer the window closing, is you become so desperate to get players in that you end up paying more in transfer fees and wages than you wanted.

So far we have signed Alcaraz on a permanent deal and 2 squad players; but, with such a small squad, we need first-team players.

So it seems, listening to Moyes, that we haven't got any of his original targets over the line and we're more likely to have to go to his 2nd or 3rd choices, which is never a great option.

Having said that, a deal similar to the one that brought Dele to Everton may be an option but do we have anyone within our current recruitment team with the necessary presence and negotiating skills who could ensure that lightning actually strikes twice?

I would have thought the guy Smith (?), who is joining the Everton recruitment team from Man City, should be best placed to advise on the wisdom of pursuing this move.

I think Grealish has more to offer, and his age is not a significant barrier if he joins on loan. It seems a moderate risk compared to signing Dele Alli on a permanent deal, for example.

Competition at Man City is fierce, and they have strengthened further. Although he featured in 32 games last season, Grealish will want to be starting more matches at the age of 29 with a wealth of experience (and trophies) under his belt. He also made 4 England appearances in 2024.

There is also an element that the club needs to sign players who will get the supporters excited once again. David Moyes said as much and he is right "We are all desperate to give the supporters something again. Let's hope we can pull it together for them and give them a team to be proud of by the start of the season."

Barry, Aznou and Travers are all good signings, but they won't be starters.

By the way, James Rodriguez scored 6 goals and made 4 assists in his 23 appearances at Everton – hardly "finished physically for club football of any standard." Jack Harrison took over his position and recorded 1 goal and 0 assists in 38 appearances during the 2024-25 season.

Compare and contrast.

If Chermiti goes on loan, might want another forward, so I can't see Grealish coming until deadline day as a loan, maybe with an option to buy?

Well, you never know; travelling around Europe's major cities with Man City may have turned him into a culture vulture?

Otherwise, too much Italian wine, the sea, and his flip-flops may not end well.

One a defensive liability; one an attacking liability. Both contributed to low points tallies in different ways.

Neither achieved anything for us. Hopefully we don't sign these sorts of players again - and instead focus on players with talent who can run too (like clubs that actually achieve things). That's real ambition, rather than just an illusion.

He was never the same after that derby defeat at Goodison but his threaded pass through for Richarlison's winner at their place showed his class. I think only Richarlison has got anywhere near being someone who could get us out of our seats.

It saddens me that the Everton fans didn't get to see Rodriguez because I think he would have loved Goodison, when full.

To answer the question, I think Grealish should be signed. He's head and shoulders above any of our midfield players.

The gears were screeching. Keep em coming!

During those hellish relegation battles and points deductions, Everton damaged my health through fretting over every point, every penny, and every opponent. There was no joy in being a Blue (probably too much to ask). It was like some never-ending penance.

I won't do that again, whatever way our season goes. So I would like my newly discovered stoicism to be rewarded with some enjoyment. That means leaving the worry about finance to someone else and relishing the thought of watching a player like Grealish in an Everton shirt. If it goes wrong, the world won't end — and just imagine if it goes right.

Sign him now.

For a while now Everton have made too many bad deals. I believe that our only way to a consistent place among the top 6 or 7 is to be making more good deals than bad ones as, like it or not, football is far more of a business these days.

But sometimes a bad deal can be ok if a player has something really significant to offer the team and/or brings the fans great joy! I just hope it’s a loan and not an obligation if it happens.

Probably the first guy that I'd be trying to sign. Free agent, Premier League experience and knows where the goal is.

Also, I had hoped that we might be building a team for the future, and not looking for expensive quick-fix solutions.

Only a couple of seasons ago, Grealish was part of a treble winning side

He'd be our best attacking player if he signed on loan for a year.

"The deal depends on Man City because Everton are thinking of a potential deal on loan. Let's see what City want to do, if they insist on a permanent deal.

"If they can accept a loan, then what sort of loan, whether with a buy obligation or option, salary split. So let's see the conditions of the deal but the contact is real."

Except — and I'm probably alone on this and maybe I haven't watched enough of him — I just don't rate him.

He's always looking to go down and has no end product. I guess McNeil would love it though. He's 27 and will regard Everton as a step down.

More than happy to be massively proved wrong though.

Why would Man City and Juventus loan us Grealish and Luiz, respectively, when they can get good money selling them to cash-rich clubs?

It feels like we are still naive in the transfer market.

I've said it before and I'll say it again, Grealish to Everton, No, a thousand times No! I would rather have Harrison back.

Even though Harrison offers little in attack, I think Grealish would offer not much more to justify his huge wage.

He's gone as far as giving even us, an attacking threat. Leave him and his agent to sort out a deal to sell him to the owners of Man City, or he could go to Newcastle, oh, hang on, they are the owners of Man City. Win-win for the Saudis, and Jack the Lad.

Leave well alone, or we will have to endure 38 games of Grealish doing fuck-all, falling over, moaning and being substituted.

Putting that observation to one side, if he wants to join us and can still find the back of the old onion bag then get the fucker in.

29 goals in 184 league games for Villa

4 goals in 39 England appearances

Hardly prolific

In his first spell at Everton he complained about never having money. When he made big signings. He spent badly.

At Man Utd, arguably the biggest and most powerful football club in the world at that time he blamed the board for not signing the players he wanted. Kroos and Bale he points to. And all the club’s fault and not his.

At Sociedad he was just an unmitigated disaster.

At Sunderland he blamed the regimes that went before him.

At West Ham he moaned about the board and fans wanting more than what he could deliver. Which he insisted was their ceiling and that they should be grateful for it.

At Everton, all I hear from him this summer is negativity. Passive aggressive comments in which he is clearly digging people behind the scenes out for being engaged with the US Tour rather than conducting Everton business elsewhere.

Maybe he should look in the mirror and think - why did I get sacked at Man Utd after just a few months into a massive contract. Why did Kroos and Bale not want to sign for me? Why did I not succeed in Spain? Why did I relegate Sunderland? Why did the West Ham board feel that more could be achieved than what I was delivering? Why have I been in this business for 25 years and never won a major trophy? Why have I never won at Anfield, Stamford Bridge, Highbury/Emirates or Old Trafford (as a visiting manager)?

All someone else’s fault isn’t it, Moyesie?

I cant see Moyes wanting him around the premises.

“Does a lot of moaning Moyes, doesn't he?”

Then eight paragraphs of you moaning.

Not at all. Just a chronological and factual summary of his career.

I'm not moaning about any of those things. I couldn't care less if he succeeded at any of his previous clubs.

All I care about is what he does now. And this summer. All I have seen is quite a bit of moaning, losing, and not much else.

He was with another group who just fell out of Pangea & the guy there reckoned they'd been partying all day on a yacht moored up in Puerto Banús Marina, before arriving there around midnight & continuing the party, and it was 6:30 in the morning when we saw him lying in the road.

Everyone's entitled to a bit of down time and letting off some steam, but does that sound like the sort of “professional” that Pep would hang his hat on, never mind Moyes?

So you can now see why I'm not surprised that Pep's had his fill, just amazed that he invested in him in the first place?

Good signing with a goal threat and he could also run!

Next level... down?

Why anyone would think we shouldn't sign him is utterly beyond me.

You want Everton to progress, you sign big name, high profile players – he's exactly that. A known name in world football.

All this stuff about being past his best is just talk – none of us know how good he is and motivation is a massive factor in top level sport. He'd be by far the best player at Everton – and by far the biggest name.

At Man City, he was swallowed up amongst all the talent they have, and barely played at times because Guardiola is Guardiola and has so many options.

Grealish would play every week for us, and that's exactly what he needs. We'd also win more free kicks in a game than we did all last season!

I'll be fucking delighted if they pull this off.

Man Utd were imploding anyway and Sunderland had already played the Houdini card on more than one occasion.

He signed an 18-month contract at Real Sociedad and in the 12 months he was there beat Barcelona.

At West Ham, he initially signed a 6-month contract to simply keep them in the league – which he did. He then left the club, job done.

On his return to the club, West Ham gained their most points ever and for 2 seasons finished in the top 7, again another historical first for the club. Beaten in the Europa semis. In 2023, he won the Europa Conference League, unbeaten – won 12 drew 1.

During Covid, he took a massive pay cut to ensure other club staff could be kept on and paid.

Do you think he's making it up that the club are dragging their feet in the transfer market? I don't.

Do you think he's right when he says, due to the club's most recent past, we're not as attractive as we could be to prospective signings? I do.

The likes of Fofana, Kubo and Luiz will only come to us when there's nothing left on the table — and be gone in 2 years when their profile has risen.

Absolutely no way, unless your vision of the first season of Everton at BMD is Grealish constantly sitting on his arse, arms outstretched at the ref, trying to win a free.

** See Royston Drenthe bringing birds back to use the hot tubs at Finch Farm in the wee hours of the morning…

I have to take issue here, Iain. Man Utd were not imploding – they were the reigning champions.

Moyes relegated Sunderland after 10 years in the Premier League and they haven't been back since. Dress it up however you like but it was he who took them down.

At Real Sociedad, he had a 28% win ratio. He won just two games in his second season before getting the bullet.

At West Ham – yes, I would like us to win the Conference League rather than win nothing but not alongside finishing 14th in the league and not putting up any kind of showing in the domestic cup competitions.

The following season, when they stepped up into the Europa League, they were dispatched at the first opportunity against the first half-decent opponent they faced.

In fact, those ‘glorious' European nights he ‘gave' the fans over those 3 seasons - the 21-22 season was their best season comfortably and they actually faced some decent European teams. They finished potless and 7th and they went downhill over the following seasons, which is why he was moved on.

Or as a wry commentator said in another forum …

“At this point I’d take Jack Duckworth”

Yes, on loan would be nice, he and Ndiaye could be a great double act.

Moyes will get the best out of him

We haven't had a playmaker since Arteta.

Everton brings out the best in most.

On Grealish, I'm indifferent. If there is anything in it and he was to arrive, I wouldn't be disappointed, but if it's speculation, there's nothing in it and he goes elsewhere, I wouldn't be too fussed.

It depends on whether Moyes wants him enough and if the player has it in him to pick up his career again. And if Jack wants to come to Everton.

I was disappointed at Moyes... Reminds me of Howard Kendall's comeback, but I have to say I am excited now.

Silly named stadium, but hey ho...

All of the above should offer differing ways of getting up the pitch and creating chances. Direct and powerful running, taking the ball in tight spaces and twisting and turning, one-twos, give-and-goes, the ability to carry the ball up the pitch and hold onto it until a pass opens up or a foul is committed or whipping it into the box (likely the least favoured option minus McNeil, why we need fullbacks who get up and down).

With another 2 centre mids to back up Gana and Armstrong behind Alcaraz or whoever plays the No 10, I think we could look upwards this season.

Grealish on a loan, Dibling purchased. I would love Kubo still, I think he makes the biggest impact this season out of any right-winger. Direct, seems to relish a one v one duel and drives into the box

Luiz + Ndidi, Hackney, Rudoni or Riggs — I think that would be a successful window + a rb

Proper Football Manager talk…

All transfers come with an element of risk, especially at our current level, but if we were lucky enough to get Grealish, I would be genuinely excited. Such a rare talent.

I reckon I'd be out of my seat more than I've been for years. Plus the guy is surely desperate to get in the England squad. Treble-winning attacking midfielder with hunger? Yes, please.

Funnily enough, I was excited when Howard Kendall came back and immediately appointed Colin Harvey as his assistant again.

I was still relatively young and my heart was ruling my head. I thought it was going to be the '80s all over again. Not to be.

Conversely, I was one of the disappointed ones when Moyes was re-appointed, but he did enough to earn my respect. Now, with the right backing, let's see what he can do in a full season.

That's equal to 40 weeks at £300k.

Why do I think he would just stroll about, wave his arms, dive, and generally look a twat in that hair band?

No thanks.

Yesterday's news.

Loan fee, What?

Personally, I worry when a player hasn't played (well or not) for a season. I doubt he'll get back to anywhere near his previous form. Especially in an Everton team that is levels below and has a completely different playing style to Man City

I also think he's far too expensive and his partying ways are a big worry.

Nevertheless, if he did sign, I'd be delighted if he got back to his Villa or early Man City best. I just think it highly unlikely.

Guardiola's system is all about movement; Grealish is a player who wants the ball, but too often under his own terms.

I'm on holiday, and have been trying to refrain from getting involved, but I agree that, if Grealish is still hungry, he will definitely be suited to a team that needs to get him on the ball, rather than a team whose number one rule is keeping possession of the football.

I guess you don't think this would be a good move and you are obviously not keen on his hair band either. Do you think if he had a short back and side he would be more palatable.

The fact that the club is calling this some kind of premium loan should set alarm bells ringing. A premium loan is Lukaku as a young striker, someone who genuinely could transform the team.

It is? Where and when did you read or hear that? In fact, who from the club has commented on Grealish at all?

As for the statistics, to me the most revealing for an attacking mid or wing is combined goals and assists versus minutes played. For his career in the PL Grealish has a goal involvement every 198 minutes. Compare that to the best we have right now -- McNeil, at one every 325 minutes -- and tell me what makes you so sure he wouldn't improve our attack.

If City will pay half his wages, I'm for it.

For the impact on the pitch and the media attention he brings. The more spotlight, the better

Covid ruined the James enjoyment.

And without a doubt, we are by far better with him than without.

Perfect world, him and Dibling and tbh, we need both anyway

Would 50m spent on Dibbling have as much impact in the coming season as signing grealish ?

Obviously there's a long term upside to Dibbling, and I'm not saying it's an either or situation, but I'd reckon grealish would have a bigger impact on the coming season than a 19yo talented youngster.

I could be wrong, Cole palmer shows that.

Dibbling could hit the ground flying, we have a better team than Southampton, it may make him even better, even quicker.

However if you are 1-1 in a vital PL game, with half an hour left, who would you rather be turning to ?

Grealish or dibbling?

I'd take Grealish, 1 year loan, strengthen other areas.

He's on tier 1 top level player wages.

If you are dropping a level or 2 you are dropping wages too.

Yes jack doesn't have to drop the wages, he can sit it out, but for city, any loan that gets half his wage off the bill is a bonus.

All negotiating teams know this, the longer it drags on, the better deal we will get from city is my opinion.

I was a massive fan of his when he was at Villa, and I didn't want him to join City as I thought Pep's tactics would stifle his natural flair, and that's turned out to be true.

Now, he's a player at the back end of his career, off the field issues and going from a club that expects to win Titles to a club that would be ecstatic at winning the League Cup!

I just can't see him being anyway near motivated enough to perform and work at the level we need. Joining us would be a step down for him and he knows it.

We've wasted enough money over the last few years to hopefully steer clear of making the same mistakes all over again.

But, the thought of peak Grealish in the Royal Blue still makes me wonder...what if?

£12M for Grealish and £15M for Fellows would certainly make us stronger. And that's roughly half the price Saints want for Dibling.

Nothing like a bit of Football Manager in the summertime.

Otherwise, you're right, motivation would be a huge question mark.

I wouldn't want to be paying £12M for a loan and using McNeil as my benchmark. Grealish has pretty much done nothing for the past 2 seasons, 17 starts, 40 appearances in the Premier League and a grand total of 4 goals and 2 assists, whilst playing for Man City. That's shocking.

He's had one half-decent season for Man City in 5 years. There's a reason why Pep is happy for him to go out on loan, he's basically doing nothing.

What makes you think an ageing player who has got a reputation for partying is suddenly going to re-discover his Aston Villa form from the 19-20 and 20-21 seasons?

I'd like to see him in an Everton shirt. There are few players within reach who have his mercurial abilities.

Very little outlay, potential to change games from start or off the bench, and desperate to get in the World Cup squad. Yes, please.